Tom Tancredo in In Mortal Danger, by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R, CO)


On Principles & Values: Audacious agenda: limited government & individual freedom

“This guy’s got an agenda,” my opponent screamed at me. The charge has been hurled at me in almost ever political campaign I have ever waged. Every time, I answer the same way: “You bet your life I do!”

I have always wanted to advance the agenda of limited government and enhanced individual freedom. I want to participate in the reintroduction of the concept that America is a unique place, not just a place we can reap the economic & political benefits afforded by the labors of those who lived before us. I want our borders to be secure and those who have violated them to be deprived of the benefits lawful citizens enjoy. I want immigrants seeking that citizenship to assimilate & sever their ties to their country of origin. I want to do what I can to defend the West in the clash of civilizations that threatens humanity.

The parts of my agenda that have generated the most trouble for me deal with the security of our borders and with my criticism of what I refer to as the “cult of multiculturalism.”

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 9 Jun 6, 2006

On Principles & Values: Label “lightning rod” suits me fine

I have lived by my commitment to do everything I can to avoid falling into the political pitfall that happens to so many congressmen after a few years: simply taking up space. To my surprise, perhaps the phrase “lightening rod” is used more often than an other to describe me. Although writers or speakers in a negative connotation use it, the description suits me fine.

There is a price to pay for standing up for what I believe rather than going along. My differences of opinion with my GOP colleagues & m willingness to voice them mean that I almost certainly will never be the chair of a major House committee. After Karl Rove told me to “never darken the door of the White House” because of my criticism of the president, I expected no calls to confer with him on immigration issues. If ever Congress does pass immigration reform, my name won’t be on it as a principal sponsor. During a debate with a colleague, he said I should resign from the party because my views were not the same as his or the president’s

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 10-11 Jun 6, 2006

On Corporations: Strong immigration stance costs PAC and corporate support

I get little or no support from business political-action committees, largely because many businesses and corporations depend on cheap illegal-immigrant labor to hold down their costs and increase their profits, thus denying better paying jobs to American workers. In fact, one corporation in my district, First Data Corporation, even formed a PAC to ensure my defeat, telling a county commissioner that if I didn’t “shut up on the immigration issue,” they might move the company out of the country. Ironically, First Data owns Western Union, a company that makes millions of dollars from facilitating the transfer of funds from foreign nationals living in the US to families back home.
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 11 Jun 6, 2006

On Principles & Values: We’ve lost 1950s selfless devotion to civic duty

In America in the 1950s, the term “civic duty” had the connotation of selfless devotion to the American creed. Students once learned of the hardships endured by patriotic volunteer soldiers who made sacrifices for the ideas and ideals embodied in the documents that that were read to them by their officers at Valley Forge. In the 1950s, people of faith were regarded as the pillars of their community, and it was perfectly acceptable to display an American flag.

Today, our schools and almost every social institution send a totally different message. Civic duty, for instance, is currently considered by too many office holders as an obligation to erase any vestige of pride in the symbols or the substance of the land of the free and home of the brave.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 22 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Our society is intoxicated with multiculturalism

My grandparents, like most of their peers, wanted to cut the ties that bound them to the old country and to connect with their new land. At that time, this desire and the economic forces at play combined to encourage the assimilation of immigrants.

In today’s America, immigrants are welcomed by a society intoxicated with the idea of multiculturalism. Today’s immigrants quickly become aware that there is no need to leave their old language or attachments behind because the only cause they will be required to espouse is allegiance to the ideology of radical multiculturalism.

I don’t know if we have become a nation of the same kind of self-indulgent hedonists that characterized the societies of past civilizations, but I do know that there is much here worth saving. To do that we must not only look at what it means to be American, but we must also notice how becoming an American has changed.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 22-23 Jun 6, 2006

On Principles & Values: Terrorists have no identity crisis, while we do

The battle for our way of life must continue beyond Congress into the streets. We must talk about the value of Western civilization and the principles it embodies. If we just live in America with no particular philosophy, no set of ideals that are worth our allegiance, then the opponents of Western civilization will continue to corrupt our children’s minds with false ideas.

The terrorists who seek to kill us know exactly who they are. They have no identity crisis. They know and believe with all their being the philosophy and religious underpinnings of their worldview. They are intent upon spreading it with word and deed, by violence, if necessary.

