Interviews during 2017-2019: on War & Peace
Jo Jorgensen:
Opposed withdrawal from Iran nuclear deal
Q: Support Trump withdrawal from Iran nuclear treaty? Require congressional approval for military to attack Iran?Jo Jorgensen: No on treaty withdrawal. "An agreement that helps create harmony is better than continued hostility."
The U.S. should not attack Iran.
Howie Hawkins: No on treaty withdrawal. U.S. should rejoin nuclear treaty. Yes on congressional approval.
Source: CampusElect on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Aug 30, 2020
Jo Jorgensen:
No military aid to Saudi Arabia for war in Yemen
Q: Block arms sales to Saudi Arabia over Yemen war and allegations about journalist Jamal Khashoggi's death?Jo Jorgensen: Yes. The U.S. should not provide military aid to Saudi Arabia during its conflict with Yemen.
Howie Hawkins: Yes. The U.S. must "stop its war on Iran and get its military out of the whole Middle East," including "Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean."
Source: CampusElect on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Aug 30, 2020
Howie Hawkins:
Supports 2015 Iran nuclear deal
The Green Party supports the "joint comprehensive plan of action" signed in July, 2015 which confirms Iran's status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. The Green Party supports the swift elimination of economic sanctions on Iran and looks to
the normalization of relations between Iran and the United States. The Green Party also calls on Israel to dismantle its nuclear weapons program and sign on to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.
Source: Green Party Platform adopted by 2020 presidential hopeful
Jul 12, 2020
Kanye West:
I'm focused on protecting America with our great military
On foreign policy: "I haven't developed it yet.
I'm focused on protecting America, first, with our great military. Let's focus on ourselves first."
Source: Forbes Magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Jul 8, 2020
Jo Jorgensen:
Bombings in Middle East aren't a boost to Western security
She's the only one of the lot to take the issue of vicious, bombing of Middle Eastern children seriously,
and the only to recognize that it isn't a boost to Western security to be committing cold-blooded acts of murder in the Middle East.
Source: BeingLibertarian.com blog on 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 27, 2020
Don Blankenship:
We are unalterably opposed to entangling alliances
The United States is properly a free and sovereign republic which should strive to live in peace with all nations, without interfering in their internal affairs, and without permitting their interference in ours.
We are unalterably opposed to entangling alliances--via treaties, or any other form of commitment--which compromise our national sovereignty or commit us to intervention in foreign wars.
We shall:- steadfastly oppose American participation in any form of world government organization;
- call upon the President, and Congress, to terminate United States membership in the United Nations and terminate U.S. participation in
all so-called U.N. peace keeping operations;
- bar the United Nations, and its subsidiaries, from further operation, including raising of funds, on United States territory.
Source: Constitution Platform adopted by 2020 presidential hopeful
May 2, 2020
Justin Amash:
Make Congress authorize wars or else withdraw troops
As for wars and having our troops everywhere, those things have to be authorized. I would look at these wars and if I don't think the war has an authorization, I would say to Congress, "Give me an authorization for this conflict within 90 days.
If you don't do that, we're bringing the troops home." And force their hand on it. And then if the American people support engagement in that war, then they can authorize their representatives and senators to vote for that engagement.
Source: Reason magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 1, 2020
Joe Biden:
Afghanistan: against surging troops; not nation builders
I was against surging troops to Afghanistan in the first place. We're not nation builders. We can't build that nation. We should not be in the business of that. But we should have a small footprint to be able to determine whether or not there are
terrorist organizations operating in the region that are planning attacks against the United States. And we should have cooperation from the Afghan government on that and a commitment from the Taliban that they will not in any way support that effort.
Source: CNN "State of the Union" on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Mar 1, 2020
Mike Pence:
Taliban committed to oppose terrorists; now hard work begins
Q: Shouldn't the Taliban agree to renounce al Qaeda before the U.S. withdraws?PENCE: The agreement represents a historic step forward on the path to peace. I wouldn't gainsay what the Taliban has literally put in writing. It is the first time ever
that they have been willing to commit publicly to oppose the presence of al Qaeda in their region. They have made a commitment to oppose the presence of terrorist elements and organizations using Afghanistan to launch attacks. Now the hard work begins.
Source: CNN "State of the Union" on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Mar 1, 2020
Mike Bloomberg:
Iraq war was a mistake based on faulty intelligence
Bloomberg said he had no regrets over supporting the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. "I don't live in a regret world, and I didn't make the decision," the former New York mayor told The Times. "America wanted to go to war, but it turns out it was based on
faulty intelligence, and it was a mistake," Bloomberg said. "But I think the people that made the mistake did it honestly, and it's a shame, because it's left us entangled, and it's left the Middle East in chaos through today."
Source: Los Angeles Times on 2020 Presidential Hopefuls
Jan 6, 2020
Pete Buttigieg:
Would use force, but need to think of the consequences
I would never hesitate to use force if it was necessary in order to protect American lives. The question is, was it necessary, and was it better than the alternative? When you're dealing with the Middle East, you need to think about the next and
the next and the next move. This is not checkers. I'm not sure any of us really believe that this president and the people around him is really going through all of the consequences of what could happen next.
