More headlines: Donald Trump on Principles & Values
(Following are older quotations. Click here for main quotations.)
AdWatch: Nominating Trump is Biden's ticket to re-election
[On ads aired before & during the first GOP primary debate]: - The political arm of the network backed by billionaire Charles Koch is releasing a slate of digital ads in key states aimed at former President Donald Trump.
- The ads argue a Trump
nomination in 2024 would effectively give President Joe Biden a second term.
- The digital ads are targeted at voters in IA, SC, NH, and NV, all key primary and caucus states.
[Transcription of 15-second ad]: "What's Biden's secret weapon? Donald
Trump as the GOP nominee. Then Biden wins the White House, and gets the House and Senate too. It's easy to see why Democrats want Trump: it's Biden's ticket to re-election."[Transcription of second 15-second ad]: "Trump did a lot of good things as
President. But this time, Trump can't win. Swing voters say no: 60% of Americans don't want Trump. In 2024, Biden will beat Trump. We need new leadership."
[Ads tagged, "Paid for by Americans for Prosperity Action. Not authorized by any candidate."]
Source: AdWatch "Prosperity Action" on 2023 GOP debate in Milwaukee
Aug 23, 2023
I've done a great job; next year is going to be better
I've done a great job. We have the strongest economy in the world. The vaccines are coming out soon, and our economy is strong. We are at a level with jobs like we've never been before. We've rebuilt our military. We've rebuilt our borders.
We've given you the greatest tax cut in the history of our country. Greatest regulation cut, equally as important. We created new levels of jobs that nobody thought was possible. Next year is going to be better than ever before.
Source: Second 2020 Presidential Debate/NBC Town Hall Miami
Oct 15, 2020
I'm president of everybody, but they're Democrat-run cities
Q: Why do you keep talking about Democrat states?TRUMP: They are.
Q: They're American states.
TRUMP: No. The Democrat-run states are the ones that are doing badly. If you look at New York, if you look at Illinois,
if you look at a lot of different places, they're doing poorly. And cities in particular are being run so poorly.
Q: Don't you have a responsibility to those states and cities as well?
TRUMP: .largely because of the debt, but largely because of the crime. They don't want to do anything about crime. They have sanctuary cities where they're protecting criminals. They have things that the Republicans don't have.
I'm the president of everybody, but I don't want to say it, but they're Democrat-run cities. It is what it is.
Source: ABC This Week: special edition 2020 Town Hall interview
Sep 15, 2020
OpEd: Human hand grenade: razed and remade Washington
Trump has delivered in part on his promise to be a human hand grenade, to raise and remake Washington. He has weakened the regulatory state, toughened border enforcement, and refashioned the federal judiciary, including with two nominations to the
Supreme Court--all priorities for his conservative political base.
Trump also transformed America's trade posture, weakening multilateral agreements, which he believed allowed smaller countries to take advantage of us, and forging new bilateral accords on more favorable terms.
He inherited a growing economy from president Obama and kept it humming, even as economists in 2019 predicted an eventual downturn. As Trump often reminded his critics, he has been a president like no other.
Source: A Very Stable Genius, by P.Rucker & C.Leonnig, p. 3
Jan 21, 2020
America will never be a socialist country
Socialism is not about the environment. It's not about justice. It's not about virtue. Socialism is about only one thing. It's called "power for the ruling class." That's what it is. Look at what's happening in Venezuela and so many other places.
All of us are here today because we know that the future does not belong to those who believe in socialism. The future belongs to those who believe in freedom. I have said it before and I'll say it again: America will never be a socialist country--ever.
Source: White House press release, "Remarks at CPAC 2019"
Mar 2, 2019
FactCheck: 46M watched SOTU; 98M watched Super Bowl
CLAIM: "More people watched President Trump's 2019 State of the Union address on television than watched Super Bowl Super Bowl LIII." FACT-CHECK: FALSE. The size of the crowds attending his public events has always been supremely important to
President Donald Trump, so much so that he has been known to inflate attendance numbers on more than one occasion. The tendency for exaggeration seems to have rubbed off on some of Trump's supporters, who posted on social media after his 5 February
2019 State of the Union (SOTU) address that more people had watched the president's speech on TV than had watched the 2019 Super Bowl (which is typically the most-watched television broadcast in any given year).
2019's Patriots vs. Rams match-up
drew a total viewing audience of 98.2 million watchers--more than twice the viewership of any State of the Union address (including Trump's previous outing) from the past decade. [Post-SOTU reports pegged viewership of SOTU 2019 at 46 million].
Source: Snopes.com Fact-Check on 2019 State of the Union address
Feb 6, 2019
FBI: Trump had fewer people at inauguration than Obama
Donald J. Trump was inaugurated the 45th president of the United States on January 20, 2017, before a crowd whose number immediately and famously came into dispute. The new president was determined to demonstrate that the number of spectators that
turned out for him, which was sizeable, surpassed the number of people for Barack Obama's 2009 inauguration. They did not. No evidence, photographic or otherwise, would move him off his view, which, as far as everyone but his press team seemed to
agree, was simply false.This small moment was deeply disconcerting to those of us in the business of trying to find the truth, [by which we mean there] are things that are objectively, verifiably either true or false.
It was simply not true that
the biggest crowd in history attended the inauguration, as he asserted, or even that Trump's crowd was bigger than Obama's. To say otherwise was not to offer an opinion, a view, a perspective. It was a lie.
Source: A Higher Loyalty, by James Comey, p.228-9
Apr 17, 2018
OpEd: Question Trump's dealings with Genovese crime family
My concern was that coverage would focus on the horses race rather than a serious vetting of the candidate, who had not a scintilla of public experience.
I wrote an early piece that posed twenty-one questions I thought reporters should ask on the campaign trail. Not one of journalists did. Late in the primaries, Senator Marco Rubio brought up my question about Trump University and
Senator Ted Cruz posed my question about Trump's dealings with the Genovese and Gambino crime families. But no journalist ever asked any of those questions.
I will always wonder what might have happened had journalists (or even some of the sixteen candidates vying with Trump for the Republican nomination) started asking my questions months earlier.
Source: The Making of Donald Trump, by David Cay Johnston, p. XIV
Nov 14, 2017
Make America great again
My theme is make America great again. We don't win anymore. We don't win with trade, we don't win with the military. We can't even knock out ISIS.
We don't win in any capacity with healthcare. We're going to make a great country again. We're going to start winning again.
Source: 2016 CNN-Telemundo Republican debate on eve of Texas primary
Feb 25, 2016
In NYC almost everyone is Democrat, but I'm Republican
Q: In 2004, you said in most cases you identified as a Democrat. When did you actually become a Republican?TRUMP: I come from a place, New York City, which is virtually, I mean, it is almost exclusively Democrat. And I have really started to see some
of the negatives--as an example, and I have a lot of liking for [Jeb Bush], but the last number of months of his brother's administration were a catastrophe. And unfortunately, those few months gave us President Obama. And you can't be happy about that.
Source: Fox News/Facebook Top Ten First Tier debate transcript
Aug 6, 2015
3 principles: One term, two-fisted policies, zero excuses
I would center my presidency on three principles: one term, two-fisted policies, and no excuses. For voters it would be a business approach, and the best one available in the presidential marketplace. I’d lead by example.
And what I could also bring to the presidency is a new spirit, a great spirit that we haven’t had in this country for a long time-the kind of spirit that built the American Dream.