We must use our schools, churches, and government to reestablish an allegiance to the principles of Western civilization. Those principles are embodied in the Judeo-Christian ethic and whether we follow them or not will surely determine the fate of the nation.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 24 Jun 6, 2006

On Education: For first time, we’re telling students to NOT learn English

Practitioners of the cult of multiculturalism do things to de-emphasize our society’s uniqueness, such as working against any effort to officially adopt a common language. English is America’s “native tongue” and always has been, but the cult’s influence over our politicians and national policies has led to our essentially telling millions of immigrants and first-generation Americans that they SHOULDN’T learn English. Instead, we will teach their children in their native language.

In Arizona, a state with a large Hispanic population, voters approved Proposition 203 in 2000, banning so-called bilingual education--rules that forced schools to teach children in their native language. Instead, voters mandated the adoption of English-immersion classes that required English-language instruction in all classrooms so the children could more quickly learn the language. Opponents sued, and in response, a federal court ordered the state to increase spending for English-language learners.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 27-28 Jun 6, 2006

On Civil Rights: Hyphenated-Americans balkanize our society

The 1991 book The Disuniting of America [observed that] free institutions are next to impossible in a country made up of different nationalities & speak different languages. This “disuniting” phenomenon is growing rapidly in our country. You can see it in the way we balkanize and divide ourselves into cultural and ethnic subgroups of hyphenated Americans.

I am concerned that we are doing things that will pull us apart and separate us into exclusionary groups both as individuals and as enemies. Some people say that America’s diversity is strength. While there are positive aspects of diversity, there are times when diversity is emphasized to the extreme and becomes a negative and divisive factor. When we are pulled apart and divided along ethnic lines--as opposed to ideological lines--I fear we are causing long-term damage to our society.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 29-30&33 Jun 6, 2006

On Civil Rights: Cult of multiculturalism destructive to western civilization

For several years there has been a rise in the influence of a self-destructive belief and behavior system I call the “cult” of multiculturalism-- a subtle but potent shift in the attitudes espoused by many Americans. It is so pervasive it now permeates every segment of our society. It is creeping into our public schools and onto our college campuses. While this philosophy may be peculiar to most Americans, it is taking hold among elites, academics, the media, and certain groups within the political establishment.

The cult has been transformed from a rather benign philosophy of teaching an appreciation and a tolerance of differences to a malignant one that degrades and debases our uniquely American culture as well as Western civilization in general. It teaches our children that there is no value to who we are and what our country has accomplished--except that WHATEVER we’ve done has been bad or has had a negative impact on the world.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 37-38 Jun 6, 2006

On Environment: US’s world-scale consumerism is a measure of success

I have often heard the US criticized because, while the nation is only a small percentage of the world’s population, it is the largest consumer of the world’s resources. To the multiculturalists this is a bad thing; to me it is a success story. By any other measurement, we would hail such progress as an enormously positive accomplishment.
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 38 Jun 6, 2006

On Education: Should be OK to say “Merry Christmas” at public schools

In a school in my district just before Christmas, I was talking to a large number of 5th & 6th graders. When I left the room, I said “Merry Christmas!” There was an uneasy response, with only a few kids acknowledging me and saying, “Okay.” As I was walking out, a teacher’s aide said, “The principal does not like us using the word ‘Christmas’ here.” As I pointed to a Christmas tree in the hallway, I asked, “What is that?” She said it was a “seasonal” tree. I replied, “Are you telling me that we cannot use ‘Christmas’?“ And she replied, no, but the teachers don’t. Not to be deterred, I waited until all the kids came out, and I very loudly wished them all a ”Merry Christmas!“ In reply, they all responded, ”Merry Christmas!“ This kind of thing is happening all over the US. This is not a situation that is unique to my little suburban district. If parents went to schools to inquire about these things, they would no doubt be shocked by the answers coming from the school administrators & teachers.
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 39-40 Jun 6, 2006

On Education: Our students are taught Christian fanatics are the problem

In classrooms I ask, “How many believe we live in the greatest country?” Four students raised their hands in one Denver classroom. Although that is the same percentage of positive responders I get in other schools, the comments were antagonistic & not typical. These students knew why they hated this country. To them, America was beset with racism, sexism, chauvinism, & just about every other ism that has a negative connotation. The real problems we faced were those perpetrated by religious, Christian fanatics. One student said the reason we have problems with aliens is we do not do enough to accommodate their values. When I asked what we should do if aliens came here with values that were antithetical to ours--like radical Islamists who want to set up a Caliphate--there was a collective sneer.

