Supreme Court 2020s: on Jobs


Ketanji Brown Jackson: Follows precedent in workplace racial discrimination cases

Reuters reviewed 25 cases in which Jackson issued substantive rulings as a U.S. district court judge in Washington from 2013 to 2021 involving plaintiffs who made claims of racial discrimination, most involving the workplace. Of the 25 cases, 22 were pursued by Black plaintiffs. Jackson ruled against 19 of the Black plaintiffs.

She ruled in favor of plaintiffs in only 3 of the cases. "Plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases lose a lot; they are notoriously hard to win," said an employment law expert.

In one case, Jackson declined to certify racial discrimination claims brought by two Black workers against defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp as a class action that would have involved potentially more than 5,000 employees.

Jackson's rulings show that she followed Supreme Court precedent in analyzing cases brought under the federal law that prohibits employment discrimination, a claim that can be difficult to prove because plaintiffs rarely have direct evidence of bias.

Source: Reuters on 2022 SCOTUS Confirmation Hearings Mar 17, 2022

Ketanji Brown Jackson: Lengthy discovery needed in employment discrimination cases

In Ross v. U.S. Capitol Police, an employment discrimination case, Judge Jackson addressed a motion to dismiss from the US Capitol Police. Judge Jackson observed that summary judgment [should come only] "after the plaintiff has been given adequate time for discovery." Jackson considered that general principle to be especially important in employment discrimination cases, where a plaintiff's success often depends on the whether a defendant's proffered reasons for taking an employment action are pretextual. As Judge Jackson observed, without the benefit of discovery, "it is hard to fathom that the plaintiff would be able to present any evidence related to the employer's reasons for the adverse employment action at all, much less evidence that would be a sufficient basis upon which a rational jury could conclude that the defendant intentionally discriminated [or retaliated] against the plaintiff." Based on this analysis, Jackson concluded that a motion for summary judgment was premature.
Source: Cong. Research Service on 2022 SCOTUS Confirmation Hearings Mar 14, 2022

Ketanji Brown Jackson: Reversed narrowing of federal collective bargaining rules

Labor groups--longtime allies of Biden--were vocal about wanting a nominee with a record of backing workers' rights. Jackson's first written opinion as a DC Circuit judge was a win for federal employees. In a 3-0 decision earlier this month, the court struck down a 2020 policy change by the Federal Labor Relations Authority that narrowed the circumstances when agencies were required to engage in collective bargaining before making changes to work conditions.
Source: BuzzFeed.com on 2022 SCOTUS Confirmation Hearings Feb 25, 2022

ACLU: No discrimination for sexual orientation or gender identity

By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.

The transgender case ruled on by the court involved Aimee Stephens, who was dismissed from her job at a Michigan funeral home two weeks after she told them she was transgender. Her boss explained she failed to follow the dress code.

The ACLU told the court hers was a clear case of sex discrimination, because if she had been assigned female sex at birth she would not have been fired for wanting to come to work dressed as a woman. Instead Stephens was assigned male sex and was fired because she failed to conform to the sex stereotypes of her employer, it argued.

The Trump administration had urged the court to rule that Title VII does not cover cases like these.

Source: NBC News on 2020 SCOTUS rulings Jun 15, 2020

  • The above quotations are from Supreme Court decisions 2020 to date.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Jobs.
  • Click here for other issues (main summary page).
  • Click here for more quotes by Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Jobs.
  • Click here for more quotes by John Roberts on Jobs.
2020 Presidential contenders on Jobs:
  Democrats running for President:
Sen.Michael Bennet (D-CO)
V.P.Joe Biden (D-DE)
Mayor Mike Bloomberg (I-NYC)
Gov.Steve Bullock (D-MT)
Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D-IN)
Sen.Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Secy.Julian Castro (D-TX)
Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI)
Rep.John Delaney (D-MD)
Rep.Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI)
Sen.Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Gov.Deval Patrick (D-MA)
Sen.Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
CEO Tom Steyer (D-CA)
Sen.Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
Marianne Williamson (D-CA)
CEO Andrew Yang (D-NY)

2020 Third Party Candidates:
Rep.Justin Amash (L-MI)
CEO Don Blankenship (C-WV)
Gov.Lincoln Chafee (L-RI)
Howie Hawkins (G-NY)
Gov.Gary Johnson(L-NM)
Howard Schultz(I-WA)
Gov.Jesse Ventura (I-MN)
Republicans running for President:
Sen.Ted Cruz(R-TX)
Gov.Larry Hogan (R-MD)
Gov.John Kasich(R-OH)
V.P.Mike Pence(R-IN)
Gov.Mark Sanford (R-SC)
Pres.Donald Trump(R-NY)
Rep.Joe Walsh (R-IL)
Gov.Bill Weld(R-MA & L-NY)

2020 Withdrawn Democratic Candidates:
Sen.Stacey Abrams (D-GA)
Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-NYC)
Sen.Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Sen.Mike Gravel (D-AK)
Sen.Kamala Harris (D-CA)
Gov.John Hickenlooper (D-CO)
Gov.Jay Inslee (D-WA)
Mayor Wayne Messam (D-FL)
Rep.Seth Moulton (D-MA)
Rep.Beto O`Rourke (D-TX)
Rep.Tim Ryan (D-CA)
Adm.Joe Sestak (D-PA)
Rep.Eric Swalwell (D-CA)
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Mar 21, 2022