Newt Gingrich in Real Change, by Rep. Newt Gingrich (R, GA)


On Corporations: 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act drives IPOs out of the US

A 2005 press report by the London Stock Exchange attributed one reason for its success to the fact that "about 38% of the international companies surveyed said they had considered the US. Of those, 90% said the onerous demands of the new Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance law had made London listing more attractive."

The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which added massive new reams of accounting red tape for businesses, has driven IPOs out of the US. Furthermore, the legislation is leading public companies to delist from the stock market in order to avoid red tape (and potential criminal penalties). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act effectively drives businesses to be LESS accountable than they were before and has done vastly more damage to the American economy than the corporate accounting scandals it was supposed to reform. It has had a substantial effect on New York as a financial center and has been a big asset for London. It is a wound inflicted by Congress on the American economy.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.136-138 Dec 18, 2007

On Crime: Supports Prison Fellowship InnerChange Freedom Initiative

The Prison Fellowship program creates a faith-based center of commitment and activity aimed at changing the prisoner's outlook on life. Its results have been impressive. The graduates of Prison Fellowship's InnerChange Freedom Initiative (IFI) in Texas found that they were two times less likely to be rearrested.

You don't have to believe in the power of faith to appreciate the benefits IFI provides to the community: fewer victims, safer neighborhoods, reduced court cases, and fewer prisoners.

Many government officials find a faith-based solution unacceptable. They would rather have people commit more crimes and do more prison time than risk changing their lives with a faith-based approach.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.214-216 Dec 18, 2007

On Education: More learning options: community college-run charter schools

The Detroit school bureaucracy is a particularly tragic example of the human cost of protecting unionized bureaucracy at the expense of serving the public. Only 22% of entering high school freshmen in the Detroit public school system graduate on time. Th national average is about 70 %.

Consider also that the Detroit public school system will spend $7,469 per pupil. The Detroit school system doesn't fail for lack of money. They fail because success if not the priority. If you measure the Detroit system by whether the checks arrive for the bureaucrats each month no matter how badly they are doing, then it has 100% success rate.

The young people of Detroit need more learning options, but government stands in their way. Michigan community colleges, for example, are prevented by state law from chartering schools in city districts. A charter school is simply a public school freed from the bureaucracy's rules and willing to hold itself accountable for producing results. And guess what? They work.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 51-53 Dec 18, 2007

On Education: Offer coupons to send kids to schools that work best

There is ample evidence of what works in education, but the bureaucracies have systematically ignored all of it. Innovations that work include merit-based pay, increasing teacher-student ratios, revamping union rules to reward the best teachers, bonuses and incentives for new teachers, charter schools, ad offering parents a coupon giving them the opportunity to send their children to the school that works best for them. I've even suggested rewarding student in the poorest neighborhoods by paying them if they get a B or better in math and science.

But real change requires real change, not new rhetoric while doing more o the same old thing. Propping up the failed past at the expense of future generations leads to prison and poverty for too many of our children.

In city after city across the country, education bureaucrats and unions make it quite clear that they put the union's interests ahead of the children.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 57-58 Dec 18, 2007

On Energy & Oil: Billion-dollar prize for first mass-produced hydrogen car

The America that works focuses on inventing a better future and knows that customers will rapidly switch to a better solution. The same will be true for a new energy strategy. We need very large prizes for fundamental breakthroughs. There ought to be a billion-dollar tax-free prize for the first hydrogen car that can be mass-produced for a reasonable price. Hydrogen has to be the ultimate basis for a truly bold energy program because it has no environmental impact and it is universally available as a natural resource. Therefore it would have huge appeal to China and India if it were commercially competitive in price. American technologies for hydrogen vehicles might be one of the biggest economic winners of the next generation.

There should be a substantial tax break for investing in both ethanol and hydrogen supply stations and hydrogen pipelines so the fuel can be delivered when the automobiles are available at a reasonable cost.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.203 Dec 18, 2007

On Energy & Oil: 2008 book: Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less

In 2008, American Solutions launched an online petition drive to demand Congress lift the 25-year-old moratorium on new offshore drilling. We collected 1.5 million signatures. Our effort sparked a nationwide grassroots rebellion that resulted in Congress allowing the moratorium to expire.