Source: CNN SOTU 2020 interview of presidential hopefuls
Jan 5, 2020
Joe Walsh:
Withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan
Walsh criticizes Trump's approach to peace talks in Afghanistan, as well as the president's treatment of US defense allies. Walsh calls for the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, though while in Congress he supported a "surge" strategy of
additional troops, similar to the one carried out in Iraq during the Bush administration. He has criticized President Trump's negotiations with the Taliban, particularly the possibility of inviting Taliban representatives to the United States for talks.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Dec 24, 2019
Donald Trump:
Syria pullout: Let Turks & Kurds fight, then pull them apart
President Trump [at a Texas rally tried out a new response to] the backlash over his Syria decision. He justified the idea of removing American troops from Syria by saying he did not want to deplete the U.S. military anymore or continue to entangle the
U.S. in what he called "the endless wars."Trump said, "It was good to let Turkey attack the Kurds, longtime U.S. allies in the fight against ISIS, Trump said, because "sometimes you have to let them fight like two kids. Then you pull them apart."
Source: Nancy Cook on Politico.com on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 17, 2019
Bill Weld:
Unlimited military aid to Ukraine against Russian incursion
Q: What steps would you take to counter Russian aggression against Ukraine?A: Ukraine, while not a NATO member, is an EU partner and a treaty-recognized buffer zone between Russia and NATO. Ukraine has a sizeable population and economic zone whose
seizure would be a major first step toward reconstituting the old Soviet Union's borders and corresponding influence--for Putin, it is therefore a major opportunity if it could be seized intact. Conversely, Ukraine has shown itself willing to fight and
take losses in blood and treasure. Allowing Ukraine to fall would effectively "Finlandize" Europe, to the extent it has not already been. Accordingly, I would provide military aid to Ukraine--as much as was necessary. I would make it clear that if
the Ukrainians wanted to defend their territory, we would help, and further incursions would be costly. I would continue to hold exercises in Eastern Europe and look at ways to defend the Baltics.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2019
Bill Weld:
Supports Israeli-Palestinian two-state solution
Q: Do you support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and how would you achieve it?A: The question suggests outsiders can "solve" the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
I think it is up to the Israelis and Palestinians to come to an arrangement, and for us to support their efforts.
If there is a deal to be made that's acceptable to both, we should get behind it, but the timing for further negotiations is going to have to be driven by events and by the parties themselves.
Having said all that, I am personally very much in favor of a two-state solution, and I believe, as my friend Shimon Peres always maintained, that multi-state economic development projects and trade are the sinews of peace.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2019
Bill Weld:
Withdrawing from Iran nuke deal was a colossal blunder
Q: Would you rejoin the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action [JCPOA, the Iranian nuclear deal by 7 countries and the EU]? What changes would you require before agreeing to rejoin the accord?A: I thought that Mr. Trump's withdrawal from the 2015
JCPOA was a colossal blunder. We had a ten-year period during which Iran would not advance its nuclear weapons program, and they were in compliance. I would rejoin the JCPOA without changes to the written agreement.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2019
Bill Weld:
Partial sanction relief for partial Korean denuclearization
Q: Would you sign an agreement with North Korea that entailed partial sanctions relief in exchange for some dismantling of its nuclear weapons program but not full denuclearization? A: "Partial" and "some" imply matters of degree, but yes, I think a
partial dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapons program is a development worth promoting, and of course such an agreement might prove to be the first step to a fuller resolution.
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2019
Joe Walsh:
Congress must have a say in military force overseas
On presidential war power: "On the matter of the military and use of force, our founders assigned to Congress the power to declare war and to support the military, as a means to ensure that the President could not abuse his role as Commander-in-Chief.
This balance reflects very practical logic: Through our elected representatives, we, the people, should have a say before we use military force overseas, imperil the lives of our men and women in uniform, and spend taxpayer money on expensive wars."
Source: Council on Foreign Relations on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2019
Lincoln Chafee:
Disarmament, non-proliferation where we want to go
Chafee said that bringing an end to war--he specifically mentioned the ongoing conflict in the Middle East--was a core reason for running. "I think the major political party system engineers it so they get a war supporter in there, and that's just what
has happened it seems every time," he said. "Disarmament and non-proliferation should be where we want to go."
Source: Warwick Beacon on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Sep 11, 2019
Joe Biden:
FactCheck:No, didn't oppose Iraq War right after war started
In recent interviews defending his past foreign policy decisions, Biden has misrepresented his past position on the Iraq War. In explaining his 2002 vote to authorize military force in Iraq, Biden told NPR this week that, "Immediately, that moment it
started, I came out against the war at that moment."But a review of Biden's public statements about Iraq in the lead up to the invasion shows he was never entirely opposed to military action against Saddam Hussein:
- "Nine months ago, I voted to
use force and I would vote that way again today," Biden said in a July 2003 speech at the Brookings Institution.
