Jay Stamper in Survey of 2014 Senate campaign websites


On Civil Rights: Backs marriage equality: it is a civil rights issue

The issue of marriage equality is one that politicians everywhere are eager to avoid. In South Carolina, where gay marriage is banned by the State Constitution, the issue is even more politically problematic, especially for Democrats.

I fundamentally believe marriage equality is not a minor issue to be minimized, ignored or treated as a political inconvenience. It is a civil rights issue affecting millions of people who are our neighbors, friends and family.

The US Constitution requires equal protection under the law: rights given to one group by law should not be denied another. In my view then, it's simple: gay couples must not be denied the right to marry.

Beyond our constitutionally guaranteed rights, I believe that we have a moral obligation to treat every human being with respect--even if he or she is different. I won't be silent or hide behind political rhetoric on the issue of marriage equality and civil rights. Stand with me if you won't either.

Source: 2014 Senate campaign website, JayStamper.com, Press Release Oct 23, 2013

On Social Security: Chained CPI a bad idea

Some members of Congress want to reduce benefits for the most vulnerable members of our society by replacing the current Consumer Price Index with one that grows more slowly, the so-called "Chained CPI". I strongly oppose the adoption of the Chained CPI for two main reasons.

First, adopting the Chained CPI is the wrong prescription for our economy. If the proposal is adopted, the total disposable income of millions of Americans will be slashed, reducing the consumer spending that our economy relies on to create jobs.

Second, implementing the Chained CPI is simply the wrong thing to do. It will hurt retirees, veterans, and those receiving disability or social security who depend on the existing Consumer Price Index to keep up with the rising cost of healthcare. Under the Chained CPI, these Americans will find it more and more difficult to afford the medical care they need just to survive.

Please join me in calling on the President and members of Congress to take this bad idea off the table.

Source: 2014 Senate campaign website, jaystamper.blogspot.com Apr 19, 2013

On Crime: We are all criminals because we over-lawed

We aren't over-lawyered, we're over-lawed. Given the number of laws we have and their vagueness, complexity and contradictions, it's amazing we don't have more lawyers because we surely need them. But maybe that's the point; professional lawyers become professional lawmakers--career politicians making the law more and more imponderable to the layman, in turn necessitating the creation of more lawyers.

Whatever the cause, the fact is: the law is now so absurd that no one--not even a lawyer -- can be sure what the law even is.

You are a criminal. Don't believe me? You've never driven over the .08 limit, never taken an illegal drug, even a prescription medication in the wrong jurisdiction, never ripped one of those mattress tags off? And another thing: how do you know you've never broken the law when you don't know what the law is? Even lawmakers don't read the laws they pass. And even if you did read all of the laws, have you read the court decisions modifying the laws?

Source: 2014 Senate campaign website, jaystamper.blogspot.com Apr 12, 2013

On Crime: Pled guilty to SEC violation in exchange for zero sentence

In my own experience, my teams of securities lawyers, didn't know that there was any issue selling 6-month promissory notes to investors without first registering the notes. Both firms relied on the plain language of the 1933 Securities Act, which exempts from registration: "Promissory Notes not exceeding 9 months". They relied on it. I relied on it. The problem was, once upon a time, some circuit court judge said it meant commercial paper rated by a recognized ratings agency.

As much as I want to blame the lawyers, I can't. The law is so complex and unascertainable that its very imponderability is becoming a valid excuse for noncompliance. Since all investors made money and were never defrauded, all the states dropped their investigations but Nevada.

So, did I nobly risk 120 years in state prison for a chance to clear my name? Hell no! I pled guilty, and in return for my pleading guilty to crimes I didn't commit, Nevada agreed to a reduction from 120 years down to zero years.

Source: 2014 Senate campaign website, jaystamper.blogspot.com Apr 12, 2013

The above quotations are from Survey of 2014 Senate campaign websites.
Click here for other excerpts from Survey of 2014 Senate campaign websites.
Click here for other excerpts by Jay Stamper.
Click here for a profile of Jay Stamper.
Jay Stamper on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Dec 07, 2018