John McCain in John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac


On Budget & Economy: Consistent conservative voting on free-market principles

For someone whom critics characterized as insufficiently conservative in the 2000 Republican primary, McCain compiled a domestic voting record in the House that reflected a standard, and highly consistent, conservative record. In this, he was no different from any other sun-belt conservative, espousing a fairly predictable line on a range of issues which hung together, perhaps loosely, but which hung together nonetheless.

He was on the right-hand side of most "values" issues--at a time when they had NOT been endorsed by Democrats. In economic policies, McCain's priorities also revealed the same type of free-market principles as Phil Gramm of Texas, "Boll Weevil" Democrat-turned-Republican, who moved from the House to the Senate in the early 1980s and would continue to be one of McCain's closest allies, even though they diverged on campaign finance reform and tobacco legislation.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.148 Sep 20, 2000

On Civil Rights: 1987: 1st Senate committee was Indian affairs, crucial to AZ

McCain's committee assignments would prove crucial to the development of his later political career. Having inherited Sen. Barry Goldwater's seat, McCain soon found himself neatly fitting into two issues that Goldwater had made his own: Indian affairs and defense. The first was a natural fit for an Arizona politician, for Goldwater had long been a supporter of tribal rights in Arizona. McCain received the political backing of every Arizona tribe.

As a freshman senator and something of a POW celebrity in Washington, McCain also got a seat on the powerful Armed Services Committee, which controlled budgetary appropriations.

McCain's third committee appointment, to the Commerce Committee, has proved to be the area of his greatest legislative publicity. Tobacco legislation, and his advocacy for telecommunications deregulation, emerged from his role on this committee.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.153-154 Sep 20, 2000

On Corporations: Skilled chair of Senate Commerce Committee since 1997

After the 1996 election, McCain moved up from the #2 position on the Commerce Committee to assume the chairmanship. Both lobbyists & industry representatives had long eyed McCain as a rather controversial member of the Commerce Committee, if only because his commitment to free markets and deregulation ran deeper than the normal cozy relations with industry or sectors of industry.

As chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, McCain became the senator charged with the issue of forging consensus on tobacco legislation--an unlikely issue in that McCain was himself an avid smoker in the Hanoi Hilton. The bill, christened the McCain bill, passed through the Commerce Committee by a vote of 19-1. Members of both parties, with an eye to events beyond the 1998 mid-term elections, suggested that McCain's skill in shepherding such a contentious issue through committee demonstrated presidential caliber. (The sole dissenting negative vote belonged to the conservative Republican John Ashcroft of Missouri.)

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.180-183 Sep 20, 2000

On Environment: 1980s: 1st House committee was water rights, crucial to AZ

To ensure his reelection, McCain got on the right committees. He joined a committee dealing with water rights, crucial to the urban growth of the Southwest and the Rocky Mountain states. (The expansion of Phoenix was made possible by access to strategic water resources in turn connected to federal irrigation projects and dam construction).

McCain got a seat on a committee dealing with aging issues, crucial in a state that, because of its dry, temperate climate, had absorbed many retirees from other parts of the country.

By 1984, he got on the choice Armed Services Committee which was crucial in a state that had many high-tech defense-related industries. In a larger sense, however, being on the Armed Services Committee also played to McCain's political strength in national-security affairs and foreshadowed a wider, perhaps less parochial focus in the upcoming Senate race, which he surely must have been contemplating after winning an easy reelection to the House in 1984.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.147-148 Sep 20, 2000

On Foreign Policy: 2000: Internationalist vision with populist caution

In the 2000 primary, McCain was the only major candidate to articulate a truly "national" vision for foreign policy. The mystery was why McCain did not fuse the issue of foreign policy with a domestic agenda as part of a seamless package--in effect picking up on Reagan's message of vigilance abroad and less government intrusion at home.

Ultimately, McCain is an internationalist with a populist touch. A former soldier, he shares with Reagan a skepticism about so-called experts, yet McCain's skepticism is leavened by long operational experience. Unlike Bush the elder, McCain is immunized from the charge of being an East Coast internationalist, a Rockefeller Republican. Unlike Bush the younger, McCain has demonstrated a flare for foreign policy, with a capacity to engage in a thrust-and-parry that runs beyond coached lines.

