George W. Bush in A Matter of Character


On Drugs: Arrested for drunk driving, plead guilty, paid fine

On September 4, 1976, Bush was arrested in Maine for driving under the influence of alcohol after he left a bar. At the police station, his blood alcohol level registered at 0.10, the legal limit at the time. Bush pleaded guilty, was fined $150, and had his driving privileges temporarily suspended. The incident would not come out until just before his election as president.

Bush would later say he could pass a background check going back to 1974. The date was chosen because his father was inaugurated in 1989, and background checks of appointees went back fifteen years. “I’m not going to talk about what I did years ago,” Bush said. “This is a Washington game where they float rumors, force a person to fight off a rumor, then they’ll float another rumor. And I’m not going to participate. I saw what happened to my dad with rumors. I made mistakes. I’ve asked people not to let the rumors get in the way of the facts. I’ve told people I’ve learned from my mistakes, and I have.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 35-36 Aug 5, 2004

On Drugs: A “carefree lad” who drank but never did drugs

If Bush had used illegal drugs [as a youth, when he was arrested for drunk driving], few around him knew about it. “I don’t know why he said all this about drugs,” his girlfriend from 1970 to 1972, said. “He never did anything like that. He was the straightest guy I knew. The most we ever did was go to a party and drink beer.”

“I’ve never known him to take drugs, and he’s never talked to me about taking drugs,” his college roommate said. I’ve never been with him when he was taking drugs. He drank in college, and he drank as an adult. I never saw him drink to excess any more than anyone drinks to excess in college.

I was unmarried and single,“ Bush would latter say. ”I deny every a

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 40 Aug 5, 2004

On Drugs: Spiritual reawakening ended beer and bourbon consumption

[In 1986] Bush had a reawakening of his Christian faith. While vacationing in Kennebunkport, the Reverend Billy Graham, a family friend, talked to him about accepting Jesus Christ as his personal savior. He began to study the Bible and recommit his faith As his spiritual life evolved, Bush began to reconsider his nightly consumption of beer and bourbon. He knew that drinking sapped his energy. Others noticed that it made him overly feisty and annoying.
Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 47-49 Aug 5, 2004

On Education: Required Texas schools to teach phonics over whole language

The whole language approach, used in the “Dick and Jane” series of books which first came out in 1929, required kids to memorize words. Prior to the introduction of these so called progressive methods promoted by education professors, schools going back to ancient Greece had taught kids to read by sounding out letters and combinations of letters, a method known as phonetics.

[As governor in 1995, Bush] understood there was empirical, scientific evidence that could help Texas make better decisions about how we teach kids to read. By then, “science” had become a code word for phonics. But the educational establishment was so fanatically wedded to the whole-language method [so proponents] referred to what the “science” had found about reading.

Bush devised legislation that would tie Texas state funding to use of a reading method whose efficacy had been proven, meaning phonics. To create more accountability, schools that did not improve were penalized.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 61-67 Aug 5, 2004

On Education: Pushed standardized testing as a top legislative priority

Bush devoted much of his first weeks as president to education reform, which would be his first legislative initiative. Until the events of 9/11, reforming education was a principal reason Bush wanted to be president. Bush wanted to provide money to states that agreed to administer standardized reading and math tests annually in grades three through eight.

Under Bush’s proposal, schools would be required to make steady progress toward raising proficiency, with all students required to reach state-defined acceptable levels by 2014. Schools deemed failing for two consecutive years would have to begin to allow students to transfer to better schools. After a third year of failing, they could use public money to hire private firms to tutor students. If a school continued to fail, it had to replace its principal and teachers or reopen as a charter school. Bush wanted vouchers so parents could send their kids to such schools.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 91 & 97 Aug 5, 2004

On Education: No Child Left Behind Act implements phonics nationally

Besides mandating more frequent reading tests and imposing accountability, the [No Child Left Behind Act] provided $1.1 billion to schools that adopted reading instruction methods proven to be effective - meaning phonics. The money was allocated specifically to train teachers to teach phonics and provide new teaching materials Still, most school systems resisted. Teachers’ unions either ejected phonics or took a neutral approach.
Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 94 Aug 5, 2004

On Energy & Oil: Kyoto Treaty is the “emperor with no clothes”

[Under the Kyoto Protocol], the United States was supposed to reduce emissions by 7% below 1990 levels, while developing countries like India, Mexico, and China were exempted. Clinton gave lip service to the treaty and had signed it, but didn’t dare submit it to congress for ratification. He knew it would never pass.