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.276
Jul 2, 2000
I'm a clean-hands freak; and dislike shaking hands
One of the curses of American society is the simple act of shaking hands, and the more successful and famous one becomes, the worse this terrible custom seems to get. I happen to be a clean-hands freak.
I feel much better after I thoroughly wash my hands, which I do as often as possible. Recent medical reports have come out saying that colds and various other ailments are spread through the act of shaking hands.
I have no doubt about this.To me the only good thing about the act of shaking hands prior to eating is that I tend to eat less.
For example, there is no way, after shaking someone's hand, that I would eat bread. Even walking down the street, as people rush up to shake my hand, I often wonder to myself, why? Why risk catching a cold?
Source: The Art of the Comeback, by Donald Trump, p.175
Oct 27, 1997
Has not spoken with Obama or Clinton since his inauguration
Former presidents used to help each other in times of crisis. Trump has made that impossible. He has not spoken with Obama or Clinton since his inauguration more than three years ago (aside from a brief hello and goodbye to Obama during George H.W.
Bush's funeral in December 2018). In fact, the only substantive conversation he and Obama have had was during the customary visit Trump made to the Oval Office two days after he won the 2016 election. He has been criticizing him ever since.
"I didn't like the job that he and Biden did," Trump said at a Fox News Town Hall in March. "I didn't like the position they put us in." Seeking to justify his administration's bungled response to the novel-coronavirus outbreak in
America, he attacked Obama, tweeting that his handling of the 2009 H1N1 swine flu was "a full scale disaster, with thousands dying, and nothing meaningful done to fix the testing problem."
Source: Team of Five, by Kate Andersen Brower
Apr 21, 2020
I got Obama to produce birth certificate, so I'm satisfied
Q: For five years, you perpetuated a false claim that the nation's first black president was not a natural-born citizen. In the last couple of weeks, you acknowledged that the president was born in the US. What took you so long?TRUMP: Sidney
Blumenthal works for [Hillary's] campaign and sent a highly respected reporter to Kenya to find out about it. They were pressing it very hard. She failed to get the birth certificate. When I got involved, I didn't fail. I got him to give the birth
certificate. So I'm satisfied with it.
Q: The birth certificate was produced in 2011. You've continued to question the president's legitimacy as recently as Jan. 2016. What changed your mind?
TRUMP: Nobody was pressing it. But I was the one that got
him to produce the birth certificate. And I think I did a good job.
CLINTON: Donald started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted.
Source: First 2016 Presidential Debate at Hofstra University
Sep 26, 2016
OpEd: Obama's grandmother never said he was born in Kenya
[After a TV appearance where he questioned Obama's birth certificate], Trump talked as if facts were being withheld. In none of his statements did Trump offer any reliable sources, and in one case he seemed to ignore the actual record. This happened
when he announced, "His grandmother in Kenya said, 'Oh, no, he was born in Kenya, and I was there and I witnessed the birth.' Now, she's on tape and I think the tape's going to be produced fairly soon."Already public, the tape in question was a
recorded telephone interview with Obama's stepmother, Sarah, who was in Kenya. Sarah spoke Swahili. The interviewer was an English-speaking preacher named Ron McRae.
The interview finds McRae saying "Was he born in Mombasa?" In response the translator
says, "No. Obama was not born in Mombasa. He was born in America." McRae pressed Sarah on the issue, and the translator, after asking the question and waiting for the answer, replied, "Hawaii. She says he was born in Hawaii."
Source: Never Enough, by Michael D`Antonio, p.288-9
Sep 22, 2015
OpEd: Charmed but threatened ruination as business strategy
Donald was still Fred's [his father's] construct, but now he belonged to the banks and the media. He was both enabled and dependent on them. He had a streak of superficial charm, even charisma, that sucked certain people in. When his ability to charm
hit a wall, he deployed another, "business strategy" where he threatened to bankrupt or otherwise ruin anyone who failed to let him have what he wanted. Either way, he won.Donald was successful because he was a success. That was a premise that
ignored one fundamental reality: he did not and could not achieve what he was being credited with. Despite that, his ego, now unleashed, continually had to be fed, not just by his family, but by all who encountered it. New York's elite would never
accept him for anything but the court jester from Queens, but they also validated his pretensions and grandiose self-image by inviting him to their parties. The more New Yorkers wanted spectacle, the more willing the media were to provide it.
Source: Too Much and Never Enough, by Mary Trump, p.137-8
Jul 14, 2020
OpEd: input on options from multiple advisers
As [White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Implementation Katie] Walsh saw it, Steve Bannon was running the Steve Bannon White House, Jared Kushner was running the Michael Bloomberg White House, and Reince Priebus was running the
Paul Ryan White House. It was a 1970s video game, the white ball pinging back and forth in the black triangle."
[Trump wanted all three options, and each appealed to Trump in their own way]: Bannon offered a rousing fxxx-you show of force;
Priebus offered flattery from the congressional leadership; Kushner offered the approval of blue-chip businessmen.
Source: Fire & Fury, by Michael Wolff, pp.117-120
Jan 5, 2018
Bought Plaza hotel for cultural value, not profit
Trump's propensity for purchases that played to his ego was evident in his acquisition of one of New York's most storied properties, the Plaza Hotel.To trumpet his 1988 purchase, he made a startling confession about his deal for the 19-story landmark
hotel he called his Mona Lisa. "I can never justify the price I paid, no matter how successful the Plaza becomes, he wrote under the title, "Why I Bought the Plaza."
The price--$407 million--was not the point, Trump suggested. The hotel was etched
into American culture. Scenes in The Great Gatsby were set in the Plaza. The architect Frank Lloyd Wright lived in a 2nd-floor suite while he designed the Guggenheim Museum. The Plaza was the home of Eloise, the fictional 6-year-old who carried
out escapades while living with her nanny on the "tippy-top floor."
The Plaza's financial underpinnings, never sturdy, weakened. Trump's purchase--a record price for a US hotel--was tens of millions of dollars more than the next-highest bid.
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p.190
Aug 23, 2016
OpEd: Leveraged government and companies against each other
Winning the right to rebuild the Commodore Hotel [into a midtown-Manhattan modernized Hyatt] gave Trump a 1900-room hotel in a blighted neighborhood. For Donald's plan to succeed, Penn Central (the local railroad) had to sell him the hotel; NYC's
bureaucracy had to give him a tax break; and the bank had to front him the money to pay for the whole thing.Trump played the city, the sellers, and the hotel chain off one another, using one to leverage a deal with the other.
When a city official asked for proof of Penn Central's commitment, Trump sent what looked like an agreement with the sellers. Trump then used the city's resulting approval to push his deal with Hyatt to closure. Trump was saved by New York's first-ever
tax break for a commercial property--he could buy the hotel for $1, then lease it back for 99 years--an arrangement that would save Trump's project an estimated $440 million over the next 40 years.
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Marc Fisher, p. 73-5
Aug 23, 2016
The harder I work, the luckier I get
When I was presented with the opportunity to build my first golf course, I had to think over carefully.
I decided to work on golf courses because I love to gold, and I wanted to create spectacular courses to play on. I did not need to do it, but I wanted to do it.
Source: Think Big, by Donald Trump, p.119-22
Sep 8, 2008
For bad investment advice, you get blame; if good, no credit
Perhaps the question I am most often asked is where, when, and how should someone invest their money. My answer is usually a very quick and terse "good luck." The reason for this is simple.