At the end, the teacher walked out with me. He pointed out that what I had witnessed was more a reflection of dinner table conversations than of public school pedagogy. But I have no doubt they are both.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 41 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Self-deluded NEA union blames America for 9/11

Not long after 9/11, the National Education Association, the largest teachers’ union, distributed some “suggestions” for teachers and parents, instructing them on how to address the issue of the attack. Not one word mentioned the uniqueness of America and the importance of defending the country. The handout was aimed at telling people they should not think negatively about the people who attacked our country. We should not use the attacks to cast aspersions on any groups or organizations because after all, there are many bad things we have done too.

The 9/11 attacks seemed to incite more than just left-wing political responses. Instead of the shock, horror, and outrage expressed by most Americans, the attacks seemed to evoke a perverse sense of gratifications on campuses. The nation had not yet had time to tally its dead before many of the elites renewed their assault on the American character.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 42-43 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: We are at war with Islamofascism

I believe the US & western civilization are in a “clash of civilizations.” And it is a real clash... a real war. This view of the current conflict is not acceptable conversation in politically correct circles. Although I believe it is understood in the White House, it is not articulated there either. Pres. Bush continues to refer to our enemy as terrorism or extremism. Neither of these isms accurately characterizes our enemy. The real enemy is Islamofascism. Contrary to popular belief, Islamofascism did not begin with our support for Israel, and it would not end if that support were withdrawn.

The clash of civilizations is not with the religion of Islam, but with the Islamic religion that has been married to a political philosophy that says all the nonbelievers must be annihilated, abolished, eliminated. It is with people who have openly & repeatedly stated that their desire is to eradicate us from the planet because we do not accept their political & religious ideologies.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 65-66 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Islam’s basic tenets are inextricably linked to terrorism

The basic tenets & characteristics of Islam are a cause for concern. Scholars lay out the basic lessons of Islam:Religious freedom is not permitted in the Islamic world. Conversions can only go one way: from whatever you are to Islam. Punishment for the reverse procedure is torture or death.

Many scholars believe that Islam is incapable of a radical transformation. Many are skeptical about the willingness of a vast number of righteous Muslims to reject radicalism in favor of a worldview in which Islam exists harmoniously with other religions, because Muslims view the Koran as a document that cannot be interpreted by man.

We are at war with radical Islam. We must all be aware of the enemy: who they are, what they believe, & why they believe it.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 67-68 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Technology can’t defeat religion-fueled suicide bombers

Congress appropriated more than $400 billion for the Department of Defense last year. Most of it went for the support of a traditional military infrastructure. Yet our most dangerous enemy does not spend money on weapons, systems, ships, or plans. It utilizes suicide bombers and inexpensive equipment: improvised explosive devices, anthrax, and suitcase nuclear devices. Our enemy does not need to be part of a national military, nor does he need to follow orders from anyone empowered by a secular authority.

This phenomenon has rendered much of our war plans ineffective. When the fuel for a suicide bomber is religion, no technology can defeat him. It is impossible to create a sensor to ferret out the individual who sees death as the doorway to a world of endless sensual pleasure. Additionally, the enemy knows that after he blows himself and his victims to bits, his mother will be giving thanks to God and she will receive Saudi cash.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 76-77 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: If nuked by Islamic terrorists, take out their holy sites

A radio talk-show host asked me what America’s response should be to a nuclear attack by Islamic terrorists. I said our first option should be to think of something that would deter such an event. One option might be to threaten retaliation for such an attack by “taking out their holy sites.” Nothing I have ever said evoked the kind of reaction that followed, and the reaction was worldwide.

The death threats were numerous & serious. But not all reactions were negative.

One supporter made the commonsense observation that as the present time, there are no negative consequences to the action of a suicide murderer. Instead, those who matter most to the murderers meet these actions with praise. Let me say now that if the threat of destruction of the religious sites would not deter the religious zealots, then we’d better think of something that will. If all we do is kill the ones we can identify before they commit their deeds, we can expect the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse to be saddling up soon.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 78 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Active Hezbollah cells operate out of Mexico

Testifying before Congress in 2005, FBI Director Mueller revealed that his agency had “received reports that individuals form countries with known al Qaeda connections have attempted to enter the US illegally using alien smuggling rings and assuming Hispanic appearances.” Mueller confirmed that the FBI suspected many of these people had changed their Islamic surnames and adopted false Hispanic identities to escape detection.