Bush would have none of that. If there was anything he hated, it was charades. He forthrightly announced he would not support the treaty and would instead devote funds to study how to reduce global warming through less drastic measures, including building more environmentally friendly vehicles.

“The emperor Kyoto was running around for a long time, and he was naked,” Andy Card said. “It took President Bush to say, ‘The guy doesn’t have any clothes on.’” European nations, in particular, were incensed that Bush rejected the Kyoto treaty. The French environment minister called it a “scandal.” Yet none of those countries had agreed to honor the treaty.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.119-21 Aug 5, 2004

On Foreign Policy: Foreign affairs is interpersonal leadership, not knowledge

To most Americans, Bush’s grasp of foreign affairs was symbolized by his inability in a TV interview during thee campaign to name the leaders of Taiwan, Pakistan, India, and Chechnya. But as Bush’s aides saw it, foreign affairs was all about leadership and interpersonal skills. That had always been Bush’s strength, along with surrounding himself with smart, capable people.

With Bush, Rice said, “The worst thing you can do is tell him you’re going to do something and then not do it.” The next worst thing is to waste his time beating around the bush. “He is very straightforward himself and tends to like straightforward people,” Rice said. “You don’t want to spend a long time constructing a baroque argument for him. I’ve watched him with many foreign leaders. His best relationship with foreign leaders are when he feels like they are being as straightforward with him as he is with them. He can do that past language barriers. He can sense the body language.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.172-175 Aug 5, 2004

On Health Care: Medicare bill uses market-based solutions to reduce costs

The December 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act embodied Bush’s approach. On the one hand, it helped seniors, many with low incomes, by covering prescription drugs and checkups that were not covered before. While coverage would not start until 2006, a prescription discount card was to start giving seniors savings of 10% to 25% in June 2004. On the other hand, by introducing competition, free enterprise, deductibles, and preventive health care, the new law used free market approaches of the private sector to keep costs in line.

The Bush approach was to use elegantly simple market-based solutions to reduce costs. Under the old Medicare, there was no preventative care. Now when you are a senior and turn sixty-five, you will get a physical. Medicare can identify problems rather than waiting until you are seventy-five and they are more serious. And how could anyone be against giving the elderly prescription drugs that they did not have before?

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.267-68 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: Comforted mother Barbara at age 7 when his sister died

Bush’s sister Robin, then three, was diagnosed with leukemia. The local doctor said there was little hope. On Oct. 11, 1953, Robin died.

Bush’s parents had not told him how serious her condition was. They were afraid he might tell her. When they drove to his school to tell him she had died, George, in the second grade, spotted them and thought he saw Robin. “I got to the car still thinking Robin was there,” Bush said later, “but of course, she was not.”

Barbara Bush said in her memoirs, “He asked a lot of questions and couldn’t understand why we had known for a long time.“ George felt an obligation to comfort his mother, who leaned on her son for support while her husband traveled. He would joke and laugh and make her feel better. The loss gave him a sense of how fleeting and arbitrary life can be, contributing to his lighthearted approach. Bush was bothered by the fact that, outside their family, no one mentioned Robin and her death. As he would later in life, Bush liked to confront issues.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 16-17 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: Cheerleader at Andover & Yale; as full of energy now

[A friend at Yale, Clay] Johnson said Bush’s strengths were the same then as now: “He’s full of energy. He is as quick to make fun of himself as anyone else. It’s not negative or caustic humor. He likes people. He doesn’t like them as a class. He likes them as individuals. That’s why he’s so good at recalling names, because he just zeros in on them. He’s not someone who studies names to win votes or curry favor.” At Andover and Yale, he said, “Everyone seemed to know who George W. Bush was. He wasn’t running for anything, but everyone knew him.“

Bush became a cheerleader at the all-boys school. He would wield a megaphone at football games and make barbed remarks about spectators and players. The show that he and his cohorts put on overshadowed the game, causing some grumbling. But the school paper came to his defense. ”George’s gang has done a commendable job, and now is not the time to throw a wet blanket over cheerleading,“ an editorial said. ”School spirit had never been higher,“ Johnson said.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 22 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: IQ of 120 puts him above 90% of the population

Bush’s Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores were 566 for verbal and 640 for math. Because of an adjustment in the way the scores are reported, the total of 1,206 is equivalent to 1,280 today. [When the scores were published] the liberal elite made fun of Bush. Based on the scores, Bush’s IQ would be more than 120, placing him in the top 10% of the population.