If I recommend an investment and it turns out badly, it will be my fault. I will always be blamed. If on the other hand, the investment turns out to be brilliant, earning tremendous amounts of money, people are quick to forget that it was
I who made the recommendation in the first place. This unfortunately, is human nature. It's how the game is played. If it's bad, you take the blame.
If it's good, you get no credit. As I tell my young employees all the time, "Welcome to life."
Source: The Art of the Comeback, by Donald Trump, p.187-8
Oct 27, 1997
More due process was afforded at Salem Witch Trials
In a six-page invective to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, President Donald Trump contended he has been more wronged in the impeachment proceedings than even the 17th-century women who were hanged based on dreams,
visions and confessions elicited by torture. "More due process was afforded to those accused in the Salem Witch Trials," the president wrote.
But legal experts say this criticism is based on a misinterpretation of what the Constitution says about impeachment and how much protection it gives the president. The answer: Not much.
The Fifth Amendment says no one can be deprived of "life, liberty or property" without due process of law. A president facing an impeachment trial is not at risk of losing life, liberty or property.
Source: USA Today analysis of impeaching Trump
Dec 30, 2019
Analysis: Federal criminal law turns on corrupt intent
Corrupt Intent: Some have argued it is common for the United States to condition foreign aid on another government's agreement to take certain steps. But this is where the element of corrupt intent comes into play. A president might tell Mexico that the
U.S. would provide more foreign aid if Mexico would devote more resources to fighting internal corruption. One could call such an offer a quid pro quo. But in that case, the president is asking for actions that further U.S. national policy.
Demanding investigations for the president's own political benefit --and doing so in a way that actually harms U.S. national security by withholding important aid from an ally--provides the element of corrupt intent that
transforms this from routine foreign policy into a potential crime.
Source: JustSecurity.org analysis of impeaching Trump
Dec 16, 2019
OpEd: impeachable act to fire FBI's Comey
[Besides criminal obstruction described in the Mueller Report], the president also committed impeachable offenses. Crimes and impeachable offenses are not the same thing. Some of the most obviously impeachable offenses are the most unacceptable abuses
of power [regarding] the firing of former FBI Director James Comey. While this fact pattern is complicated for criminal purposes, as a matter of impeachment, it's very simple indeed. The president of the United States isolated Comey in order to ask that
he drop a sensitive FBI investigation in which Trump had a personal interest. The president then leaned on Comey to make public statements about his own status in the investigation. And when he couldn't get Comey to do so, he recruited the deputy
attorney general to create a pretext for Comey's removal.While there may be viable technical defenses against a criminal charge here, there simply is no plausible way to understand this fact pattern as a good-faith exercise of presidential power.
Source: The Atlantic magazine on Mueller Report
Apr 29, 2019
OpEd: impeachable act to investigate Hillary Clinton
[One of the most obviously impeachable offenses was] the effort to get A.G. Jeff Sessions to investigate Hillary Clinton. Mueller does not disentangle this effort from the attempt to get Sessions to reassert control of the Russia investigation.
Let's do so here: Even as he was trying to get Sessions to protect him from the FBI, Trump was also trying to induce Sessions to investigate his political opponents.This is not obstruction of justice in any criminal sense.
It's rather the opposite of obstruction of justice; it's the initiation of injustice. So I don't think it's plausibly sound in terms of criminal law. But it is molten-core impeachment territory. Consider: The president of the
United States was trying to induce the attorney general of the United States to initiate a criminal investigation based on no known criminal predicate against a private citizen whom he happened to dislike.
Source: The Atlantic magazine on Mueller Report
Apr 29, 2019
If Congress tries to impeach, I'll go to the Supreme Court
President Donald Trump said he would turn to the Supreme Court if the House of Representatives moves to impeach him, though it is unclear what role the nation's highest court could play if the president were to seek its help in such a situation. Trump
claimed in a tweet that special counsel Robert Mueller's report was written by a team biased against him with "unlimited money" for an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Still, he said, the report "didn't lay a glove on me."
"I DID NOTHING WRONG," Trump said. "If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court."
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1993 that authority for impeachment trials resides in Congress and "nowhere else."
The power of impeachment belongs to Congress and proceedings must be launched in the House, according to the U.S. Constitution. If representatives vote to impeach, the case is tried in the Senate.
Source: Politico.com on "Supreme Court if impeached, says Trump"
Apr 24, 2019
Letting Trump go risks system of justice
[On] witness tampering and intimidation: The Special Counsel's report establishes that the President tried to influence the decisions of both Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort with regard to cooperating with investigators. Some of this tampering and
As former federal prosecutors, we recognize that prosecuting obstruction of justice cases is critical because unchecked obstruction?--?which allows intentional interference with criminal investigations to go unpunished?--?puts our whole system
of justice at risk. We believe strongly that, but for the OLC memo, the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favor of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller Report.
Source: Letter from 500 ex-prosecutors on Mueller Report
May 6, 2019
Mueller Report documents 77 lies by Trump campaign
The Mueller report documents at least 77 specific instances where President Donald Trump's campaign staff, administration officials and family members, Republican backers and his associates lied or made false assertions (sometimes unintentionally)
to the public, Congress, or authorities, according to a new CNN analysis. The plurality of lies came from Trump himself, and most of them took place while he was president.Topics of lies:- 31 Trump Tower Moscow
-
25 Trump Tower meeting and other Russian contacts
- 13 Comey firing & fallout
- 8 Other topics
Lies told to whom:- 53 to the public (including press conferences)
- 12 to Mueller or other authorities
- 10 to Congress
-
2 Undetermined
CNN's approach to analyzing the report was this: Every time Mueller documented a false assertion made to the public or federal officials -- even if it was the same falsehood told again and again -- it was counted.
Source: CNN Fact-check/coverage of 2019 Mueller Report
Apr 30, 2019
OpEd: criminal act to try to get A.G. to unrecuse
The president committed crimes. Mueller does not accuse the president of crimes. He doesn't have to. But the facts he recounts describe criminal behavior. They describe criminal behavior even if we allow the president's--and the attorney general's--
argument that facially valid exercises of presidential authority cannot be obstructions of justice. They do this because they describe obstructive activity that does not involve facially valid exercises of presidential power at all.
Consider only two examples. The first is the particularly ugly section concerning Trump's efforts to get then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to "unrecuse." Another example: Mueller reports that after the news broke that Trump had sought to get
then-White House Counsel Don McGahn to fire the special counsel, Trump sought to get McGahn to deny the story. He also sought to get him to create an internal record denying the story. McGahn refused.
Source: The Atlantic magazine on Mueller Report
Apr 29, 2019
OpEd: Trump's crew tried to collude, like Keystone Kollusion
Trump was not complicit in the Russian social-media conspiracy. Separating the wheat from the chaff is important, so let's do so. While Trump has a great deal to answer for, Mueller unambiguously clears him--clears in the true sense of the word--of
involvement in Russian efforts to interfere in the U.S. election by means of the Internet Research Agency's social-media campaign.Here's the key point: If there wasn't collusion on the hacking, it sure wasn't for lack of trying.
Indeed, the Mueller report makes clear that Trump personally ordered an attempt to obtain Hillary Clinton's emails; and people associated with the campaign pursued this believing they were dealing with Russian hackers. And Donald Trump Jr. was
directly in touch with WikiLeaks--from whom he obtained a password to a hacked database. None of these incidents amount to crimes. But the picture it all paints of the president's conduct is anything but exonerating. Call it Keystone Kollusion.
