State of Minnesota Archives: on Energy & Oil
Erin Murphy:
Cap-and-trade to achieve MN greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the Green Solutions Act of 2008.- The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
- The
right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
- A greenhouse gas cap-&-trade program
is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized in the 1990s under President George
H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; passed Senate 43-21; Erin Murphy sponsored the program report and then voted YES; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Feb 18, 2008
Erin Murphy:
Keep CO2 emissions ban; no new coal plants
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; Rep. Murphy voted YES; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 11, 2011
Heather Johnson:
Federal legislation has limited alternative energy
Q: What is your opinion on oil fracking?A: Safety and cleanup of any spills should be their responsibility, that should apply to oil or fracking or any business. There should be no risk taken by the people; [and public] land rights should not be up
for grabs for a private company's benefit.
Q: Do you support an increase in alternative forms of energy, including green energy such as solar and wind?
A: Yes. I don't know how much the public is aware how much the government has limited alternative energy through legislation, and given tax breaks for oil or car production for gas guzzlers. In the early 2000s SUVs were given tax breaks and fuel
efficient cars were penalized. That's discrimination and a misuse of power. We should utilize any and all forms of energy and let business conduct business, as long as they are responsible for impact and any potential problems.
Source: News Examiner Q&A on 2014 Minnesota Senate race
Aug 11, 2014
Jason Lewis:
Unlawful for EPA to impose cap-and-trade on refineries
The Executive branch has a duty to 'execute' or implement the law passed by Congress. While some deference to agency interpretation is warranted, agencies' power to make law is limited by the specific Congressional authority delegated to the agency.
In too many cases now, unelected bureaucrats are rewriting law--the EPA recently cited the Clean Air Act to implement a utility regulation that would have cost consumers $10 billion. In this instance, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA acted unlawfully.
The administration's $500 billion Clean Power Plan is yet another attempt to legislate and impose 'cap and trade' legislation that would have a direct impact on Minnesota's largest refinery. The Federal Register now has more than 82,000 pages--
in fact, there is a new agency regulation coming out every two and half hours, costing our economy $1.9 trillion annually. That's why I support the REINS Act, which would require Congress to vote up or down on any regulation that costs over $100 million.
Source: 2016 Minnesota House campaign website JasonLewis2016.com
Nov 8, 2016
Jim Abeler:
Voted NO on removing CO2 emissions ban
Jim Abeler voted Nay (Passage of SF 86). Bill Passed, 76-54Legislative title:Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition
Legislative summary:Vote to exempt certain energy imports from the prohibition on increasing CO2.
- Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock coal; and
- The facilities began construction after April 1, 2007.
Source: Minnesota House voting records (Votesmart synopses)
May 11, 2011
Jim Abeler:
Supports regional cap-and-trade emissions program
Jim Abeler voted Yea on Conference Report for HF 3195.Legislative title:Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap and Trade Program Report
Legislative summary:Vote to establish a cap and trade program under the Midwestern Greenhouse
Gas Accord by January 15, 2009.
- Commissions studies related to the impact a cap and trade program will have on the economic, environmental, and public health, potential revenue, and governance options for determining expenditures of revenue.
-
Specifies that up to $500,000 shall be used to fund the studies.
- The report shall also cover implementation mechanisms; the potential for the program to allow the state to meet existing greenhouse gas reduction goals; legislation in
Congress to implement a federal cap and trade program; economic, environmental, and public health impact study; and the potential cap and trade revenue study.
Source: Minnesota House voting records (Votesmart synopses)
May 13, 2008
Jim Abeler:
No subsidies for wind and solar
Question topic: Governments should pay to develop wind and solar energy solutions when these are not economically feasible.
