Mike Huckabee in Fox News Sunday interviews during 2015


On Government Reform: Opposes "judicial supremacy"; they're just rulings, not law

Q: You said, "Many of our politicians have surrendered to the false god of judicial supremacy, which would allow black robed and unelected judges the power to make law as well as enforce it." You wouldn't necessarily obey court rulings? No principle of judicial review?

A: Judicial review is actually what we've operated under. We have not operated under judicial supremacy. The notion that the Supreme Court comes up with the ruling and that automatically subjects the two other branches to following it defies everything there is about the three equal branches of government.

Q: Are you saying that it's up in the air as to whether you're going to obey the Supreme Court?

A: Well, the president has to follow whatever the law is. It's a matter of balanc of power. If the Supreme Court could just make a ruling and everybody has to bow down and fall on their faces and worship that law, it isn't a law because it hasn't been yet passed.

Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls May 24, 2015

On Homeland Security: NSA bulk metadata isn't effective; human intelligence is

Q: What should we do about the NSA's bulk data collection?

A: The Constitution already provides what we should do. If you have probable cause, you go to a judge, you get a warrant, and then you listen in on his calls, now you've got the other branch of government that's constitutionally required to be a part of that process. You don't just give the executive branch unlimited power.

Q: Do you support NSA bulk collection of metadata?

Q: 225 different terrorist plots over the past years since 9/11 and so far, not one of them has been tied directly to the NSA's collection of metadata. So, if this is so effective, how come it hasn't resulted in the foiled terrorist plots? Those have been foiled by old fashion good police work, old-fashioned human intelligence. It seems like we're spending billions of dollars on whiz-bang technology and not enough money on human resources, which really is proven to be the most effective way of stopping terrorism.

Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls May 24, 2015

On Social Security: Opposes increases the eligibility age for social security

Q: Government trustees say, without any changes, for instance Medicare's hospital insurance fund will run out of money by 2030, and the Social Security trust fund will run out of money by 2033. Governor, don't we have to find some way either raising the eligibility age or cutting perhaps for the wealthier people to try to keep these programs solvent? I'm not saying for current retirees, but for people, a lot of reformers say, 55 and younger.

HUCKABEE: The problem with people even 55 and younger, they've been paying in for 40 years. This was not a voluntary extraction from their paycheck. It was involuntarily lifted from them, under the guise that the government would then provide for them their money back in that Social Security or Medicare fund. One of the reasons that I'm for the FairTax is that it means that everybody will help fund Social Security and Medicare. If everybody was under a consumption tax, which is what the FairTax does, all Americans would be contributing.

Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls May 24, 2015

On Tax Reform: Bottom 1/3 of economy benefits most from the FairTax

Q: Critics of your FairTax proposal say the problem with that is it's too regressive. The average rate for the lowest income group would exceed 33%, while the average for the top group would fall to less than 16%. The rich are going to end up making out pretty well under this.

A: They have it exactly wrong. In fact, it's the bottom third of the economy who benefit the most from the FairTax. The people of the top third of the economy benefit the least, although everybody benefits some. That tax study is one that has been discredited by the people who spend over $20 million, very thorough, thoughtful economic study developing the fair tax. The difference is that the FairTaxhas what's called the pre-bate, which untaxes people for their necessities. So, if you're at the bottom 1/3, chances are you really don't pay any effective tax whatsoever in the consumption tax because you are consuming less & you're getting a pre-bate, which is a rebate in advance for that what you would have spent

Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls May 24, 2015

The above quotations are from Fox News Sunday interviews during 2015
(Chris Wallace interviewing candidates for 2015 and 2016 races).
Click here for other excerpts from Fox News Sunday interviews during 2015
(Chris Wallace interviewing candidates for 2015 and 2016 races)
.
Click here for other excerpts by Mike Huckabee.
Click here for a profile of Mike Huckabee.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Nov 30, 2021