The Huffington Post: on Education


Antonio Villaraigosa: Mayoral control of 22 poorly performing schools

Villaraigosa said he tried to take over the schools, winning passage of a state law that was later overturned by the courts. Villaraigosa changed his tactics from trying to take control to helping seat a new Los Angeles Unified Board of Education that agreed with his views on educational reform. He also took direct control of 22 poorly performing schools, which he said have turned around.

Also, his added focus on graduating students helped the district reverse its drop out rate, he said. "In 2005, there were only 48 percent of kids graduating," Villaraigosa said. "Last year, it was 64 percent. Almost two-thirds of the students."

Source: Huffington Post on 2014 California Governor race Jun 23, 2013

Barack Obama: We need a sense of urgency about improving education system

Q: How would you assess the American education system, how well is it doing from K to high school?

A: Well, I think it’s doing very well for some. But it’s not doing very well for all. So, No Child Left Behind has been false advertising. And there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency about improving the education system. It is a sense of urgency that we’ve got to restore if we’re going to be able to remain competitive in this new global economy. So, a couple of steps that I think we have to take. Across the board we’re going to have to recruit a generation of new teachers. We’re going to have to pay our teachers more, we going to have to give them more professional development, and we’re also going to have to work with them rather than against them to improve standards. We’ve got to improve early childhood education, because that’s the area where we can probably most effectively achieve the achievement gap that exists right now.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Bill Richardson: Start earlier with preschool for every child under 4

Q: What ought to be the debate about education in America?

A: The debate should be the fact that our high-school curriculums are not competitive. We are 29th in the world when it comes to science and math scores in K through 12. The debate should be not just emphasizing science and math, but art in the schools, civics. Revise high-school curriculums. We gotta start earlier with preschool, early childhood, for every child under 4. Full-day kindergarten. We have got to pay our teachers better. I’d have a minimum wage for teachers. We’ve got to scrap this No Child Left Behind, which is a one-size-fits-all testing that is hurting disabled kids, gifted kids, English-learning kids, that humiliates schools that are not doing well. If a school isn’t doing well, what you do is you help that school. And finally, I would have a national goal that in 15 years, America will be No. 1 in science and math, because that’s competitiveness.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Bobby Jindal: Teach kids the best science; but no comment on evolution

Like the experienced tennis player he is, Jindal repeatedly batted away questions about whether he believes the theory of evolution explains the existence of complex life forms on Earth. Pressed for his personal view, Jindal--who earned a specialized biology degree in an elite pre-med program at Brown University--declined to give one. He said only that "as a parent I want my children taught the best science." He didn't say what that "science" was.
Source: Huffington Post 2014 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls Sep 16, 2014

Bobby Jindal: Local control instead of Common Core

After initially supporting the Common Core attempt to write national education standards, the governor now opposes the project.

Jindal takes the latter stance in the name of greater "local control" of education--which would presumably allow Louisiana schools to teach his version of acceptable "science."

Source: Huffington Post 2014 coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls Sep 16, 2014

Chris Dodd: Advocate for free community-college education

Q: If education is so important, should we provide a free college education for everybody who qualifies?

A: I’m an advocate of a free community-college education, and I do that by offering a match to any state that will equal 50% of that cost. I’ll match that here. In order to release that initial portal of higher education becomes available. To talk about a free education for everyone, regardless of choice they make between private and public institutions, may be difficult, but certainly expanding Pell Grants here, providing more work-study programs, Americorps, I’ve advocated a million slots, not 150,000 that we have today, where educational benefits become a part of that. I’d provide a sliding scale of incentives, so if you choose careers that are not as lucrative as others are, that your payback of loans would be calibrated to those choices rather than insisting upon everyone paying the same amount back. And college costs are going up all the time. So I’m an advocate for indexing as well.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Dennis Kucinich: End No Child Left Behind; end testing as be-all & end-all

Q: Don’t we need a common set of national standards for measuring school performance?

A: My election will mean the end of No Child Left Behind as a way of achieving the education of our children, because the fact of the matter is, No Child Left Behind has made testing the end-all and be-all of education. Of course, you have to have tests, but you to realize that some school districts, the students have already started out behind. We have to make education a priority, but all this debate about education and testing is almost beside the point. We only spend a fraction of the money on education that we spend on arms buildups. Under a Kucinich administration, education becomes one of the top domestic priorities. We put money into it. We cause the government to be vitally involved in it. And we make sure our children have the love of knowledge. All this stuff about test-taking, we make children good little test-takers under No Child Left Behind. It’s the wrong approach to education.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Hillary Clinton: We have not yet reached consensus on education reform

Q: Has the debate so far in this campaign paid enough attention to education?