- In early January 2003, ahead of Secretary of State Colin Powell's presentation to the UN Security Council, Biden said war with Iraq
appeared near inevitable.
- In a speech to the New Castle Chamber of Commerce in February 2003, Biden said. "I supported the resolution to go to war. I am not opposed to war to remove weapons of mass destruction from Iraq."
Source: CNN K-File FactCheck on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Sep 4, 2019
Pete Buttigieg:
Be more judicious when committing troops
Buttigieg thinks there should be a higher standard for committing American troops overseas. He's criticized the threat of sending ground troops to places such as˙Venezuela or Syria, though he would support targeted military action in Syria. "There has
to be a pathway to ending endless war." He thinks America is losing credibility overseas and should re-establish itself as a world leader through diplomacy. The current policy of America˙first, he has said, is leaving America isolated.
Source: Indianapolis Star on 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 6, 2019
Mike Pence:
North Korea must abandon its nuclear ambitions
"But the era of strategic patience is over," he declared. "President Trump has made it clear that the patience of the United States and our allies in this region has run out and we want to see change.
We want to see North Korea abandon its reckless path of the development of nuclear weapons, and also its continual use and testing of ballistic missiles is unacceptable."
Source: PBS Newshour "North Korea," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Apr 17, 2019
Andrew Yang:
Limited foreign intervention; restore Congress's role in war
On declarations of war: First, I would push back the ability to declare war back to Congress where it belongs. And second, I would be very judicious and restrained about intervening in other country's affairs,
where if we go in significantly, there are going to be vital national interests at stake that we can achieve in a defined timeframe.
Source: CNN Town Hall: 2020 presidential hopefuls
Apr 14, 2019
Julian Castro:
Don't entangle ourselves in wars, but rebuild alliances
My first order of business would be to make sure that we repair our alliances around the world that have helped keep us safer. The country has a role to lead for the values that we believe in, for freedom, democracy, and opportunity.
That doesn't mean that we entangle ourselves in wars. We saw what can happen when we make a mistake, like the Iraq war. However, we need to reclaim our role as the world leader in standing up for things like human rights around the world.
Source: CNN Town Hall: 2020 presidential hopefuls
Apr 11, 2019
Amy Klobuchar:
Supported regime change in Libya; supports Israeli military
- Klobuchar supported the U.S.-NATO-led regime change war in Libya in 2011, and her public statements suggest that her main condition for the U.S. use of military force anywhere is that U.S. allies also take part, as in Libya.
-
In January 2019, Klobuchar was the only presidential candidate who voted for S.1, a bill to reauthorize
U.S. military aid to Israel that also included an anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions provision to allow U.S. state and local governments to divest from companies that boycott Israel.
-
She is the only Democratic presidential candidate in the Senate who did not cosponsor Sanders's Yemen War Powers bill in 2018, but she did cosponsor and vote for it in 2019.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Bernie Sanders:
Cut military spending, except F-35 at Vermont air base
- Senator Sanders has only voted for three out of 19 military spending bills since 2013.
- Sanders voted as requested by Peace Action 84 percent of the time from 2011 to 2016, despite some hawkish votes on Iran from 2011-2013.
-
One major contradiction: Not only did Sanders support the F-35, he pushed--despite local opposition--to get these fighter jets stationed at the Burlington airport for the Vermont National Guard.
-
In terms of stopping the war in Yemen, he and Senators Chris Murphy and Mike Lee have led a sustained effort to shepherd his historic War Powers bill on Yemen through the Senate.
-
Sanders supports U.S. withdrawals from Afghanistan and Syria and opposes U.S. threats of war against Venezuela.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Cory Booker:
End intervention in Yemen & Iran, but not Israel
- Booker was one of the first five cosponsors of Sanders's Yemen War Powers bill, and he has an 86 percent Peace Action voting record.
- He cosponsored the Senate bill condemning the UN Security Council resolution against Israeli settlements in
2016.
- He was an original cosponsor of a bill to impose new sanctions on Iran in December 2013, before eventually voting for the nuclear agreement in 2015.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Elizabeth Warren:
No intervention in Yemen; but intervention in Gaza OK
- Her Peace Action voting record is 84% and she was one of the first five Senators to cosponsor the Yemen War Powers bill in March 2018 [requiring Congressional authorization to arm the Saudis in Yemen].
- In 2014 she supported Israel's invasion
of Gaza that left more than 2,000 dead, and blamed the civilian casualties on Hamas.
- She opposed a bill to criminalize boycotting Israel and condemned Israel's use of deadly force against peaceful Gaza protesters in 2018.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Jay Inslee:
Opposed war in Iraq; opposed use of torture
Inslee was a strong opponent of the U.S. war in Iraq, and introduced a bill to impeach
Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez for approving torture by U.S. forces.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Joe Biden:
Supported wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, but not Iran
- Biden at first endorsed full-scale nation-building in Afghanistan but when he saw it wasn't working, he changed his mind, arguing that the U.S. military should destroy al-Qaeda and then leave. As vice president, he was a lonely voice in the
Cabinet opposing Obama's escalation of the war in 2009.
