Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on Aug/26/14; State Sen. Padilla voted YES; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on Aug/27; Vetoed on Sep/28.
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on Aug/26/14; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on Aug/27/14; Vetoed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Sep/28/14
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on 8/26/14; State Sen. Lou Correa voted NO; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on 8/27/14; Vetoed on 9/28/14
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on Aug/26/14; State Sen. DeSaulnier voted YES; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on Aug/27; Vetoed on Sep/28.
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on Aug/26/14; State Sen. Torres voted YES; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on Aug/27; Vetoed on Sep/28.
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on 8/26/14; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on 8/27/14; State Rep. Chavez voted NO; Vetoed on 9/28/14
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on 8/26/14; State Sen. Knight voted NO; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on 8/27/14; Vetoed on 9/28/14
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on 8/26/14; Sen. Lieu co-sponsored bill & voted YES; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on 8/27; Vetoed on 9/28.
Analysis by Slate.com: AB 1327 requires law enforcement drone-users to get a warrant. A warrant requirement does not prevent police from using drones; it checks the scope of drone surveillance by involving legal standards and a judge. California's drone bill includes exceptions for emergency situations, search-and-rescue efforts, traffic first responders, and inspection of wildfires.
Veto message : There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill's exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the California Constitution.
Legislative Outcome: Passed Senate 22-8-10 on Aug/26/14; Passed Assembly 68-4-7 on Aug/27; State Rep. Allen voted YES; Vetoed on Sep/28.
| |||
| 2016 Presidential contenders on Technology: | |||
|
Republicans:
Sen.Ted Cruz(TX) Carly Fiorina(CA) Gov.John Kasich(OH) Sen.Marco Rubio(FL) Donald Trump(NY) |
Democrats:
Secy.Hillary Clinton(NY) Sen.Bernie Sanders(VT) 2016 Third Party Candidates: Roseanne Barr(PF-HI) Robert Steele(L-NY) Dr.Jill Stein(G,MA) | ||
|
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) | |||