|
Al Sharpton on Crime
Reverend; Civil Rights Activist; Democratic Candidate for President
|
States rights are dangerous when applied to death penalty
SHARPTON: Senator Edwards, are you saying, since you agree that there's a lot of problems in the death penalty -- and no one has mentioned the racial disparity about those on death row -- that therefore, you would suspend your support of capital
punishment until we dealt with those problems? EDWARDS: No, I would not.
SHARPTON: So you would proceed even with the flaws?
EDWARDS: I think those changes need to be made in the system. We need to make those changes.
I've been fighting for those changes in the United States Senate.
SHARPTON: But you would let them continue?
EDWARDS: States can evaluate whether their own system is working. I think they vary from state-to-state.
Illinois did that and came to a conclusion that their system was not working. I think we should support that if they make that determination.
SHARPTON: That sounds like states' rights again. I don't agree with that.
EDWARDS: No, it is not.
Source: [Xref Edwards] Democratic 2004 primary debate at USC
Feb 26, 2004
Opposed to death penalty under any circumstances
Q: Do you support the death penalty?A: Unilaterally opposed and unequivocally under any circumstances.
Source: Associated Press policy Q&A, "Death Penalty"
Jan 25, 2004
End the death penalty-discriminatory, non-deterrent, wrong
Q: Do you disagree with the death penalty in the capital murder of a police officer? SHARPTON: I disagree with the use of the death penalty because it has been proven too many times to have been discriminatory in the way it has been applied.
It has not been proven to be a deterrent against crime. And I do not think because it has been proven wrong that we have the right to take lives if we can't give lives, and we can't give them.
Source: Democratic 2004 Primary Debate at St. Anselm College
Jan 22, 2004
Prison programs for job skills & drug rehab
Which principles do you support regarding crime :- Eliminate the use of the death penalty for federal crimes.
- Support programs to provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related skills and job-placement assistance when released.
-
Support programs to provide prison inmates with drug and alcohol addiction treatment.
- Reduce prison sentences for those who commit non-violent crimes.
Source: Vote-Smart Presidential National Political Awareness Test
Jan 8, 2004
Tawana Brawley case was about standing up for a victim
Q: How would you stand up to criticism from the GOP regarding the Tawana Brawley affair? A: Very easily. I stood up for a 15 year-old girl who said to me and others that she had been violated. I joined a wide array of people from Bill Cosby to elected
officials who came to her defense. A jury didn't believe her, many of us did and do. I stood up about the same time-about a year or two later-for several young men who were accused of raping a woman in Central Park in New York. A jury found them guilty
and sent them to jail-some of them for 8 years. 13 years later a completely different person came forward and admitted to the crime and their convictions were overturned. Sometimes you have to stand up for what is right and you will be vindicated.
I would say to the GOP that it is very strange if they were to attack me for standing up to a young woman who said she is violated. I suppose if I were accused of fondling her the GOP might have considered me for governor of California.
Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A
Nov 5, 2003
Only candidate opposed to death penalty
I'm the only candidate in this race that's opposed to the death penalty.
Source: Interview on WNCV-TV in NYC
Feb 2, 2003
Focus on prevention instead of Three Strikes
I am opposed to the three-strikes-and-you're-out law. Instead of setting up a multi-tiered way to permanently incarcerate people, we ought to be setting up programs that will prevent people from becoming repeat offenders. What the Crime Bill of the
Clinton Administration did was spend more money to penalize and incarcerate people than no having things like afterschool and tutorial programs that would prevent young people from becoming repeat offenders. They don't give any alternative to crime.
Source: Al On America, by Rev. Al Sharpton, p. 131-32
Jan 1, 2002
It's no coincidence that the wealthy don't get executed
In 2000, Shaka Sankofa asked for me [and 3 others] to attend his execution in Texas. Lying down on a gurney, handcuffed, he repeated, "I did not kill [the man I was convicted for murdering]. Keep marching, Black people. They are murdering me tonight."
While he's talking, they inject him with the lethal potion and his head jerks back, and minutes later, he's dead. I walked out after that in a daze. After the execution, George W. Bush, then governor of Texas, stood before the cameras and said, "This was
a great day for justice." Justice? How do we celebrate killing people? All I kept hearing in my head was, "Reverend Sharpton, keep marching." It's no coincidence that the wealthy don't get executed in this country. There have been wealthy individuals
who have committed more horrendous crimes than Sankofa and we don't take their lives. I'm running for president for people like Shaka Sankofa and others who have no rights or resources to save their lives and who have no one to speak for them.
Source: Al On America, by Rev. Al Sharpton, p. 11-15
Jan 1, 2002