Saving Freedom: on Principles & Values


Barack Obama: OpEd: Spoke often during campaign of common struggles

Democrats have united [many] groups in a common struggle against the injustices of a free society, free enterprise, and religious-based moral judgments. In his presidential campaign, Barack Obama spoke often of common struggles and called on Americans to unite "by binding our grievances." Socialists understand that uniting people behind centralized power requires a belief that without the help of government they will stand alone against oppression and injustice. The struggle of one group must be linked t the struggle of others and people must be "agitated" to unite & fight.

The Democratic Party has become synonymous with government security. Democrats agitate & unite by reminding voters that America has been unfair, and without government protection, they will be alone and powerless. In so many words "freedom: is their enemy. Ironically the more dependent Americans become on government, the more insecure and fearful they become. Democrats use this fear to manipulate their votes at election time.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 48-50 Jul 4, 2009

Barack Obama: OpEd: Victimology master; irrevocably bound to tragic past

Obama became a master of "victimology" during his campaign for president. He painted a picture of America as a collection of groups who have been victimized by injustice. In May 2008, Obama attempted to unite Americans around their dissatisfaction with their country, [citing] "the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man who's been laid off, the immigrant trying to fed his family."

Obama offered hope not in an American identity but a hope that America could change from its repressive past. The enchantment of Obama to the disenchanted was derived from the fact that much of what he said was true. There has been political injustice. But instead of inspiring Americans with hope and pride in the greatness of our country and the strides we've made toward justice, he inspired people to unite around the wrongs & injustices that they have suffered because of their affiliation with a victimized group. Obama's platform was the antithesis of liberty; he offered hope in more government

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 68 Jul 4, 2009

George W. Bush: OpEd: Compassionate conservatism means big spending

The Democratic Party has become synonymous with government security. Democrats agitate and unite by reminding voters that America has been unfair, and without the protection of government, they will be alone and powerless. In so many words "freedom" is their enemy. Ironically the more dependent Americans become on government, the more insecure and fearful they become. Democrats use this fear to manipulate their votes at election time.

Republicans have become America's minority party because they have been poor salesmen of the benefits of true freedom. As Americans have become more dependent on government, Republican have tried to use a "Democrat lite" approach, trying to appeal to voters' desire for more security. George W. Bush tried to appeal to America's need for security with his big-spending, "compassionate conservative" agenda. But few Republicans have been willing to tell Americans the truth: people are most secure when they are most free.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 48-50 Jul 4, 2009

Jim DeMint: Most members of Congress lean towards socialism

One of the primary causes of the growth of socialism is the blurring of the lines between the role of government and the proper functions of a free society. Voters must distinguish between the role of voluntary charities and the proper role of local, state, and federal governments. I hope this book with help Americans reestablish these constitutional boundaries.

Few in America and in Congress would call themselves socialists. They believe they are liberals, progressives, Democrats, compassionate conservatives, moderate Republicans, or obedient religious adherents.

While they would never admit it, most members of Congress lean toward socialist policies. They're not involved in a conspiracy. Nor are they intent on destroying freedom. They are patriotic Americans who want the best for our country and our people, but they just don't understand how freedom works, and they don't understand the dangers of socialism.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 11 Jul 4, 2009

Jim DeMint: Socialists prefer arbitrary affirmative justice to equality

In the McCain-Obama debates in 2008, both candidates blamed the massive Wall Street and financial market collapse on corporate greed. Obama went further, citing markets running wild after deregulation. Neither candidate defended free enterprise or explained how bad government policies had been the root cause of the problem. Obama confidently made his case with socialist principles.