Abeler: Strongly Disagree
Source: Faith2Action iVoterGuide on 2014 Minnesota Senate race
Jul 2, 2014
Jim Abeler:
Cap-and-trade to achieve MN greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008". - The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
- A greenhouse gas
cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized in the
1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; Rep. Jim Abeler voted YES; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Jim Hagedorn:
Don't turn our economy upside-down due to climate change
Much rhetoric around climate -- in politics, at least -- is environmentalists vs. the status quo. Take this example from the recent MPR News debate with candidates for Minnesota's 1st
Congressional District: "To transform our energy sector and turn our economy upside down over the premise that at some point the world comes to an end? No, I don't agree with that," said Jim Hagedorn, the Republican candidate.
Source: Minnesota Public Radio on 2018 Congressional MN-1 election
Oct 18, 2018
Jim Newberger:
Defended coal-burning Xcel plant in Becker
The biggest handout to a fossil fuel-loving monopoly in Minnesota history is also the biggest accomplishment of Jim Newberger's young career.Newberger fiercely defended the coal-burning Xcel plant in Becker; he loved every ounce of its
20 million tons of annual carbon emissions. When those were set to go offline, Newberger begged for a replacement natural gas plant to be built in Becker.
He succeeded. So did Xcel.
Newberger's bill lets Xcel build that plant "at its sole discretion," meaning it could proceed without government oversight.
The monopoly's $1 billion plant project will be paid for by its one-plus million ratepayers. Expect Xcel to thank Newberger by funding his campaign.
Source: City Pages on 2018 Minnesota Senate race
Aug 16, 2017
Jim Newberger:
Don't prioritize green energy
Q: Do you support or oppose the statement, "Prioritize green energy"?
A: Oppose.
Source: OnTheIssues interview of 2018 Minnesota Senate candidate
Mar 15, 2018
Jim Newberger:
Does not believe climate change is man-made
It would be hard to find two candidates further apart on issues than state Rep. Jim Newberger and U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who are fighting for the six year seat in the U.S. Senate. In a debate at the Minnesota State Fair, Republican Newberger called
for a return to free-market health care, said he does not believe climate change is man-made and declared a wall is needed along the Mexican border.Democrat Klobuchar, meanwhile, told the Minnesota Public Radio debate
audience that federal laws such as allowing sick people to obtain insurance should be continued, said she agrees with a majority of scientists who think climate change is at least partly due to human activity and felt Mexican border security should be a
combination of a wall, fence and personnel.
In a rare area of agreement, Klobuchar and Newberger said the federal government needs to find a way to keep prescription medicine costs down.
Source: Twin Cities Pioneer Press on 2018 Minnesota Senate debate
Aug 24, 2018
Karin Housley:
Increase Minnesota's Renewable Energy Standard to 50%
Lawmakers from both parties were chief authors of a bill to increase Minnesota's Renewable Energy Standard to 50% by 2030. The legislation would update existing Renewable Energy Standard, which has lowered energy costs, grown clean energy jobs, and
increased tax payments to communities. This outstanding leadership by Rep. Joe Schomacker, Rep. Erin Maye Quade, Sen. Karin Housley, and Sen. Nick Frentz helps build on Minnesota's tradition of bipartisan support for market driven clean energy policy.
Source: Fresh-Energy.org on 2017-8 Minnesota special election
Feb 27, 2017
Karin Housley:
Diverse portfolio of energy: wind, solar, fossil fuels
Housley said she is in favor of renewable sources of energy. But, she said, she does not favor a homogeneous set of energy sources, instead electing for a diverse and balanced portfolio--whether that's wind power or solar, or oil and
other forms of fossil fuel."Nobody disagrees that clean energy is good energy, but it's not the only source of energy," Housley said. "You really have to work with everybody and not be all in on one form of energy."
Source: Brainerd Dispatch: 2017-8 Minnesota Special Senate Election
Jul 31, 2018
Karin Housley:
Paris Climate Accord would cost trillions & kill jobs
Climate Change: Consider climate change a serious threat?Smith: Yes. "Climate change is real & poses a threat to our economy & our health." Pushed for 50 percent renewable electricity by 2030 in Minnesota & helped expand renewable energy in
state government.
Housley: Unclear. Opposed Paris Climate Accord, says would cost trillions, kill jobs & hinder oil, gas, coal & manufacturing. Wants a "balanced approach to climate policy."