Since 9/11, Mexican authorities have reportedly apprehended hundreds of individuals with suspected terrorist ties in the border region.

In 2006, Mueller told a house appropriations committee hearing that the FBI had broken up a smuggling ring organized by the terrorist group Hezbollah that had operatives cross the Mexican border to carry out possible terrorist attacks inside the US.

This was not considered newsworthy by mainline news media, so most Americans are still unaware that there are active Hezbollah cells within a day’s drive of our porous border.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 79-81 Jun 6, 2006

On Drugs: Porous border allows Mexican cartels to smuggle drugs

Corruption is spreading throughout the US that is linked to Mexican based drug cartels and the Mexican mafia. To observers in the law enforcement community, there seems to be a pattern of corruption in which these cartels are buying influence and seeking comfort within US cities. The Tijuana-based Felix drug cartel and the Juarez-based Fuentes cartel began buying legitimate US businesses for money -laundering operations.

IN Cameron County, TX, the former sheriff and others were convicted of receiving drug-smuggling bribes. The Tohono O’odham Indian Reservation in Arizona is the scene of one of the major drug corridors between the US and Mexico. IN 2002, tribal police seized 65,000 pounds of narcotics.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 82-84 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Evil prowls this planet; defend with terrorist profiling

An al Qaeda spokesman asserted in 2002: “We have the right to kill four million Americans--two million children--and to exile twice as many and wound and cripple hundreds of thousands.” In a separate communiqu‚, officials found the essay “The Truth About the New Crusade: A Ruling on the Killing of Women and Children of the Non-Believers.” It argues that “the sanctity of women, children, and the elderly is not absolute” and concludes that “in killing Americans who are ordinarily off-limits, Muslims should not exceed four million noncombatants or render more than 10 million homeless.“

I would not advocate the suspension of habeas corpus or a declaration of martial law, but I would be the last to complain about measures such as terrorist profiling, eliminating all immigration from terrorist-sponsoring nations, and securing our borders to allow the government to do all it can to defend the country.

Evil prowls this planet. It searches for easy targets. And it strikes without mercy.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p. 97-98 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Spend billions more to enforce border fully

Mass immigration is the sole reason the US population is nearing 300 million. It’s why the Census Bureau estimates that, at current rates, the population will surpass 420 million by 2050. These are astronomical numbers, but given our country’s poor record of border enforcement, they aren’t surprising.

My answer to the problem of border enforcement is simple: if we’re not devoting enough resources to it, then devote more resources to it. We should be spending billions more than we are. It is Congress’s duty to do whatever it takes to protect and defend our borders. If we can’t stem the flow of millions of illegal aliens, how can we possibly hope to stop terrorists from infiltrating the country?

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.101-102 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Erect fence along entire Mexican & Canadian borders

Our immigration policies are in need of reform. In terms of physical security, there is so much we can do. We have the resources to erect a fence along the entire border--not just along our frontier with Mexico, but with Canada as well. High-tech, two-layer fences have been set up at some portions of the border, and they have been effective. The plan is cost-effective: we can build a border-length fence for about $1.5 million per mile: $3 billion for a two-thousand plus mile fence along our southwestern border. Given what we would save in terms of providing so many benefits for illegals, I have no doubt we could recoup this investment in no time. That $3 billion figure is less that we’re spending per month in Iraq.

But I cannot pretend that a border-length fence will completely eliminate illegal immigration. Still, a fence will go a long way toward accomplishing that goal.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.109-110 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Deploy military troops to support Border Patrol

To bolster the physical protection of our borders, the president should also deploy military troops, when feasible, to support the Border Patrol. To facilitate that, we should amend the criminal statute of posse comitatus, which some believe bars the use of military in a border-enforcement capacity. This works: in 2005, 444 soldiers in the Army’s 4th Squadron, 14th Calvary Regiment of the 172nd Stryker Brigade conducted desert-like training in conjunction with the border patrol in New Mexico. They were responsible for aiding federal agents in the apprehension of more than 2,500 illegal aliens and 6,900 pounds of marijuana.