- Regarding Iraq, however, he was a hawk. He repeated false intelligence claims that Saddam Hussein possessed chemical and biological weapons and was seeking nuclear weapons, and therefore was a
threat that had to be "eliminated." He later called his vote for the 2003 invasion a "mistake."
- Biden is a self-described Zionist. He has stated that the Democrats' support for Israel "comes from our gut, moves through our heart, and ends up in our
head. It's almost genetic."
- He would disagree with the present Israeli government on Iran. He wrote that "War with Iran is not just a bad option. It would be a disaster," and he supported Obama's entry into the Iran nuclear agreement.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Kamala Harris:
Ok with Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory
- Senator Harris has been vocal about is her unconditional support for Israel. She told an American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference in 2017, "I will do everything in my power to ensure broad and bipartisan support for
Israel's security and right to self-defense." When President Obama allowed the U.S. to join a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements in Palestine as a "flagrant violation" of international law, Harris, Sen. Cory Booker and
Sen. Amy Klobuchar were among 30 Democratic (and 47 Republican) senators who cosponsored a bill to withhold U.S. dues to the UN over the resolution.
- Harris did join most of the other presidential candidates who chose not to speak at
AIPAC's 2019 gathering.
- She also supports rejoining the Iran nuclear agreement.
- Harris has voted for six out of eight military spending bills, but she did cosponsor and vote for Sanders's Yemen War Powers bill.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Kirsten Gillibrand:
Withdraw from Yemen; Withdraw from Afghanistan
- Opposing runaway military spending, voting against 47 percent of military spending bills since 2013.
- Her Peace Action voting record is 80 percent, reduced mainly by the same hawkish votes on Iran as Sanders from 2011 to 2013.
-
Gillibrand was an early cosponsor of Sanders's Yemen War Powers bill. She has also supported a full withdrawal from Afghanistan since at least 2011, when she worked on a withdrawal bill with then Sen. Barbara Boxer and wrote a letter to
State Department Secretaries Robert Gates and Clinton, asking for a firm commitment that U.S. troops would be out "no later than 2014."
- Gillibrand cosponsored the Anti-Israel Boycott Act in 2017 but later withdrew her cosponsorship when pushed by
grassroots opponents and the ACLU, and she voted against S.1, which included similar provisions, in January 2019.
- She has spoken favorably of Trump's diplomacy with North Korea.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Marianne Williamson:
Stop relying on brute force internationally
- Williamson believes, "Our country's way of dealing with security issues is obsolete. We cannot simply rely on brute force to rid ourselves of international enemies."
-
She [says] that our military budget "simply increase(s) the coffers of the military-industrial complex."
- She writes, "The only way to make peace with your neighbors is to make peace with your neighbors."
-
Williamson proposes a 10 or 20 year plan to transform our wartime economy into a "peace-time economy." "From massive investment in the development of clean energy, to the retrofitting of our buildings and bridges, to the building of new
schools and the creation of a green manufacturing base," she writes, "it is time to release this powerful sector of American genius to the work of promoting life instead of death."
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Tulsi Gabbard:
No regime change in Iran; no war in Yemen
- She unequivocally states her opposition to U.S. "regime change" interventions, as well as the New Cold War and arms race with Russia, and supports rejoining the Iran nuclear deal. She was also an original cosponsor of Representative Khanna's
Yemen War Powers bill.
- Gabbard voted at least twice (in 2015 and 2016) not to repeal the much-abused 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, and she voted three times not to limit the use of Pentagon slush funds.
Source: Truthout.org, "War and Peace," on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 27, 2019
Andrew Yang:
Repeal post-9/11 Authorization for Use of Military Force
- Foreign policy and defense: Supports NATO, would create a secretary of cybersecurity.
- Yang believes in NATO and other international alliances, and would institute regular Pentagon audits.
-
He would repeal the "Authorization for Use of Military Force" enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, and hand the power to declare war back to Congress.
-
As part of his focus on reducing military spending, Yang would redirect 10 percent of the annual military budget to a domestic infrastructure initiative called the "Legion of Builders and Destroyers."
-
He would also create a secretary of cybersecurity position.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Mar 19, 2019
Beto O`Rourke:
Discuss U.S. policy in Syria in a more meaningful way
Afghanistan and Syria: It is not clear where O'Rourke stands on President Donald Trump's proposed withdrawal from Afghanistan and Syria.
O'Rourke has said he thinks U.S. policy in Syria should be debated and discussed in a more meaningful way. It is not clear if he supports troop withdrawal from the country. Likewise it is not clear if he would withdraw troops from Afghanistan.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Mar 14, 2019
Pete Buttigieg:
U.S. not the guarantor of peace in Afghanistan
There may need to be some residual intelligence or special operations capability to make sure there is never an attack against the United States. I'm encouraged to see the peace talks taking place in Doha. If the Taliban are really serious about being
ready to lay down their arms, that's a good sign. But I'm also concerned that the Afghan government seems to be an afterthought, because the peace needs to be sustainable. We can't be the guarantors of peace and stability in Afghanistan.