Source: The Atlantic magazine on Mueller Report
Apr 29, 2019
OpEd: strong evidence of collusion by Trump campaign
The redacted Mueller Report documents a series of activities that show strong evidence of collusion. Or, more precisely, it provides significant evidence that Trump Campaign associates cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support to the Russia/WikiLeaks
election interference activities. The Report documents the following actions:- Trump was receptive to a Campaign adviser's (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
- Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the
Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
- The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman
worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia "peace" plan for Ukraine.
- The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
Source: Ryan Goodman, JustSecurity.org on Mueller Report
Apr 29, 2019
OpEd: 1920s law authorizes to get presidential tax returns
"We're fighting all the subpoenas," says the person who is supposed to be chief executive of the United States government. In other words, there is to be no congressional oversight of this administration: no questioning a former White House counsel
about the Mueller report. No presidential tax returns to the ways and means committee, even though a 1920s law specifically authorizes the committee to get them. Such a blanket edict fits a dictator of a banana republic, not the president of a
constitutional republic founded on separation of powers.If Congress cannot question the people who are making policy, or obtain critical documents, Congress cannot function as a coequal branch of government. If Congress cannot get information about
the executive branch, there is no longer any separation of powers, as sanctified in the US constitution. There is only one power--the power of the president to rule as he wishes. Which is what Donald Trump has sought all along.
Source: Robert Reich in "The Guardian" on impeaching Trump
Apr 28, 2019
OpEd: Trump aides must testify despite "executive privilege"
Presidents before Trump have argued that complying with a particular subpoena for a particular person or document would infringe upon confidential deliberations within the executive branch. But no president before Trump has used "executive privilege" as
a blanket refusal to cooperate.Trump is treating Congress with contempt--just as he has treated other democratic institutions that have blocked him. Congress should invoke its inherent power under the constitution to hold any official who refuses a
congressional subpoena in contempt.
When President Richard Nixon tried to stop key aides from testifying in the Senate Watergate hearings, in 1973, Senator Sam Ervin, chairman of the Watergate select committee, threatened to jail anyone who refused
to appear.
When Nixon tried to block the release of incriminating recordings of his discussions with aides, the supreme court decided that a claim of executive privilege did not protect information pertinent to the investigation of potential crimes.
Source: Robert Reich in "The Guardian" on impeaching Trump
Apr 28, 2019
OpEd: would face criminal charges if not president
Prosecutors working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded last year that they had sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges against President Donald Trump for obstruction of justice over the president's alleged pressuring of then FBI Director
James Comey in February 2017 to shut down an FBI investigation of the president's then national security adviser, Michael Flynn.Privately, the two prosecutors, who were then employed in the special counsel's office, told other Justice Department
officials that had it not been for the unique nature of the case--the investigation of a sitting president--they would have advocated that he face federal criminal charges.
Given the Justice Department's longstanding doctrine that
a president cannot face criminal indictment while in office, Mueller suggested in his report that Congress could still act: the special counsel made more than twenty references in his report to Congress's impeachment power.
Source: NYBooks.com on Prosectors' letter on Mueller Report
Apr 26, 2019
Trump's lawyer convicted of lying to Congress about Russia
Michael Cohen, the president's personal lawyer, had been willing to deceive the public--and then commit a crime--to keep secret the timing of his dealings with the Kremlin.
Cohen admitted that he told Congress work on the Moscow project ended in January 2016--in fact, it lasted until June 2016, after Trump had sealed up the Republican nomination for president.
Cohen also conceded he had direct contact with a Kremlin official to request help with the project. The special counsel's office would reveal that Cohen met with its investigators seven times.
The motive for his lying to Congress was to "minimize links" between the Moscow project and Trump. [Cohen was imprisoned in May 2019, after the publication of the Mueller Report].
Source: Mueller Report: Washington Post Related Materials, p.643-4
Apr 23, 2019
Barr/Trump's Mueller conclusion: no collusion;no obstruction
On Friday, March 22, 2019, Attorney General William P. Barr broke the news to lawmakers, giving them this four-page summary of the special counsel's top-line findings.The letter was a political windfall for President Trump.
No one else would be indicted, Barr wrote, Mueller had declined to make a prosecution judgement on the question of whether Trump obstructed justice, but instead had described the facts he had found and noted "while this report does not conclude that the
President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." Barr wrote that he [and Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein,] reviewed the question themselves and determined the evidence
was "not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense." Trump seized on the letter to declare he had been vindicated.
Source: Mueller Report: Washington Post Related Materials, p.723
Apr 23, 2019
Mueller: firing Comey is obstruction if Russia probe delayed
The act of firing Comey [on May 9, 2017] removed the individual overseeing the FBI's Russia investigation. The President knew that Comey was personally involved in the investigation based on Comey's briefing of the Gang of Eight, and the President's
one-on-one conversations with Comey.Firing Comey would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the probable effect of impeding the investigation--for example, if the termination would have the effect of delaying the investigation or providing the
President with the opportunity to appoint a director who the President perceived as more protective of his personal interests.
On March 20, 2017, Comey had announced that the FBI was investigating Russia's interference in the election,
including "an assessment of whether any crimes were committed." It was widely known that the FBI, as part of the Russia investigation, was investigating the hacking of the DNC's computers--a clear criminal offense.
Source: The Mueller Report, Vol. ii, pp. 74-5
Mar 30, 2019
Trump: no Russia probe; Mueller: yes, Comey was running it
Substantial evidence indicates that the catalyst for the President's decision to fire Comey was Comey's unwillingness to publicly state that the President was not personally under investigation, despite the President's repeated requests that Comey make
such an announcement. In the week leading up to Comey's May 3, 2017 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, the President told McGahn that it would be the last straw if Comey did not set the record straight and publicly announce that the President was not
under investigation. But during his May 3 testimony, Comey refused to answer questions about whether the President was being investigated. Comey's refusal angered the President, who criticized Attorney General Jeff Sessions for leaving him isolated and
exposed.At the time the President fired Comey [on May 9], a grand jury had not begun to hear evidence related to the Russia investigation and no grand jury subpoenas had been issued.
Source: The Mueller Report, Vol. ii, pp. 74-5
Mar 30, 2019
Trump: Mueller has conflict; Mueller: no, it's obstruction
After news reports that in June 2017 the President had ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed, the President publicly disputed these accounts, and privately told McGahn that he had simply wanted McGahn to bring conflicts of interest to the
Department of Justice's attention.Substantial evidence, however, supports the conclusion that the President in fact directed McGahn [on June 17] to call Rosenstein to have the Special Counsel removed.
On June 16, 2017, the President publicly
acknowledged that his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor, tweeting, "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director!"
Substantial evidence indicates that the President's
attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel's oversight of investigations that involved the President's conduct--most immediately, to reports that the President was being investigated for potential obstruction of justice.
Source: The Mueller Report, Vol. ii, pp. 88-9
Mar 30, 2019
Mueller convicted three Trump aides of lying about Russia
The [Mueller] investigation established that several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to [Mueller's] Office, & to Congress, about their interactions with Russian-affiliated individuals. Those lies materially impaired the investigation
of Russian election interference. [Mueller's] Office charged some of those lies as violations of the federal false-statements statute. Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying about his interactions with Russian Ambassador
Kislyak during the transition period. George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy advisor during the campaign period, pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about, [among other things], the nature and timing of his interactions with Joseph Mifsud, the
professor who told Papadopoulos that the Russians had dirt on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. Former Trump Organization attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements Congress about Trump Moscow project.
