Chuck Hagel on Principles & Values
Republican Sr Senator (NE)
A: Well, I have 16 months left on this term. First, I had said even before I was elected in 1996 that 12 years was probably enough. I think it is. There are other ways to make the world better
Q: One of those ways would be to run for president of the United States. Are you ruling that out right now? I just want to be precise on that.
Q: Well, I'll sign a certification or anything that you want me to sign. I don't see any circumstance where I would be a candidate for any office next year, including the presidential office.
Q: Because there's been a lot of speculation, along with Mike Bloomberg. Is that any basis in fact?
A: Well, I have never, along with Mayor Bloomberg, as far as I know, come to any conclusions or worked our way towards that kind of outcome or applied any focus on that. I don't really see that happening.
A: I don't know. You know the difficulty of a third-party candidacy, but one of the things that Mike Bloomberg would bring--and I'm not here to promote Bloomberg, but you brought him up--is you have to have financing, and you must have resources. There's probably $100 million that you would need. I would hope that as we work our way through next year & into 2012 that some alternatives could emerge in the presidential race, and I think that's where we are tracking here politically in this country. The fact is, when you look at these poll numbers and the disconnect with our country with those of us in Washington, what the people of America are saying, they've lost confidence in our leadership, they've lost confidence and trust in what we're doing that we cannot build a consensus to go forward & really resolve the great problems and issues of our time.
A: I'll make that decision in the next couple of months. If there might be a place for me along the presidential road somewhere, then I'll look at that.
Q: Were you to run, would you run as a Republican or as an independent?
A: I have no intention of changing parties. And that doesn't mean that I don't think an independent does not have some renewed possibilities next year to be president.
Q: Are you ruling out running as an independent?
A: For right now I am, and what the world looks like next year, I don't know. But I have no plans to change parties or run for president as an independent.
Q: But you're leaving both of those options open.
A: You try to keep as many options open for yourself as you can.
A: Two things. One, I do think some of us who hold real jobs now have some responsibility to focus on those jobs. I think this presidential race got started absurdly too early. It's a sad, sad commentary on our system when the focus is on who can raise the most money, not who is best qualified, who has the best solutions for the future of our country. I wasn't going to put myself in that situation early on. I think someone should be paying attention to Iraq, should be paying attention to entitlements, to immigration reform, some of the things that we should be focused on. Now, I understand the political realities. I can't change those. But what I do control in this business, I'll keep that control.
Hagel made the suggestion after sharing a meal with Bloomberg durin the mayor's most recent visit to Washington. "It's a great country to think about--a New York boy and a Nebraska boy to be teamed up, leading this nation," he said.
Bloomberg has said repeatedly he will not enter the presidential race. Nevertheless, Bloomberg has fueled speculation about his ambitions with a schedule that has frequently taken him outside NY. He has also relaunched a Web site, www.mikebloomberg.com, to keep backers abreast of his governmental and philanthropic work, Bloomberg says.
Hagel didn't set out to sandbag McCain when he first offered [his own CFR proposal in1999 as a compromise]. Unlike McCain, he had an independent streak and hadn't been especially popular with the Senate Republican leaders; they believed he spoke his mind a bit too much in party conferences.
Hagel saw up close what happened to McCain when he ran against the party structure. If Hagel was to run for national office in the future, he'd have to find a different way. More than one close observer of Hagel--people who like him--began to see his pursuit of his own campaign finance proposal as one that would help him "get well" with the establishment of the Republican Party.
The Adherents.com website is an independent project and is not supported by or affiliated with any organization (academic, religious, or otherwise).
Such factors as religious service attendance, belief, practice, familiarity with doctrine, belief in certain creeds, etc., may be important to sociologists, religious leaders, and others. But these are measures of religiosity and are usually not used academically to define a personís membership in a particular religion. It is important to recognize there are various levels of adherence, or membership within religious traditions or religious bodies. Thereís no single definition, and sources of adherent statistics do not always make it clear what definition they are using.
OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2006 AU scores as follows:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom. AU is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.
Americans United is a national organization with members in all 50 states. We are headquartered in Washington, D.C., and led by the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director. AU has more than 75,000 members from all over the country. They include people from all walks of life and from various faith communities, as well as those who profess no particular faith. We are funded by donations from our members and others who support church-state separation. We do not seek, nor would we accept, government funding.
|Other candidates on Principles & Values:||Chuck Hagel on other issues:|
2008 Senate retirements:
Incoming Obama Administration:
Winners of 2008 Senate Races:
( * if new to the Senate)
AK:*Begich over Stevens
DE:Biden and Kaufman
GA:Chambliss v.Martin (Dec. 2 runoff)
MN:Coleman v.Franken (recounting as of Dec.1)
NC:*Hagan over Dole
NH:*Shaheen over Sununu
OR:*Merkley over Smith
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)