Bill Richardson in Take Back America 2007 Conference


On Energy & Oil: Bush won’t follow the Kyoto treaty, but my state does

I’m proud of making New Mexico the clean energy state. We’re doing something about global warming in New Mexico. We’re requiring utility companies to produce energy from renewable sources. We’ve invested directly in energy efficiency. We’re promoting renewable energy with tax credits for wind, solar and biofuels. We’ve eliminated taxes on hybrid cars. And I set tough standards to reduce greenhouse emissions. Maybe the country and President Bush don’t follow the Kyoto treaty, but my state does.

In his typical fashion, after years of refusing to admit that global warming exists, the president has started lecturing developing nations and telling them to clean up their act. Now, Mr. President, we don’t need half-hearted measures like the European agreement that just came out of the G-8 summit. The Kyoto treaty has been sitting on your desk for six and a half years. You might as well sign it now because in a year and a half, if you haven’t, I will.

Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 19, 2007

On Energy & Oil: Buying carbon offsets not enough; sacrifice for common good

Buying carbon offsets isn’t enough. Just like paying somebody else to go to church doesn’t make you religious. Paying somebody else to conserve doesn’t make you a conservationist.

My wife Barbara and I both use a hybrid and flex-fuel vehicle. We’ve made New Mexico’s governor’s mansion a lot more energy efficient, including compact fluorescent lighting, low water use irrigation and ceiling fans to cut down on air conditioning. Let me tell you, on a 95-degree day in New Mexico, that is a sacrifice.

But I know we can do more, and I’ll bet that a lot of you could too. We all, when we have an Apollo program to reduce our dependence on imported oil, we have to sacrifice for the common good. We have to get rid of that dependence on Middle Eastern oil.

Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 19, 2007

On Foreign Policy: Talking to your enemies can produce results, like N. Korea

Two months ago in North Korea, I was proud to help show how talking to your enemies can produce results. We need to bring back diplomacy in our foreign policy. We need to remember what the great Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said. He said, you don’t make peace with your friends; you make peace with your enemies.

With North Korea, we were able to push the North Koreans, possibly, to start reducing their nuclear threat, and we did bring home the remains of six American servicemen from the Korean War.

The situation is similar to the Middle East. This president broke Iraq. The next president needs to know how to use diplomacy to fix it. My world view is different from my colleagues. In my career, I’ve been able to get results not with harsh words but hard work. You talk to your adversaries. You listen. And with clarity comes cooperation. It’s how I have approached foreign policy. It’s how I have approached governing. And it’s how I’ll serve, hopefully, as your president.

Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 19, 2007

On War & Peace: Long road ahead is hauntingly similar to 1968

I first got involved with public service in the 1968 presidential election. This [election] is a hauntingly similar tune. Like 1968, we are a nation deep into an unwanted war, the president has lost the country, there is hurt and sorrow among our people, and there is a sense that no matter who is elected, we have a long road in front of us.

I’m optimistic about our country. I’m optimistic about the Democratic Party. We have the majority in Congress. And we’re going to put a Democrat in the White House.

Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 19, 2007

On War & Peace: No troops left behind at bases; green zone; or for training

Some will tell you that we only have two options: we either stay in Iraq and try to referee a civil war, or leave and watch the Middle East collapse into a regional war.

I have a different view. The fundamental difference [from other candidates’ view] is how many troops each of us would leave behind. Other than the customary Marine contingent at the embassy, I would leave zero troops behind. Not a single one. And if the embassy isn’t safe, then they’re all coming home too.

So here is Bill Richardson’s position: no air bases, no troops in the green zone, no embedded soldiers training Iraqi forces, because we all know what that means. It means that our troops would still be out on patrol with targets on their back.

Clearly my colleagues in this campaign think it’s responsible to have an ongoing military role in Iraq. I respect that. They voted not once, but twice to leave troops behind. [If you believe in leaving no troops behind], you can sign our petition at notroopsleftbehind.com.

Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 19, 2007

The above quotations are from Take Back America 2007 Conference, in Washington DC, June 18-20 2007, sponsored by the Campaign for America's Future.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of Bill Richardson.
Click here for Bill Richardson on all issues.
Bill Richardson on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Feb 25, 2019