On paper, Richard Nixon was one of the smartest presidents, with an IQ of 143, yet he orchestrated the Watergate cover-up, leading to his resignation. Bush had little interest in learning for its own sake. He was goal oriented and prized actions over words. Only if learning helped him to make a decision was he interested. What he wanted, he would say in rare reflective moments, was to “get as much out of life as possible and to do as much as possible.” When he retires someday to his ranch, he has said, “I want to turn to my wife and say, My dance card was full. I lived life to the fullest.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 23-24 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: Member of secret society Skull and Bones & a fraternity guy

In his junior year at Yale, Bush was one of fifteen students inducted into Skull & Bones, a secret ritualistic society that his father and grandfather also had joined. Skull & Bones prided itself on selecting the best and brightest who would go on to be leaders in their fields and give back to their community and country.

In Skull & Bones’ house were faded portraits of venerable Bonesmen-Rockefellers, Harrimans, Tafts, Whitneys, and Bushes-posing with skull and crossbones. Members called themselves “good men,” a term Bush would use to describe people he trusted and admired.

Bush drank at fraternity parties and engaged in pranks. “George was a fraternity guy, but he wasn’t Belushi in Animal House,” recalled Calvin Hill, a DKE with Bush. He was a goodtime guy. But he wasn’t the guy hugging the commode at the end of the day.

“I think he was far less wild than the media portrays it,” his Skull and Bones friend Donald Etra said. “He drank but not to excess. I never saw any drugs.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 24-26 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: Bush’s smirk shows he’s perturbed, not that he’s arrogant

Bush had waged a highly disciplined campaign that focused on a few core issues. Yet in his three debates with Al Gore, Bush had come across to many as unprepared for the job. Occasionally, Bush made his trademark smirk, a gesture that many took as a sign of arrogance.

The entire performance was a manifestation of Bush’s intense distaste for acting and pretense. When responding to loaded questions from reporters or an unfair charge by Gore, Bush’s honesty impelled him to signal, if ever so subtly, what he really thought. The smirk was not a signal of arrogance but rather an effort to convey his true feelings: that he was participating in a charade. When emerging from sessions with political types, he would roll his eyes and grouse under his breath about the “B.S.” meeting he had just had. In debates with Gore, he could not very well say, “That’s B.S.,” so he would smirk.

“He’s a bad actor, a bad pretender,” an aide said. “What you see is what you get.. A real actor would not show that.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 75-76 Aug 5, 2004

On Principles & Values: Character determines your path; we are not the author

“No man can climb out beyond the limitations of his own character,” Viscount John Morley wrote. So long as Americans ignore that truism, they will continue to be surprised-for better of worse-by the candidate they elect for president.

“When I left here, I didn’t have much in the way of a life plan,” Bush told students when he returned to Yale in 2001. “I knew some people who thought they did. But it turned out that we were all in it for the ups and downs, most of them unexpected. Life takes its turns, makes it own demands, writes its own story. And along the way, we start to realize we are not the author.“

No one could have anticipated the peril that America would face during the presidency of George W. Bush. Yet no one could have been better suited to confronting that peril. It required vision, courage, patience, optimism, integrity, focus, discipline, determination, decisiveness, and devotion to America.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.289-90 Aug 5, 2004

On War & Peace: During Vietnam, did not protest, & counseled supporting war

At Yale, Bush was neither politically active nor introspective. While unrest over Vietnam was beginning to spread, Yale was still relatively untouched by it. “I don’t remember us talking much about the morality of the war,” a roommate said. Another said Bush “believed that his father’s position was correct-we’re involved so we should support the national effort rather than protest it.” A third said, “I told him I was thinking about going to Canada [to avoid the draft] & he said, ”That’s irresponsible.’“

As president, Bush would look back at Vietnam as an example of how not wage war. If a war was worth fighting, it had to be to win, Bush would say. He called Vietnam a “politicians’ war,” one where the politicians made military decisions.

But at Yale, he was acutely aware that anything he did or said could harm his father’s political career. “George didn’t have that luxury [of engaging in protest],” Laura Bush would later say. “He really didn’t. He was absolutely devoted to his father.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 29 Aug 5, 2004

On War & Peace: Bush Doctrine: harboring terrorists treated as terrorism

In a speech in 1999, he had said that those who sponsored terrorism or attacks on the US could expect a “devastating” response. [In Bush’s televised speech on 9/11]. the final sentence read: “We will make no distinction between those who planned these acts and those who harbors them.”

By using the broader term “harbor,” Bush had not only expanded the definition of the enemy, he shifted the burden of proof of the United States would use in going after those who support terrorism. Instead of having to show that another country was aware of and permitted terrorists to operate within its borders, the US would now use military force or apply diplomatic pressure on countries simply because terrorists lived there. The declaration became known as the Bush Doctrine. It was a sea change in foreign policy, one that would make all the difference in the war on terror.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.147-48 Aug 5, 2004

On War & Peace: First president to use the term “Palestine”

Almost everyone recognized the need for a Palestinian state, but the issue was so politically charged that no president prior to Bush had come out and said it. When government officials discussed the issue, they used vague terminology to refer to such a state.