Source: 2017-2018 Minnesota special election CampusElect.org Guide
Nov 1, 2018
Kurt Bills:
Remove CO2 emissions ban; authorize new coal plant
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; Rep. Bills voted YES; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 11, 2011
Lori Swanson:
Proceed with caution approach to solar energy gardens
Solar power currently provides less than 1% of Minnesota's total electricity generation. But the push for more production continues, and utility customers are being heavily encouraged to "invest" in "community solar gardens." Not everyone is convinced
these "gardens" are a bright idea. Even the Office of Minnesota AG Lori Swanson admits "the sun does not always shine in Minnesota" and "a solar developer's claim that its facility will produce a certain amount of energy may not pan out."
Source: AmericanExperiment.org on 2018 Minnesota Gubernatorial race
Jun 9, 2017
Mark Dayton:
Keep CO2 emissions ban; no new coal plants
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; \bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 22, 2011
Matt Dean:
Voted NO on cap-&-trade for greenhouse gas reduction goals
<Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008". - The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
- A greenhouse gas
cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized in the
1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; Rep. Matt Dean voted NO; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Matt Dean:
Remove CO2 emissions ban; authorize new coal plant
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; Rep. Dean voted YES; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 11, 2011
Michelle Benson:
Minnesota needs an all-of-the-above energy policy
Keeping Minnesota Moving: Minnesota needs an all-of-the-above energy policy so families and businesses have reliable, resilient, and reasonably-priced energy options
that are respectful of the environment. Common-sense energy policy means no new gas taxes, pipelines to safely and efficiently transport fuel, as well as market-driven renewable energy.
Source: 2022 Minnesota Governor campaign website Michelle4MN.com
Dec 23, 2021
Michelle Benson:
Remove CO2 emissions ban; authorize new coal plant
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed & am returning SF 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired electricity
poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; Benson co-sponsored and voted YES; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 21, 2011
Michelle Fischbach:
Voted NO on cap-&-trade for greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008".- The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
- The
right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
- A greenhouse gas cap
and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation:Cap-and-trade was first popularized in the 1990s under
President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.Legislative Outcome:Passed House 91-38 on April 23; passed Senate 43-21-3; State Sen. Michelle Fischbach voted NO; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Michelle Fischbach:
Remove CO2 emissions ban; authorize new coal plant
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; Sen. Fischbach voted YES; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 21, 2011
Mike McFadden:
Approve Keystone; faster permits for gas plants
Q: What do you think Congress should do with energy policy?A: One is approve the Keystone pipeline, which has thoroughly passed multiple environmental reviews. Two is natural gas. There are 24 [LNG liquefied and natural gas plants] around the country
that have applied for permits. I would fast-track the permitting process. If we had these LNG plants up and running, we actually could export to Europe.
Q: Natural gas may contribute to climate change.
A: There's a false choice out there.
You're either for the environment, or you're for the economic growth or business growth. You can do both. You grow; you develop in a responsible way. I'm a big proponent of all forms of energy. Let the market determine what's the most efficient way to
provide energy sources. Look at the improvements we made in the coal industry in terms of what we've been able to do there. Whether its coal, nuclear, natural gas, propane--let's promote it in a responsible way.
Source: Minneapolis Post on 2014 Minnesota Senate race
May 12, 2014
Paul Gazelka:
Remove CO2 emissions ban; authorize new coal plant
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; Sen. Gazelka voted YES; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 21, 2011
Paula Overby:
Pursue green energy aggressively; it is the future
Q: Do you support or oppose the statement, "Prioritize green energy"?A: Support--It is the future of energy production and we should be pursuing it aggressively.
It also offers major benefits in terms of supporting community cooperatives, localized solutions, and energy independence. It is fundamental to the growth of the new grassroots economy.
Source: OnTheIssues interview of 2018 Minnesota Senate candidate
May 13, 2018
Pete Stauber:
Against Paris Climate deal, oppose job killing regulation
Stauber believes the U.S. shouldn't rejoin the
Paris climate deal and favors an "all-of-the-above" policy for energy over what he considers burdensome, job-killing regulation.