Source: The Mueller Report, Vol. i, p. 9
Mar 30, 2019
OpEd 2016: Putin hated Hillary and wanted to help Trump win
During the summer of 2016, we were working like crazy to understand what the Russians were up to. Evidence within the intelligence Community strongly suggested that the Russian government was trying to interfere with the election in three ways.
First, they sought to undermine confidence in the American democratic enterprise--to dirty us up so that our election process would no longer be an inspiration to the rest of the world.
Second, the Russians wanted to hurt Hillary Clinton.
Putin hated her, blaming her personally for large street demonstrations against him in Moscow in December 2011. Putin took that as an unforgivable personal attack.
Third, Putin wanted to help Donald Trump win.
Trump had been saying favorable things about the Russian government and Putin had shown a long-standing appreciation for business Leaders who cut deals rather than stand on principle.
Source: A Higher Loyalty, p.189, by James Comey
Apr 17, 2018
OpEd:FBI believes Steele Dossier showed Russian interference
[GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC NEWS] Q: You first were briefed on the Steele dossier in August of 2015. What did you make of it?COMEY: That it, at its core, was consistent with the other information we'd gathered during the intelligence investigation.
That there was a massive Russian effort underway to interfere with our election with three goals: to dirty up the American democracy so it's not a shining light for others around the world; to hurt Hillary Clinton, who Vladimir Putin personally hated;
and to help Donald Trump become elected president. Those allegations are at the core of the Steele dossier, and we already knew that was true from totally separate information. And it was coming from a credible source.
Q: Did you know it had been
financed at the beginning by President Trump's political opponents?
COMEY: I was told at some point that the effort had originally been financed by a Republican source to develop opposition research on Trump, and then Democrats were paying for it.
Source: ABC-TV Q&A: Jim Comey on Higher Loyalty & impeaching Trump
Apr 15, 2018
Raised money for election challenges, most goes to his PAC
Trump has raised more than $150 million with his campaign to contest Biden's victory in court. Following the November 3 defeat, the Trump campaign asked supporters for contributions to fund a legal offensive in six states on the grounds, without
evidence, that there was electoral fraud. However, according to the Post and Times sources, up to 75% of that proceeds will go to finance Trump's new political action committee, "Save America," with which he will finance his next political movements.
Source: Univision on impeaching Trump
Dec 1, 2020
Presidential library to be located in New York or Florida
Have the years Trump has spent in that awe-inspiring office given him empathy for what his predecessors went through? "No," he replies flatly. When I ask him whether he would go to Obama's presidential-library opening, the question sounds preposterous.
Presidents have always attended one another's library openings as a sign of respect. But: "I don't know," he answers. "He probably wouldn't invite me." Trump mulls it over for a moment and says, "Why should he?"On the subject of the location of his
own presidential library, he uses our interview to distinguish himself from his predecessors--and to take a swipe at them. "That's a very interesting question. I have thought about it very little. I'm more thinking about all of the things that we're
doing, which are a lot," he says, jutting his chin out proudly. "New York seems to be the most natural place, but Florida is another one. I know location like nobody," says the former real estate developer. "We'll pick somewhere very appropriate."
Source: Team of Five, by Kate Andersen Brower
Apr 21, 2020
Electing Hillary means four more years of Obama
We're going to make America great. We have a depleted military. It has to be helped. We don't take care of our veterans. We take care of illegal immigrants better than we take care of our vets. We need law and order,
but we need justice, too. Our inner cities are a disaster. You get shot walking to the store. They have no education. They have no jobs. We cannot take four more years of Barack Obama, and that's what you get when you get her.
Source: Third 2016 Presidential Debate moderated by Fox News
Oct 19, 2016
Hillary does not have the stamina to be president
Q: This year Secretary Clinton became the first woman nominated for president by a major party. Earlier this month, you said she doesn't have, quote, "a presidential look." She's standing here right now. What did you mean by that?TRUMP:
She doesn't have the look. She doesn't have the stamina. I said she doesn't have the stamina. And I don't believe she does have the stamina. To be president of this country, you need tremendous stamina. You have to be able to negotiate our trade deals.
You have so many different things you have to be able to do, and I don't believe that Hillary has the stamina.
CLINTON: Well, as soon as he travels to 112 countries and negotiates a peace deal, a cease-fire, a release of dissidents, an opening of new
opportunities in nations around the world, or even spends 11 hours testifying in front of a congressional committee, he can talk to me about stamina.
Source: First 2016 Presidential Debate at Hofstra University
Sep 26, 2016
I beat 16 very talented people in the primary
Q: Does Donald Trump have the temperament to be commander-in-chief? Can we afford to have a commander-in-chief who says things that he later regrets?A: Sure, I regret. But in the meantime, I beat 16 people and here I am. I would have liked to have
done it in a nicer manner. But I had 16 very talented people that I had to go through. That was a record in the history of Republican politics. I was able to get more votes than anybody ever has gotten in the history of Republican politics.
Source: 2016 NBC Commander-in-Chief forum with Matt Lauer
Sep 7, 2016
Trump made a profit from his 2016 campaign
For the 2016 run, a large share of Trump's campaign money was spent paying himself for the use of his Boeing 757 as well, in addition to his smaller jet, his helicopter, his Trump Tower office space, and other services supplied by Trump businesses.
By law, Trump must pay charter rates for his aircraft and market prices for services from his other businesses.
This anticorruption law was designed to prevent vendors from underpricing services to win political favors--a legacy of a time when no one imagined that a man of Trump's presumed immense wealth would buy campaign services from himself.
In 2016, the law perversely ensured that Trump made a profit from his campaign for the goods and services he bought from the Trump Organization.
Source: The Making of Donald Trump intro, by D.C.Johnston, p. XIII
Aug 2, 2016
OpEd: Trump never faced tough press questioning
Trump doesn't know anything. His comments on many issues in 2017 show how appallingly ignorant he is. I wish one of the news personalities interviewing candidates in the 2016 "debates" had asked Trump a question I am sure he could not have answered.
Keep this question in mind when you read in this book about other questions he answered with replies indicating complete cluelessness.Alas Trump never faced tough questioning as a candidate in a forum where he could not walk away or give nonsense
answers without repeated follow-up. This is a serious problem for the future of American democracy in the television era, when appearances matter more than reality. Trump will not be the last manifestly unqualified candidate who knows how to manipulate
television to his or her advantage and fool many people. To guard against that we need to have flint-eyed reporters--not just smiling television news readers--asking tough questions in public forums that are aimed at eliciting facts and truths.
Source: The Making of Donald Trump intro, by D.C.Johnston, p. XIV-XV
Aug 2, 2016
Agrees with Hillary on marijuana, campaign finance, trade
Hillary and Trump do agree on some, including:- Tax Reform: Both would increase income taxes on the wealthy, although Trump would lower corporate taxes and estate taxes.
- Faith-based initiatives: Both support working with religious organizations
for social services.
- Drug War: Both cautiously support state-based medical marijuana while postponing other aspects.
- Campaign Finance Reform: Both would reform the current finance system, although Hillary supports public financing (while
Trump avoids the issue by self-financing).
- Free Trade: Both would reform our current trade deals, although for different goals: Hillary for better labor and environmental standards; Trump for a better overall deal.
The bottom line: If you prefer
a polar opposite to Hillary, Trump should not be your chosen candidate. And if you prefer someone who will dismantle forever the Bush legacy, Hillary should not be your chosen candidate. Neither is the extremist their opponents make them out to be.
