Jim Neal on Social Security

Protect Social Security from privatization schemes

We must protect Social Security from privatization schemes that would turn your Social Security check over to the same sort of folks that created the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

Over the past two decades, it has become commonplace for corporations to cut back and default on pension obligations, and Americans face increasing job insecurity. I would never support a reckless financial strategy that exposes retirees to the loss of the guaranteed Social Security benefit they worked hard to earn.

Source: Campaign website, jimnealforsenate.com, "Issues" Mar 31, 2008

Click here for definitions & background information on Social Security. Click here for a profile of Jim Neal. Click here for SenateMatch answers by Jim Neal. Agree? Disagree? Voice your opinions on Social Security in The Forum. Click here for a summary of Jim Neal's positions on all issues. Click here for issue positions of other NC politicians.
*Other candidates on Social Security:*		*Jim Neal on other issues:*
*NC Gubernatorial:* Mike Easley *NC Senatorial:* Elizabeth Dole Kay Hagan Richard Burr *2008 Senate retirements:* Wayne Allard(R,CO) Larry Craig(R,ID) Pete Domenici(R,NM) Chuck Hagel(R,NE) Trent Lott(R,MS) Craig Thomas(R,WY) John Warner(R,VA) *2008 Presidential Contenders:* Rep.Bob Barr(L) Sen.Hillary Clinton(D) Sen.Mike Gravel(L) Alan Keyes(C) Sen.John McCain(R) Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G) Ralph Nader(I) Sen.Barack Obama(D) Rep.Ron Paul(R)	*2008 Senate Races:* AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma AL:Sessions v.Figures AR:Pryor v.Kennedy CO:Schaffer v.Udall DE:Biden v.O`Donnell GA:Chambliss v.Cardwell v.Buckley IA:Harkin v.Rathje ID:Risch v.LaRocco IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery KY:McConnell v.Fischer LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy MA:Kerry v.O`Reilly v.Ogonowski ME:Collins v.Allen MI:Levin v.Baron MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Ventura v.Cavlan MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove MS6:Cochran v.Fleming MT:Baucus v.Bushman NC:Dole v.Hagan NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Raimondo NH:Sununu v.Shaheen NJ:Lautenberg v.Andrews v.Pennacchio v.Zimmer v.Sabrin NM:Wilson v.Pearce v.Udall OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Novick v.Frohnmayer OK:Inhofe v.Rice RI:Reed SC:Graham v.Cone SD:Johnson v.Kephart v.Dykstra TN:Alexander v.Padgett v.Tuke v.Lugo TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson VA:Gilmore v.Warner WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe WY4:Barrasso v.Carter v.Goodenough WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss	Abortion Budget/Economy Civil Rights Corporations Crime Drugs Education Energy/Oil Environment Families Foreign Policy Free Trade Govt. Reform Gun Control Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Jobs Principles Social Security Tax Reform Technology War/Peace Welfare Other Senators House of Representatives SenateMatch (matching quiz) Senate Votes (analysis) House Votes Bill Sponsorships Affiliations Policy Reports Group Ratings

Page last updated: 3/31/2008