Federal courts said the administration had acted arbitrarily when phasing out the program. The courts pointed to the administration's thin justification--reasoning Roberts and the Supreme Court eventually agreed with.
The 5-4 ruling was written by Chief Justice Roberts and joined by Ginsburg, emphasizing that the administration failed to provide an adequate reason to justify ending the DACA program. Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. "'The wisdom of those decisions 'is none of our concern.' We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action."
|
The above quotations are from Supreme Court decisions 2020 to date.
Click here for other excerpts from Supreme Court decisions 2020 to date. Click here for other excerpts by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Click here for a profile of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
| Click for details -- or send donations to: 1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140 E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org (We rely on your support!) |