Source: Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton On The Issues, by J. Gordon
Feb 29, 2016
OpEd: Obama doesn't have the psychology of a winner
Trump is generally disgusted by President Barack Obama, whom he regards as weak. In our meetings Trump often filled pauses with criticisms of Obama. Often these statements came during walks to the elevator, when the audio recorders were switched off,
or they were couched as "off the record."In two instances when he spoke on the record, Trump veered from a general discussion of "success" to an evaluation of the president. In the first case he said Obama lacked the qualities of a winner and "has
had so many losses and people don't even want to watch him on television." In the second he said the president was not psychologically tough. "It's all psychology.
If Obama had that psychology, Russia's Vladimir Putin wouldn't be eating his lunch. He doesn't have that psychology and he never will because it's not in his DNA."
Source: Politico.com article with Trump's "Never Enough" biographer
Sep 25, 2015
I want to win as a Republican, but might run as Independent
Q: Is there anyone on stage who is unwilling tonight to pledge your support to the eventual nominee of the Republican party and pledge to not run an independent campaign against that person. [Only Trump raises hand]. Mr. Trump to be clear, you're
standing on a Republican primary debate stage.TRUMP: I fully understand.
Q: And that experts say an independent run would almost certainly hand the race over to Democrats & likely another Clinton. You can't say tonight that you can make that pledge?
TRUMP: I cannot say. I have to respect the person that [is nominated], if it's not me, I can totally make that pledge. If I'm the nominee, I will pledge I will not run as an independent. We want to win; I want to win as the Republican;
I want to run as the Republican nominee.
RAND PAUL: He's already hedging his bet. Maybe he supports Clinton, or maybe he runs as an independent.
Q: You're not gonna make the pledge tonight?
TRUMP: I will not make the pledge at this time.
Source: Fox News/Facebook Top Ten First Tier debate transcript
Aug 6, 2015
No more morning in America; we'll be mourning FOR America
If we keep on this path, if we reelect Barack Obama, the America we leave our kids and grandkids won't look like the American we were blessed to grow up in. The American Dream will be in hock. The shining city on the hill will start to look like an
inner-city wreck. It won't be working in America, as President Reagan put it. We'll be mourning for America, an America that was lost on Obama's watch. The dollar will fall as the world's international currency.
Our economy will collapse again (something I believe is a very real danger and risk: a double dip recession that could turn into a depression). And China will replace American as the world's number one economic power.
But it doesn't have to be this way. If we get tough and make the hard choices, we can make America a rich nation--and respected--once again.
Source: Time to Get Tough, by Donald Trump, p. 4
Dec 5, 2011
Bad students (like Obama) shouldn't go to Harvard
If there were any doubts about the racial animus driving Donald Trump's attacks on Barack Obama, Trump questioned how Obama could possibly have been admitted to Ivy League schools, since Trump "heard" Obama was a "terrible student." Trump said he was
investigating the issue, whatever that means, just as he claims to have dispatched investigators to Hawaii in order to find the president's famous birth certificate."How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to Harvard?" Trump said. "I'm thinking
about it, I'm certainly looking into it. Let him show his records." By charging that Obama was not admitted based on merit, Trump is suggesting that Obama was admitted because he is black. In GOP politics, attacking racial minorities as the
underachieving beneficiaries of affirmative action is a very old move. Trump is blatantly attacking Obama's teenage qualifications for college--a topic so obscure, it was a non-issue in Obama's exhaustive, two-year-long presidential campaign.
Source: Ari Melberon in The Nation, "Coded Racism"
Apr 27, 2011
OpEd: Praised Hillary Clinton in 2008 election
Q: Mr. Trump, since you are not running for president, who do we support and how do we get started?DT: You have a lot of good people. Rudy Giuliani is a very good person. Hillary Clinton is a very good person.
We might not like what's going on right now, but we live in a very resilient country, and we'll find a way out of our problems. This country is very, very resilient.
Source: Think Big, by Donald Trump, p.307
Sep 8, 2008
1980: We handled captives in Iran poorly
Former President Jimmy Carter is a very nice man, but he wasn't my kind of president. I had never supported him and was actually very vocal on how poorly he handled our captives in Iran.
As an example, when it was announced Ronald Reagan won the election, the Iranians immediately turned them over to us. If Jimmy Carter had won, they'd probably still be there.
Source: Think Big, by Donald Trump, p.276-7
Sep 8, 2008
Focus in school was "creating mischief"
Trump was raised in rare comfort. The Trumps had a family chef and chauffer, but they never considered themselves part of the country's ruling class. Theirs was immigrant stock, from Germany and Scotland, hardy entrepreneurs who tackled the new land
with a blitz of new business--restaurants, hotels and, finally, real estate. Donald Trump grew up in a 23-room manse in Queens, a faux Southern plantation house with a Cadillac limousine in the driveway.
He attended private school from kindergarten on; his focus in school, Trump told The Washington Post in 2016, was "creating mischief, because, for some reason, I liked to stir things up and I liked to test people.. It wasn't malicious so much as it
was aggressive."
In second grade, he said, he punched his music teacher in the face. He got into trouble often. Before eighth grade started, his father sent him to military school.
Source: Mueller Report: Washington Post Related Materials, p.502-3
Apr 23, 2019
Grade school mischief-maker: headstrong and determined
At Kew-Forest school, Donald encountered a dress code--ties and jackets for boys, skirts for girls--and a strict set of rules. From the start, Donald resisted their teachers' commands. Donald spent enough time in detention that his friends nicknamed the
punishment DTs--short for "Donny Trumps."No matter the consequences, Donald's behavior did not change. "He was headstrong and determined," said a Kew-Forest teacher. "He would sit with his arms folded, with this look on his face--surly."
By his
own account, Trump's primary focus in elementary school was "creating mischief because I liked to stir things up & test people. It wasn't malicious so much as it was aggressive." As a 2nd-grader, as Trump has described it, he punched his music teacher,
giving him a "black eye" because "I didn't think he knew anything about music, and I almost got expelled. I'm not proud of that, but it's clear evidence that even early on I had a tendency to stand up and make my opinions known in a very forceful way."
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p. 34
Aug 23, 2016
Played varsity baseball at military academy
Trump could rely on his athletic ability to win respect from his teachers and classmates. In his second year at the New York Military Academy (NIMA), Trump played on the freshman football and baseball teams. By his sophomore year, as he shed baby fat
and continued to grow, Trump had made the varsity in both sports. He particularly excelled at baseball, playing first base and developing a reputation for stretching his long body to scoop up balls. Donald could also swing the bat, inspiring a caption
beneath an action photo in the yearbook that read, "Trump swings... then HITS." A headline in the local paper--"Trump Wins Game for NYMA"--may have been the first to celebrate his exploits. "It felt good seeing my name in print,"
Trump said years later. "How many people are in print? Nobody's in print. It was the first time I was ever in the newspaper. I thought it was amazing."
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p. 42
Aug 23, 2016
1990 Marla Maples headline: "Best sex I ever had"
In early 1990 Donald: "I like Ivana, but we've grown apart. Her level of arrogance has grown steadily worse in recent years."February 1990 was a newsy month. Nelson Mandela was freed from prison. President George H. W. Bush welcomed the president of
Czechoslovakia, as the collapse of the Soviet empire accelerated. But for weeks, one story dominated the front pages of the city's tabloids: Donald vs. Ivana. The obsession in the nation's media capital spread to serious national publications.
The sensational headlines reached their apex with the Post's February 16 front-page "Best Sex I've Ever Had", a statement supposedly uttered by Maples in reference to Donald. The headline would become a tabloid classic.
