Bob Barr in Newsweek


On Civil Rights: Threats to liberty in post-9/11 world require libertarianism

Q: In 2003, Reason [a libertarian magazine] called you the “most conservative member of Congress.” How can you now lead the Libertarian party having once had that reputation?

A: I’ve had the opportunity over the last few years to work with the Libertarians. They’ve had a chance to get to know me. Of course, there are always going to be some naysayers, but the vast majority of Libertarians that I’ve worked with have come to understand my views and my commitment to the Libertarian Party and its principles. I also have explained many times to Libertarians that the post-9/11 world is a very different world from the one I served in Congress. The threats to our liberty in a post-9/11 world are dramatically greater than prior to that. The changes have really necessitated--in my case and I think in the eyes of a lot of Americans--a re-evaluation of where we stand on a whole range of issues regarding government power and have highlighted the need to start rolling those back with greater urgency.

Source: Daniel Stone in Newsweek magazine May 13, 2008

On Principles & Values: Expects votes to come from those who would sit out election

Q: Barr served in the House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003 as a Republican. But in 2006 Barr exited his party and became a Libertarian, strongly criticizing President Bush’s handling of the war in Iraq. Rep. Barr, your critics in the GOP allege that your candidacy will spoil the Republican Party’s chances in November. How do you respond?

A: They have no idea why I’m doing it, and, plus, that’s just a knee-jerk reaction. Does anybody getting into the race plan to ask the tough questions or plan to point out some of the areas where McCain is less conservative than he would like people to believe? Those pundits have no idea where my votes would come from, nor do they know about the issues I stand for. As a matter of fact, I suspect the votes I will get will come from folks who would be more inclined to sit out the election, because there’s not a real conservative in the race. The votes are not going to come from people that are committed to voting for McCain.

Source: Daniel Stone in Newsweek magazine May 13, 2008

On Principles & Values: Rejects “spolier” label; expects to win electoral votes

Q: Barr rejects the spoiler label and insists he’s “in it to win it.” Rep. Barr, History shows that third-party candidates win few, if any, votes in the Electoral College. Can you really win?

A: History provides no blueprint for the future in politics. We know that by looking at the dynamics of this particular race, which are very different in terms of the significant increase of new younger voters, the deep dissatisfaction with the status quo, the more than 70% of voters who believe that the country i on the wrong track. I’m a very different candidate from the Libertarians and other candidates who have run in the past.

Q: Take me through your strategy. In which states will you be most competitive?

A: We’re not going to disclose that at this point. There are a number of states that we believe, based on our analysis, give us a greater chance for carrying those states. But I don’t think it would be appropriate to lay those out right now. But that is a very tangible part of our strategy.

Source: Daniel Stone in Newsweek magazine May 13, 2008

The above quotations are from Columns and news articles in Newsweek magazine.
Click here for other excerpts from Columns and news articles in Newsweek magazine.
Click here for other excerpts by Bob Barr.
Click here for a profile of Bob Barr.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Sep 29, 2024