State of West Virginia Archives: on Government Reform
Stephen Noble Smith:
Offer public financing for all state elections
Offer public financing for all state elections. Cap maximum campaign donations for statewide races at $500 per cycle, per race. Limit the influence of lobbyists and dark money. Ban corporate lobbyists from participating in campaigns.
Institute a lifetime ban on former legislators, state office holders and judges from becoming lobbyists. It should also be illegal to be a lobbyist and a legislator at the same time.
Source: 2020 W.V. Gubernatorial campaign website WVCantWait.com.com
Jan 24, 2020
Stephen Noble Smith:
Implement automatic voter registration
Double the number of polling places during early voting; expand the number of polling places by 50% on election day. Institute same-day registration. Install vote-by-mail as an option. Reinstitute paper ballots for all elections.
Make general election day a holiday. Repeal the Voter ID law and implement automatic voter registration. Restore voting rights for every West Virginia citizen. End gerrymandering.
Source: 2020 W.V. Gubernatorial campaign website WVCantWait.com.com
Jan 24, 2020
Jim Justice:
Ban fundraising while the legislature is in session
Justice has called for a series of ethics reforms, including banning fundraising while the legislature is in session so lobbyists and associations that represent various industries can't be extorted for campaign cash.
Justice added, "No politician should be fundraising instead of doing the job they were elected to do." Bill Cole and the Republican leadership wasted $595,000 during the recent special session on the budget.
Source: 2016 W.V. Gubernatorial campaign website JusticeForWV.com
Jun 15, 2016
Jim Justice:
No contributions to legislators during legislative sessions
Jim will end the free lunch for politicians by:- Banning all fundraising activity during the regular legislative session for all state government officials. No elected official at the state level will be able to accept contributions during the
legislative session or solicit political donations of any kind. Many states, including Maryland and Virginia, impose fundraising restrictions during legislative sessions.
- Capping lobbyist meals for lawmakers at $75 per meal, and limiting the number
will stop "dark money" organizations from playing shell games to conceal exactly where the money is coming from to pay for political advertising. West Virginians deserve to know who is spending money on our elections.
Source: 2016 W.V. governor campaign website JusticeForWV.com
Nov 16, 2015
Michael Folk:
No party-line voting; yes write-in voting
Sen. Cole voted YES on a bill to disallow voting a straight party ticket by one mark on a general election ballot: West Virginia legislative summary for S.B.249:- An electronic voting system may not be approved by the State Election
Commission or any county commission unless it meets the following requirements:
- It secures or ensures the voter absolute secrecy in the act of voting.
- It permits each voter to vote at any election for all persons, including permitting each voter
to write in the names of persons for whom he or she desires to vote whose names do not appear upon the ballots.
- It permits each voter to change his or her vote up to the time when his or her ballot is deposited in the ballot box.
-
Direct-recording electronic voting machines must generate a paper copy of each voter's vote.
Legislative Outcome:Passed Senate 25-8-1 on Feb. 3; passed House 87-13-0 on March 10; Signed by Gov. Tomblin March 25.
Source: W.V. legislative voting records: S.B.249
Mar 10, 2015
Bill Cole:
No party-line voting; yes write-in voting
Sen. Cole voted YES on a bill to disallow voting a straight party ticket by one mark on a general election ballot: West Virginia legislative summary for S.B.249:
An electronic voting system may not be approved by the State Election
Commission or any county commission unless it meets the following requirements:- It secures or ensures the voter absolute secrecy in the act of voting.
- It permits each voter to vote at any election for all persons, including permitting each voter
to write in the names of persons for whom he or she desires to vote whose names do not appear upon the ballots.
- It permits each voter to change his or her vote up to the time when his or her ballot is deposited in the ballot box.
-
Direct-recording electronic voting machines must generate a paper copy of each voter's vote.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate 25-8-1 on Feb. 3; passed House 87-13-0 on March 10; Signed by Gov. Tomblin March 25.
Source: W.V. legislative voting records for SB 249
Feb 3, 2015
Earl Ray Tomblin:
No party-line voting; yes write-in voting
Gov. Tomblin signed a bill to disallow voting a straight party ticket by one mark on a general election ballot: West Virginia legislative summary for S.B.249:
An electronic voting system may not be approved by the State Election
Commission or any county commission unless it meets the following requirements:- It secures or ensures the voter absolute secrecy in the act of voting.