Source: MPR Minnesota voter guide: 2018 Congressional MN-8 election
Oct 10, 2018
Rebecca Otto:
Minnesota should lead on clean energy
Rebecca Otto is Minnesota's best opportunity to tackle climate disruption. Rebecca has lived in a sustainable, clean energy home since 1995.
With more than two decades of personal experience in the climate change discussion, Rebecca understands the economics of clean energy and how to make Minnesota into a national leader.
Source: 2018 Minnesota Gubernatorial website RebeccaOtto.com
Nov 1, 2017
Steve Carlson:
Want to see much more science on climate change linkages
Q: Do you believe in climate change, and should the U.S. rejoin the Paris climate accords?CARLSON: We need to study the impact on our economy, wildlife, transportation, and population.
I want to see MUCH more science on the actual linkages we observe between small measured changes and specific changes in the climate. It appears small changes in water temperature, may raise the water levels on the seashores.
Source: CBS-4 Minnesota on 2020 Alabama Senate race
Jul 24, 2018
Tim Pawlenty:
Cap-and-trade to achieve MN greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008". - The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
-
A greenhouse gas cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first
popularized in the 1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
May 19, 2008
Tim Walz:
Climate change is real and urgent
Q: Consider climate change a critical threat?Jeff Johnson (R): No. Says climate is changing naturally and human involvement is debatable.
Tim Walz (D): Yes. Sees climate change as real and urgent.
Q: Should the government limit the levels of
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?
Johnson: No. Believes that a single country's efforts to mitigate climate change would have only a "small effect" & "we don't need to reorder our economy based on climate change."
Walz): Yes.
Supported legislation to restrict carbon emissions. Opposed Trump's decision to withdraw from Paris Climate Agreement.
Q: Support government subsidies for renewable energy?
Johnson: Questions Minnesota's mandates on producing renewable fuels
like ethanol & biodiesel, but promises not to end them if elected.
Walz: Yes. Wants to expand the Renewable Energy Standard, so Minnesota will get at least 50% of its energy from renewables by 2030, up from 21% now.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on Minnesota Governor race
Oct 9, 2018
Tim Walz:
Invest in statewide electric vehicle charging infrastructure
The Governor and Lieutenant Governor propose investing more than $262 million in environmental stewardship projects across the state. The plan includes $20 million in flood hazard mitigation grants to local governments, $13.8
million in statewide electric vehicle charging infrastructure, $60 million in capital improvements to bus rapid transit, more than $20 million for local government stormwater construction grants, and $8 million in dam safety repair and reconstruction.
Source: 2022 State of the State Address to Minnesota legislature
Jan 18, 2022
Tina Liebling:
25% renewable energy by 2025
As energy production evolves so must Minnesota. In 2007, Minnesota passed a renewable energy standard of 25% by 2025. Many utilities are close to achieving the goal, but we must do even better. I support the proposal for 50% of our energy to come
from renewables by 2030. This is not only better for our environment and Minnesotans' wallets, it creates good paying jobs. Clean energy jobs grew 78% from 2000 to 2014, compared to total 11% for total employment. And climate change MUST be contained.
Source: 2018 Minnesota governor campaign website TinaLiebling.com
May 2, 2017
Tina Liebling:
Cap-and-trade to achieve MN greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative Summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008". - The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
- A greenhouse gas
cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized in the
1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; Rep. Tina Liebling voted YES; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Tina Liebling:
Keep CO2 emissions ban; no new coal plants
Legislative Summary: Repeals Carbon Dioxide Emissions Prohibition: - Authorizes 1,500 megawatts of energy to be imported from out of state facilities if they meet the following requirements:
- The facilities are fueled by feedstock
coal; and
- The facilities began construction after 2007.
- Repeals exemption based on a project contributing a specified fee per ton of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the project, to fund permanent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Veto Message: I vetoed and am returning Senate File 86, a bill that significantly rolls back Minnesota's restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions by energy utilities. Minnesota does not now need any new coal-fired power plants. Coal-fired
electricity poses unacceptable risks to human health and to our climate.