The strength of McCain is that he speaks with a sense of gravity, [and] with the sense of conservative caution in the face of many threats to America's security.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.212-214 Sep 20, 2000

On Government Reform: 2000: Theme "reformer & outsider" attacked as Senate insider

McCain's stance as an anti-Washington outsider was ideally suited to the early primary of N.H. but also to challenging the Clinton-Gore administration.

The Bush team had asked what McCain had actually accomplished in Washington. What were his so-called reforms? On key issues, they argued, McCain had been consistently shot down. McCain had failed to persuade Congress to pass either tobacco legislation or campaign finance reform.

Second, the Bush campaign attacked McCain's claim to outsider status. Reminding voters that McCain was far more the Washington insider than he suggested, Bush took to calling the senator "Chairman McCain." Of course, McCain had indirectly given them this issue, by overplaying his outsider status.

Third, Bush stole McCain's message, in effect, calling himself a "reformer with results."

Most Republican primary voters got exactly what they wanted: NOT reform but restoration, albeit one with a patina of reformist veneer to make it palatable.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.223-225 Sep 20, 2000

On Government Reform: Early Congressional races included large war chests

Early in his career, McCain would have struck one as an unlikely advocate for changing the campaign finance laws. As a dark horse in the 1982 House primary, McCain had amassed a huge war chest, which allowed him to outspend more prominent candidates in a media blitz. In 1986, he used his even bigger war chest to help scare off A-list challengers, such as then-Governor Bruce Babbitt, in the bid to assume Barry Goldwater's Senate seat.

Though the McCain-Feingold proposals have gone through multiple incarnations, the gist of the reform legislation touched on accepting voluntary spending limits, which differ from state to state, in exchange for free broadcast time and other concessions. A second component has involved banning so-called "soft money," that is, money given, not to the candidates outright, but for party-building purposes. "Soft money" is, in fact, a camouflaged donation to candidates, a way of evading the campaign finance laws.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.226-227 Sep 20, 2000

On Government Reform: McCain-Feingold reforms never appealed to GOP base

Groups as diverse as the American Civil Liberties Union (on the left) ad the Christian Coalition (on the right) have opposed McCain-Feingold as an interference on free speech and issue advocacy.

Many Republicans have opposed McCain-Feingold because it would constrain their ability to rake in money from corporate donors. Quite simply, Republicans currently have a fund-raising edge over Democrats. By contrast, the Democrats, with the support of organized labor, are better organized at the grass-roots level, which perhaps makes them objectively less dependent upon, but in reality no less addicted to, "soft money." Though less conspicuous, Democrats have discreetly opposed any reform of the campaign finance laws for much the same reasons as Republicans have. Nonetheless, because they are a minority party within Congress (and thus have less to lose from opposing the status quo), Democrats have tended to support reform.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.226-227 Sep 20, 2000

On Government Reform: Reform focus endears him to many, but alienates GOP insiders

Although we think of reform as utilitarian and operational, the strongest impetus is a sense of moral outrage against the rottenness or incompetence of the political process. Ultimately McCain and other campaign finance reform stalwarts have proved unabl to channel the growing cynicism of the policies of both parties to their advantage.

The issue of campaign finance reform has made McCain the darling of many who believed that money has indeed corrupted the political process; it also has, however, made him something of a persona non grata among those within his own party who rather like the status quo.

McCain has not reassured his GOP fellow travelers how such reform would work to their mutual advantage. He has not convincingly suggested how it would be tactically shrewd for conservatives to get ahead on the issue. In short, he has not argued the case on its conservative merits. Instead, McCain has framed the issue in terms that played to his maverick strengths but also to his maverick weaknesses.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.228-229 Sep 20, 2000

On Government Reform: Reform was a lonely message in 2000

McCain's political voice has always seemed one step ahead of his actual position, which is perhaps the penalty of anyone with a vision. He is thus open to assault from those whose positions veer little from the predictable fault lines.

Ultimately, reform is a complicated process of watering down strident ideas, thereby bringing change, but perhaps not too much.