- It permits each voter to vote at any election for all persons, including permitting each voter
to write in the names of persons for whom he or she desires to vote whose names do not appear upon the ballots.
- It permits each voter to change his or her vote up to the time when his or her ballot is deposited in the ballot box.
-
Direct-recording electronic voting machines must generate a paper copy of each voter's vote.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate 25-8-1 on Feb. 3; passed House 87-13-0 on March 10; Signed by Gov. Tomblin March 25.
Source: W.V. legislative voting records for SB 249
Feb 3, 2015
Jeff Kessler:
Straight party ticket voting ok
Sen. Kessler voted NO on a bill to disallow voting a straight party ticket by one mark on a general election ballot: West Virginia legislative summary for S.B.249:
An electronic voting system may not be approved by the State Election
Commission or any county commission unless it meets the following requirements:- It secures or ensures the voter absolute secrecy in the act of voting.
- It permits each voter to vote at any election for all persons, including permitting each voter
to write in the names of persons for whom he or she desires to vote whose names do not appear upon the ballots.
- It permits each voter to change his or her vote up to the time when his or her ballot is deposited in the ballot box.
-
Direct-recording electronic voting machines must generate a paper copy of each voter's vote.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate 25-8-1 on Feb. 3; passed House 87-13-0 on March 10; Signed by Gov. Tomblin March 25.
Source: W.V. legislative voting records for SB 249
Feb 3, 2015
John Buckley:
Require photo identification for voting
Q: Do you support stricter enforcement of voting rights?
A: Support, including photo identification.
Source: Email interview on 2014 W.V. Senate race with OnTheIssues
Sep 5, 2014
Natalie Tennant:
Supports electronic voter registration and vote-by-mail
Senate Bill 477, a bill that modernizes the voter registration system, passed the state legislature today. "Citizens will be able to fill out their voter registration application electronically at the DMV, at their local library, or at their house--
anywhere they have access to a computer," Secretary Tennant said. "This legislation makes it easier for people to apply to become a registered voter, but still keeps in place all the safeguards to make sure these people live where they say they live.
This legislation will cut down on the number of paper applications county clerks will have to process, saving some valuable time and reducing costs." SB477 is the most recent of Secretary Tennant's bold initiatives to modernize the elections process.
Other successful efforts were a pilot project that allowed deployed military and their families vote over a secure internet connection, a Vote By Mail pilot project, and a process that allowed counties to utilize community voting locations.
Source: W.V. Secretary of State website
Apr 12, 2013
Natalie Tennant:
Voter photo ID laws place unrealistic barriers
At the Pew Center on the States' Voting in America 2012 conference, Secretary of State Natalie Tennant said [of a recent W.V. investigation], "photo ID laws would not have prevented elected officials from manipulating the election process.
I am not against voter ID laws if it means every single person who wants to vote has a valid ID to present at the polls. Even if we have 99% of people with ID, that's still not enough. We cannot place unrealistic barriers or arbitrary rules that will
impact a certain group of people or keep a single person from being able to cast a ballot when they are legally registered to vote. I am dedicated to providing open, fair, and honest elections to the people of West Virginia--and making sure everyone
follows the rules."Tennant also pointed out webcasting of voter information press conferences, the revision and improvement of poll worker training materials, and being present in all 55 counties on election day to work closely with election officials
Source: W.V. Secretary of State website
Dec 10, 2012
Joe Manchin III:
Not more government, but easier government
When it came to jobs and economy, Raese was all about free enterprise and less government, which he said was unlike his opponent Senator Manchin. "Most of his answers are about government and what government can do," said
Raese. "Mine are not about government and what government can do, I think we need less government."
Manchin said he isn't about more government but rather making government easier to work with. "Government should be your partner. It shouldn't be your adversary, it should be your ally," said
Manchin. "That's what we don't have in Washington and that's what I've been working for."
Source: West Virginia MetroNews on 2012 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 3, 2012
John Raese:
I think we need less government
When it came to jobs and economy, Raese was all about free enterprise and less government, which he said was unlike his opponent Senator Manchin. "Most of his answers are about government and what government can do," said
Raese. "Mine are not about government and what government can do, I think we need less government."
Manchin said he isn't about more government but rather making government easier to work with. "Government should be your partner. It shouldn't be your adversary, it should be your ally," said
Manchin. "That's what we don't have in Washington and that's what I've been working for."