Legislative Outcome: Bill Passed House 76-54 on May/11/2011; Rep. Liebling voted YES; bill passed Senate 44-22 on 5/21/2011; vetoed by Gov. Dayton on May/22/2011.
Source: Minnesota House voting records SF86
May 11, 2011
Tina Smith:
Climate change is real & poses a threat
Climate Change: Consider climate change a serious threat?Smith: Yes. "Climate change is real & poses a threat to our economy & our health." Pushed for 50 percent renewable electricity by 2030 in Minnesota & helped expand renewable energy in
state government.
Housley: Unclear. Opposed Paris Climate Accord, says would cost trillions, kill jobs & hinder oil, gas, coal & manufacturing. Wants a "balanced approach to climate policy."
Source: 2017-2018 Minnesota special election CampusElect.org Guide
Nov 1, 2018
Tom Emmer:
Increase production of coal, gas, oil, plus alternatives
Emmer indicates support of the following principles regarding the environment and energy. -
Promote increased use of alternative fuel technology.
- Support increased production of traditional domestic energy sources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil, etc).
Source: Minnesota Congressional 2008 Political Courage Test
Nov 1, 2008
Brad Finstad:
Voted NO on cap-&-trade for greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008".- The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
-
A greenhouse gas cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized
in the 1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; State Rep. Brad Finstad voted NO; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Brad Finstad:
Voted NO on cap-&-trade for greenhouse gas reduction goals
Legislative summary: This act may be cited as the "Green Solutions Act of 2008".- The legislature finds that a cap and trade program will achieve Minnesota's greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals in a cost-effective manner.
-
The right to emit greenhouse gases should be auctioned to emitting facilities rather than allocated at no cost, with proceeds from the auction invested in projects that advance the transition to a low greenhouse gas-emitting economy.
-
A greenhouse gas cap and trade program is best pursued in cooperation with other Midwestern states.
- A "climate trust fund" is established [to manage revenue from auctions]
OnTheIssues explanation: Cap-and-trade was first popularized
in the 1990s under President George H.W. Bush as a means to efficiently reduce CO2 emissions.Legislative Outcome: Passed House 91-38 on April 23; State Rep. Brad Finstad voted NO; passed Senate 43-21; signed by Gov. Pawlenty on May 19.
Source: Minnesota legislative voting records: HF 3195
Apr 23, 2008
Tim Walz:
Climate change is complex problem & existential threat
Climate change is an existential threat that impacts all Minnesotans and our ability to thrive. Communities, farms, and industry face more frequent extreme weather events that threaten the infrastructure that we rely on to connect all parts of our state,
cause undue economic stress, and place our communities and environment at risk. The duties of the Governor's Advisory Council on Climate Change and Subcabinet are as follows:
Climate Mitigation and Resilience Policy and Strategy Development.
Identify policies and strategies that the State may adopt to meet the economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions goals of the 2007 Next Generation Energy Act and achieve 100% clean energy by 2050.Identify policies and strategies that will enhance the
climate resiliency of Minnesota's natural resources, working lands, and communities.Consider how climate change mitigation and resilience policies and strategies can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy waste.
Source: Minnesota voting records: Executive Order 19-37
Dec 2, 2019
Royce White:
We control prices by being energy independent
Our society relies on energy to function. Our people pay a price for energy, and our nation pays a price for energy. We cut and control that price by being energy independent. This also protects us from unnecessary insecurities in our energy.
Security in our own energy helps our citizens and nation function more reliably. Again, security helps us avoid the temptation to get involved in military conflicts to support our energy needs.