What is perhaps most intriguing about McCain 2000 was the loneliness of his message. He has ventured down a public road that politicians, particularly senators, tend not to take, preferring instead the technical aspects of brokered deals. McCain possesses Clinton's policy knowledge but matches it to Reagan's conviction and credibility and, in the politics of reform, credibility is the most important asset. What is certain is that change will take place. The real question concerns the direction of change, and just how much influence McCain will have. And that is a chapter that remains to be written.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.241-242 Sep 20, 2000

On Health Care: 1998 tobacco bill attempted regulation via $1.10/pack tax

Pres. Clinton, in a White House ceremony, endorsed the 1997 agreement to regulate tobacco--the deal that had been brokered between the tobacco companies and certain state attorneys general. The bill, christened the McCain bill, passed through the Commerc Committee by a vote of 19-1. The McCain bill had proposed a cigarette tax of $1.10 per pack.

Slowly but surely, however, things began to unravel, precipitated by the tobacco companies' media blitzkrieg against the McCain bill. Ultimately, the tobacco companies spent nearly $50 million in media spots.

The tobacco industry advertisements fixed on one subtle, though not insurmountable contraindication to the McCain bill. If tobacco was indeed addictive, then the addicted smoker was all but compelled to pay increased taxes. The fact that the majority of cigarette smokers were in lower income brackets made it an even more regressive tax. The McCain bill failed in the Senate.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.184-187 Sep 20, 2000

On Homeland Security: Focuses on issue-specific waste, not overall Pentagon reform

Relatively speaking, McCain has been silent on the politics of military reform. Presumably, he has opinions on how to shake up the military bureaucracy--as sprawling a bureaucracy as one would find in the entire political universe--but those opinions did not figure prominently in his rhetoric about changing the status quo in Washington.

Early in his political career, McCain had actually bragged that he could bring back fat defense contracts to his Arizona district. McCain emerged, not only as a sophisticated voice on national security issues, which he was, but also sufficiently secure to rail against Pentagon procurement waste on an issue-specific basis, and to do so while still maintaining his hawkish credentials.

Only the former POW, third generational scion of a military family, and currently second-ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, could begin that overdue house-cleaning at the Pentagon, which so many idealistic, committed officers view as necessary.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.230&232 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: To understand McCain, understand grandfather Slew

One cannot really understand Senator John S. McCain II without understanding the grandfather, universally known as Slew.

To contemporaries, Slew was something of a proverbial "old salt," ready to cuss the elements with a colorful turn of the phrase. It was said he spoke in two languages: English and profane. Indeed, he was known as one of the best cussers in the entire Navy. Popular, combative, feisty, Admiral Slew McCain was a character, and to be a character is in some senses to have a reputation, not altogether positive, that follows one like a shadow. He appeared a throwback--perhaps to the age of frigates and the naval melee.

In an age of increasingly sophisticated naval technology he seemed one governed by impulse and instinct. He seemed, in short, an old-fashioned sailor.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 1-3 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Community of origin is the Navy, not a geographic community

McCain is without a geographic point of origin. A child of the services, McCain was born into a community walled off from the civilian world and, in its own way, far stronger than any of the geographical communities. It is an idealized, a self-contained world--sometimes described as a citadel or fortress--but NOT typically thought of as a training ground for future politicians.

McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone. In reality, he was born into that reassuring American blue and gold universe that one could find in naval installations from San Diego in the Pacific to Norfolk in the Atlantic. In common parlance, McCain was what was affectionately known as a Navy brat.

More to the point, McCain was a Navy junior, which carries a certain elite connotation, possibly reserved for the children of high-ranking officers. The term "brat" suggests that the child is something of a benign nuisance; "Junior" suggests a measure of entitlement and continuity.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 21-22 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Described himself as a "jock," but not exceptional

On the campaign trail, McCain was wont to refer to himself as a jock. In "Faith of My Fathers," McCain made constant reference to his immersion in sport--wresting, football, tennis. "I wasn't an exceptional athlete," he noted, "but I was good enough to earn the respect of my teammates and coaches."

Then he went on to write that he turned his reputation as a "credible athlete" and a "troublemaker" into a distinction as a "leader of sorts." For McCain, sport formed an outlet for his competitive streak; it was a way for overcoming any and all insecurities. McCain contrasted himself with his father, who had not such outlet or perhaps even aptitude for athletic context and who later poured all his nervous, brittle energy into his work.

