Sam Brownback in State of Michigan Archives


On Energy & Oil: Energy security: drill every place you can find resources

Q: Where do you draw the line? Do you support drilling/exploration off the coasts of Florida and California? A: I think you go in every place that you can to find resources. I put forward a proposal for us to be energy-secure--not independent, energy-secure--in 15 years. I don’t think it’s realistic for us to say we can be independent of every country around the world on oil supplies or on energy supplies in the near future, given our dependence and given the nature of what the global economy is like.

Q: On the issue of exploration, you said yes to the coast of Florida, and you say yes to ANWR?

A: I voted yes for ANWR, and I would support those in other places, environmentally sound. We have to do it in environmentally sound fashion.

Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan Oct 9, 2007

On Jobs: Unions do good, but need effective oversight

Q: Are unions good for America?

A: Sure. They’ve been good for the United States, I think, historically. My mother was a union member. It helped her on health care. There can be abuses, and I think you’re seeing some of them taking place. And I think the government has to work aggressively to see that those don’t take place and that there is effective oversight, which I don’t think you see during a Democrat administration. I think that is good for union members to have that effective oversight.

Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan Oct 9, 2007

On Technology: Cut the Advanced Technology Program; it’s corporate welfare

Q: So name one program you would cut.

A: Advanced Technology Program would be a good one to start with. It goes towards high-end spending, corporate welfare programs. There’s an abundance of those. That’s why you got to change the system, so that it regularly requires a vote of Congress on things to cut. That’s what’ll actually reduce spending.

Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan Oct 9, 2007

On War & Peace: Iraq war is about terrorism, not oil

Q: Would we have gone to war in Iraq if we weren’t so dependent on Middle East oil?

A: I don’t believe that in the least. What I voted for was the war on terrorism. And Afghanistan was where the Taliban was -- where al Qaeda was located; it was run by the Taliban. And we saw in Iraq what we thought was the mixture of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. And it was in 2003, this was in close proximity to 2001, when we had the 9/11 crisis, and I wasn’t about to trust that Saddam Hussein wasn’t going to mix terrorists with weapons of mass destruction. And we haven’t found the weapons of mass destruction, but that doesn’t mean we leave. And I think the Bush administration has generally done well military, and I think the military has done a fabulous job. I think we have done poorly on the political side. That’s what has been poorly done by the Bush administration--it hasn’t been well-handled politically. We’ve got to get a better bipartisan political solution--we can.

Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan Oct 9, 2007

The above quotations are from State of Michigan Politicians: Archives.
Click here for other excerpts from State of Michigan Politicians: Archives.
Click here for other excerpts by Sam Brownback.
Click here for a profile of Sam Brownback.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Oct 13, 2021