|
John Garamendi on War & Peace
|
Strategic interest in a strong, secure and viable Israel
The United States has a moral and strategic interest in a strong, secure and viable Israel. The special relationship between the United States and Israel is based on shared values and a commitment to democratic principles, and I support continuing that
relationship. I am deeply troubled by the influence Hamas and Hezbollah have in Palestine, and America must work closely with Palestinian moderates to help ensure Israel has a partner in peace as we work together to create a two-state solution.
Source: 2010 House campaign website, www.garamendi.org, "Issues"
, Nov 3, 2009
Iraq War was an unnecessary war of choice sold on mistruths
The Iraq War was an unnecessary war of choice sold on mistruths, and I opposed it from the onset. By destabilizing the Middle East and increasing Iran's clout, the Iraq War has made our country less safe. We must end this senseless war with dignity and
do it fast.Iraqis, with assistance from the US and the international community, deserve to be able to chart their own course. And we must always respect our returning men and women in uniform.
Source: 2010 House campaign website, www.garamendi.org, "Issues"
, Nov 3, 2009
Continued American presence in Afghanistan
The border shared by Afghanistan and Pakistan is now the front line in our efforts to rid the world of a terrorist element bent on harming the US and our allies. A continued American presence there is appropriate for the time being. Our military effort
must be matched with an equal humanitarian and development effort. We must develop an exit strategy that involves all interested countries in the region. We must not let Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal fall into the hands of stateless enemies.
Source: 2010 House campaign website, www.garamendi.org, "Issues"
, Nov 3, 2009
Embargo refined oil products into Iran if they keep nukes
The elimination of terrorism and the reduction of the spread of weapons of mass destruction requires a strategy to induce Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program and to cease the support of terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
A nuclear armed Iran will create serious instability & will likely cause a nuclear arms race in the area. If Iran continues to defy the UN's resolutions, then additional pressure should be applied by all nations to embargo refined oil products into Iran.
Source: 2010 House campaign website, www.garamendi.org, "Issues"
, Nov 3, 2009
Voted YES on banning armed forces in Libya without Congressional approval.
RESOLUTION Declaring that the President shall not deploy, establish, or maintain the presence of US Armed Forces in Libya, pursuant to the War Powers Resolution.The House of Representatives makes the following statements of policy: - The US Armed Forces shall be used exclusively to defend and advance the national security interests of the US.
- The President has failed to provide Congress with a compelling rationale based upon US national security interests for current US military activities regarding Libya.
- The President shall not deploy, establish, or maintain the presence of units and members of the US Armed Forces on the ground in Libya unless the purpose of the presence is to rescue a member of the Armed Forces from imminent danger.
The President shall transmit a report describing in detail US security interests and objectives, and the activities of US Armed Forces, in Libya since March 19, 2011, including a description of the following:- The President's
justification for not seeking authorization by Congress for the use of military force in Libya.
- US political and military objectives regarding Libya, including the relationship between the intended objectives and the operational means being employed to achieve them.
- Changes in US political and military objectives following the assumption of command by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
- Differences between US political and military objectives regarding Libya and those of other NATO member states engaged in military activities.
- The specific commitments by the US to ongoing NATO activities regarding Libya.
- The anticipated scope and duration of continued US military involvement in Libya.
- The costs of military, political, and humanitarian efforts concerning Libya as of June 3, 2011.
Congress has the constitutional prerogative to withhold funding for any unauthorized use of the US States Armed Forces, including for unauthorized activities regarding Libya.
Reference: Resolution on Libya;
Bill HRes294
; vote number 11-HV410
on Jun 3, 2011
No contact & enforce sanctions on Iran until threat is gone.
Garamendi co-sponsored Iran Threat Reduction Act
Congressional Summary:
- Iran Energy Sanctions: Compelling Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and other threatening activities can be achieved most effectively through full implementation of all enacted sanctions. Declares that it is US policy to deny Iran the ability to support acts of foreign terrorist organizations and develop unconventional weapons.
- Iran Freedom Support: States that specified sanctions regarding Iran shall remain in effect until the President certifies to Congress that the government of Iran has dismantled its nuclear weapons, biological and chemical weapons, and ballistic missile development programs; and ceased its support for international terrorism.
- Iran Regime and Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Accountability: Prohibits any US person from knowingly conducting any commercial transaction with any IRGC-owned entity or any foreign entity that conducts any transaction with the IRGC.
- Iran Financial Sanctions:
Divestment from Certain Companies that Invest in Iran; and Prevention of Diversion of Certain Goods, Services, and Technologies to Iran.
Opponent's Comments (Robert Naiman on Huffington Post, Dec. 13, 2011):This bill would restore as policy the "Cooties Doctrine" of the early Bush Administration--US officials can't meet with officials of the adversary, because our officials might get contaminated. It seems highly doubtful that the provision is constitutional, since it tries to micromanage the executive branch in its conduct of foreign affairs. But putting the legal issuesaside, isn't the logic of this provision completely counter to the argument that we voted for in Nov. 2008: that it's ok--indeed, it is wise, prudent, and preferable--for the US to be able to talk to its adversaries?
Result: Bill passed the House on Dec. 15, 2011, by a vote of 410-11 (rollcall vote #927). Referred to Senate, where there was no vote before adjournment.
Source: H.R.1905 11-H1905 on May 13, 2011
Boycott & sanctions against Iran for terrorism & nukes.
Garamendi signed Iran Threat Reduction Act
- Declares that it is US policy to deny Iran the ability to support acts of foreign terrorist organizations and develop unconventional weapons and ballistic missiles.
- Urges the President to initiate diplomatic efforts to expand the multilateral sanctions regime regarding Iran.
- Directs the President to impose specified sanctions on a person who knowingly makes specified investments with respect to Iran's ability to develop petroleum resources; or exports to any items that would contribute to Iran's ability to acquire or develop chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons, or acquire or develop destabilizing numbers and types of advanced conventional weapons.
- Defines sanctions to include: prohibitions on loans from US financial institutions; prohibitions on foreign exchange; prohibitions on property transactions; and export and procurement sanctions.
- States that a determination to impose sanctions under this Act shall not be reviewable in any court.
-
Authorizes financial and political assistance to entities that support democracy in Iran.
- Imposes visa, property, and financial sanctions on persons identified as officials of the government of Iran, security services, or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
- Directs the President to develop a National Strategy to Counter Iran.
- Requires a report on the Central Bank of Iran's activities to facilitate Iran's efforts to acquire nuclear missile capacities, and promote terrorism.
Terminates the provisions of this Act when Iran:- has dismantled its efforts to develop or acquire nuclear, chemical and biological weapons;
- no longer provides support for acts of international terrorism; and
- poses no threat to US national security, interests, or allies.
Source: H.R.1905 11-HR1905 on May 13, 2011
Page last updated: Apr 11, 2013