At Virginia Episcopal, McCain's prep school, sport is never simply about sport. The prep school approach to sport tended to resemble the Spartan ethic in which the student is thrown into the maelstrom of competition whether he likes it or not.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 30-32 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Temper usually directed at those higher; seldom at underling

At the Naval Academy, as in political life, McCain stood up to bullies. Here is the origin of the famous temper. Critics suggest that McCain's temper is problematic, but McCain's temper is typically directed at those higher than him. It is directed against those who affront his honor or dignity, against what he perceives as a false accusation, or, most tellingly, against a corruption of procedure, practice, or the spirit of the endeavor. We seldom hear of him verbally abusing a staff member or an underling.

"Pick on someone your own size" seems to be a very McCain trait. He may have been an irritant to many in his Academy days, but he was never a bully. In this, he completely resembled Dwight D. Eisenhower in his cadet days.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 48 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: From Hanoi to C.F.R., never chose path of least resistance

McCain constantly tried to, and did, prove himself through ordeal. This is the ultimate rebuttal to the charge that McCain himself did not deserve anything, that his life was easy. His life was anything but easy.

One wonders if McCain deliberately looked for ways to make his life hard, to pick struggles for the sake of struggle as if to prove a certain worthiness for life's battle. It is a resistance to the charge of softness.

In every instance, in the active pursuit of a combat assignment in Vietnam, in his confrontation with his Vietnamese captors, in his pursuit of campaign finance reform in the face of mounting and often bitter opposition within his own caucus, McCain has not chosen the path of least resistance. He has chosen the hardest--and in Vietnam, the most honorable--path. Having made the choice, McCain rarely backs down. By contrast, he shows a tendency to proverbially dig in his heels and not give ground.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 48-49 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: War injuries left him unable to raise arms above head

McCain came back from Hanoi with several bones broken from the ejection, healed improperly from the shoddy medical attention, coupled with repeated abuses and torture. McCain received reconstructive therapy, outside of that he received at Bethesda Naval Hospital, from a person who provided the service without charge. Step by step, McCain worked back toward being able to move his elbow, each time a little bit more. In the world of the naval aviator, the measure of rehabilitation was if he could fly--everything was tangential to that.

When McCain went to Florida for the physical screening, he urged the doctors to make their assessment on his physical suitability for flying, not on how his arms looked, which was, admittedly, not good. (Even to this day, he cannot raise his arms to comb his hair.) McCain had, however, regained much of his movement, thanks to the intensive physical therapy. Ultimately, he passed the physical and was cleared for a flying assignment.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.129-130 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Won 1992 AZ House election as newcomer & confident war hero

Prior to settling in AZ, McCain made his contacts with the Washington political consultants. Justifiably fearful of the carpetbagger charge, the consultant cautioned that he run for office, at the earliest, in 1984. Ever impatient, McCain viewed his new job as a chance to make contacts in AZ in a bid for office in 1982. The audacity of the whole enterprise was nothing short of astonishing: that he, an outsider with no roots whatsoever in the state--could represent a state on the basis of nothing other than drive and an admittedly honorable military record. Politics, apparently, rewards confidence.

McCain, however, had several advantages. He had a measure of name recognition on the right, which loved its war heroes, particularly if they could work the circuit. McCain had "test-marketed" his story in the popular press. {And he had] personal discipline: after the Hanoi Hilton, the marathon of running a campaign, of taking the hits and giving them back, was child's play.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.143 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: 1990: McCain & Glenn exonerated in Keating 5 scandal

In the middle of the Keating scandal in the late 1980s, McCain said that it was the worst experience of his whole life. It couldn't be the worst, someone expressed with surprise, to which McCain responded that indeed it was the worst.

McCain, along wit John Glenn, found himself caught in the middle of an unfortunate investigation. Both men were linked by association with three senators--Cranston, DeConcini, and Riegle--whose actions were highly questionable. Both McCain and Glenn had their otherwise sterling reputations tainted. Three years later, the congressional verdict questioned their judgement, but absolved them of charges, and stipulated that they should not have been subject of inquiry in the first place.