I wrote a book in fall 2008 called "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less," describing America's vast energy potential and explain how misguided government policies have prevented us from becoming an energy powerhouse.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.205-206 Dec 18, 2007

On Environment: Katrina's collapse of New Orleans was avoidable

As much as any one things, it was the government's failure to respond to the catastrophe of Katrina that made me determined to launch American Solutions and to insist on a bipartisan national movement to get America back on track. Here are the unspoken--and apparently unspeakable--facts about the disaster in New Orleans.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 44-45 Dec 18, 2007

On Environment: Boston's Big Dig was a classic pork barrel project

Compare success stories in saving time and money with one of the most disastrous public infrastructure projects in modern America" Boston's Big Dig.

The Big Dig highway project was the most expansive such project in U.S history. The initial price tag was $2.6 billion (in 1982 dollars), and it was supposed to be completed in seven years. From the start, it was plagued by leaks, falling debris, delays, and other problems linked to faulty construction. On July 10, 2006, a woman was killed by falling concrete in a connector tunnel. In 2008, the "Boston Globe" reported that the Big Dig's total cost would hit an astounding $22 billion and will not be paid off until 2038.

That sounds disastrous--and it is. The Big Dig was a classic pork barrel project, with weak oversight, no incentives for achievement, and no innovation in management. But that's the way government programs usually work. That's why we need real change for a smarter, more efficient government.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.185-186 Dec 18, 2007

On Environment: Reject apocalyptic warnings; they only lead to higher taxes

In addition to favoring science and innovation over red tape and litigation, we must reject an approach to the environment that relies on apocalyptic warnings.

In every instance the danger was apocalyptic, science and technology were major threats, and the free market was hazardous. Big government, big regulation, centralized bureaucratic controls, and higher taxes were the solution.

Former Vice President Al Gore wrote in his 1992 book "Earth in the Balance", "We have tilted so far toward individual rights and so far away from any sense of obligation that it is now difficult to muster an adequate defense of any rights vested in the community at large or the nation--much less rights properly vested in all humankind or in posterity."

The danger here is that private property rights & individual liberty could be taken away in favor of some collectivist & non-democratic elite's interpretation of what is needed. The level of power that this would give to international bureaucrats is almost beyond belief.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.197-198 Dec 18, 2007

On Government Reform: End judicial supremacy; preserve our Godly heritage

We must have real change that forces our judiciary to acknowledge and respect the central role of our Creator in American history, and real change to bring an end to the idea that the judiciary is supreme over the legislative and executive branches in interpreting the Constitution. That is why in 2009 I helped create a not-for-profit organization called Renewing American Leadership whose mission is to defend and advance Americans civilization--specifically, to preserve and protect our American history and our Godly heritage.

The Declaration of Independence assumes that God is sovereign over the universe. And it assumes that man must obey an order of justice God Himself has instituted.

The challenge comes from a bigoted anti-religious judiciary asserting a doctrine of judicial supremacy. In hostility to American history, these anti-religious bigots insist that religious belief is inherently divisive, and that public debate can proceed on secular terms only when religious belief is excluded.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.165-169 Dec 18, 2007

On Health Care: Focus on health as a moral issue

After I stepped down as Speaker, I became involved in another long-term project: reforming the nation's health care system. Health is the largest sector of the economy; it is literally a matter of individual life and death, and in the case of a pandemic or an engineered biological or nuclear attack, it could be a matter of America's life and death. I began studying health issues in 1999, and since then I have not only written and lectured extensively on health, but I also helped create the Center for Health Transformation, which has become an internationally recognized leader for rethinking health policy and seeking health care solutions. I believe it will contribute significantly to a great transformation of our health system, focusing on health as a moral issue and bringing together the public and private leaders in the health field to achieve the changes the system needs.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 89 Dec 18, 2007

On Health Care: 21st-century personalized intelligent health system

In a 21st-century, personalized, intelligent health system, individuals have accurate, timely, personalized knowledge about their health and treatment options. A key test for any new system is its ability to provide affordable access to quality care for the poorest and sickest among us. The elimination of health disparities must be a critical goal: no American can be left out. The new system has many characteristics, which can be distilled into three major components:
  1. Centered on the Individual
  2. Information Technology and Quality
  3. Health, Not Health Care
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.227-238 Dec 18, 2007

On Homeland Security: Gingrich-plus-up: $1B increase in 1990s Pentagon funding

I first began working with the Army Training and Doctrine Command in 1979. Since then I have become the longest-serving teacher in the senior military. In 2003, I was serving on the Defense Policy Board and the Transformation Advisory Group of the Joint Force Command. Beyond the Pentagon I was known in intelligence community as the only person how had insisted on a billion dollar-plus increase in funding in the 1990s (a point the 9-11 Commission made in its report; it called it the "Gingrich plus-up").
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.108 Dec 18, 2007

