Mark Udall in 2008 CO Senate Debates


On Education: More money for government-run college aid programs

When asked about the cost of higher education, Udall said he supported government-run college aid programs and said they should be given more money.

Schaffer opposes such programs and said he would fight for more lenders, which would generate competition for lower rates. He warned the collapse of mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could also happen to the federal loan system.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate reported on ABC7-Denver Channel Oct 17, 2008

On Immigration: Program for illegal immigrants to come out of the shadows

Udall said the federal government “has been missing in action” on immigration. He suggested a number of reforms including tamper proof IDs, new technology for monitoring the border and a program that would allow for immigrants already in the country to “come out of the shadows,” register themselves, pay a fine, go through a background check to prove they can speak English and are employed, then “go to the back of the line” to gain citizenship.

Schaffer said he opposes so-called sanctuary cities, and said the federal government should do more to help local law enforcement. “We need to provide incentives to encourage local sheriffs and local police departments to actually enforce immigration laws and when they incur expenses associated with incarcerating those who violated the law, or need to be deported, states out to be reimbursed and compensated,” he said.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate reported on ABC7-Denver Channel Oct 17, 2008

On Budget & Economy: Financial bailout results from Reagan & Bush GOP policies

Q: Isn’t it time to reinstitute closer regulation of Wall Street?

UDALL: What we can’t do, is return to the policies that Schaffer supported and supports today, which are tax breaks for CEOs, tax breaks for companies that offshore jobs, tax breaks for the wealthiest among us.

SCHAFFER: That’s not true.

UDALL: That’s not going to get us to health in our financial system. Schaffer supported a lessening of regulation.

SCHAFFER: That’s not true either. You voted against several amendments. You voted in 2007 to further loosen Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s credit limits. That leads directly to the crisis we’re seeing on Wall Street today.

UDALL: This is [the result of deregulation during] 10 years of the Bush administration, of the Reagan revolution coming to its logical conclusion.

SCHAFFER: Those of us who’ve been back home in the private sector working hard for the last six years are sick and tired of these kinds of votes that make all of the rest of us pay.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate on Meet the Press Sep 28, 2008

On Budget & Economy: $700 billion bailout is not good for my constituents

Udall and Schaffer sparred over who is to blame for the policies that have led to talks of a bail out of the financial industry.

Udall accused Schaffer of supporting the policies that have led to the economic crisis, while Schaffer responded that Udall has voted against having more oversight for companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Schaffer said the proposed $700 billion bailout is necessary but “essentially a tax.” Udall says the plan is not supported by his constituents.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate debate reported by AP in Boston Herald Sep 28, 2008

On Corporations: No welfare for CEOs in financial bailout

Q: You said you didn’t like anything about this bailout bill. You described it as the dead hand of government making things worse.

SCHAFFER: Yes. It’s essentially a tax of $10,000 to $11,000 per American household.

Q: [to Udall]: One in every 95 households in Denver are in foreclosure, well above the US average. Why should other taxpayers across the country have to now bail out those Colorado mortgage buyers?

UDALL: People are upset. My calls are mixed between people who say no and people who say hell, no. This is a real crisis that we face. I think there’s some principles that we have to pursue as we move towards a rescue plan not for Wall Street, this shouldn’t be welfare for CEOs, but for Main Street. And that has to include no blank check, oversight, no golden parachutes. What we can’t do, is return to the policies that Schaffer supported and supports today, which are tax breaks for CEOs, tax breaks for companies that offshore jobs, tax breaks for the wealthiest among us.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate on Meet the Press Sep 28, 2008

On Energy & Oil: We need comprehensive plan, not just oil & gas development

SCHAFFER: The dramatic increase in revenue for the federal government right now is partially a function of the dramatic increase in energy prices. The energy industry’s marginal profit rate is taxed, and the windfall is raked in by the federal government That’s one of the possible motivations why people in Washington, like Mark, have fought to drive energy prices up, that this pays off government.

UDALL: That’s laughable. Congressman Schaffer’s an oil and gas executive. Of course he’s going to take the side of the oil and gas industry. If you want maintenance of the existing energy policy we have in this country, which is focused on oil and gas development of fossil fuels, then you ought to hire Schaffer. If you want a comprehensive plan, if you want to throw the kitchen sink at this where we take a fresh look at nuclear and we develop clean coal supplies and we invest deeply in renewables and in conservation, we also drill responsibly, I’m going to be the senator that’s going to pursue that.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate on Meet the Press Sep 28, 2008

On War & Peace: Proposed votes against the declaration of war

SCHAFFER: [Since I left Congress in 2002], under Republican leadership, deficits grew, and I think it has mainly been a function of war.

UDALL: That’s a great narrative, but go back to 2002. You cast votes for a war.

SCHAFFER: You proposed votes against the declaration of war.

UDALL: You cast votes against an energy policy set of proposals that would have us much closer to being energy independent today.

SCHAFFER: I cast votes in favor of an energy policy.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate on Meet the Press Sep 28, 2008

On War & Peace: Surge has helped, but it’s time to leave Iraq

Q: A year ago you said that the surge was a tragic mistake. Were you wrong?

UDALL: It’s time to leave Iraq. It’s time to leave Iraq responsibly.

Q: Were you wrong on the surge?

UDALL: The surge has helped. There are other factors in Iraq that have been helpful. The Al Anbar Awakening, Muqtada al-Sadr’s call for a cease-fire. There’s ethnic cleansing to a great extent now that you don’t hear that story. Sunni and Shia do not live together anymore in places like Baghdad. But whatever the situation was then, it’s now time to leave Iraq in an honorable & responsible way. As a member of the Armed Services Committee, I know how stretched our military is. I also know we haven’t finished the job in Afghanistan and in Pakistan. Bin Laden is still at large. I also know we have no capacity to defend our own country or to respond to any other emergencies all over the world. It’s time to turn Iraq back over to the Iraqis and refocus on a tough and a smart national security policy.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate Debate on Meet the Press Sep 28, 2008

On Free Trade: Reducing repatriation tax rewards sending jobs overseas

Udall called Schaffer’s idea for chopping the tax charged on money repatriated to US banks a “giveaway to companies that send jobs overseas.”

“When you give these companies a [tax] holiday, that rewards these companies for creating these jobs overseas & not here,” Udall said. Instead, he said Colorado leaders should be focused on restoring the financial markets’ vitality and instituting oversight to prevent future crashes. “It’s exactly that kind of thinking that got us into this crisis to start with, Udall said of Schaffer’s plan.

Schaffer, however, said a temporary reduction in the repatriation tax would, in fact, strengthen the US economy. “What would be a more powerful boost to the economy is exploring multiple strategies to pump private capital real dollars, into the economy,” Schaffer said.

Schaffer noted that Udall “voted for it at its last step before it went to the president.” Udall voted for the 2004 American Jobs Creation Act on Oct. 4, 2004, after he voted against it in June.

Source: 2008 Colorado Senate debate reported in The Daily Sentinel Sep 25, 2008

The above quotations are from 2008 Colorado Senate Debates.
Click here for other excerpts from 2008 Colorado Senate Debates.
Click here for other excerpts by Mark Udall.
Click here for a profile of Mark Udall.
Mark Udall on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Dec 01, 2018