One is liable to suggest that justice was not properly served in the Keating Five investigation. But Cranston was unelectable. DeConcini and Riegle chose not to run for re-election. By contrast, both Glenn and McCain ran for re-election in 1992 and won with relative ease.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.157&173 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Identifies with Teddy Roosevelt, but only some reforms apply

The imagery of Theodore Roosevelt presents political imagery for John McCain. It is, however, perhaps imagery that is most compelling in the broad brushstrokes rather than the detail.

Roosevelt represented the forward-thinking, activist wing of his party against a stand-pat, pro-business wing. Roosevelt was, by virtue of his war experience and his early years into the Dakota Badlands, inoculated against being an effete reformer, a "good-government" know-it-all. How could McCain NOT want to compare himself with this canonized political figure?

Roosevelt was able to advocate reformist change by playing off two extremes of wild-eyed radicals and the worst do-nothing conservatives. In the current language of political campaigns, Roosevelt was able to "triangulate." That was a middle ground that, for all his efforts, McCain could not find, if only because the conditions were different. In short, the reality of present conditions did not match McCain's larger rhetoric.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.236-237 Sep 20, 2000

On Principles & Values: Re-adjusted to civilian life after POW years: no "imbalance"

The years in Hanoi, it was intimated by the Senate whisperers, had unbalanced McCain. The accusation of McCain's putative imbalance was worse than simply false, it veered on the dishonorable. It was a dishonor, not only against McCain, but against every veteran of the Hanoi prison complex. In fact, the opposite was true; McCain--along with the rest of the POWs--adjusted remarkably well to civilian life. This confirms what service chaplains and medics have long known: that those with deep-rooted beliefs (and the almost religious belief of the vast majority of POWs was a belief in America itself) withstand the pressure of repetitive fire, the stress of attack, much better than those without such sustaining faith. This, just perhaps, is the alpha and the omega of Faith of My Fathers--keep faith with the cause, the cause of the fathers and the cause of one's comrades--and one can endure anything.
Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.250 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1966: Part of no-win situation in Operation Rolling Thunder

In 1965 [began] a campaign known as Rolling Thunder. This air campaign lasted until late 1968, by which time McCain was a prisoner of war.

American pilots encountered relatively little resistance from Soviet-made North Vietnamese jets. The real enemy was the North Vietnamese Soviet-built air defense systems, reckoned to be among the best in the world at the time.

In the narrative of his shoot-down, McCain refers to "jinking" the plane, that is, the grueling aeronautical acrobatics necessary to evade this type of defensive systems. McCain actually underplayed the risk to American pilots in what increasingly became something of a no-win situation, in which the American flyers were faced with a double jeopardy of antiaircraft fire on one hand and Soviet surface-to-air missiles on the other. It took nerves and skill, and one wonders if McCain was quite ready for his first combat flight over Hanoi, not because of his flying skills, but because of the novelty of the threat.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 80-82 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1967: Survived USS Forrestal fire that killed over 100

On one typical day in the summer of 1967, McCain was in his cockpit preparing for take-off, when unexpectedly one of the rockets affixed to the neighboring jet malfunctioned. This soon ignited a fuel fire, and in the space of only a few seconds, the Forrestal threatened to become a floating inferno. With quick presence of mind, McCain leapt out of the cockpit and rolled under the neighboring planes to safety, just before his own plane exploded. Wounded, McCain made it past the utter chaos swirling around him, down to the ship's sick bay. There he realized that the infirmary was, in effect, reserved for the unlucky, those who had charred skin peeling off their disfigured bodies.

One suspects that, to this day, McCain cannot recount the incident without betraying intense emotions--the type that causes the speaker to lose composure. Aboard the Forrestal in that frightful day in the summer of 1967 the fire was eventually brought under control, but not before more than 100 crewmen lost their lives.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 83 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1967: Shot down on first mission over central Hanoi

On Oct. 23, 1967, with 23 solo missions over Vietnam, Lt. Commander McCain flew over central Hanoi. He brought his A-4 bomber, that reliable workhorse of a jet, into a dive at the height of 4,500 feet. Suddenly the sky was filled with Soviet surface-to-air missiles that were, quite literally, the size of telephone poles, and it was one of these missiles that hit the wing of McCain's bomber.