A: I don't think it has. In the debates that we've had, education is an afterthought. But when I go out and campaign all over the country, it's really on the minds of people. And I've outlined a very vigorous education agenda starting with universal prekindergarten, changing No Child Left Behind, making college affordable, finding programs for training and apprenticeship for kids who don't go to college.

Q: Why has education not come along as fast as other societal changes?

A: I think it's a combination of a lot of factors. Everybody is an expert on education because we all went to school. And therefore, local control means that there are millions upon millions of opinions in America about what we should do. I don't think we have reached a consensus that reflects the reality today. Our public school system worked so well for America for so long. We've got to make sure it works as well for our future.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Hillary Clinton: AR Ed Reform taught that there is a place for testing

Q: How do you feel about the testing mania forced upon our children by No Child Left Behind?

A: I believe in accountability. In 1983, I led the effort in Arkansas to improve our schools, and I do think there is a place for testing. But we should not look at our children as though they are little, walking tests, and we've gone way overboard. So I would like to see us do assessments, but understand we need a broad, rich curriculum that honors the spark of learning in every child.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Joe Biden: $3000 tax credit for college for anyone earning under $150K

Q: Since education is a great equalizer, shouldn't a college education be free?

A: Absolutely, positively, unequivocally. As president, that's what I would push for. The idea that 12 years of public education is sufficient in the 21st century is ridiculous. I have a thing called a college access program. I would allow every single solitary family making up to $150,000 to be able to have a refundable tax credit of $3,000 per student. Everyone under $50,000 now qualifies for a Pell Grant. I would change them from $4,300 to $6,300 plus the refundable tax credit. It would mean every child in America, every qualified person in America, under an income under $50,000 would have $9,300 to go to any state university in their state in America for four years. But we have to change our mind-set here, and lead with early education, with pre-Head Start and Head Start. The whole Biden plan for starting early and college as well, that whole plan costs less than $18 billion a year.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

John Edwards: Make community colleges & public universities free

Q: How can middle-class and working-class people afford college?

A: What I proposed is something called College For Everyone. The idea is for any young person who commits to work while they're in college, a minimum of 10 hours a week, we pay for their tuition and books. We've actually put a similar model in place, in Green County, a relatively poor county in eastern North Carolina. About 70% of the kids were signed up.

Q: You're proposing free college for everybody for four years for a four-year program, not just community college for two years and not just the first year?

A: The other requirement is since private colleges and universities cost so much, this is what I propose requires either a public community college or public university.

Q: But it's four years?

A: Yes, sir. But I wanted to be clear that what we've done in Green County is not just the first year.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

John Edwards: Think of education as a birth-to-death experience in America

Q: Do we need to rethink education in any particular way?

A: Yes, I believe we do. I think that we tend to think of education as K through 12, maybe college and in some rare cases, graduate school. We should think of education as a birth-to-death experience in America. That means we get the kids as early as we possibly can. [Then, for college], we know if you graduate from college this year that the information you learned, a huge amount will be outdated in 5 or 10 years. So we need an infrastructure for continuing education after high school, college, or graduate school, whichever is the last part of your formal education. So we continue to learn. Now, we have an ad hoc system, where we leave it to individuals or their employers the enormous responsibility of ensuring that 50-year-old workers in America are up-to-date and best trained, best educated they can possibly be. I think we have to develop a national infrastructure for making sure people continue to learn as they age.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Ken Buck: Federal research, but no federal requirements or funding

I asked how do we fix the K-12 system. Ken sees a very important role for the federal government where it can support research on what works best in the classroom and promulgate the results of research out to schools. But he is opposed federal requirements and funding such as Race to the Top an NCLB. He added that competition is the best way to find best practices and the combination of public, charter, parochial, private, and home schooling provides the innovation that we need.

Ken spoke about how our educational system is not presently providing what we need for our economy and our country. That we need more scientists and engineers, but that it needs to be accomplished locally. He doesn't blame teachers at all for what's going on. He sees the core problem that parents have not been involved enough. Ken discussed the fundamental need for a parent (usually the mom) to be fully involved in the child's education.

