A: Make the military more efficient, but cut military spending by 50%. The hawks would have us believe we are defenseless. We have enough power to obliterate the entire planet six times over.
A: Strongly oppose. Adm. Mullen, former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said that the number one threat to our national security is our national debt. A debtor nation is not a free nation. It is wrong that our spending on the military is more that so many other nations combined. We cannot afford to be, nor should we want to be, the policeman of the world. President Eisenhower warned of the terrible danger to freedom by the influence of the military-industrial complex. We must heed his warning.
A: The Military is our first priority. That might not require more funding though. There are areas where we can spend less. Thousands of swarming, nimble fighter jets are probably more effective than three or four Joint-Strike fighters, and the cost is equivalent. We feed, house, train, and pay an abundance of soldiers abroad that are probably unnecessary. (There are eight US bases in Italy; there are 22 in Germany.) The 30,000 "man" DMZ is almost certainly over-bloated. Defense is the PRIMARY reason we form a government, for mutual protection. Defense, courts, and environmental protection are the only truly worthy federal functions, so we should give them their due. And because well-trained, bad-ass soldiers, and the willingness to use them if necessary just may deter bad foreign actors, I err on the side of more for the military.
A: no
Stein: [We've tried privatization] in everything from prisons to the military--the military-industrial complex is a poster child against privatization--where contractors' needs become the prime mover of the budget.
OnTheIssues: I think you mean such as how in Iraq, support functions such as transportation and meals were provided by private contractors, while in Vietnam and earlier , those same functions were performed by uniformed soldiers, and that the numbers of soldiers were hence artificially reduced?
Stein: I agree completely
Stein: That's a complicated problem in a society that has many issues and struggles but that also includes Korea's history of violence and imperialism, from both Japan and the US. There is a history of incredible distrust and aggression--it's important to understand that.
OnTheIssues: And what about their nuclear capability?
Stein: To build a nuclear free world--we've been addressing non-proliferation for a long time without address nuclear disarmament. Non-proliferation was supposed to be a phase through which we passed on the way to nuclear disarmament. They see nuclear weapons as essential, from their viewpoint, to defend their sovereignty.
OnTheIssues: So you mean we should lead by example?
Stein: We should lead by virtue of global agreements that also include us. We could get rid of MANY nukes as a first step because we're so far ahead [in possessing more nuclear weapons than the rest of the world].
Stein: Hero ; he has done the American people an incredible service by exposing the violations of the Constitution that have been perpetrated on us--which was taken very seriously around the world, where he has been vindicated. The kind of spying going on has not been protecting us--not one instance of a terrorist plot was found by these abuses--none, by mass spying. They initially claimed dozens of cases but it was found tat there were no none, in a Congressional investigation. Snowden should be treated as a hero---efforts to harass him and prosecute him should be declared over and done with. Charges should not be brought against him, and he should return with hero status--he could improve our national security if he were working for us
Stein: Foreign relations would be a whole lot more predictable if done by the Stein Doctrine, than when done by the current policy of military domination. For an example of a specific application, we need to bring troops home from 800 bases abroad.
A: ISIS was created by Saudi Arabia, has been trained by the CIA and armed by the Pentagon, and is a direct result of our intervention in Iraq that was itself rooted in 925 now clearly documented lies. Al Qaeda is a joint creation of Saudi Arabia and the CIA.
Q: What should be done about that?
A: We should close all of our military bases and withdraw all of our military forces around the world, bringing them home to their families and bringing their wallets home to our economy as well. We need a strategic pause to clean house at home: install an honest government; devise a strategy of peace, friendship, and commerce (I cite Ron Paul); and focus on the well-being of the American public, not the well-being of predatory banks and US-based merchants of death.
Q: Strongly oppose the enactment of that law
Q: Oppose
A: Yes for U.S. Citizens.
A: No funds available now.
A: Yes, it does.
Q: Should it be repealed?
A: Retain it, but it needs reform.
A: No.
Q: Would you cut the defense budget?
A: We should cut defense spending and contain it. And we can do so without compromising national security. We need to restructure because the types of conflicts we're likely to have in the future are different than in the past, and that effects your force structure, footprint, weapons systems, etc.
A: Strongly Support
A: Strongly Oppose
A: Agree.
A: Strongly Support. The Patriot Act was not even read by our corrupt Congress, and is long over-due for being slammed down along with the provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that permit the incarceration and even the murder of US citizens by the military without due process. The federal government is out of control and lacking in both intelligence and integrity.
A: SUPPORT, unconstitutional, although profiling works for any security group to observe and question a potential terrorist or drug dealer or child molester or human trafficker , unless we want to clean up dead bodies and can suddenly heal the pains. DHS needs revisions, Patriot Act extensively refined
A: SUPPORT, expand armed forces programs to re-patriot into useful public sector training as well.
A: Agree. We need to be addressing the root causes of things such as terrorism, so that considering things like the Patriot Act becomes nonsense. The authorization of wire tapping, for example, without due cause, is a huge invasion of privacy to law abiding citizens and gives the central government too much power.
A: Support with qualifications. We need to shift our military's focus. We need to bring all non-treaty troops home immediately, and stop seeking to control oil supplies when we could be completely free of oil in a couple of years. The military needs to be strong, but the focus needs to be on helping people not killing and conquests.
We will also close down all foreign military bases and abolish the CIA and NSA. We stand for unconditional disarmament, outlawing all nuclear power and weapons of mass destruction and end U.S. arms sales.
| |||
| 2020 Presidential contenders on Homeland Security: | |||
|
Democrats running for President:
Sen.Michael Bennet (D-CO) V.P.Joe Biden (D-DE) Mayor Mike Bloomberg (I-NYC) Gov.Steve Bullock (D-MT) Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D-IN) Sen.Cory Booker (D-NJ) Secy.Julian Castro (D-TX) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Rep.John Delaney (D-MD) Rep.Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) Sen.Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Gov.Deval Patrick (D-MA) Sen.Bernie Sanders (I-VT) CEO Tom Steyer (D-CA) Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) Marianne Williamson (D-CA) CEO Andrew Yang (D-NY) 2020 Third Party Candidates: Rep.Justin Amash (L-MI) CEO Don Blankenship (C-WV) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Howie Hawkins (G-NY) Gov.Jesse Ventura (I-MN) |
Republicans running for President:
V.P.Mike Pence(R-IN) Pres.Donald Trump(R-NY) Rep.Joe Walsh (R-IL) Gov.Bill Weld(R-MA & L-NY) 2020 Withdrawn Democratic Candidates: Sen.Stacey Abrams (D-GA) Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-NYC) Sen.Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) Sen.Mike Gravel (D-AK) Sen.Kamala Harris (D-CA) Gov.John Hickenlooper (D-CO) Gov.Jay Inslee (D-WA) Mayor Wayne Messam (D-FL) Rep.Seth Moulton (D-MA) Rep.Beto O`Rourke (D-TX) Rep.Tim Ryan (D-CA) Adm.Joe Sestak (D-PA) Rep.Eric Swalwell (D-CA) | ||
|
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) | |||