Flores attacked the EPA, particularly its proposed ozone standards and carbon pollution cap on power plants. But Flores never mentioned the economic benefits of improving public health by cutting coal pollution and shifting to clean energy. Those tend to outnumber the cost: The EPA's climate rules on power plants could save $55 billion per year by 2030, versus $9 billion in costs.
Flores's other points are hardly worth arguing: If climate change is junk science, then 97% of scientists are part of the ploy. Yet these facts fail the "smell test," Flores claims. He might try living next to an unregulated coal plant to see what that smells like.
|
The above quotations are from Columns and news articles in The New Republic magazine.
Click here for other excerpts from Columns and news articles in The New Republic magazine. Click here for other excerpts by Bill Flores. Click here for a profile of Bill Flores.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
| Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) |