Source: CNN Town Hall: back-to-back 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 10, 2019
Donald Trump:
Countries hosting US troops should pay for them
The administration is drawing up demands that Germany, Japan and any other country hosting U.S. troops pay the full price of American soldiers deployed on their soil--plus 50 percent or more for the privilege of hosting them.
His insistence on it almost derailed recent talks with South Korea over the status of 28,000 U.S. troops in the country when he overruled his negotiators with a note to National Security Advisor John Bolton saying, "We want cost plus 50."
Source: Bloomberg News, "Huge Premium" on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 8, 2019
Bernie Sanders:
End Syrian conflict; pull out U.S. troops
- Foreign Policy: Use diplomacy to end Syrian conflict. Pull out troops, but in different way from Trump. Cut U.S. support in the conflict in Yemen, hold the Saudi crown prince "accountable" for crimes.
- Sanders would pull U.S. troops from
Syria, but said he would do it in a different, less "erratic" way than Trump recently announced. He believes diplomacy with Russia and Iran can turn things around in Syria.
-
He also believes the president did not have the right to launch airstrikes against the Assad regime and that war powers must get more rigorous oversight and/or approval from Congress.
- A longtime anti-war activist, Sanders voted against the Iraq
war resolution in 2002.
- He regularly called for the U.S. to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.
- In both Afghanistan and Syria, Sanders has said that he believes the U.S. should remain involved, though with no ground troop presence.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Feb 19, 2019
Bill Weld:
Supports non-nuclear proliferation efforts
On the 2016 campaign trail, Weld called nuclear proliferation "the number one threat to the security of the world."
Weld is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and, has called for the U.S. to form closer ties with Mexico and Canada in order to address security and economic challenges.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Feb 15, 2019
Bill Weld:
Don't use military for regime change
In fairness to young adults in the military, they should not be asked to risk their lives in order to engineer regime changes in foreign
countries at the whim of the US government, in the absence of any substantial threat to the United States.
Source: Speech in New Hampshire by 2020 presidential hopefuls
Feb 15, 2019
Amy Klobuchar:
Keep US military presence in Syria
Klobuchar opposed President's Donald Trump's decision to withdraw troops from Syria. Earlier this month, Klobuchar highlighted her opposition by voting in favor of bipartisan legislation that rebuked Trump's position.
At the time of the vote, all the senators who had already announced they were running in 2020 or had declared their intention to run voted against the bill.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Feb 10, 2019
John Delaney:
Withdraw military aid from Saudi forces fighting in Yemen
- Foreign policy: Supports punishing Saudi crown prince for the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
- Delaney strongly supports the Senate vote declaring Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman responsible for the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi.
- Delaney has also praised the Senate's decision to withdraw military aid from Saudi forces fighting in Yemen.
- He has not spoken publicly about Trump's decision to withdraw American forces from Syria.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Feb 4, 2019
Kamala Harris:
Time for a political solution in Afghanistan
- Afghanistan: Wants a "political solution" to end the war, bring troops home.
- After a trip to Afghanistan last month, Harris said she supports a "political solution" to the war that would allow U.S. troops to return home.
- She has not taken a public position on Trump's planned U.S. troop withdrawals from Afghanistan and Syria.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 21, 2019
Elizabeth Warren:
Withdraw US troops from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria
- Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria: U.S. should withdraw troops from those countries.
- Warren, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, supports reducing the U.S. military's presence in some global hotspots.
- Last November, she called for
the immediate withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan.
- Warren also says the U.S. should withdraw service members from Iraq and Syria, though she has not gone into detail about what timetables she would support for those withdrawals.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 17, 2019
Kirsten Gillibrand:
Withdraw from Afghanistan & Syria
- Afghanistan and Syria: Withdraw from Afghanistan. Do not arm Syrian rebels.
- For years, Gillibrand has pushed for U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.
- She has opposed efforts to arm Syrian rebels and she slammed the airstrikes ordered
against Syria in the spring of 2018, saying that Trump did not have the authority to order them.
- Gillibrand also argued that President Barack Obama did not have authority to send U.S. troops to Syria.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 16, 2019
Kirsten Gillibrand:
End military aid to Saudi Arabia to attack Yemen
- Gillibrand co-sponsored legislation that would end U.S. support for the Saudi-led conflict in Yemen.
- She has written that Saudi Arabia is using American weapons to "terrorize Yemeni civilians."
- In regards to the murder of journalist
Jamal Khashoggi, Gillibrand wrote that the U.S. should hold "the Saudi government to account."
- It is not clear where she stands on whether Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman personally was responsible for the killing.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 16, 2019
Tulsi Gabbard:
End US support for Saudi-led conflict in Yemen
- In general, Gabbard believes the U.S. should be less involved in foreign conflicts and have a smaller troop presence in many places around the world. She has specifically called on the U.S. military to pull out of Afghanistan.
- Gabbard also
opposes US military presence and action in Syria.
- The congresswoman believes U.S. action around the world often benefits extremists. She also has argued that Democrats and others should not back away from the term "Islamic extremists."