Source: 2024 Minnesota Senate campaign website RoyceWhite.us
Oct 2, 2024
Al Franken:
Delay Keystone pipeline; but if built, use American steel
McFadden accused Franken of holding up energy projects like the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, overburdening rail lines tasked with hauling oil instead of other goods. "There's not been one pipeline built; the Keystone pipeline has been under the
review process for six years," he said. "That is crazy. Until you start passing pipelines, we're going to have a rail car shortage."Franken acknowledged that he voted "to not circumvent the regulatory process," but said he also voted for a proposal
that would ensure that the Keystone pipeline, if it's built, would be done with American steel, seizing on a comment by McFadden over the summer that he would opt for Chinese steel if that saved taxpayer money.
Said Franken: "Those are
Minnesota jobs. I fight for Minnesota jobs. Maybe that's the difference between me and Mr. McFadden. Maybe he sees profits over people."
Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune on 2014 Minnesota Senate debate
Oct 2, 2014
Tim Walz:
Supports nuclear power as part of clean energy plan
Under Walz's leadership, Minnesota adopted an aggressive clean energy plan. We asked if that includes nuclear power, which is controversial because of the potential for accidents and the thorny issue of what to do with nuclear waste. Although Yucca
Mountain, north of Las Vegas, has been designated as the national repository for high-level nuclear waste, Democrats have defunded the project and are seeking alternatives to burying waste at Yucca.But Walz said despite the waste issue, nuclear
should be part of the nation's energy portfolio. "I know the vice president and I talk about an 'all of the above' [strategy]," Walz said. "I know one of the issues, and I know this is a hot topic here in Nevada, the storage issue. And how do we store
the waste? But I do think it's part of it. I think we're going to have an aggressive approach."
Walz's home state of Minnesota has two nuclear generating stations and struggling to deal with the waste generated there.
Source: KNTV ABC-13 on 2026 Minnesota Governor race
Nov 1, 2024
Royce White:
Energy security helps our nation function more reliably
Our society relies on energy to function. Our people pay a price for energy, and our nation pays a price for energy. We cut and control that price by being energy independent. This also protects us from unnecessary insecurities in our energy.
Security in our own energy helps our citizens and nation function more reliably. Again, security helps us avoid the temptation to get involved in military conflicts to support our energy needs.
Source: 2026 Minnesota Senate campaign website RoyceWhite.US
Apr 27, 2025
Jeff Johnson 2018:
Climate is changing naturally; human involvement debatable
Q: Consider climate change a critical threat?Jeff Johnson (R): No. Says climate is changing naturally and human involvement is debatable.
Tim Walz (D): Yes. Sees climate change as real and urgent.
Q: Should the government limit the levels of
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?
Johnson: No. Believes that a single country's efforts to mitigate climate change would have only a "small effect" & "we don't need to reorder our economy based on climate change."
Walz): Yes.
Supported legislation to restrict carbon emissions. Opposed Trump's decision to withdraw from Paris Climate Agreement.
Q: Support government subsidies for renewable energy?
Johnson: Questions Minnesota's mandates on producing renewable fuels
like ethanol & biodiesel, but promises not to end them if elected.
Walz: Yes. Wants to expand the Renewable Energy Standard, so Minnesota will get at least 50% of its energy from renewables by 2030, up from 21% now.
Source: 2018 CampusElect.org Issue Guide on Minnesota Governor race
Oct 9, 2018
Lisa Demuth:
Minnesota needs a true all-of-the-above approach
Minnesota needs a true all-of-the-above approach that keeps energy bills affordable for families and ensures year-round reliability of our grid on the coldest days of winter and hottest days of summer.
I will repeal Minnesota's longstanding ban on nuclear energy, and reform burdensome mandates imposed by Democrats that are driving up your heating and electric bills.
Source: 2026 Minnesota Gubernatorial campaign website LisaForMN.com
Dec 28, 2025
Royce White:
We pay a price for not being energy independent
Our society relies on energy to function. Our people pay a price for energy, and our nation pays a price for energy. We cut and control that price by being energy independent. This also protects us from unnecessary insecurities in our energy.
Security in our own energy helps our citizens and nation function more reliably. Again, security helps us avoid the temptation to get involved in military conflicts to support our energy needs.
Source: 2026 Minnesota Senate campaign website RoyceWhite.us
Jul 23, 2025
Page last updated: Feb 07, 2026