Source: David Thielen's interview in The Huffington Post Aug 24, 2010

Mike Gravel: Extend school day and extend school year

Q: Are the schools failing our children?

A: Well, we're failing our children, and let me give the figure, how bad it is. 30%, one-third of our children, do not graduate from high school, and that's a good number. I've been in parts of the country where it's 40%. We're failing? Of course, we're failing. How can we not fail when we make the No. 1 priority in this country the military-industrial complex? We're spending more money on our defense than all of the rest of the world put together. There's no money left to make what should be the No. 1 priority, and that's education. In Japan, children go to school at 7 in the morning and end at 5. In the US, they get off at 3. In the US, we have all summer off. That's no way to compete & succeed. We need to get off of this agricultural-educational-designed system we have. Teachers want to get paid? Well, let them work year-round like the rest of the people. We need to have super teachers, and we need competition in education.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Mike Gravel: Our school stats fail because we're stuck in triumphalism

Q: How do you make sure special needs children are not being left behind?

A: Well, you do that with leadership. Not just presidential leadership, but empowering the American people so they can make laws. Clearly, the Congress & the president in the las 50 years haven't been able to do it, because education is not the top priority, and it needs to be. It is in other countries, and it shows. We are going downhill as a nation. We refuse to accept this. We're stuck in triumphalism, thinking we're the greatest in the world. Well, boy, start looking at educational statistics around the world and you'll see we're far from the greatest in the world, and we're going downhill. When a third of your children do not graduate from high school, it means that these people are destined to suffer subeconomic existence. No, we are failing, and it's our leadership that's failing, and the American people, if they had the power to make laws in partnership with representative government, they could correct this.

Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate Sep 13, 2007

Mike Gravel: GovWatch: Yes, Americans are getting fatter, but not dumber

Mike Gravel said, "Americans are getting fatter and dumber... If things are going bad, just remember who put these people in power."

To be fair to Gravel, he made this incendiary claim in response to a question citing that obesity had risen to an "all- time high," SAT scores have declined, and 38% of fourth graders cannot read at basic level. Challenged to "tell Americans that they're getting fatter and dumber," Gravel obliged. But is the underlying data correct?

The Facts: According to the CDC, the incidence of obesity among adults increased from 15% in 1980 to nearly 33% in 2004, so there's no controversy there. The "dumber" part is much more controversial. Average SAT scores have declined a little over the last two years, but that's because more students are taking the test. A better indicator of the educational skills of the overall student population is the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which concludes that math skills have been rising steadily since 1982.

Source: GovWatch on 2007 Huffington Post Mash-Up Sep 13, 2007

Oprah Winfrey: Changing the way people think starts with education

The other way it started - the reason why I wanted to do a school is because I had tried other things and failed. I had tried creating my own Big Sisters program when I first moved to Chicago. I tried moving families out of the projects to give them a new lease, a chance on life, and what I recognized with all of my failed projects is that unless you change the way people think, you don't change them. You have to start at the core of how they think. So that's why education is so important to me.
Source: Huffington Post speculation on 2020 Presidential hopefuls Dec 6, 2017

  • The above quotations are from Columns and news articles on the Huffington Post blog.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Education.
  • Click here for other issues (main summary page).
2016 Presidential contenders on Education:
  Republicans:
Gov.Jeb Bush(FL)
Dr.Ben Carson(MD)
Gov.Chris Christie(NJ)
Sen.Ted Cruz(TX)
Carly Fiorina(CA)
Gov.Jim Gilmore(VA)
Sen.Lindsey Graham(SC)
Gov.Mike Huckabee(AR)
Gov.Bobby Jindal(LA)
Gov.John Kasich(OH)
Gov.Sarah Palin(AK)
Gov.George Pataki(NY)
Sen.Rand Paul(KY)
Gov.Rick Perry(TX)
Sen.Rob Portman(OH)
Sen.Marco Rubio(FL)
Sen.Rick Santorum(PA)
Donald Trump(NY)
Gov.Scott Walker(WI)
Democrats:
Gov.Lincoln Chafee(RI)
Secy.Hillary Clinton(NY)
V.P.Joe Biden(DE)
Gov.Martin O`Malley(MD)
Sen.Bernie Sanders(VT)
Sen.Elizabeth Warren(MA)
Sen.Jim Webb(VA)

2016 Third Party Candidates:
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Roseanne Barr(PF-HI)
Robert Steele(L-NY)
Dr.Jill Stein(G,MA)
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Aug 04, 2024