The socialist principles of "equality" and "justice" sound like ideas we should all support, but the socialists' definition of equality is not equality of opportunities but an equality of outcomes. They are not speaking of equal justice under law. Socialists promote a more arbitrary "affirmative justice" government action to combat perceived discrimination or suspected prejudice. To save freedom, Americans must understand these advocates of government-imposed social and economic justice want to transform America into a social democracy that whether they know it or not, advances the cause of socialism.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 29 Jul 4, 2009

Jim DeMint: Freedom is on the decline in America

The dilemma for democratic governments is how to balance the use of force with the requirements of freedom. Governments must have laws & the ability to enforce them. Without some control there will be chaos. The ironic political question has always been: how much societal control is necessary for freedom to thrive, and at what point does control by government destroy freedom?

It is not an overstatement to say freedom describes the highest state of human existence. For more than 2 centuries, this elusiv treasure has thrived in the US. Freedom is hard to define. We can't see it or touch it. Yet freedom has been written about and spoken of throughout history as the height of individual achievement and the ultimate goal of civilization.

By all objective measures freedom is on the decline in America. The philosophy of socialism has crept into almost every aspect of American life, and this philosophy has slowly and indiscernibly stripped many American of their prosperity, dignity, and hope for the future.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 55-57 Jul 4, 2009

Jim DeMint: Secular government good; but secular society destructive

On one of my trips to Iraq in 2005, as I encouraged these Iraqi candidates to adopt secular government, it occurred to me I was fighting against the destructive forces of secularism back home in America.

This personal conflict encouraged me to think more clearly about the difference between a secular government and a secular society. One is good; the other is destructive. We do notwant a government that represents a particular religion or forces a particular religion on its people. Our government should be religion-neutral or secular.

But we also do not want a government that purges religion from society. We do not want a government that prohibits religious-based moral judgments by individuals or private institutions. We do not want a government that excludes constructive values and principles. And we do not a government that promotes destructive behaviors opposed to the traditional values of our nation.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p.154 Jul 4, 2009

Jimmy Carter: 1970s: Too many of us worship self-indulgence & consumption

As the debt and dependency of people and the government increased, America found itself in difficult times in the last years of the 1970s. Pres. Carter attempted to blame both the people and the government: "In a nation that was proud of hard work, stron families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption." Carter continued by explaining that we have "a system of government that seems incapable of action...a Congress twisted and pulle in every direction by hundreds of well financed and powerful special interests."

Carter missed the real cause of America's problems. Government was trying to do too much. Government becomes "incapable of acting" when it attempts to serve a large number of particular needs rather than promoting the general welfare. When the federal government began to involve itself in planning specific aspects of America's culture and economy, it was inevitable there would be destructive and costly consequences.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 35-36 Jul 4, 2009

Milton Friedman: Individual choice is the essence of freedom

"Political leaders in capitalist countries who cheer the collapse of socialism in other countries continue to favor socialist solutions in their own. They know the words, but they have not learned the tune." --Milton and Rose Friedman, published in the best seller "Free to Choose" in 1980.

An individual making his own choices based on his own values, according to Friedman, was the essence of freedom.

Friedman also argued that the free operation of the economy provides a backstop to the centralization of power in the government sector. When economic and social decisions are made in the private sector and wealth is held by individuals, the size and scope of government power is restricted.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p.225-226 Jul 4, 2009

Paul Ryan: America's greatest strengths lie in Americans themselves

"This Road Map is built on a fundamental conviction that America's greatest strengths lie in Americans themselves--in their creativity, their productive capacities and their personal initiative. ...Therefore this plan, to the greatest extent possible, builds on the initiative of individual Americans. Exercised responsibly in a free economy and a democratic political system. Strengthening the role of the individual is the key to invigorating the society and the economy." --Congressman Paul Ryan
Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p.242 Jul 4, 2009

Ron Paul: Just about everything Congress does is unconstitutional

[After swearing tp uphold support the Constitution in the oath of office], I rarely heard the Constitution spoken of again--not when considering legislation, not when considering any new government program. It was never used as justification for legislation because there was little we did that fit within the limited powers of the federal government specified by the Constitution. Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, a physician and former presidential candidate, was known as "Dr. No" because he voted no on almost every piece of legislation. He argued that just about everything Congress did was unconstitutional. He was usually right.

