John Kerry in State of Denial, by Bob Woodward
On Principles & Values:
Rejected challenging Ohio irregularities as too “personal”
[The day after the 2004 election] Kerry was up at 7AM. He had decisions to make- First, he could mount a challenge in Ohio based on the provisional ballots.
- Second, he could challenge Ohio based on allegations of voting irregularities.
- Third,
and most dramatic, he had a dossier that showed how people in Democratic precincts in Ohio waited up to seven hours to vote. In Republican precincts there were no lines. Eight voting machines in some Republican precincts, and only one or two in some
Democratic precincts.
Kerry could fly to Ohio with a press entourage and stand with a whole bunch of people who had been disenfranchised, and cal for a re-vote. But the biggest impact on Kerry was the number of provision votes. There just weren’t
enough. Kerry decided to accept the result. “To do otherwise,” he said later, “would have personal. It would have been venal. As strongly as I feel that it is flawed, deeply flawed, it would have been the wrong thing to do, to prolong the agony.”
Source: State of Denial, by Bob Woodward, p.350
Oct 1, 2006
On Principles & Values:
Challenging Ohio voting irregularities was too "personal"
[The day after the 2004 election] Kerry had decisions to make:- He could mount a challenge in Ohio based on the provisional ballots. But the number of provisionals was roughly equivalent to Bush's lead, so Kerry would have to take virtually all of
them.
- He could challenge Ohio based on allegations of voting irregularities.
- His campaign had a dossier that showed how people in Democratic precincts in Ohio waited 3 to 7 hours to vote. In Republican precincts there were no lines, and voters went
through in 5 minutes, [based on] 8 voting machines in some Republican precincts, and only 1 or 3 in Democratic precincts. There was a real disparity.
It could be unbelievably powerful, Kerry thought. Kerry realized that fighting would mean leaving
the country in disarray for the 2nd presidential election in a row. He decided to accept the result. "To do otherwise," he said later, "would have been personal. It would have been just the wrong thing to do when you're running for president of the US."
Source: State of Denial, by Bob Woodward, p.350-1
Oct 1, 2006
Page last updated: Feb 24, 2019