OnTheIssuesLogo

Michael Cavlan on Homeland Security

 


Patriot Act is simply a means to control the people

Q: Does the Patriot Act harm civil liberties?

A: Strongly oppose the Patriot Act. It has been touted as necessary to our security. Because it strips us of many of our civil rights, I consider it simply a means to control the people of the United States

Source: Email interview with OnTheIssues.org Aug 12, 2006

Transfer military funding to veterans' benefits

Q: Would you support or oppose more spending on the armed forces?

A: We oppose more spending on military. Keep the funding where it is now, but reallocate it to raising military pay and benefits. A very large portion must fund veterans health and well-being, as well as their families who suffer the same as the veteran who comes back from war.

Source: Email interview with OnTheIssues.org Aug 12, 2006

Dealing with terrorism militarily is counter-productive

Terrorism is a complex subject. It cannot be boiled down to a statement as simple as "you're with us or you're against us." Trying to deal with terrorism militarily is not only counter-productive, it is strategically wrong, and immoral as well.
Source: Campaign website, www.michaelcavlan.org, "Issues" Jan 24, 2006

Other candidates on Homeland Security: Michael Cavlan on other issues:
MN Gubernatorial:
Tim Pawlenty
MN Senatorial:
Al Franken
Amy Klobuchar
Dean Barkley
Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer
Jesse Ventura
Norm Coleman


2008 Senate retirements:

Wayne Allard(R,CO)
Larry Craig(R,ID)
Pete Domenici(R,NM)
Chuck Hagel(R,NE)
Trent Lott(R,MS)
Craig Thomas(R,WY)
John Warner(R,VA)

2008 Presidential Contenders:

Rep.Bob Barr(L)
Sen.Hillary Clinton(D)
Sen.Mike Gravel(L)
Alan Keyes(C)
Sen.John McCain(R)
Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G)
Ralph Nader(I)
Sen.Barack Obama(D)
Rep.Ron Paul(R)
2008 Senate Races:
AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma
AL:Sessions v.Figures
AR:Pryor v.Kennedy
CO:Schaffer v.Udall
DE:Biden v.O`Donnell
GA:Chambliss v.Cardwell v.Buckley
IA:Harkin v.Rathje
ID:Risch v.LaRocco
IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford
KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery
KY:McConnell v.Fischer
LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy
MA:Kerry v.O`Reilly v.Ogonowski
ME:Collins v.Allen
MI:Levin v.Baron
MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Ventura v.Cavlan
MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove
MS6:Cochran v.Fleming
MT:Baucus v.Bushman
NC:Dole v.Hagan
NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Raimondo
NH:Sununu v.Shaheen
NJ:Lautenberg v.Andrews v.Pennacchio v.Zimmer v.Sabrin
NM:Wilson v.Pearce v.Udall
OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Novick v.Frohnmayer
OK:Inhofe v.Rice
RI:Reed
SC:Graham v.Cone
SD:Johnson v.Kephart v.Dykstra
TN:Alexander v.Padgett v.Tuke v.Lugo
TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson
VA:Gilmore v.Warner
WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe
WY4:Barrasso v.Carter v.Goodenough
WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes
Bill Sponsorships
Affiliations
Policy Reports
Group Ratings

Page last updated: 3/31/2008