Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader: on Government Reform


Ralph Nader: Denying D.C. vote is colonial mentality by congress

The hallway outside the arena were filled with activists [who] advanced D.C. statehood, living wage, healthcare, eliminating child poverty, an end to the death penalty, revoking the cruel life-destroying sanctions on the innocent Iraqi people, protecting the global environment, free Tibet, and sustainable self-sufficient economies. The turnout, estimated at 10,000, was gratifying.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p.288

Ralph Nader: Clean money means clean elections

It's way past time for a shift of power today from big business to the people. Power is the central contention of politics.

Just think about it: you go down to vote, you expect it to count, and the votes are cut off at the pass by fundraising dinners where fat cats pay off politicians for present and future favors and the politicians shake down the fat cats in a kind of combined symbiosis of legalized bribery and legalized extortion.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p.289

Ralph Nader: Government obstacles to voting make our elections oppressive

The test of any democracy is whether after a national trauma significant reform follows. From obstacles to registration to incomplete or erroneous voting lists (note the miscues regarding ex-felons in Florida), to machine errors, to confusing ballot designs, to poorly publicized changes of precinct locations, and on and on, millions of voters are not having their votes counted or counted accurately.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p.296-297

Jesse Ventura: Credits win to public financing & same-day registration

We learned more about end-running the media during our visit with Governor Jesse Ventura. How did you reach the people of Minnesota to win the election? I asked him. He replied that he was at about 10% in the polls and then got on 10 statewide debates with the other major candidates. Second, the state provided substantial public funding of election campaigns, and third, Minnesota had same-day voter registration. In about a month, Ventura went from 10% to 38% and won the governorship in a three-way race. Same-day registration led to a last-minute surge of voters for him that helped raise the total average in an off-year election.
Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p.182 Oct 14, 2002

Joseph Lieberman: Tort law is an out-of-control lottery

In Oct. 2000, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA) sent an email to their members urging them not to vote for Ralph Nader.

In 2000, ATLA received more bad news. Al Gore chose their nemesis, Senator Joseph Lieberman, as his vice presidential running mate over Senator John Edwards, who was a successful trial lawyer from North Carolina. In addition, Gore surrounded himself with an inner circle of longtime advisers and speechwriters right out of a tort "deform" nightmare.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p.263-264 Oct 14, 2002

Ralph Nader: Lack of election opponents let corrupt pols stay in office

When House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was subject to a devastating page-one expose in the Washington Post five years ago, nothing happened. The article cited instances of DeLay bordering on making extortionate demands for money from special interests, and the House Ethics Committee did not even open an investigation. At the August Republican convention, Congressman DeLay became a veritable talent agent reportedly offering lobbyists packages starting at $15,000 and rising to $100,000 in terms of how exclusive one’s meetings could be with the elected bigwigs.

Like most congressional districts, DeLay’s is one-party dominated, and he wins by large majorities with only nominal opposition. This is typical. In about 90 percent of the 435 congressional districts, there is one-party rule. So choice is effectively denied to a vast majority of voters.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, Chapter One Oct 9, 2002

Ralph Nader: Non-violent demonstrations are ignored by the press

Certainly the most interesting events at the [2000 Democratic and Republican conventions] took place in the streets, parks, and parking lots near the convention halls. But the story here incredibly became one not of protest but of crowd control & police preparation. Unlike in the 60s & 70s, peaceful mass demonstrations no longer receive much media coverage. Many a weekend march of 50,000 to 200,000 people for labor rights or the environment receives little more than a picture & a caption in the Washington Post.

Consequently, demonstrators began to figure that nonviolent civil disobedience or, in some frustrated instances, controlled violence against property, would mesh with the television media’s mantra, “If it bleeds, it leads.” Studious, well-prepared news conferences, absent these demonstrations, don’t make the grade with the eyes and ears of the press. The reaction of course is for the police to organize massive counterforce against what is perceived as a giant safety problem

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, Chapter One Oct 9, 2002

Ralph Nader: National Youth Convention bypasses electoral fluff and bluff

As part of the National Youth Conventions, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group called Youth in Action [held a presidential forum]. As the presidential candidate for the Green Party, I was asked to listen to each youth panel summarize its points and then respond, which I did in some detail.

Our interaction was one of the most stimulating exchanges in the campaign. I was pleased to hear young people in their teens and early twenties articulating a political agenda separate from the tactics, fund-raisers and fluff and bluff surrounding the major-party candidates.

These Youth convocations were intricately planned and promoted. They were supported by major foundations, such as the Pew Charitable Trusts, and major nonprofits, including the League of Women Voters and the YMCA and YWCA. These conventions give young men and women a voice and involvement, when so often they are alienated from presidential campaigns that ignore their existence, except for the occasional scripted photo op.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, Chapter One Oct 9, 2002

Ralph Nader: Dems & GOP say they want campaign reform, but do nothing

Politics, as it is practiced, is the art of having it both ways. One party--the Democrats--regularly says all the right things about campaign finance reform but does nothing. The other party--the Republicans--rarely says the right thing about the corruption of our elections and does nothing. Both use the same ready cliche when asked why one party doesn’t lead on reform by example: “We do not believe in unilateral disarmament.”

