OnTheIssuesLogo

Orrin Hatch on Principles & Values

Republican Sr Senator (UT)


Voted with Republican Party 87.1% of 319 votes.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), was scored by the Washington Post on the percentage of votes on which a lawmaker agrees with the position taken by a majority of his or her party members. The scores do not include missed votes. Their summary:
Voted with Republican Party 87.1% of 319 votes.
Overall, Democrats voted with their party 88.4% of the time, and Republicans voted with their party 81.7% of the time (votes Jan. 8 through Sept. 8, 2007).
Source: Washington Post, "US Congress Votes Database" Sep 8, 2007

Withdraws, citing too-late entry & anti-Mormon bias

After his last-place showing in the Iowa caucuses, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch abandoned his nomination bid and endorsed George W. Bush for the nomination. Hatch blamed his late entry into the race for his poor showing in the caucuses. “I got in too late. I regret having not gotten in earlier. I think it would have made a difference.”

Hatch, the only Mormon among the presidential contenders, has said anti-Mormon bias hurt him among Christian conservative voters. He said a Gallup Poll showed that 17% of Americans would not vote for a Mormon, adding he hoped his candidacy helped dispel some misconceptions about his religious faith. “I can’t do anything about bigotry but I can do a lot about people who are misinformed about my faith and about some people who don’t believe we are Christian,” he said. While he endorsed Bush, Hatch said any of the five remaining GOP candidates would be an “improvement over the current occupant of the White House.”

Source: CNN.com Jan 26, 2000

President should set a moral example

The first thing the President ought to do in order to try and change things is not expect from the American people something that he himself is not willing to do. The President ought to set a moral tone in this country and ought to do what’s right. He ought to be a person of integrity and decency. And I’ll tell you, I’d set an example. I think that’s the first thing that the president can do and should do and I think the American people will follow suit.
Source: Des Moines Iowa GOP Debate Dec 13, 1999

23 years of experience fighting for you

I have more experience in fighting for you than [any other candidates]. I have a record of accomplishment that I don’t think can be matched. I have a reputation for bringing those diverse elements together in Washington and getting things done. Look, I wasn’t born to wealth. We were dirt poor. I understand you. I’ve been fighting for you for 23 solid years. And I’m not just talking about it. I’ve done it. I want to serve you and if you’ll give me the chance, I guarantee I won’t let you down.
Source: Phoenix Arizona GOP Debate Dec 7, 1999

$36 donations from skinny-cats, not $1000 from fat-cats

I filed on July 1st. Some people thought it was too late, saying, “Aren’t you a day late and a dollar short?” I said, “No, I am two years late and $36 million short.” I wouldn’t want to just rely on the fat-cat establishment out there giving me $1000 donations. So I said, “If I get a million people to give me $36 dollars, I’ll win [and be] beholden only to the people.” And [people from all parties have said], “I want to be one of your million.” I’m asking you all to become a “Hatch Skinny-cat.”
Source: Republican Debate at Dartmouth College Oct 29, 1999

Legislative record of bipartisan accomplishment

Q: Why should I vote for you for President? A: I’m a staunch social conservative who works hard to put our fiscal affairs in order. I’m the author of the balanced budget amendment. I have a legislative record and record of accomplishment that no other candidate can match, ranging from bills on consumer pharmaceuticals to child health insurance; all done by bringing Democrats and Republicans together to get things done. And last of all, I understand the people because I come from the people.
Source: The Exchange, New Hampshire Public Radio Sep 13, 1999

Voted YES on confirming Samuel Alito as Supreme Court Justice.

Vote on the Nomination -- a YES vote would to confirm Samuel A. Alito, Jr., of New Jersey, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Reference: Alito Nomination; Bill PN 1059 ; vote number 2006-002 on Jan 31, 2006

Voted YES on confirming John Roberts for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Vote on the Nomination (Confirmation John G. Roberts, Jr., of Maryland, to be Chief Justice of the United States )
Reference: Supreme Court Nomination of John Roberts; Bill PN 801 ; vote number 2005-245 on Sep 27, 2005

Religious affiliation: Latter-day Saint.

Hatch : religious affiliation:

The Adherents.com website is an independent project and is not supported by or affiliated with any organization (academic, religious, or otherwise).

What’s an adherent?

The most common definition used in broad compilations of statistical data is somebody who claims to belong to or worship in a religion. This is the self-identification method of determining who is an adherent of what religion, and it is the method used in most national surveys and polls.

Such factors as religious service attendance, belief, practice, familiarity with doctrine, belief in certain creeds, etc., may be important to sociologists, religious leaders, and others. But these are measures of religiosity and are usually not used academically to define a person’s membership in a particular religion. It is important to recognize there are various levels of adherence, or membership within religious traditions or religious bodies. There’s no single definition, and sources of adherent statistics do not always make it clear what definition they are using.

Source: Adherents.com web site 00-ADH8 on Nov 7, 2000

Rated 0% by the AU, indicating opposition to church-state separation.

Hatch scores 0% by the AU on church-state separation

OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2006 AU scores as follows:

About the AU (from their website, www.au.org):

Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU) is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom. AU is a nonpartisan organization dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.

Americans United is a national organization with members in all 50 states. We are headquartered in Washington, D.C., and led by the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director. AU has more than 75,000 members from all over the country. They include people from all walks of life and from various faith communities, as well as those who profess no particular faith. We are funded by donations from our members and others who support church-state separation. We do not seek, nor would we accept, government funding.

Source: AU website 06n-AU on Dec 31, 2006

Other candidates on Principles & Values: Orrin Hatch on other issues:
UT Gubernatorial:
Jon Huntsman
UT Senatorial:
Robert Bennett


2008 Senate retirements:

Wayne Allard(R,CO)
Larry Craig(R,ID)
Pete Domenici(R,NM)
Chuck Hagel(R,NE)
Trent Lott(R,MS)
Craig Thomas(R,WY)
John Warner(R,VA)

2008 Presidential Contenders:

Rep.Bob Barr(L)
Sen.Hillary Clinton(D)
Sen.Mike Gravel(L)
Alan Keyes(C)
Sen.John McCain(R)
Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G)
Ralph Nader(I)
Sen.Barack Obama(D)
Rep.Ron Paul(R)
2008 Senate Races:
AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy
AL:Sessions v.Figures
AR:Pryor v.Formicola
CO:Schaffer v.Udall
DE:Biden v.O`Donnell
GA:Chambliss v.Cardwell
IA:Harkin v.Rathje
ID:Risch v.LaRocco
IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford
KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery
KY:McConnell v.Fischer
LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy
MA:Kerry v.O`Reilly v.Ogonowski
ME:Collins v.Allen
MI:Levin v.Baron
MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Cavlan
MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove
MS6:Cochran v.Fleming
MT:Baucus v.Bushman
NC:Dole v.Hagan v.Neal
NE:Johanns v.Kleeb
NH:Sununu v.Shaheen
NJ:Lautenberg v.Andrews v.Pennacchio
NM:Wilson v.Pearce v.Udall
OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Novick
OK:Inhofe v.Rice
RI:Reed
SC:Graham v.Cone
SD:Johnson v.Kephart v.Dykstra
TN:Alexander v.Padgett v.Tuke v.Lugo
TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson
VA:Gilmore v.Warner
WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe v.Raese
WY4:Barrasso v.Carter v.Goodenough
WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes
Bill Sponsorships
Affiliations
Policy Reports
Group Ratings

Page last updated: 3/31/2008