It doesn't take a legal scholar to see that the main purpose of the Constitution is to limit the role, scope, and power of the federal government. It does this by dividing and specifying the duties and powers of the federal government and by reserving all other powers to individuals or the states.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 88 Jul 4, 2009

Ronald Reagan: Preserve the last best hope of man on earth

"Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment. ... You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness" --President Ronald Reagan
Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 12 Jul 4, 2009

Ronald Reagan: Private values must be at the heart of public policies

"Private values," said President Reagan in his 1986 state-of-the-union message, "must be at the heart of public policies." Americans have always valued faith, character, hard work, personal responsibility, self-reliance, discipline, competition, charity, fairness, and achievement. Values originate from what people believe, especially what they believe about God.

Reagan won the hearts and votes of the American people by shifting the debate from a myriad of confusing political issues to values Americans recognized immediately as their own. By reminding Americans of our goodness and strengths, Reagan held up a mirror and helped us see ourselves at our very best. Reagan made us believe we could get across any river on our own. Reagan convinced Americans that freedom would work for everyone and that the big-government welfare state was just a fox clothed in deceptive political promises.

Unfortunately the cause of freedom has had too few articulate champions since Ronald Reagan.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 3 Jul 4, 2009

Ronald Reagan: Replace left-right with up (freedom)& down (totalitarianism)

Americans who have become increasingly dependent on the federal government must now make a difficult choice. Reagan said we must decide "whether we believe in our capacity for self-government of whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to man's dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ash heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course."

Reagan knew every generation of Americans must make a choice between freedom and socialism. Today that choice confronts Americans more urgently than ever before.

Source: Saving Freedom, by Jim DeMint, p. 7-8 Jul 4, 2009

  • The above quotations are from Saving Freedom:
    We Can Stop America's Slide into Socialism
    , by Sen. Jim DeMint.
  • Click here for definitions & background information on Principles & Values.
  • Click here for other issues (main summary page).
  • Click here for more quotes by Jim DeMint on Principles & Values.
Candidates and political leaders on Principles & Values:

Retired Senate as of Jan. 2015:
GA:Chambliss(R)
IA:Harkin(D)
MI:Levin(D)
MT:Baucus(D)
NE:Johanns(R)
OK:Coburn(R)
SD:Johnson(D)
WV:Rockefeller(D)

Resigned from 113th House:
AL-1:Jo Bonner(R)
FL-19:Trey Radel(R)
LA-5:Rod Alexander(R)
MA-5:Ed Markey(D)
MO-9:Jo Ann Emerson(R)
NC-12:Melvin Watt(D)
SC-1:Tim Scott(R)
Retired House to run for Senate or Governor:
AR-4:Tom Cotton(R)
GA-1:Jack Kingston(R)
GA-10:Paul Broun(R)
GA-11:Phil Gingrey(R)
HI-1:Colleen Hanabusa(D)
IA-1:Bruce Braley(D)
LA-6:Bill Cassidy(R)
ME-2:Mike Michaud(D)
MI-14:Gary Peters(D)
MT-0:Steve Daines(R)
OK-5:James Lankford(R)
PA-13:Allyson Schwartz(D)
TX-36:Steve Stockman(R)
WV-2:Shelley Capito(R)
Retired House as of Jan. 2015:
AL-6:Spencer Bachus(R)
AR-2:Tim Griffin(R)
CA-11:George Miller(D)
CA-25:Howard McKeon(R)
CA-33:Henry Waxman(D)
CA-45:John Campbell(R)
IA-3:Tom Latham(R)
MN-6:Michele Bachmann(R)
NC-6:Howard Coble(R)
NC-7:Mike McIntyre(D)
NJ-3:Jon Runyan(R)
NY-4:Carolyn McCarthy(D)
NY-21:Bill Owens(D)
PA-6:Jim Gerlach(R)
UT-4:Jim Matheson(D)
VA-8:Jim Moran(D)
VA-10:Frank Wolf(R)
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Feb 22, 2019