There are two lessons to learn from these [Democratic and Republican] political conventions. One is that our nation’s political leaders are chosen by one big entertainment extravaganza. Voters are left with only limp imagery, hackneyed slogans, and the omnipresent thirty-second propaganda advertisement. Dr. Pavlov soon becomes the patron saint of the political horse race.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, Chapter One Oct 9, 2002

Ralph Nader: Citizens should shape elections, not just spectate and vote

In 1984 my associates and I made our first determined effort to broaden the agenda between the two presidential candidates. We called this project The Difference. As usual, the Republican and Democratic candidates--in this case Reagan and Mondale-- managed to narrow the number of issues they would advance. The Difference challenged the candidates to take stands and debate subjects such as energy and consumer protection.

It did not work. Voters were expected to be polled, to be spectators and to vote. Their participation in the whole election process as an active civic force shaping the substance and tone of the campaign--why, that wasn't the way it was done.

During the 80s, it became ever more clear that the Democrats were losing the will to fight. Business money pouring into party coffers melded into the retreat from progressive roots and then into an electoral tactic that argued for defeating Republicans by taking away their issues and becoming more like them.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p. 26-27 Jan 17, 2002

Ralph Nader: Binding "None Of The Above" disqualifies election if it wins

The general goal of the 1992 presidential write-in campaign was to meet with people throughout the state [of NH] to hear and discuss a broad pro-democracy agenda. The subjects were contained in what I called the "Concord Principles," having released them one very cold winter morning on the steps of the state office building. The principles were essentially a "new democracy toolbox" replete with election reforms, such as public funding of elections, more convenient voter registration rules, binding none- of-the-above (NOTA) lines that would cancel that election and order a new election with new candidates if NOTA won the most votes, and 12-year congressional term limits. The principles also offered simple strategies for consumers, workers, and taxpayers to band together with membership organizations and work for universal health insurance, trade union growth, an end to corporate welfare, renewable energy, and safer food and other products, and to try to avert future perils and injustices on the horizon.
Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p. 38 Jan 17, 2002

Ralph Nader: FEC regulations prevent 3rd-party campaigns

In 2010 we had to navigate the treacherous regulatory waters of the Federal Election Commission. A few examples will give a sense of the FEC thicket that had to be cleared.

Can someone voluntarily drive the candidate to and from events without converting it into a dollar contribution for gasoline and mileage expenses? Do we have to put "Paid for by the Nader 2000 election committee" on our buttons? Answer: No, there is a de minimus rule for items that are too small.

If you are finding the above listing tedious, try studying the guidelines and then transferring them into operation among the headquarters staff, field people, and everyone else they have to guide. Full public financing of public elections would remove the vast number of regulations. The FEC thicket has become another barrier to entry by small parties that simply cannot afford the cost of clearing a path toward fund-raising.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p. 65-66 Jan 17, 2002

Ralph Nader: Ballot access restrictions set up as barriers to 3rd parties

After fund-raising, our next priority was getting on the ballot in every state. In no Western democracy are the hurdles for candidates to access the ballot anywhere near as high as ours. Another obstacle for smaller parties to challenge the duopoly.

Paid signature gatherers can become very expensive, as Pat Buchanan found out: more than $200,000 just to get him on the NC ballot. In WV & GA, the filing fee is $4,000. PA stipulates that signature forms have to be on special colored paper. Officials would provide only 400 forms when our volunteers needed more than 2,000. Downloading the forms from the Internet was prohibited.

I wrote my first article on ballot access barriers in 1959. And matters have in many states only gotten more burdensome. For decades, third parties have had to spend time and money confronting ballot barriers. We did not get on the ballot in 7 states.

Source: Crashing the Party, by Ralph Nader, p. 74-76 Jan 17, 2002

  • The above quotations are from Crashing the Party:
    How to Tell the Truth and Still Run for President
    Taking on Corporate Governance in an Age of Surrender
    , by Ralph Nader.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Government Reform.
  • Click here for other issues (main summary page).
  • Click here for more quotes by Ralph Nader on Government Reform.
2012 Presidential contenders on Government Reform:
Republicans:
Rep.Newt Gingrich(GA)
Rep.Ron Paul(TX)
Gov.Mitt Romney(MA)
Sen.Rick Santorum(PA)
Democrats:
Pres.Barack Obama(IL)
V.P.Joe Biden(DE)
Third Parties:
Green: Gov.Gary Johnson(NM)
AmericansElect: Gov.Buddy Roemer(LA)
>Libertarian: Jill Stein(MA)
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Jul 04, 2012