We have the technology and resources to secure our borders tomorrow. It is a canard for politicians to say it’s impossible. What they are really saying is: I choose not to defend and secure our borders because there are political ramifications that I fear. It is those fears that put the life of every American in mortal danger.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.110 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Supports employer verification in 2005 reform bill

The measure adopted in the immigration reform legislation passed in December 2005 would, if adopted, severly curtail the numbers of people flowing uninhibited across our borders. Though the measures were still LESS than I wanted, the overall bill was the best start at real immigration reform is more than ten years. It called for the construction of nearly 700 miles of a two-tiered security fence, for employers to be required to verify that their workers are either US citizens or in the country legally, for cities to stop providing sanctuary for illegal aliens by prohibiting their police from inquiring about a suspect’s immigration status, and for changing illegal immigration from a civil penalty to a misdemeanor.

In debunking these sensible reform measures, the Wall Street Journal resorted to “the sky is falling” arguments: “Tancredo has done everyone a favor by stating plainly the immigration rejectionists’ endgame--turn the US into the world’s largest gated community.”

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.113 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: It’s a myth that illegal immigrants benefit our economy

For those willing to listen to reason, it’s time to set the record straight. Illegal immigration does very little to benefit our country. For those of you who desire to join me in the fight to secure our borders & our future, remember the following myths
  1. Myth: There is nothing the US can do to stop illegal immigration
  2. Myth: Illegal immigrants take jobs Americans don’t want
  3. Myth: Illegal aliens are an economic plus for America
  4. Myth: Only bigots object and oppose illegal immigration.
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.114 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Immigration agency acts as greeters; should act as enforcers

Perhaps the most telling thing about the immigration agency, in spite of 9/11, is that many view their primary task as customer service. They don’t see themselves as enforcers of the law or as protectors of national security.

There is a small contingent, however, that does perform a law-enforcement duty. The objective of this group (the “enforcers”) is the enhancement of national security. When the enforcers’ director resigned, they were isolated and they became whistle-blowers. I sent an invitation for the head of the whistle-blower group to testify before my Immigration Reform Caucus.

My friend contacted the House Judiciary Committee to set up a meeting for the whistle-blowers to appear before staffers. Those staffers went to the Whit House to discuss ways to keep the agents from revealing the depth of the corruption in the immigration agency. The administration made it clear it did not want the information to come out for fear it would undermine the immigration guest worker program.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.118-119 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Disallow Mexican “matricula” cards as valid ID cards

A matricula consular card is a semiofficial ID issued by the Mexican government to its citizens living in the US. The FBI has determined it “is not a reliable form of identification.” Yet their use is widespread and the US government had done nothing to curtail it.

The only reason a Mexican citizen would need a matricula consular card from the Mexican Embassy is if they are in this country illegally. The cards are easy to fabricate. Authorities have arrested an Iranian national with a Mexican matricul consular card in his own name.

But the State Dept. views it more “diplomatically.” In 2005, a State Department official said that while State does not defend the use of the cards, it is concerned that limitations on the cards would provide retaliation from other countries.

Mexican consulates have issued 1.2 million cards & say cards are only issued to citizens who appear in person with acceptable ID. Sometimes applicants need only convince issuing officers that they are who they say they are.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.124-125 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Left supports immigration for votes; right for cheap labor

For years I have been one of the few to voice my concern over the marriage of politics and the law. On the left side of the aisle, politicians continue to do nothing about immigration because they know their ambiguities turn into votes for them. The right does nothing to stop it because we believe it generates cheap labor. The sum of those two powerful interests has stopped us from doing anything significant about the immigration problem and border security.

Our borders are porous because we lack the political will to close them. The amazing thing is we have the technology and resources to secure our border tomorrow, but we lack the will to do it.

Is it right that our borders allow the influx of millions of people to take the jobs of Americans? To force people either to work for less money than they were working for just a few years ago. To be unemployed? All in order to achieve political goals.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.127-128 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Bush’s “guest worker” program IS amnesty

The president’s guest-worker program, which he says is not an amnesty but would nonetheless allow people to legally remain in the US for a period of time to work, is a reward for breaking into our country. And even if it is not full-blown amnesty, it is being looked upon as such by the lawbreakers themselves.

The president said he was going to create a program but did not want to call it amnesty because that has a bad connotation with the public. No matter how many ways he wants to phrase it, no matter how many times he says he is against amnesty, the truth is, his plan is an amnesty plan.