- Gabbard
has said the US is complicit in a humanitarian disaster by giving support to the Saudis, because they have cut off aid to large parts of the Yemeni population while battling rebels there.
- She also sent a controversial tweet that was highly critical
of Trump following news that the U.S. was standing by Saudi leadership despite intelligence implicating the kingdom's crown prince in the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.
- Gabbard believes Saudi Arabia is a hub of anti-Western extremism.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 14, 2019
Julian Castro:
Withdraw US troops from Syria
- Syria: Withdraw U.S. presence over a planned period of time.
- In an appearance on NBC's "Meet The Press" last month,
Castro said it was "time for us to pull out of Syria," but insisted it must be on a planned timeline.
- He criticized Trump's sudden announcement of a potential withdrawal as "not the way it should be done."
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 12, 2019
Donald Trump:
We've beaten ISIS in Syria; bring US troops home
Just two days after US Secretary of Defense James Mattis quit, the top US envoy fighting ISIS, Brett McGurk, also resigned as Washington reeled from US President Donald Trump's dramatic announcement that he planned to pull US troops out of Syria.
McGurk, in his resignation letter, said that the militants were still on the run but not yet defeated, and that the early withdrawal of American troops from Syria would re-create the conditions that gave rise to ISIS.Trump continued with his slew of
tweets defending the Syria announcement. "We were originally going to be there for three months, and that was seven years ago--we never left. When I became President, ISIS was going wild. Now ISIS is largely defeated and other local countries, including
Turkey, should be able to easily take care of whatever remains. We're coming home!" Trump wrote.
Trump's declaration of triumph has alarmed key NATO allies, who said such a change of course on Syria risks damaging the fight against Islamic State.
Source: Jerusalem Post on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Dec 22, 2018
Lindsey Graham:
Hearings on Trump's decision to withdraw troops from Syria
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis quit as Washington reeled from US President Donald Trump's dramatic announcement that he planned to pull US troops out of Syria. Mattis did not mention Syria specifically in his resignation letter, but he did speak
of a difference of opinion between himself and Trump.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reassured Israelis that their security has not been compromised. He pledged to increase Israeli activity against Iran in Syria. The absence of US troops
will make it easier for Iran to strengthen its foothold in Syria and smuggle arms into the country.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham called for immediate Senate hearings on Trump's decision to withdraw all American troops from Syria. Graham, a member
of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told reporters he wanted to hear directly from Mattis at any hearing. Trump has given no sign of changing his mind. He promised to remove forces from Syria during his 2016 election campaign.
Source: Jerusalem Post on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Dec 22, 2018
John Kasich:
Keep up pressure on North Korea to give up nukes
North Korea's acquisition of nuclear weapons remains another major concern. Until we have a definitive, verifiable treaty that formally ends the Korean War and denuclearizes the Korean Peninsula, we will need to keep up the pressure on Pyongyang to
relinquish its nuclear weapons. Additional sanctions can and should be put in place. That includes sanctions on large Chinese companies that enable North Korea's nuclear weapons program. North Koreans who are working overseas to earn the regime the hard
currency that funds that program should be sent home on an expedited basis. The US & its allies should also put in place a much tighter counterproliferation regime on shipments going into or out of North Korea. Ultimately, however, it will take peaceful
regime change in Pyongyang to resolve the nuclear threat North Korea poses in Northeast Asia. The country best positioned to facilitate such a change is China, provided it can be sure that the US, South Korea, and Japan will not exploit the situation.
Source: 2020 presidential hopeful Kasich column in Foreign Affairs
Jun 6, 2018
John Kasich:
Balance cooperation and confrontation with China
To deal with the rise of China, we must strike the right balance between cooperation and confrontation. In other words, the world needs more American engagement, not less.Looking to fill the political void created by the current vacuum in US
international leadership, Chinese leaders are making ridiculous assertions that their country will define the meaning of freedom and liberty.
The principal strategic challenge for the US is to integrate China into the international system in a manner
that allows us to protect our interests in Asia and safeguard international institutions against China's assaults on democratic values. China's ultimate goal is to end what it considers to be American dominance and to replace it with a new order in
which Beijing gets an equal voice in setting the rules. It wants to push the US out of the western Pacific, undermine our alliances in the region, and re-create a Sinocentric sphere of influence in Asia free from challenges to its authoritarian rule.
Source: 2020 presidential hopeful Kasich column in Foreign Affairs
Jun 6, 2018
John Kasich:
Forward-deploy US forces in the Pacific to challenge China
China does not need to be contained as the Soviet Union once did during the Cold War [but] deterring China also has a military dimension. The U.S. military should forward-deploy greater numbers of forces in the western Pacific and continue to challenge
China's illegal attempts to expand its territorial control there. Washington should make it clear that there will be a significant price to pay for any attack on U.S. assets in space and expand our regional allies' missile and air defense capabilities.
In the long run, however, the best chance for peace lies in a China that itself chooses reform. To kick-start that process, we will have to support efforts to give mass audiences in
China better access to the unvarnished truth about what is going on in the world.