On Immigration: Deport 55,000 illegal aliens with multiple arrest records

According to a report by the Government Accountability Office, our country has 55,322 criminal illegal aliens who have been arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about eight arrests per illegal alien. Twenty-six percent (about 15,000) have had eleven or more arrests. Imagine a government bureaucracy so incompetent it can't even remove people from the United States when they have been arrested eleven or more times.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 29 Dec 18, 2007

On Immigration: Elite immigration solution incompatible with American values

There is a clear path to an effective immigration solution that is better for America and better for immigration. The challenge is to get the elites to listen to the American people.

Unfortunately, the Washington elites have agreed on a definition of success that is infuriating to the average American. The elites on the left oppose border control, oppose English as the official government language, oppose expanding legal immigration, and want to find a way to allow everyone here illegally to stay, all while prohibiting illegal immigration in the future. The country is convinced that this so-called solution is incompatible with American values and will weaken America's future.

In trying to force their left-wing solution on a country that rejects it, the elite have resorted to describing their critics as racist, xenophobic, unrealistic, and much worse. Those attacks are merely a sign of the elites' desperation.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.127 Dec 18, 2007

On Immigration: Lax border security lets in terrorists

The American people overwhelmingly want to see their borders controlled as a matter of national security. By more than 7 to 1 (86% to 12%), Americas believe terrorists are trying to enter the United States illegally.

Most Americans understand the irrationality of intense security at airports and lax security at the borders. This requires the terrorist to be dumb enough that he insists on flying into the United States when he could simply ride a truck or walk into the country unimpeded. The refusal to control the border has been one of the most infuriating aspects of modern government, and one of the most inexcusable.

The American people want reform that establishes English as the official language of government, reform that controls the borders, reform that doesn't reward illegality, reform that enforces penalties on employers.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.132 Dec 18, 2007

On Jobs: Unions want to take away right to secret-ballot elections

As unions cannot win many secret-ballot elections to organize workers, they have come up with a new solution. It's not to make the union more desirable. It's simply to take away the American worker's right to have a secret-ballot election. This would repeal reforms to protect workers from intimidation and extortion that go back to 1935. It's not an idle left-wing fantasy: it actually passed the House of Representatives in early 2007 with almost no public notice. Under the Orwellian name of the "Freedom of Choice Act," this legislation is backed by President Obama, who has vowed to sign the measure if passed by Congress, where it enjoys wide Democratic support. This the Democratic Congress and president are fighting to eliminate a fundamental American right just to make it easier for their union allies to acquire more members, more dues, and more power. And yet 89 percent of the American people don't want workers to lose their secret-ballot rights.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 35 Dec 18, 2007

On Principles & Values: Red-blue split in America is 85% Americans and 15% fringe

Americans believe overwhelmingly that we need a change in course. Americans are surprisingly united in this belief, and in the conviction that real change will never come from Washington. On this, like so many things, Americans are absolutely right.

The media tell us America is a nation divided between conservative red states and liberal blue states. They tell us that red and blue are equally divided--which is why elections are so close, why Congress seems gridlocked, and why nothing ever seems to get done in Washington.

But that's simply not true. The reality is the American people are united on almost every important issue facing our country. The real division is between red-white-blue America (about 85% of the country) and a fringe on the left (about 15% of the country). Not only have the media perpetuated the myth that the country is equally divided, but the elites on the left fringe have also insisted that their positions hold moral superiority. Neither is true.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 3 Dec 18, 2007

On Principles & Values: After 2000, Republicans failed to govern successfully

After the 2000 election it became obvious that something was profoundly wrong with Republican political strategies. From 2004, I realized (after 5 years of painful reevaluation) why. There had been three significant opportunities for conservative parties to adapt by heeding the lessons of history. Yet in each case, the party failed to learn.
  1. In Great Britain, Thatcher failed to change the culture of the Conservative Party, which reverted to an unthinking, non-reform style as soon as she left office.
  2. Reagan failed to change the culture of presidential Republicans; the first Bush administration got rid of virtually all the Reaganites as soon as it could, and within two years was cutting deals with the Democrats to raise taxes.
  3. Those of u who believed in a reform-oriented, majority Republican Party could not change the minority mindset of the House Republicans. The minority thinkers had no idea what it had taken to win the majority in 1994, and they had no interest in learning.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 13-15 Dec 18, 2007

On Principles & Values: Red-vs.-Blue fails: propose Red-White-and-Blue solutions

In retrospect, it seems clear that the two greatest habits that get the GOP in a lot of trouble [are] emphasizing the partisan divide, and emphasizing the negative. Together they can be summed up as the red-versus-blue fixation. This flawed political focus has had a devastating effect on the party.

