As Attorney General, upholds law; no longer an advocate
Sen. Schumer [to Ashcroft]: Will you now use, as United States attorney general, that office to continue crusading against those you passionate and fervently disagree with? Senator Ashcroft, the issue boils down to this: When you have been such a zealous
and impassioned advocate for so long, how do you just turn it off?
A: I know that if confirmed, on my shoulders will rest the responsibility of upholding American justice, a tradition that strives to bring protection to the weak, freedom to the
restrained, liberty to the oppressed and security to every citizen.
I understand the responsibility of the attorney general’s office, I revere it, I am humbled by it. And if I am fortunate enough to be confirmed as the attorney general, I will spend
every waking moment, and probably some sleeping moments as well, dedicated to ensuring that the Justice Department lives up to its heritage, not only enforcing the rule of law but guaranteeing rights for the advancement of all Americans.
Source: Senate confirmation hearing
Jan 17, 2001
No American should suffer based on skin color
From racial profiling to news of unwarranted strip searches, the list of injustice in America today is still long. Injustice in American against any individual must not stand. This is the special charge of the US Department of Justice. No American should
be turned away from a polling place because of the color of her skin or the sound of his name. No American should be denied access to public accommodations or a job as a result of a disability. No American family should be prevented from realizing the
dream of homeownership in the neighborhood of their choice just because of skin color. No American should have the door to employment or educational opportunity slammed shut because of gender or race. And no woman should fear being threatened or coerced
in seeking constitutionally protected health services. I pledge to you that if I’m confirmed as attorney general the Justice Department will meet its special charge: injustice against individuals will not stand, no ifs, ands or buts, period.
Source: Senate confirmation hearing
Jan 17, 2001
Opposed Ronnie White on qualifications, not on skin color
Some have suggested that my opposition to the appointment of Judge Ronnie White, an African- American Missouri Supreme Court judge, to a lifetime term on the federal bench was based on something other than my own honest assessment of his qualifications
for the post. As governor, I was the appointing authority for judges. I exercised the power with special care to promote racial diversity on the Missouri bench. [In the Senate] I voted to confirm 26 out of 27 African- American judicial nominees.
My
opposition to Judge White was well-founded. Studying his judicial records, considering the implications of his decisions and hearing the widespread objections to his appointment from a large body of my constituents, I simply came to the overwhelming
conclusion that Judge White should not be given lifetime tenure as a US District Court judge. My legal review revealed the troubling pattern of his willingness to modify settled law in criminal cases. 53 of my colleagues reached the same conclusion.
Source: Senate confirmation hearing
Jan 17, 2001
Against affirmative action
Ashcroft is against affirmative action, and opposed the nomination of Bill Lann Lee as President Clinton’s civil rights chief, citing Lee’s support for the policy. He’s also reviled by black leaders for spearheading a movement to shoot
down the appointment of a black Missouri judge, Ronnie White, to the federal bench. But Ashcroft’s stance on issues like voting rights, racial profiling and alleged voting irregularities in Florida remains unclear.
Source: ABCnews.com, “An Ashcroft Justice Department”
Dec 23, 2000
Blocked appointment of black judge in Missouri
Ashcroft’s single-handed campaign to block African-American Missouri judge Ronnie White from getting a U.S. District Court seat angered black voters. Ashcroft only got 17 percent of the black vote in November’s
senatorial election, and his support among self-described moderates also slipped.
Source: ABCnews.com, “An Ashcroft Justice Department”
Dec 23, 2000
Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation.
Vote on an amendment that would expand the definition of hate crimes to include gender, sexual orientation and disability. The previous definition included only racial, religious or ethnic bias.
Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women.
Vote to table, or kill, an amendment to repeal the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise [DBE] Program, which requires no less than 10% of highway construction projects funded by the federal government to be contracted to 'disadvantaged business enterprises'
Voted YES on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business.
This legislation would have abolished a program that helps businesses owned by women or minorities compete for federally funded transportation.
Status: Cloture Motion Rejected Y)48; N)52
Reference: Motion to invoke cloture;
Bill S.1173
; vote number 1997-275
on Oct 23, 1997
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation.
Would have prohibited job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Status: Bill Defeated Y)49; N)50; NV)1
Reference: Employment Non-Discrimination Act;
Bill S. 2056
; vote number 1996-281
on Sep 10, 1996
Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit flag burning.
Approval of a constitutional amendment which would prohibit desecration or burning of the U.S. flag.
Status: Joint Res. Defeated Y)63; N)36
Reference: Flag Desecration Bill;
Bill S. J. Res. 31
; vote number 1995-600
on Dec 12, 1995
Click here for definitions & background information on Civil Rights.