McCain immediately ejected out of the cockpit and was temporarily knocked unconscious by the force. The parachute opened and McCain regained consciousness before landing in a small, man-made lake in the center of Hanoi. Weighed down by 50 lbs of equipment and gear, McCain sank several times. A Vietnamese pulled him to shore.

A woman poured tea to McCain's lips, and photos were taken. Kindness or propaganda? Then came the stretcher, and McCain was deposited on a truck and taken to Hanoi's main prison: Hoa Lo, dubbed the "Hanoi Hilton."

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 85-86 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1967: POW son of admiral was propaganda coup for N. Vietnam

Perhaps four days had passed since McCain's shootdown [and he was in a North Vietnamese hospital]. McCain has described this period as one of the most desperate in his five-and-a-half year internment. Upon seeing McCain's leg, the physician said that it was too late; McCain would receive no treatment.

Then an officer rushed in, claiming they just learned that McCain's father was a "big admiral." The North Vietnamese cleared McCain for surgery. The logic was clear enough: the son of a big admiral was a propaganda gold mine. Win him over, it was reasoned, and others would follow. McCain was, in their words, the "crown prince."

For propaganda, the patient must be made presentable, and so a cast was quickly fashioned. Without painkiller, McCain passed out several times as the exasperated physician tried to connect the broken bones in his arm. For propaganda, there must be a change of scenery, so McCain was put in a proper hospital room which was, for all practical purposes, a film prop.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 88 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1967:Refused making propaganda film in exchange for medicine

If McCain did not cooperate with his North Vietnamese captors, he was told he could receive no medical help; he was to express his gratitude to the Vietnamese people; he was to repent for this crimes.

The film of McCain was eventually aired for American audiences in early 1968. Many thought he looked drugged. He was, in fact, fatigued from the prolonged, and futile, medical treatment without painkiller. Nonetheless, McCain was given a leg operation, which the North Vietnamese also predictably filmed. Because of his "bad attitude," the camp authorities refused McCain a second operation--typical of their psychological punishment. Up to this point, the North Vietnamese seemed, if not sympathetic, certainly not conspicuously INhumane. It was only in the face of resistance from a specific POW or a group of POWs, that they brought the full weight of physical coercion down. But that would come.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 89 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: 1968: Under torture, wrote coerced "confession"

[In the Hanoi Hilton in 1968], wrote McCain, "I was beaten every 2 to 3 hours by different guards." After 4 days, he could take no more. "I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine."

Beaten and bloodied, McCain agreed to write the statement that he was sorry for the "crimes" he committed. The interrogator wrote the final draft and, as McCain noted, "it was in their language." For McCain, this was a victory of sorts: if forced to admit anything, the prisoner should keep it as close to communist rhetoric as possible, misspell words, dissemble--all in the goal of making it clear that the confession was with the work of someone who had been tortured, brainwashed, or not within his right senses. "I am a black criminal," wrote McCain, "and I have performed the deeds of an air pirate. I almost died and the Vietnamese people saved my life, thanks to the doctors." He wrote that he had bombed a school, which was yet another lie.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p. 95 Sep 20, 2000

On War & Peace: Silent about origins & necessity of Vietnam

Discussion of politics surrounding the war was something of a taboo subject in the POW environment, as it was on the carriers: it damaged the larger, collective morale. Although McCain briefly discussed the confused operational aspect of the war, he said little about the errors of the war, particularly in the early stages. He wrote little, if nothing, about the lying, and even the subtle subversion of civil-military relations that helped lead America into war in the first place--a question fundamentally distinct from deciding to win the war once committed.

Given that McCain's argument that official lying carries profound policy consequences and corrodes trust between the governors and the governed, his silence on the origins of American involvement in Vietnam is an interesting omission. It may also be an issue that McCain, who spent 5 half years imprisoned as a result, does not care to pursue to its logical implications. In that he could be forgiven.

Source: John McCain: An Essay, by John Karaagac, p.119 Sep 20, 2000

The above quotations are from John McCain
An Essay in Military and Political History
, by John Karaagac.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of John McCain.
Click here for John McCain on all issues.
John McCain on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Jan 13, 2013