The American People Want Red-White-and-Blue Solutions: Red-versus-blue can work for one or two election cycles, but eventually it set up three destructive dynamics.

  1. It continually narrows the playing field. Candidates give up on persuading anyone on the other side to join their cause and focus instead on narrow, partisan appeals
  2. The requirement to maximize turnout with partisan appeals leads to a shrillness that eventually drives away independents & moderates
  3. The most effective turnout mechanism is to scare or anger your side into voting, which in the long run leads to a numbness that convinces all but the hardest partisans that your messages are phony and misleading.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 19-20 Dec 18, 2007

On Principles & Values: 1979: wrote Art of Transformation; 1990s: implemented it

I outlined in great detail how to use [my] approach in two books, "The Art of Transformation" and "Implementing the Art of Transformation." It evolved from 1993 to 1995 when I worked with more than 375 candidates to develop the Contract with America and help to run the House of Representatives with a new majority. Try this thought experiment. Take any area of interest and go through the key planning steps:
  1. What do you value?
  2. What vision of success do you have for achieving what you value?
  3. What metrics would tell you whether you are making progress toward your visions?
  4. What strategies would enable you to achieve your vision?
  5. What projects would enable you to implement your strategies successfully? (A project is a definable, delegatable achievement and the key to entrepreneurial management.)
  6. What tasks have to be done well to complete each project?
When you understand how to work through these six questions, you will be ready to lead.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 81-82 Dec 18, 2007

On Social Security: Move retirement plans to personal savings plans

There is a $2 trillion "fiscal hole" in unfunded retirement benefits and retirement health benefits for state and local workers. One issue is fairness: not only are we being unfair to our children and grandchildren, but we're also being unfair to today's taxpayers and retirees. [Analysts] say the obvious: "The only good options are to cut benefits and move state and local retirement plans to a pre-funded basis with personal savings plans"--the unreformed Left doesn't understand this at all.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 31-32 Dec 18, 2007

On Social Security: Invest 50% of payroll taxes in personal accounts

We will have to rethink Social Security because of our new ability to live longer. Everyone knows Social Security is going bankrupt. By 2017 Social Security will start running cash deficits. The trust funds run out in 2042.

Suppose that workers were free to save and invest, in their own personal accounts, up to roughly 50% of what they currently pay in payroll taxes. Employers would contribute the same amount to their workers' personal accounts out of the payroll taxes they currently pay on behalf of their employees. This plan was proposed in a bill by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. John Sununu (R-NH). Lower income workers would be allowed to invest a slightly higher percentage of what they currently pay in payroll taxes, and higher-income workers a little less.

If a personal account pays more than the Social Security benefits it replaces, [the taxpayer] gets to keep the gain. If the account is insufficient to pay for all the benefits it replaces, the government pays the difference.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.149-152&158 Dec 18, 2007

On Tax Reform: Flat tax proposal criticized for losing popular tax breaks

Four out of five Americans would like to have the option of a one-page tax form with a single tax rate. This concept of an optional flat tax rate was developed by Steve Forbes when his flat tax campaign was undermined by criticisms that it would take away popular tax breaks. Forbes proposed giving American taxpayers an opportunity to choose simplicity versus complexity and a single rate over a lot of deductions. They call it the free choice flat tax, and it's an idea whose time has come.

All workers and corporations would have the freedom to choose each year to file their income taxes either under the new free choice flat tax option or under the current US income tax code.

Rhode Island adopted an optional flat tax, and lawmakers there expect that it will make the state more competitive with neighboring states in attracting new business and entrepreneurs who create jobs.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.143-144 Dec 18, 2007

On Tax Reform: Tax hikes retard growth and depress revenues

    What we learned in 1995, and what we must recognize today, is that there are four key principles to achieving a balanced budget:
  1. Cut taxes to increase economic growth and therefore increase revenues. It may seem counterintuitive--and it certainly is to elite editorial writers--but cutting taxes to increase economic growth is the best long-term strategy for balancing the budget. Tax hikes retard economic growth and depress revenues.
  2. Set priorities and increase spending in key areas while reducing it in non-essential areas.
  3. Eliminate pork barrel spending. One of the reasons I strongly favor a balanced budget commitment is because it disciplines politicians.
  4. Shift from expansive, wasteful systems to smarter spending. Modern corporations that achieve success do so by being smarter and more productive, not just by being cheaper.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.178-181 Dec 18, 2007