The Post's managing editor, Colasuonno. Did Marla really say what the Post was about to trumpet on page one? "Guys, this headline is libel-proof," he said. "Donald will never complain about this one."
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p.117-8
Aug 23, 2016
After Ivana, never let wife run business again
Trump always made it clear who was boss in his marriages. He and Ivana never had "tremendous fights" because, he said, "ultimately, Ivana does exactly what I tell her to do." Trump came to regret having had her work for him, running hotels and casinos:
"My big mistake with Ivana was taking her out of the role of wife. The problem was, work was all she wanted to talk about. I will never again give a wife responsibility within my business." He didn't.As Trump's private life merged with his public
identity, he came to see his marriages as something that either boosted his image and therefore his business's reputation, or as a hindrance. "My marriage, it seemed, was the only area of my life in which I was willing to accept something less than
perfection," he said during divorce proceedings with Ivana.
Marla Maples would pose far less of a threat. She wasn't one to challenge him, except for continually pressing him to wed her. This time, there would be no talk of a marriage of equals.
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p.157
Aug 23, 2016
OpEd: curries favor with journalists who don't cross-check
I knew Trump had spent a lifetime cheating and lying and displaying remarkable success at getting away with it. And he spent vast amounts of time currying favor with journalists, mostly those who never let facts get in the way of a good story. Only a
few journalists checked & cross-checked his claims and didn't buy Trump's nonsense.I sized him up as a modern P.T. Barnum selling tickets to modern variations of mermaids, that people decided were worth a bit of their money. Trump was full of himself.
Source: The Making of Donald Trump intro, by D.C.Johnston, p. X-XI
Aug 2, 2016
Sent to military academy because of childhood rebelliousness
Q: Your high school experience? "I went to New York Military Academy for five years, from the year before freshman."Q: "So eighth grade on?"
A: "Yes."
Q: "Whose idea was this?"
A: "Well, I was very rebellious and my parents thought it would
be a good idea. I was very rebellious."
Q: "How did it evidence itself?"
A: "I was a very rebellious kind of person. I don't like to talk about it, actually. But I was a very rebellious person and very set in my ways."
Q: "In eighth grade?"
A: "I loved to fight. I always loved to fight."
Q: "Physical fights?"
A: "All types of fights. Any kind of fight, I loved it, including physical, and
I was always the best athlete. Something that nobody knew about me."
Source: Politico.com article with Trump's "Never Enough" biographer
Sep 25, 2015
I've always been rebellious and very set in my ways
I was a very rebellious kind of person when I was younger. I don't like to talk about it, actually. But I was a very rebellious person and very set in my ways, evidenced by the fact that I always loved to engage in any type of fight or athletic
competition. In fact, I was so rebellious that my parents thought it would be a good idea for me to go to New York Military Academy for five years, starting in eighth grade.
Source: Politico.com article with Trump's "Never Enough" biographer
Sep 25, 2015
Prefers short, formal bows to shaking hands
[I dislike] shaking hands. The Japanese have it right. They stand slightly apart and do a quick, formal and very beautiful bow in order to acknowledge each other's presence. This is an ancient act, and was probably originated eons ago by
someone like me--a germ freak. Whoever formalized this greeting was very smart, and far beyond his time. I wish we would develop a similar greeting custom in America.
In fact, I've often thought of taking out a series of newspaper ads encouraging the abolishment of the handshake. At the very least, people would realize why I hate to shake hands and not take it personally. In any event, if any of you folks
reading this book really like me, please approach me at any time, in a restaurant or elsewhere, and don't stick out your hand but simply bow. I will bow back and greatly appreciate the thought.
Source: The Art of the Comeback, by Donald Trump, p.175-6
Oct 27, 1997
Separated from Ivana after long less-than-perfect marriage
Looking back [on my marriage with Ivana], I believe our breakup was inevitable. Why had I hung in there so long when things were just not what they should have been? It’s very uncharacteristic of me to act that way; I’m not one to let problems fester.
[The breakup] is by no means a snap judgment. I’ve discussed the situation with many people. I even thought, briefly, about approaching Ivana with the idea of an “open marriage.” But I realized there was something hypocritical and tawdry about such an
arrangement that neither of us could live with-especially Ivana. She’s too much of a lady.
It didn’t matter that there was never a lot of yelling in the house-it was time to make the tough decisions and get on with the rest of our lives.
Source: Surviving at the Top, p. 46-50
Jul 2, 1990
Fiercely defend religious freedom and terms like "Christmas"
Q: Is religious liberty is at risk in the United States?Trump: In June 2016, Trump delivered a message to evangelicals that if he wins the White House in November, he will fiercely defend religious freedom. In August 2015, Trump said, "There's an
assault on anything having to do with Christianity. They don't want to use the word 'Christmas' anymore at department stores." Trump also said, "There's always lawsuits and unfortunately a lot of those lawsuits are won by the other side.
I will assault that. I will go so strongly against so many of the things, when they take away the word 'Christmas.' I go out of my way to use the word 'Christmas.'"
Clinton: Denounces legislative efforts in Indiana and Arkansas that supporters say
protect religious expression and opponents say discriminate against gay people. Clinton called it "sad" that Indiana would approve the law, which like the 1993 version is called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Source: 2016 AFA Action iVoterGuide on 2016 presidential hopefuls
Nov 8, 2016
Keep the word 'Christmas' in the holiday
Donald Trump said that as president he would fight in court for greater freedom of religious expression because America is trying to sanitize Christianity from the public square: "A week doesn't go by where there's not some negative ruling on something
having to do with Christianity," Trump said. "I'll be fighting on the other side much stronger than anybody else that you have up there fighting, because I think it's really outrageous."Asked whether the Gospels would inform his public-policy choices
in the White House, Trump said "deep down, maybe they do" influence his decision-making. For example, Trump said, he is offended that "the word Christmas is being taken out" of the holiday. "I see these stores like Macy's and so many others--
they're afraid to use the word 'Christmas' now," Trump said. "Maybe they can't use it, legally. What's going on is outrageous, and I will do things about it. The beliefs in the Bible had a lot to do with our country."
Source: Washington Times, "Will Trump save Christmas?" by Dave Boyer
Aug 26, 2015
FactCheck: Claims GOP is growing as 30,000+ left
Trump said at the 2021 Conservative Political Action Conference, shortly after the January 6 Capitol insurrection, "The Republican party defends the interests of working American families. That's why the party is growing so rapidly." FactCheck by The
Hill: More than 30,000 voters who had been registered members of the Republican Party have changed their voter registration in the weeks after pro-Trump supporters attacked the Capitol. The massive wave of defections is a virtually unprecedented exodus.
Source: Reuters/OnTheIssues FactCheck on 2021 CPAC Conference
Feb 28, 2021
FactCheck: "We have the best testing in the world"? Not!
