A: It's not right to tax people just "because you can". Similarly I dislike taxes on alcohol and cigarettes, many of which are bought by addicts. They have a hard time stopping, but state coffers are buoyed by taxing their addiction. A progressive tax system to me seems unfair - wealthy people take no more government services than poor people. A straight tax seems more fair - a certain percent across the board, with NO exceptions. That alone helps America rid itself of many lobbyist, who USE the tax code to favor special groups. Income taxes unfairly give power to Congress, lobbyists, and big corporations. They use the tax code selfishly and manipulate the rest of us. No income tax de-fangs them and improves democracy.
A: support
Stein: I'd call it the "Aristocracy Tax." We instituted an estate tax so we would not have massive inherited wealth so we would not have an aristocracy like we left behind in Europe. Now wealth disparities are greater than ever in history--we have more than an aristocracy going on. An aristocracy tax is only part of it--a couple can pass on $11 million in wealth before it's taxed--that's pretty outrageous--and it got codified under Obama--he made permanent the Bush tax cut on that aspect. We need to massively reduce the inheritance gift--the aristocracy gift--and broader tax reform so we don't have such massive accumulation of wealth in the first place. We need to restore the inheritance tax and it should be progressive at higher levels of inheritance.
Q: Support
A: No.
A: Are we talking about the effective tax rate?
Q: Most people mean a progressive marginal tax rate, where high-income earners have a much higher tax rate for their top marginal earnings than do low-income earners.
A: I am FOR making the EFFECTIVE tax rates more progressive, but I'm against making MARGINAL tax rates more progressive. Like a Reagan-style reform. Our current tax system is an abomination-- it needs to be simpler, fairer, and more competitive. And we need to broaden the base--fewer and better targeted tax preferences bring top marginal tax rates down to 25% for corporations as well as estate taxes and individuals. We should eliminate the differences with capital gains and ordinary income like Reagan did. So the bottom line marginal rates would go down but the effective rate would go up for the wealthy.
A: Yes, up to 25%. But we've got to get more people paying and less people taking a free ride--that's dangerous in a democracy. This proposal would also eliminate the need for the Buffett Rule.
Q: By the "Buffett Rule," you mean Obama's proposal that the top 1% of income earners, such as Warren Buffett, pay a surtax so that their marginal tax rate isn't lower than the bottom 99% of income earners, such as Warren Buffett's secretary?
A: Yes; eliminating the differences with capital gains tax rates would eliminate the need for the Buffett Rule.
A: Strongly Support
A: Disagree, the US constitution outlines a limited taxation infrastructure. Our current tax code needs to be stripped and simplified.
A: Strongly Support. HOWEVER, I favor the abolishment of personal income taxes, business incomes taxes, and all other forms of tax such that we can eliminate the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The Automated Payment Transaction (APT) Tax vastly expands the range of taxed transactions to include currency trading and stock trading as well as inter-bank transfers.
A: If it means increasing any personal federal taxes in any way then I oppose it. Eliminate income taxes completely ASAP, at least at the Federal level. Eliminate or overhaul the IRS so that they work for the people rather than against them. If we return to sovereign money we will find hundreds of new options open up for us as a country. Currently the Federal Reserve prints their money and lends it to us while we pretend that it's ours. Not a dollar in circulation belongs to the United States citizens. The constitution says to coin our own money, not borrow it.
We will not participate in wealth transfer, but rather in poverty transformation--helping poor people and poor areas of the country transform themselves through innovative plans which are laid out on our website rather than taxation.
| |||
| 2020 Presidential contenders on Tax Reform: | |||
|
Democrats running for President:
Sen.Michael Bennet (D-CO) V.P.Joe Biden (D-DE) Mayor Mike Bloomberg (I-NYC) Gov.Steve Bullock (D-MT) Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D-IN) Sen.Cory Booker (D-NJ) Secy.Julian Castro (D-TX) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Rep.John Delaney (D-MD) Rep.Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) Sen.Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) Gov.Deval Patrick (D-MA) Sen.Bernie Sanders (I-VT) CEO Tom Steyer (D-CA) Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) Marianne Williamson (D-CA) CEO Andrew Yang (D-NY) 2020 Third Party Candidates: Rep.Justin Amash (L-MI) CEO Don Blankenship (C-WV) Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI) Howie Hawkins (G-NY) Gov.Jesse Ventura (I-MN) |
Republicans running for President:
V.P.Mike Pence(R-IN) Pres.Donald Trump(R-NY) Rep.Joe Walsh (R-IL) Gov.Bill Weld(R-MA & L-NY) 2020 Withdrawn Democratic Candidates: Sen.Stacey Abrams (D-GA) Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-NYC) Sen.Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) Sen.Mike Gravel (D-AK) Sen.Kamala Harris (D-CA) Gov.John Hickenlooper (D-CO) Gov.Jay Inslee (D-WA) Mayor Wayne Messam (D-FL) Rep.Seth Moulton (D-MA) Rep.Beto O`Rourke (D-TX) Rep.Tim Ryan (D-CA) Adm.Joe Sestak (D-PA) Rep.Eric Swalwell (D-CA) | ||
|
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) | |||