Richard Mourdock in Shortest Way Home, by Pete Buttigieg


On Budget & Economy: OpEd: 2009 auto bailout not worthwhile despite saving jobs

[Mourdock argued in June 2009 before the Supreme Court to stop the Chrysler bailout, but lost]. Mourdock himself was no worse off for his courtroom rejection. He made a name for himself, and in his own mind he had stood on principle by defying Washington and the auto workers who had pushed so hard to save their jobs.

Mourdock simply could not accept that government getting involved could be a good thing, even if it prevented the destruction of thousands of lives. But I wonder, sometimes, whether he talked to any of the families whose livelihoods could have been wrecked by his legal adventure. Did he think about the stakes for them?

To Mourdock, it seems, the most important issue at stake in the auto rescue was that investors on the bond market would have to take a haircut. To the rest of us, the most important issue was that families lives could be ruined by the same kind of economic disaster that had nearly killed my hometown half a century earlier.

Source: Shortest Way Home, by Pete Buttigieg, p. 87-8 Feb 12, 2019

On Corporations: 2009: Challenged Chrysler auto bailout, and lost

Mourdock was a purist when it came to free markets, and therefore was totally against the idea of government playing a role in the economy. The auto bailout was a Bush-initiated program designed to hold off a possible depression, but that didn't make it any more acceptable in Mourdock's view.

Cleverly, Mourdock realized that Indiana's pension funds owned some Chrysler bonds, and reasoned that this might give him standing in court to challenge the deal. When else would an obscure state treasurer get a chance to not only assert free-market principles but also provoke a showdown with the Obama administration? The temptation was irresistible, and so Mourdock went to court.

The stakes were enormous: If he succeeded, the entire rescue might have been prevented, pushing the company into liquidation. The company, its assets, the jobs--would be gone forever.

On May 29 2009, New York's federal bankruptcy court rejected the motion. Mourdock appealed. In June, the Supreme Court also affirmed the sale.

Source: Shortest Way Home, by Pete Buttigieg, p. 85-6 Feb 12, 2019

On Families & Children: Pregnancies resulting from rape express the will of God

Almost immediately after beating me, Mourdock got to work on his true objective: running for Senate in 2012. Using the treasurer's office as a platform, he challenged the Republican incumbent Dick Lugar.

Helped by his far-right credentials and loyal Tea Party base, Mourdock won the primary, ending Lugar's thirty-six years of Senate service.

In the general election Mourdock faced Donnelly, who had entered the Senate race after his House district got redrawn unfavorably by the now very Republican state legislature. During the final debate in the last days of the election, Mourdock made another national splash--this time by saying that he believed pregnancies resulting from rape were an expression of the will of God. An outcry followed and national Republicans distanced themselves from him, allowing Donnelly to beat the odds and win the seat.

Source: Shortest Way Home, by Pete Buttigieg, p.102 Feb 12, 2019

The above quotations are from Shortest Way Home
One Mayor's Challenge and a Model for America's Future

by Pete Buttigieg
.
Click here for other excerpts from Shortest Way Home
One Mayor's Challenge and a Model for America's Future

by Pete Buttigieg
.
Click here for other excerpts by Richard Mourdock.
Click here for a profile of Richard Mourdock.
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: May 21, 2019