Source: 2020 presidential hopeful Kasich column in Foreign Affairs
Jun 6, 2018
John Kasich:
War on terror should focus on threats to US homeland
After 17 years, the war on terrorism has become a series of open-ended commitments. In Afghanistan, Pres. Obama put in place a series of half measures, and Pres. Trump sent additional troops into a conflict that cannot be resolved militarily. Both
presidents' decisions were mistakes. We must now look instead to diplomacy to negotiate a sustainable US exit.Regarding ISIS, in Syria and Iraq, the terrorists' strongholds have been all but eliminated. The only remaining core US interest at stake is
preventing ISIS from using those countries to mount future attacks against us.
Going forward, we need to be much more careful and focused about how we fight terrorism. We have to develop better criteria for when to intervene abroad. In particular, we
should restrict our major counterterrorism efforts to instances in which our homeland is directly at risk. When it is not, we should avoid getting embroiled in civil wars and instead use diplomacy to rally international partners to assume the lead.
Source: Kasich column in Foreign Affairs: 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jun 6, 2018
Lindsey Graham:
Damage from war with North Korea would be worth it
The damage caused by a US war with North Korea would be "worth it," Senator Lindsey Graham said. The comments further fuel speculation the US is gearing up for action against Pyongyang. "All the damage that would come from a war would be worth it
in terms of long-term stability and national security," the Republican senator told CNN. "I'm completely convinced that President Trump and his team reject the policy of containment. They've drawn a red line here and it is to never let North Korea build
a nuclear-tipped missile to hit America."
Graham's comments come as the US is reportedly considering military action against North Korea, should Pyongyang build a nuclear missile capable of striking the US.
Graham, a member of the Senate
Armed Services Committee, is a longtime hawk who has often advocated for US military action, including calling for the US to send 10,000 troops to fight Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) in Iraq.
Source: Russia Today RT.com on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Mar 3, 2018
Tom Steyer:
Trump foreign policy strategy is to react, not think
There is no Trump foreign policy. There is no thinking.
There is only political posturing and impulsive reaction. Weak and dangerous.
Source: Twitter posting by Tom Steyer, 2020 presidential hopeful
Feb 26, 2018
Oprah Winfrey:
Gave post-9/11 platform to anti-war advocates
On foreign policy, Oprah responded to the September 11 terrorist attacks with a five-part series on her program discouraging war in Iraq. Despite Saddam Hussein's demonstrated possession of weapons of mass destruction,
Iraq's violation of countless international resolutions, and a decades-long American policy of regime change in Iraq, Oprah gave her platform exclusively to anti-war advocates such as Michael Moore, Fawaz Gerges, and Thomas Friedman.
Source: The Daily Wire speculation on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jan 9, 2018
Tulsi Gabbard:
Use military to fight terrorists, not for regime change
She told Fox in 2014 that she would direct "the great military that we have" to conduct "unconventional strategic precise operations to take out these terrorists wherever they are."
"In short, when it comes to the war against terrorists, I'm a hawk," she told the Hawaii Tribune-Herald last year. "When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, I'm a dove."
Gabbard lambasted the Obama administration for avoiding the phrase. In one interview, she told the host that "the vast majority of terrorist attacks conducted around the world for over the last decade have been conducted by groups who are fueled by
this radical Islamic ideology."
Gabbard complained that by "not using this term 'Islamic extremism' and clearly identifying our enemies," the administration couldn't "come up with a very effective strategy to defeat that enemy."
Source: Jacobin Mag., "Not your friend": 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 27, 2017
Tulsi Gabbard:
Opposes fighting in Afghanistan & Syria; end arms to Saudis
She has called for pulling out of Afghanistan, the longest war in US history, suggesting that the government invest the money instead into "rebuilding our own nation through long-term infrastructure projects." She's opposed US intervention in
Syria since 2013, air strikes in Iraq, and arms sales to Saudi Arabia. She backed Sanders in the Democratic primary because of Clinton's record of supporting "interventionist regime change wars."
Source: Jacobin Mag., "Not your friend": 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 27, 2017
Donald Trump:
To eradicate ISIS, we need action, not talk
Trump and Pope Francis have made no effort to hide their shared enmity over the past few years. During the presidential campaign, the Pope--who is revered for his deep humility and sincere affinity for the poor and downtrodden--was cutting about Trump's
plan to build a border wall with Mexico. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian. This is not the gospel," Francis said in February 2016.Trump fired back via Facebook: "If and
when the Vatican is attacked by ISIS, which as everyone knows is ISIS's ultimate trophy, I can promise you that the Pope would have only wished and prayed that Donald Trump would have been President because this would not have happened.
ISIS would have been eradicated unlike what is happening now with our all talk, no action politicians."
Trump added, huffily, "No leader, especially a religious leader, should have the right to question another man's religion or faith."
