A: I am for it. I am also for paid family leave.
A: Strongly support. Education of children should be seen as a primary responsibility of the family, not the government. I support any program that increases parental engagement and control of the education of children.
A: I'd prefer to see no public schools in the first place. But if state must have them, vouchers are wise. They let students go to the schools that are best for them. They simultaneously make most schools BETTER. When schools need to compete for students carrying vouchers, the schools make themselves more attractive. Those that don't, fold. That's not a bad thing. Kids who see their decrepit schools fold go 20 minutes away to a BETTER school.
Q: What do you say to voucher opponents?
A: Those who rail against school choice are keeping kids down. Many students travel 45 to 60 minutes each way to get to a better school. Vouchers start bringing better schools closer to them. Education is too important to be besmirched by politics. There should not be federal grants for education. I dislike state grants as well, but as president I control no single school.
A: Congress Constitutionally controls education in one area: D.C. Here I have veto power and I will use it. I will implore privatizing education in DC, at least giving families vouchers to use in Maryland and Virginia schools if those in DC are deficient. Vouchers make schools better because they have to COMPETE. Do well for your students, or FOLD.
A: yes
Stein: In general, high stakes testing is more than counterproductive--it is destructive. It is used as a political tool against teachers--targeting low-income and people of color. Our educational system should target lifetime learning--with full and equitable funding; and eliminating disparities by race. Testing for diagnostic purposes as part of standards [is ok, but we should have] curriculum written by teachers--not by corporate contractors.
OnTheIssues: So what about a thumbs-up or thumbs-down on Common Core, since it addresses some of those issues and not others?
Stein: It's not separable from the issues above so I'd say thumbs down. All schools and all students should have the option to opt out. And that's not enough--because so much of school curricula have been destroyed--we need to teach multi-dimensionally and make schools relevant, using the arts, engaging the community, and more.
Stein: Public education is another example where there has been a complete scam [regarding privatization]--charter schools are not better than public schools--and in many cases they are far worse. They cherry-pick their students so they can show better test scores. The treasure of our public schools system has been assaulted by the process of privatization.
Q: Oppose
Q: Support
A: Prayer should be allowed on a voluntary basis.
A: Vouchers are fine, but no funds available now.
A: Yes, with protections to prevent abuse an ensure equity.
Q: What sort of protections?
A: To prevent discrimination and ensure that equal opportunities are being afforded.
A: Oppose. But I would support allowing a teacher-led moment of silence for prayer, reflection or whatever. This exists in certain states, including Virginia where my kids went to school.
Q: Public or private?
A: Some time in public schools and some in parochial schools.
A: Strongly Oppose
A: Oppose
A: Agree, depending on the type of school.
A: Disagree, we need to make all schools accountable. We cannot allow some schools to excel while others fade into repetitious failure to succeed.
A: Support. No society has ever held together without a strong religious under-pinning. This is a matter best left to states, and within states, to individual school districts responsive to their community.
A: Oppose. When examined carefully, vouchers turn out to be a tax break for the well-off and do not impact on schools. The federal education system is completely out of control and corrupt. Teachers need to be brought into a new class of public servant that is properly paid, with pay tied to results.
A: SUPPORT with huge limits (strictly as moments of silence and/or pledge of allegiance). Must not be mandatory for students to stick around to hear Hindu mantras, or Pentecostal Holy Rollers dancing with snakes. Religion is too diverse, so to each his own. To allow ONE religious faction or the teacher him or herself to decide the 'teacher led prayer' would be unconstitutional as it hinders freedom of religious expression.
A: Opposed. I believe students should be allowed to pray if they wish, but I am a promoter of truth & fact-based teaching in schools. And I am a supporter and promoter of the first amendment--all of it. Religion of course can be taught, but it needs to be from an objective standpoint rather than a promotion of assumption to the same level as fact. Religious studies of a faith perspective need to be handled by parents and churches, not schools and governments. Schools and governments need to be only interested in facts and seeking the truth. It is fine for those who are religious to use their time to pray, but unfair, illegal, and unconstitutional to turn our schools into a bully pulpit for any or all religions, which is what would happen if we would allow school-sponsored or teacher led prayer.
A: Oppose. ALL schools should be equally good. The entire education system needs to be overhauled. Education needs to be fully customized, include all learning styles, be 100% free (which can be done while at the same time reducing federal taxes and shrinking federal government through a bit of innovation), be mastery based rather than time based, be self-paced and teacher facilitated in each subject, and be geared to help students go far beyond their teachers rather than it being a poor transfer of insufficient knowledge as it is now. Deciding to turn over America's education to privatization is a cop out, and still isn't the true reform we need to see.
| |||
| 2020 Presidential contenders on Education: | |||
|
Democrats running for President:
Sen.Michael Bennet (D-CO) V.P.Joe Biden (D-DE) Mayor Mike Bloomberg (I-NYC) Gov.Steve Bullock (D-MT) Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D-IN) Sen.Cory Booker (D-NJ) Secy.Julian Castro (D-TX) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Rep.John Delaney (D-MD) Rep.Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) Sen.Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Gov.Deval Patrick (D-MA) Sen.Bernie Sanders (I-VT) CEO Tom Steyer (D-CA) Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) Marianne Williamson (D-CA) CEO Andrew Yang (D-NY) 2020 Third Party Candidates: Rep.Justin Amash (L-MI) CEO Don Blankenship (C-WV) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Howie Hawkins (G-NY) Gov.Jesse Ventura (I-MN) |
Republicans running for President:
V.P.Mike Pence(R-IN) Pres.Donald Trump(R-NY) Rep.Joe Walsh (R-IL) Gov.Bill Weld(R-MA & L-NY) 2020 Withdrawn Democratic Candidates: Sen.Stacey Abrams (D-GA) Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-NYC) Sen.Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) Sen.Mike Gravel (D-AK) Sen.Kamala Harris (D-CA) Gov.John Hickenlooper (D-CO) Gov.Jay Inslee (D-WA) Mayor Wayne Messam (D-FL) Rep.Seth Moulton (D-MA) Rep.Beto O`Rourke (D-TX) Rep.Tim Ryan (D-CA) Adm.Joe Sestak (D-PA) Rep.Eric Swalwell (D-CA) | ||
|
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) | |||