Trump: "Cases are up because we have the best testing in the world and we have the most testing. No country has ever done what we've done in terms of testing. We are the envy of the world. They call and they say the most incredible job anybody's done is
our job on testing. You look at other countries; they don't even do tests."OTI FactCheck: Trump refers to the total number of tests--the US is indeed first. The US is not first in testing per capita. For countries over a million population in early
2021:
| Country | Tests (millions) | Tests per million population |
|---|
| UAE | 29M | 2.9/M |
| Denmark | 15M | 2.7/M |
| Bahrain | 3M | 1.7/M |
| Cyprus | 2M | 1.3/M |
| Israel | 12M | 1.2/M |
| UK | 83M | 1.2/M |
| Singapore | 7M | 1.2/M |
| USA | 338M | 1.0/M |
Source: OnTheIssues FactCheck on Fox News Sunday 2020
Jul 19, 2020
OpEd: 18-month investigation alleges $413M in tax fraud
Trump lashed out at The NY Times over an investigation alleging decades of fraudulent tax practices that increased the money Trump received from his parents. Trump did not specifically deny the conduct the Times described as "dubious tax schemes,"
including "instances of outright fraud." It said he and his siblings used these practices to boost the value of the money they got from their parents."The Failing New York Times did something I have never seen done before. They used the concept
of 'time value of money' in doing a very old, boring and often told hit piece on me." Trump tweeted.
Trump appeared to target the newspaper's reporting that the president actually received today's equivalent of $413 million from his father's real
estate holdings.
A Times spokeswoman defended the article : "This is a powerful piece of investigative journalism, the result of 18 months of inquiry and a review of over 100,000 pages of records. It is accurate and fair and we stand behind it."
Source: CNBC's Jacob Pramuk on 2018 impeaching Trump
Oct 3, 2018
OpEd: FBI investigation of Hillary's email proves relevance
Q: The Hillary Clinton email investigation restarted on Oct. 27. Why then?COMEY: With thousands of emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop, the question is, "So what do we do now?" I can't see a door that's labeled, "No action here." I can only see
two doors: "Speak," and "Conceal."
Q: You knew that candidate Trump is going to say, "This proves everything I've been saying about Hillary Clinton is right." Five previous attorney generals all disagree with you. They say this crossed a line.
COMEY: Yeah, I've heard a lot of that. That was allegedly the reason for my firing.
Q: If you knew that letter would elect Donald Trump, you'd still send it?
COMEY: I would. Because down that path [if the letter was not sent] lies the death of the
FBI as an independent force in American life. I was operating in a world where Hillary Clinton was going to beat Donald Trump, and if I hide this from the American people, she'll be illegitimate the moment she's elected, the moment this comes out.
Source: ABC-TV Q&A: Jim Comey on Higher Loyalty & impeaching Trump
Apr 15, 2018
Mocks opponent as "Pocahontas" at Native American event
Most candidates hoping to unseat U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren in next year's election aren't shying away from President Donald Trump's criticism of her claims of Native American heritage, although all but one say they won't be adopting Trump's habit of
deriding the Massachusetts Democrat as "Pocahontas."Warren has called the Republican president's use of the name a racial slur. Warren has acknowledged telling Harvard and an earlier employer, the University of Pennsylvania, of her heritage but only
after she had been hired.
Pocahontas was a native woman who lived in present-day Virginia in the 1600s and agreed to marry an English colonist to help ensure peace and protect her people.
Questions about Warren's heritage, which first surfaced
during her successful 2012 campaign to oust Republican Sen. Scott Brown, haven't dampened her popularity in Massachusetts. One recent poll found her leading each of her challengers by more than 20 percentage points.
Source: Boston Globe, on Trump Administration, "Use of 'Pocahontas'"
Dec 5, 2017
Hillary & Obama criminally paid people to start riots
Look at what came out today on the clips--I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence. Clinton is the one--and Obama--that caused the violence. They hired people--they paid them $1,500, and they're
on tape saying "be violent, cause fights, do bad things." That was now all on tape, started by her. I believe she got these [sexual assault accusers] to step forward. If it wasn't, they get their 10 minutes of fame. It was lies, and it was fiction.
Source: Third 2016 Presidential Debate moderated by Fox News
Oct 19, 2016
I filed a 104-page disclosure form; I earned $609M last year
Q: You have not released your tax returns. Nominees have released their returns for decades so that voters will know if their potential president has any business conflicts. Don't Americans have a right to know that?TRUMP: I'm under a routine audit.
As soon as the audit's finished, it will be released. But you will learn more about Donald Trump by going down to the federal elections, where I filed a 104-page essentially financial statement. It shows income at $694 million for this past year.
Q:
The IRS says you're perfectly free to release your taxes during an audit.
TRUMP: Look, I've been under audit almost for 15 years. I'm not even complaining. I don't mind it. It's almost become a way of life. I get audited by the IRS. But other
people don't. I will say this: I will release my tax returns--against my lawyer's wishes--when she releases her 33,000 e-mails that have been deleted. As soon as she releases them, I will release.
Q: So it's negotiable?TRUMP: It's not negotiable, no.
Source: First 2016 Presidential Debate at Hofstra University
Sep 26, 2016
Charitable donations of $165,000 to Wharton and U.Penn
In the years after Trump graduated, Wharton became synonymous with financial success. But although Wharton's place in Trump's biography expanded, his contributions to the school did only rarely. In the 1980s, a Penn development officer said
Trump had given the school more than $10,000, but declined to elaborate. One of the only places his name appears on campus is the Class of 1968 Seminar Room plaque in Van Pelt Library, donated at his class's 35th reunion.
One sizable gift came in 1994, when he gave enough to be listed as a "founder" of the Penn Club's new location in midtown Manhattan. The minimum gift for that category was $150,000. Two autumns later, Donald Trump Jr. arrived at the leafy campus.
In all, three of the four older Trump children--including Ivanka (transferring after two years at Georgetown) and Tiffany--would attend Penn, making the school almost an inheritance, a family emblem.
Source: Trump Revealed, by Michael Kranish & Mark Fisher, p. 49-50
Aug 23, 2016
OpEd: Trump dealt with Genovese & Gambino crime families
My concern [in the 2016 presidential race] was that coverage would focus on the horses race rather than a serious vetting of the candidate, who had not a scintilla of public experience. I wrote an early piece that posed twenty-one questions
I thought reporters should ask on the campaign trail. Not one of journalists did. Late in the primaries, Senator Marco Rubio brought up my question about Trump University and
Senator Ted Cruz posed my question about Trump's dealings with the Genovese and Gambino crime families. But no JOURNALIST ever asked any of those questions.
I will always wonder what might have happened had journalists (or even some of the sixteen candidates vying with Trump for the Republican nomination) started asking my questions months earlier.
Source: The Making of Donald Trump intro, by D.C.Johnston, p. XIV
Aug 2, 2016
We should have impeached George W. Bush for Iraq War lies
Q: In 2008, talking about President George W. Bush's conduct of the war, you said you were surprised that Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi didn't try to impeach him: You added, "which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing." When you were
asked what you meant by that and you said: "For the war; he lied, he got us into the war with lies." Do you still believe President Bush should have been impeached.TRUMP: Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake. The war in Iraq, we spent
$2 trillion, thousands of lives, we don't even have it. Iran has taken over Iraq. Obviously, it was a mistake. George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes. But that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the
Middle East.
Q: So you still think he should be impeached?
TRUMP: You call it whatever you want. I want to tell you, they lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none.
Source: 2016 CBS Republican primary debate in South Carolina
Feb 13, 2016
Burned by press too often to be available any more
Reporters who’ve interviewed me know I’m from the “anything goes” school. I have nothing to hide, and no questions are off-limits as far as I’m concerned. I believed [in the past] that it was always best to give an interview, rather than making
yourself unavailable, because that way you at least have some chance of getting your message across. I no longer believe this. I’ve been burned too many times by reporters who have a point to make and will make it-at my expense-no matter what I say.
Source: Surviving at the Top, p. 34-35
Jul 2, 1990
Copyright 1999-2023 by Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org; page last updated: Nov 03, 2024