Source: Vox.com on 2020 Presidential Hopefuls, "Trump-Pope Meeting"
May 24, 2017
John Kasich:
Eradicate leadership of North Korea but no military strike
Kasich says he knows how to tackle the issue of North Korea: take out leader Kim Jong Un and his allies. "I believe the best way to solve this problem is to eradicate the leadership," Kasich said. "There are ways in which that can be achieved."
Kasich said that other options that the Trump team seems to be pursuing, including a military strike against the nation, would result in a major loss of lives. "Moving big warships in and having a war, I don't think that's going to work," he said. "Too
much loss of life. We are getting very serious that they cannot have an ICBM," Kasich said.
In order to avoid the devastating loss, he said the US could "remove a number of the top people and have a more benign leadership there that understands what's
at risk."
When asked if the US should do this militarily, Kasich responded, "You have to have very good intelligence. I don't want to say any more than that, but that's what I believe we need to do, as opposed to a full military strike."
Source: CNN's Caroline Kenny on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Apr 28, 2017
Bill Weld:
Supports libertarian "restraint" on military action
Weld has always been fiscally conservative and socially liberal, he says: "I've self-identified as a small-l libertarian since I was in law school." On military matters, he was once a typical GOP hawk, but events in Iraq, Libya, and
Syria have made him reconsider and he now supports Johnson's more "restrained" posture.
Source: Molly Ball in The Atlantic: 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 3, 2016
Lincoln Chafee:
Calls drone strikes "extrajudicial assassinations"
He does think Hillary Clinton is far too hawkish to be president--and indeed, she's more hawkish than our current Democratic president and more hawkish than most of the Democratic Party. She supports the Obama administration's
anti-ISIS airstrikes in Iraq and Syria; Chafee opposes them. Her State Department helped develop the legal rationale for the drone war; Chafee calls drone strikes "extrajudicial assassinations."
Source: Vox.com e-zine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 16, 2015
Lincoln Chafee:
Neocon advocates for invasions are "delusional"
Chafee ripped Republican Jeb Bush for suggesting that President Obama screwed things up in Iraq. No, said Chafee, the mess was made by Bush's brother, George W. and, Dick Cheney. If Bush thinks differently, "he's just drinking some kind of neocon
Kool-Aid." Referring to Obama-bashing Republicans and neoconservative advocates for new invasions and incursions as "delusional," Chafee warned that, "We just cannot have those people come back to make those same kind of mistakes."
Source: The Nation magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Aug 20, 2015
Lincoln Chafee:
Iraq: There was "no evidence" of WMDs, it was a hoax
"I went to the CIA, sir, before I took my vote on the Iraq War. Listen to this: I asked them to show me all the evidence you have--'I have to vote on this in three weeks.' And all the analysts laid out what they had for evidence and it wasn't anything.
I was there for more than an hour. There just was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction. It was all a hoax. That's the facts. That's the truth."
Source: The Nation magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Aug 20, 2015
Lincoln Chafee:
Iraq war was on hawks' wish list; feared another Vietnam
Chafee outlined the "primary three" reasons for his decision to vote against the war. The first was his fear that it would be for the next generation what Vietnam had been for his. Second, "I had learned in the nine months of the Bush-Cheney
administration prior to September 11 not to trust their word." Third, the war in Iraq had long been on the "hawks'" wish list, and a visit to the CIA convinced him "there was no intelligence" that made the case for intervention.
Source: Daily Beast e-zine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Jun 25, 2015
Donald Trump:
Walk away from Iranian nuclear talks; increase sanctions
Trump has said that the U.S. mishandled current Iran negotiations and should have walked away from the table once Tehran reportedly rejected the idea of sending enriched uranium to Russia. The real estate developer told Fox News that he would
increase sanctions on the Persian state. Trump has been sharply critical of the Obama administration's handling of relations with Israel and has called for a closer alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls
Jun 16, 2015
Mike Gravel:
Dislodge ourselves from Iraq, by working with Iran & Syria
On the consequences of withdrawal from Iraq: "All the statements made that it will be a bloodbath are correct. There is no question. But we instigated it. We brought it about. There is nothing we can do about that. Now, we must dislodge ourselves.
The answer is to engage with Iran. We forget that Iran helped us to whip the Taliban in Afghanistan. So, countries like Iran and Syria ought to be engaged. These countries have a greater stake than we have in the stability of the Middle East."
Source: National Review magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Aug 1, 2007
Marianne Williamson:
Form Department of Peace to pro-actively plan
A community college in Michigan welcomes an author who wants to form a "Department of Peace" within the United States government. Williamson says, "Given the extreme level of violence on our planet, it is time to expand our
thinking to pro-actively plan and strategize peace." She also notes that a peace department "would be so helpful because it would give international heft to government strategizing for peace."
Source: Human Events magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
May 3, 2006
Lincoln Chafee:
Iraq war wasn't about WMDs, but changing Middle East
According to Senator Lincoln Chafee, the only Republican to oppose the war, "I never believed that the Iraq war was about weapons of mass destruction.
It was this grand vision of changing the Middle East."
Source: Counterpunch magazine on 2020 presidential hopefuls
Oct 29, 2005
Page last updated: Nov 01, 2021