Source: West Virginia MetroNews on 2012 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 3, 2012
John Raese:
End the coalition of taking & government control
On health care, Manchin and Raese clashed over the Affordable Health Care Act. Manchin says a complete upheaval of the law would be the wrong idea. "I have been for reforming, repairing, and not repealing. Pre-existing conditions is wrong,"
Manchin said. "You don't have to throw the baby out with the bathwater, sometimes you just have to change the water every now and then."
Raese disagrees with that. In 2010, Raese fully supported a full repeal of the bill. And he still does. "This country, right now, I call it a coalition of taking.
They are taking our money, they are taking our power, and they are taking our freedom, and they are giving it government to control. That's unacceptable," Raese said.
Source: West Virginia Public Broadcasting on 2012 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 3, 2012
John Raese:
Federal earmarks create career politicians
Millionaire Republican industrialist John Raese complained that federal earmarks create career politicians in a bloated government and indicated he'd be reluctant to pursue public dollars for projects best left to the private sector. "I don't think it's
the best answer for the problems of West Virginia," he said. "I want to bring back the spirit of capitalism--to create the freedom of an individual." Raese argues state economies would be better served by cutting taxes and easing regulations on
business.But Manchin said states depend on the federal government for key infrastructure like roads, water and sewage lines, and broadband Internet access. Without government, he said, poor, rural states would suffer. "The free enterprise system is
not going to go there. They're only going to go where the market is," Manchin said. "And for all of us to have an opportunity there has to be a partnership. The federal government and state government should be your partner, not your provider."
Source: Washington Post coverage of 2010 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 18, 2010
Joe Manchin III:
Suspended state earmarking as governor; do same federally
Manchin and Raese are seeking a seat that has for more than 50 years by a politician famous--critics would say infamous--for directing billions of dollars to West Virginia in budget earmarks, also known as "pork-barrel spending."
Asked whether they would continue Byrd's tradition,
Raese indicated he would not, calling earmarks taxation without representation. "That is something that career politicians are very effective at," he said. "It services them, but it doesn't service
Americans."
Manchin said he suspended earmarking at a state legislative level when he first took office as governor. He said earmarking was one reason why there needed to be a balanced budget amendment.
Source: State Journal coverage of 2010 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 7, 2010
John Raese:
Supports line-item veto & balanced budget amendment
As for stimulating the economy and getting back to work, both candidates favored a free-market approached as opposed to government taking a leading role in job creation. Raese was critical of the economic stimulus package passed by
Congress, comparing it to the New Deal of the Great Depression. Both men called for a balanced budget amendment that would require Congress to balance the nation's books every year and not run up debt.
Neither candidate provided details about how they propose balancing a multi-trillion-dollar budget, but Raese said he favors giving presidents line-item veto power--something that
Byrd staunchly opposed. Manchin said the only time the amendment should be suspended was during war or a national emergency.
Source: State Journal coverage of 2010 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 7, 2010
John Raese:
Earmarks are taxation without representation
Manchin and Raese are seeking a seat that has for more than 50 years by a politician famous--critics would say infamous--for directing billions of dollars to West Virginia in budget earmarks, also known as "pork-barrel spending."
Asked whether they would continue Byrd's tradition,
Raese indicated he would not, calling earmarks taxation without representation. "That is something that career politicians are very effective at," he said. "It services them, but it doesn't service
Americans."
Manchin said he suspended earmarking at a state legislative level when he first took office as governor. He said earmarking was one reason why there needed to be a balanced budget amendment.
Source: State Journal coverage of 2010 W.V. Senate debate
Oct 7, 2010
Jeff Kessler:
Limit campaign contributions from PACs and corporations
Q: Do you support the current limit of terms for West Virginia governors?A: Yes.
Q: Do you support limiting the number of terms for West Virginia state senators and delegates?
A: No.
Q: Do you support limiting the following types of contributions to state legislative candidates... Individual?
A: Yes.
Q: PAC?
A: Yes.
Q: Corporate?
A: Yes.
Q: Political Parties?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
A: Yes.
Q: Do you support imposing spending limits on state-level political campaigns?
A: Yes.
Source: W.V. Congressional 2008 Political Courage Test
Nov 1, 2008
Page last updated: Oct 14, 2021