|
Mark Dayton on Education
Former Democratic Jr Senator (MN, 2001-2007)
|
Make college tuition fully tax deductible
College Costs: Dayton and Gibson disagreed on ways to reduce the cost of higher education. Dayton advocated making college tuition fully tax deductible. But Gibson said tax deductions for students don’t offer much savings.
Grams offered no solutions, but said previous attempts haven’t worked. “Every time we raise the Pell Grant limits, college tuition goes up,” Grams said.
Source: By Bob Collins, Minnesota Public Radio on-line
, Nov 6, 2000
40% more for special education; plus easier college loans
My highest priorities in education are: - To increase funding for special education to 40% which would honor the federal government’s long-broken promise to pay for the costs of this program;
- I oppose vouchers.
-
To propose making college tuition fully tax-deductible for students and parents;
- To support a post-secondary loan forgiveness program for graduates who perform 2-4 years of community service or teach for a period of time.
Source: Minnesota Newspaper Association Election Questionnaire
, Jul 2, 2000
More funding for progressive public school programs
I have a detailed, progressive agenda for public education in Minnesota:- major increases in real dollars to the per-pupil funding formula
- improved teachers’ salaries and benefits
- reduced class sizes
- more
compensatory aid for students who live in poverty, who have disabilities, and who need ESL classes
- increased funding for new computers and other educational technology
- after-school programs for kids,
using counselors, coaches, and mentors
- eventual transfer of K-12 funding from local property taxes to progressive state taxes
- programs to help teachers expand their professional horizons
and acquire new skills
- promote greater respect for academic achievement
- involve parents in the schools.
Source: Campaign Central Survey
, Jul 2, 1998
Vouchers undermine our educational system
Vouchers undermine our educational system by promoting the idea of individualized advancement, escape and disassociation from responsibility for the common good. I oppose vouchers because they take precious tax dollars and split
them between public and private schools. In addition, it has been proven that vouchers are not cost effective and they do not lead to gains in achievement.
Source: www.MarkDaytonForMN.com , campaign web site
, Nov 7, 2000
Vouchers take precious tax dollars from public schools
I oppose vouchers because they take precious tax dollars and split them between public and private schools. Instead I believe that fully funding special education should be the top priority.
This would free up state hands to hire new teachers, to reduce class sizes and other initiatives that would improve the quality of education;
Source: Minnesota Newspaper Association Election Questionnaire
, Jul 2, 2000
Public schools are doing a good job; need more money
In general, public schools are doing a good job educating children, though people would be shocked to learn that many schools lack textbook, paper and other supplies, Dayton said. Dayton labeled the notion that the state has been significantly
increasing school funding and that the money in some cases has been wasted “the Big Lie.” The state’s share of school funding had been going down in recent years, so, as might be expected, property taxes had to increase, he said.
Source: ECM Publishers, “Election 98”
, Jul 21, 1998
Supports charter schools, opposed to vouchers
Q: Do you favor alternatives to the existing education system, including charter schools, vouchers and private sector involvement?A: I am a strong supporter of public education. While I support charter schools and
open enrollment, I am opposed to vouchers. Families should be free to send their children to private schools, but their non-public choices should not be subsidized by other taxpayers. The public school system is our best hope for social progress.
Source: Campaign Central Survey
, Jul 2, 1998
Voted YES on $52M for "21st century community learning centers".
To increase appropriations for after-school programs through 21st century community learning centers. Voting YES would increase funding by $51.9 million for after school programs run by the 21st century community learning centers and would decrease funding by $51.9 million for salaries and expenses in the Department of Labor.
Reference: Amendment to Agencies Appropriations Act;
Bill S Amdt 2287 to HR 3010
; vote number 2005-279
on Oct 27, 2005
Voted YES on shifting $11B from corporate tax loopholes to education.
Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget Resolution that would adjust education funding while still reducing the deficit by $5.4 billion. A YES vote would: - Restore education program cuts slated for vocational education, adult education, GEAR UP, and TRIO.
- Increase the maximum Pell Grant scholarship to $4,500 immediately.
- Increases future math and science teacher student loan forgiveness to $23,000.
- Pay for the education funding by closing $10.8 billion in corporate tax loopholes.
Reference: Kennedy amendment relative to education funding;
Bill S AMDT 177 to S Con Res 18
; vote number 2005-68
on Mar 17, 2005
Voted YES on funding smaller classes instead of private tutors.
Vote to authorize a federal program aimed at reducing class size. The plan would assist states and local education agencies in recruiting, hiring and training 100,000 new teachers, with $2.4 billion in fiscal 2002. This amendment would replace an amendment allowing parents with children at under-performing schools to use public funding for private tutors.
Reference:
Bill S1
; vote number 2001-103
on May 15, 2001
Voted YES on funding student testing instead of private tutors.
Vote to pass an amendment that would authorize $200 million to provide grants to help states develop assessment systems that describe student achievement. This amendment would replace an amendment by Jeffords, R-VT, which would allow parents with children at under-performing schools to use public funding for private tutors.
Reference:
Bill S1
; vote number 2001-99
on May 10, 2001
Voted YES on spending $448B of tax cut on education & debt reduction.
Vote to reduce the size of the $1.6 trillion tax cut by $448 billion while increasing education spending by $250 billion and providing an increase of approximately $224 billion for debt reduction over 10 years.
Reference:
Bill H Con Res 83
; vote number 2001-69
on Apr 4, 2001
Rated 82% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes.
scores 82% by the NEA on public education issues
The National Education Association has a long, proud history as the nation's leading organization committed to advancing the cause of public education. Founded in 1857 "to elevate the character and advance the interests of the profession of teaching and to promote the cause of popular education in the United States," the NEA has remained constant in its commitment to its original mission as evidenced by the current mission statement:
To fulfill the promise of a democratic society, the National Education Association shall promote the cause of quality public education and advance the profession of education; expand the rights and further the interest of educational employees; and advocate human, civil, and economic rights for all.
In pursuing its mission, the NEA has determined that it will focus the energy and resources of its 2.7 million members toward the "promotion of public confidence in public education."
The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: NEA website 03n-NEA on Dec 31, 2003
Page last updated: Nov 05, 2011