“Presidents used to mumble when it got to a question of a Palestinian state,” Rice told me in her office one Saturday morning. “They couldn’t bring themselves to say ‘Palestinian State.’ In preparing a speech to the UN, he said, ‘There’s going to be a Palestinian state, so let’s say that. What will it be called? It will be called Palestine. If that’s the case, let’s call it Palestine.’“

On November 10, 2001, Bush told the UN, ”We are working toward a day when two states, Israel and Palestine, live peacefully together within secure and recognized borders as called for by the Security Council resolutions.“

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.176 Aug 5, 2004

On War & Peace: CIA argued against “16 words” but took responsibility

The biggest flap arose over Bush’s sixteen-word statement in his State of the Union speech that British intelligence believed Saddam had been trying to buy uranium from Niger. To be sure, George Tenet, as director of Central Intelligence, did not believe the information was solid enough to include in Bush’s speech. Yet when Bush said it, the statement was true.

In fact, M16, the British intelligence service, still believed that its intelligence about Niger was correct. Contrary to the news reports, its information did not rely on bogus documents. Nor did Powell mention Niger eight days after the State of the Union in his formal presentation to the United Nations. Few news stories mentioned these points.

Tenet stepped up to the plate and said he took overall responsibility for the fact that, when reviewing drafts of the president’s speech, his agency did not object more vigorously to citing the Niger report. [Tenet resigned in July 2004]

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.196-97 Aug 5, 2004

On War & Peace: Majority misunderstood that Bush connected Saddam with 9/11

Gore said the war was started because of “false impressions” that Hussein was “on the verge of building nuclear bombs,” that he was “about to give the terrorists poison gas and deadly germs,” and that he was “partly responsible for the 9/11 attacks.”

The “impressions” were, in fact, mis-impressions. To be sure, a majority of Americans thought that Bush had said Saddam Hussein was involved in the September 11 attacks. But they confused Bush’s simple point that, after 9/11, America must never again be in the position of passively waiting for an attack by a country like Iraq.

“After September 11, the doctrine of containment just doesn’t hold any water, as far as I’m concerned,” Bush said with typical bluntness. “We must deal with threats before they hurt the American people again.”

In his interim report, David Kay, the leader of the US hunt for Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, concluded that his team “discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities. concealed from the UN.”

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.200-01 Aug 5, 2004

On Welfare & Poverty: Compassionate conservatism means self-help over gov’t help

Rove recommended books to Bush to read that mirrored Bush’s thoughts that the feel-good, permissive values of the 1960’s undermined the strength of families and helped create dependency on government, ultimately harming the disadvantaged classes. Bush, in discussions with the authors, fashioned the concept of “compassionate conservatism.”

It was not a catchy phrase, and conservatives didn’t like it because it implied that there was something wrong with being a conservative -like calling someone a realistic liberal. But the phrase accurately described Bush’s philosophy. His goal was to help people. He believed the best way to do that was to develop government programs and policies that allowed them to help themselves. He did not see the government as the enemy, as the traditional conservatives did. Often, adjusting existing programs could achieve results while saving taxpayers money. Reducing taxes, in turn, was yet another way to help people.

Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p. 58 Aug 5, 2004

On Welfare & Poverty: Faith-based charity doesn’t violate church-state separation

Bush pushed to allow religious groups to compete for federal money to operate programs for the needy. At first blush, mixing religion with government appeared to be a violation of the principle of separating church and state. But, if organizations were already in place to help the needy, why not give them more funds to do their jobs? Those funds were available for organizations that had no religious affiliation. The fact that an organizations that was affiliated with the Catholic, Jewish, Protestant, or Muslim faiths received federal money did not mean the money would be used to fund religion. It meant the money would be channeled to help those who are hungry, addicted to drugs, or illiterate in the most efficient way possible because the overhead for attacking those problems and the volunteers to work on them already existed. Thus, taxpayers would not have to pay for the new layers of bureaucracy to distribute the aid. In effect, it was a way to leverage the government’s money.
Source: A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler, p.122-25 Aug 5, 2004

The above quotations are from A Matter of Character: Inside the White House of George W. Bush, by Ronald Kessler.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of George W. Bush.
Click here for George W. Bush on all issues.
George W. Bush on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Feb 15, 2019