On Technology: NASA bureaucrats hijacked the great space adventure

One of the great disappointments of my life has been the hijacking of the great space adventure by the NASA bureaucracy. Space should be an area in which American innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship are producing constant breakthroughs that increase our economic capability, improve our quality of life, and raise our prestige around the world. Instead, space has been hijacked by dull, inefficient, and unimaginative bureaucracies and transformed into an expensive, risk-adverse, and sad undertaking.

I propose a dramatically bolder approach. NASA currently has plans to spend twenty years getting to Mars at a cost estimated of up to $450 billion. A very significant amount of that time and money will be spent studying, planning, and thinking. We would get much further much faster if we simply established two prizes: a tax-free $5 billion prize for the first permanent lunar base and a tax-free $20 billion prize for the first team to get to Mars and back.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.187-191 Dec 18, 2007

On Technology: Establish three high-speed rail corridors; NY-MA; FL; & CA

The French & Japanese have made substantial investments in creating high-speed rail corridors. The Chinese are now following their lead. The US has 3 corridors that are very conducive to this kind of high-speed train investment. We could build a system between Boston and Washington; from Miami to Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville; and from San Diego to San Francisco.

There are three problems with trying to build high-speed systems in the US and, not surprisingly, all three relate to government.

  1. Union work rules make it impossible, at least if Amtrak has anything to do with it.
  2. Pork barrel politicians waste money subsidizing absurdly uneconomic routes
  3. Regulations and litigation involved in large-scale construction have become time- consuming and expensive.
I support a 21st century rail system that is privately built, run efficiently, and capable of earning its own way. The US should have a railroad system that works for us, and not for the Amtrak bureaucracy and their unions.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.211-212 Dec 18, 2007

On War & Peace: Goal was to liberate Iraq from Saddam, not to occupy

No one in the initial war planning expected the US would try to run Iraq after defeating Saddam. There was a general belief that portions of the Iraqi army could be converted in to a policing force.

It was vital from day one that the US be seen as a liberator and not as an occupier. For some reason the lesson learned in Afghanistan--of liberating and not occupying--did not get across. Like most bureaucracies, this one looked after itself. It created a green zone of protection and comfort to shield the bureaucrats. By creating a green zone, it acknowledged that the entire rest of the country was a red zone, a danger zone. Worst of all, the decision to have an explicitly American administrator of Iraq guaranteed that America's role would change from liberator to occupier.

By Dec. 2003, things were so bad that I went public and declared that we had "gone off a cliff" in the June decisions, and that until they were reversed things were just going to get worse.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.110-111 Dec 18, 2007

On War & Peace: The "Irreconcilable Wing of Islam" threatens our way of life

Beyond the Petraeus Report, we need a report on the larger war with the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam. This enemy is irreconcilable with the modern civilized world because its values would block any woman from being in this room, having a job, voting, being education. It is irreconcilable because it cannot tolerate other religions or other lifestyles. It represents what some have called an Islamofascist approach to imposing its views on others and as such it is a moral threat to our way of life, to freedom, and to the rule of law.

The Irreconcilable Wing of Islam has emerged as an extremist movement against not only non-Muslims but also against moderate Muslims who wish both to preserve their faith and to be a part of the modern world.

Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.292 Dec 18, 2007

On Welfare & Poverty: Ten Lessons from Successfully Transforming Welfare

There are ten big lessons I have drawn from the successful efforts to design and implement welfare reform. I suggest that we apply these lessons to developing solutions that will elevate the condition of our fellow citizens.
  1. Successful reform always starts with a big idea
  2. Decide whether to repair or replace
  3. Great change never starts with government
  4. Cheerful persistence is necessary to successfully deliver large-scale reform in a free society
  5. Collaboration is critical (including involvement of key governors)
  6. Real change always requires winning the argument
  7. Words matter; communication good policy
  8. Real change must be consistent with broad American values
  9. Opponents of reform must be forced to carry the burden of their positions
  10. Real change must be citizen-centered.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p. 270-274 Dec 18, 2007

The above quotations are from Real Change:
From the World that Fails to the World that Works
, by Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of Newt Gingrich.
Click here for Newt Gingrich on all issues.
Newt Gingrich on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Feb 21, 2019