Andrew Rice in 2008 OK Senate Debate


On Energy & Oil: Opposes a windfall-profits tax

Rice said he supports certain tax cuts and opposes a windfall-profits tax. Rice said he would focus on energy and health care as well as redeploying troops out of Iraq and into Afghanistan during his first 100 days in Washington.

Inhofe’s plan also includes making the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent, relaxing limits on individual retirement account contributions and temporarily eliminating the capital gains tax.

Source: 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate reported in The Oklahoman Oct 15, 2008

On Principles & Values: I pride myself on doing right, even if politically unpopular

Elected to the state Senate in 2006, Rice said he was able to work with Republicans when the Senate makeup was divided equally, 24 to 24. He would use that same approach in Washington, he said. “I pride myself on doing what is right for my district and for the state of Oklahoma, whether it’s politically popular or not,” Rice said.
Source: 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate reported in The Oklahoman Oct 15, 2008

On Health Care: Pay doctors to proactively treat patients; end pay-per-test

Q: In 2007 the government has begun “income relating,” or means testing. Higher income seniors will have to pay more for their doctors’ services and outpatient coverage. Do you support Means Testing?

A: I am concerned about the long range fiscal health of Medicare and I will fight for reform that ensures that seniors continue to have access to quality health care. Some change which I support include:

  1. Requiring government negotiation of lower drug prices.
  2. Paying doctors stipends to proactively treat patients, based on their age and medical conditions, instead of making payments for each test and treatment -- a change that could significantly improve care while reducing spending on unnecessary tests and equipment.
  3. Improving management controls to reduce the $60 billion lost each year to Medicare fraud by physicians, therapists and other suppliers of medical services.
Source: Senior Citizens League Guide to 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Oct 10, 2008

On Immigration: Opposes Mexico Totalization Agreement & benefits to illegals

Q: If the President signs the final Executive Totalization Social Security Agreement with Mexico it could lead to Social Security benefits going to individuals who worked in the U.S. while illegal. Do you support the Totalization Agreement?

A: Yes, I would oppose the President signing this agreement.

Source: Senior Citizens League Guide to 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Oct 10, 2008

On Social Security: I support Social Security Notch reform

Q: The Senior Citizens League members are to a large extent Notch babies--those individuals who receive lower Social Security benefits because they were born in the years 1917 and immediately thereafter. Do you support Notch Reform?

A: This arbitrary formula has deprived seniors born during this period of the full earned benefit. I support Social Security Notch reform.

Source: Senior Citizens League Guide to 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Oct 10, 2008

On Social Security: I support CPI-E for COLA Fairness

Q: We strongly believe that the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) that seniors are currently receiving does not accurately reflect how they must spend their money. Do you support COLA Fairness, based on the consumer price index (CPI) for seniors?

A: Yes, I support CPI-E.

Source: Senior Citizens League Guide to 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Oct 10, 2008

On Social Security: I do not support privatization in any form

Q: Do you support Social Security Reform or Privatization?

A: I support a bipartisan, responsible and comprehensive adjustment to Social Security to ensure its long-term stability, but will not support privatization in any form.

Source: Senior Citizens League Guide to 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Oct 10, 2008

On Government Reform: Most donations from individuals; most of Inhofe’s from PACs

Q: In terms of fund-raising, does money for your campaign come more from groups and organizations, or is it from individual donors?

A: The overwhelming majority is from individuals. The only type of group that could give us money is a Political Action Committee, and I think it’s accounted for less than 4%. Part of that is the nature of how these campaigns are. When you run against an incumbent, there’s a lot of political action committees that represent different industries, different interest groups that aren’t going to go against the incumbent because they don’t want to upset the incumbent. Therefore, they may have a bill that’s coming that affects, say, the manufactures, and they want to go see them, and you know. It’s too bad that works, but that’s the way that Washington works. And so, if you look at his [Inhofe’s] reports, he’s got a tremendous amount of money in PAC money. Probably about half of his money comes from PAC money, compared to a real small minority of mine.

Source: Judd Morse, Ada Evening News on 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Jul 9, 2008

On Homeland Security: Divest from terrorist states like we divested for apartheid

Q: And how has your voting record reflected your opinions on the war?

A: Well, on the war, there’s really no direct vote on the state level. Although somewhat related to it; I had a bill this year that the Republicans blocked. The bill would have had our state retirement pension plans, the judge retirements, the teacher retirements, all of our big state retirement plans that are invested in mutual funds, that would have forced us to divest our retirements out of mutual funds that invest in countries that are state sponsors of terrorism. Syria, North Korea, Iran. Our idea is that if they are national security threats, we shouldn’t be economically investing with their governments. And there have been a lot of states that have done these divestment plans. This is what we did in South Africa during Apartheid; we divested the money out of South Africa until they dealt with ending Apartheid. That bill was stopped. So that would have had somewhat of a direct effect on national security issues.

Source: Judd Morse, Ada Evening News on 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Jul 9, 2008

On Welfare & Poverty: Our churches have engaged society to try to improve society

Q: If I remember correctly, you have an educational background in theology as well, don’t you?

A: Yeah, I have a master’s in theological studies. There are some areas that, as a Christian, with the work I’ve done I understand our theological history and scripture and traditions and the way that our religious communities and our churches have engaged society to try to improve society. There are some common areas there that I think with my past work I can find some common ground with voters.

Source: Judd Morse, Ada Evening News, on 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate Jul 9, 2008

The above quotations are from 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate between James Inhofe and Andrew Rice.
Click here for other excerpts from 2008 Oklahoma Senate Debate between James Inhofe and Andrew Rice.
Click here for other excerpts by Andrew Rice.
Click here for a profile of Andrew Rice.
Andrew Rice on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Dec 02, 2018