The plan clearly offers amnesty in two respects. First, it protects persons who have broken the law from the punishment prescribed by law (deportation) while offering them the privilege that few get (living and working in the US). Second, does anyone really believe that, at the end of six years, the immigrants will go home or that Congress will have the political will to make them do so?

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.129-130 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: DHS not doing enough to keep terrorists out of US

Under current Department of Homeland Security guidelines, there is no doubt that terrorists have been given free access to our country. We are continuously showing terrorists that we are content to allow them to enter our country and do God only knows what to our homeland. One such example took place just six months after 9/11: immigration officials sent notices to two of the hijackers that they had been approved for flight school visas. The oversight outraged a mourning nation and President Bush vowed that this type of blunder would never happen again. But 9/11 and this blunder were not enough to prevent the same situation from happening again.

If our own agencies cannot keep track of who is in our country, how can we expect those charged with our protection to guarantee never again when it comes to terrorism?

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.137-138 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Bar foreign workers from working in nuclear facilities

The Y-12 National Security Complex plays a significant role in the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapons programs. The facility is responsible for the production of nuclear weapon components, receipt, storage, and protection of nuclear weapon materials, surveillance of the nuclear weapons stockpiles and dismantling weapons. One would think this facility would take every measure to ensure that illegal immigrants would not gain access.

In 2005 the Energy Department revealed “non-US citizens were improperly allowed access to a leased facility at the Y-12 complex.“ The report said, ”We found that foreign construction workers, using false documents, had gained access to the Y-12 site on multiple occasions. Sixteen foreign construction workers were found to have been illegal aliens. These individuals may have had opportunities to access secret information.“

What does it say about our intelligence community when illegals not only get past the Y-12 gates but also gain access to top-secret materials

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.138-139 Jun 6, 2006

On Drugs: Mexican military helps drug smugglers cross border

Mexico has long been a haven for violent drug cartels as well as the primary source for most illegal immigration. But in recent years, suspected Mexican paramilitary & military units, loyal to the drug cartels, have made repeated armed incursions into th US--with the knowledge of our government. The Dept. of Homeland Security has documented 231 incursions from 1996 to 2005.

Most disturbing was the response. DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff downplayed the events by saying that most Mexican military incursions over the years had been “accidental.” The FBI was quoted by Mexican media as saying it supported the view that the uniformed personnel were smugglers and not Mexican military.

Does the Mexican government want us to believe that the drug cartels can operate freely along the border and the Mexican military is powerless to stop them? Sadly, the federal government is more concerned about allowing the Mexican government to save face than it is about telling the truth to the American people.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.146-149 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: No net benefit from immigration; annual $70B loss

Contrary to the protestations of the open-borders crowd, illegal immigration does not result in a net economic benefit to the US. In fact, illegal immigration, and, for that matter, legal mass migration cost America taxpayers far more than it generates annually. Immigration costs US taxpayers in excess of $70 billion annually. Most of these costs are borne by state & local governments, while the majority of tax receipts go to the federal government:
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.155-161 Jun 6, 2006

On Jobs: Americans don’t shun jobs; they shun low wages

Americans have voiced concern that that cracking down on illegal immigrants would impact certain industries, such as agriculture, because it would rob those industries of workers who are both willing and able to do the jobs they require--jobs, they say, Americans don’t want.

Let’s be clear about what is really going on in terms of jobs “Americas won’t do”: (1) they aren’t shunning those jobs, they are shunning the bottom-of-the-barrel wages those jobs pay; and (2) those jobs are paying bottom-of-the-barrel wages because they are going to low-skilled illegal workers who are willing to do them for far less than an American worker needs to live.

The right question is not why someone will not take a $6/hour job when he or she needs $10 o $20/hour to live. The right question is how can they take such a cut in pay & survive? After Americans have, for generations, fought for and won a better standard of living, why should they be expected to give it up so non-citizens can work? It’s absurd.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.158-159 Jun 6, 2006

On Health Care: Healthcare costs skyrocket by free treatment of aliens

The cost of providing free health care for illegal immigrants is one of the primary reasons the price of health care continues to rise.

One reason Americans pay so much to care for illegal aliens is a federal law that prohibits hospitals from turning away any patients--whether legal citizens or not--due to their inability to pay. The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) declares that every emergency room must treat all patients who arrive with an “emergency.” An emergency can consist of a cough, headache, hangnail, cardiac arrest, herniated lumbar disc, drug addition, alcohol overdose, gunshot wound, HIV-positive infection, or mental disorders. That means anyone who comes to an emergency room must be treated to the best of that hospital’s ability, or transferred, even if the patient doesn’t have a thin dime. Not that that isn’t a compassionate policy for Americans, mind you. The problem is the law is abused by illegal aliens who come to the US to obtain health care.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.163-164 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Anchor babies: pregnant Mexicans give birth to US citizens

By simply being born in the US, a child automatically becomes an American citizen eligible for a range of public-assistance benefits. Mexican mothers frequently come to the US just to give birth.

A little-discussed constitutional provision actually allows all of this to happen legally through what’s called birthright citizenship. Though the provision was not authored with the intent of granting automatic citizenship to children of persons in the country illegally, courts throughout the years have held that it does.

The 14th Amendment starts, “All persons born or naturalized in the US... are citizens of the US.” Written in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War, the law’s intent was to prevent states from denying citizenship to newly freed slaves.

The loophole has become well known. The children born to illegal aliens are called “anchor babies” because once they are born in the US, they serve as an anchor to keep themselves & their families firmly (and legally) in the country.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.167 Jun 6, 2006

On Homeland Security: Press said “pro-peace” rallies: crowd chanted “Allah Akbar”

Shortly after 9/11, when Congress was engaged in a debate over the possibility of a conflict in the Middle East and the efficacy of that conflict--whether or not it was in the national interests of the US to embark on this venture, whether a preemptive strike was justified, and whether or not sending men and women into harm’s way was appropriate--I took the House floor to quote from some speeches made at “pro-peace rallies” in D.C. I said the press misidentified these speeches as “pro-peace,” just as the media had misidentified the rallies I attended and spoke at as “pro-war.” Most of the people exhorting the crowd were not really interested in peace and the need for it but talked instead about the problems with America and saying America needed its own “regime change.” That American needed another “revolution.” They also led chants of Allah Akbar, Allah Akbar, at these rallies.
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.184-185 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: End “catch & release” along Mexican border

Fixing Our Broken Borders
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.187-188 Jun 6, 2006

On Immigration: Eliminate “chain migration” where illegals bring in families

Fixing Our Broken Borders
Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.188-189 Jun 6, 2006

On Free Trade: Globalization is replacing “citizens” with “consumers”

During a 2006 debate, Gary Hart said: “globalization is eroding national sovereignty.” Globalization, he said, had replaced citizen with consumer in the minds of many people. The US isn’t so much a country any more as it is a market.

The same thing is happening throughout the West. Since the Maastricht Treaty finalizing the European Union was adopted, Europeans have become citizens of a union rather than remain sovereign Dutch, German, etc. citizens. For many Europeans, their nation has simply become a place they reside, no longer a part of their identity.

Multicultural elites now frequently describe themselves as “citizens of the world.” If given the chance, they would replace loyalty to any one country to humanity, to Mother Earth, and in some cases, loyalty to them. This rhetoric has trickled down to impressionable youth. Too frequently they tell me that America is a continent, not a nation. Multiculturalism had advanced so much that it denigrates the value of a national birthright.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.191-192 Jun 6, 2006

On Civil Rights: We’re diversifying to death; promote AMERICAN culture

In this mad rush to become the world’s first earthbound utopia, we are, quite literally, diversifying ourselves to death. While there are many problems associated with the general issues of “immigration & citizenship”, the most important problem is the loss of our American identity.

Oddly, while we seem uninterested in requiring immigrants to assimilate, we are going out of our way to require our own citizens to undergo “cultural diversity training” so we can better “understand” immigrant cultures. Instead of requiring immigrants to assimilate into our culture, we have required our own citizens to assimilate foreign cultures at the expense of our own.

I’m not asking immigrants to leave their ethnicity at our borders. What I am saying us we, as Americans, have to demand immigrants do what they supposedly came here to do: become Americans!

The very first thing we must do is recognize our uniquely American culture--language, religious freedom, values, beliefs--and promote them above all others.

Source: In Mortal Danger, by Tom Tancredo, p.204-205 Jun 6, 2006

The above quotations are from In Mortal Danger
The Battle for America's Border and Security
, by Tom Tancredo.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of Tom Tancredo.
Click here for Tom Tancredo on all issues.
Tom Tancredo on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Feb 18, 2019