Barbara Radnofsky in Texas 2006 Senate Debate


On Health Care: Don’t criminalize Medicare negotiating for drug prices

Q: The prescription drug plan prohibits Medicare from negotiating for lower prices of prescription drug. The VA has long negotiated, which results in lower prices for most drugs. Why not allow negotiating?

HUTCHISON: We should look at that, but the plan was a different type of plan, where we had private companies competing, and it is working very well. The “donut hole” [of missed coverage] gives people the choice to cover the donut hole, or they don’t have to, and that determines their cost.

RADNOFSKY: That response addressed the donut hole, not the criminalization of US government conduct. Of course Medicare should be allowed to use its massive bargaining power to negotiate better prices for drugs. It consistently works well for the VA. The only people who are in favor of criminalizing the negotiation of drug prices are people who profit from selling drugs.

JAMESON: Tweaking a bankrupt system is a parlor game. We need a real solution. I’m calling for universal mandatory health insurance.

Source: Texas 2006 Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV-TX (X-ref Hutch) Oct 19, 2006

On Social Security: Privatization is a terrible idea

Q: How do we afford growing Social Security entitlements while we extend tax breaks?

JAMESON: The entitlements, such as Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid, are not actually legal obligations. Those are things that are given out at the discretion of the government. The Social Security system is not sustainable and I think we should look at market alternatives.

RADNOFSKY: Privatization is a terrible idea. It would cost trillions if we do privatize, and everybody knows that. We must protect the Social Security fund from raiding.

HUTCHISON: We do need to reform Social Security and we do need to make sure we are taking out the waste & fraud. We owe it to our younger people to make sure that Social Security is there, and safe and solid for them. That means we need to reform Social Security now, because it will be much easier, and the longer we wait, the harder it will get.

Source: Texas 2006 Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV-TX (X-ref Hutch) Oct 19, 2006

On War & Peace: US presence destabilizes Iraq; leaving causes stability

Q: Your solution in Iraq is a staged withdrawal. How is this not cutting-and-running?

RADNOFSKY: We are destabilizing Iraq by our presence. The NIE indicates as such, and British generals indicate as such. By withdrawing, we will allow international building, by the US taking its role as leader among nations. My opponent has said we must increase troops, and also that we cannot leave until we’ve stabilized the country. Our presence is destabilizing there. Therefore when we leave, we will be able to mount, if we take our lead among the nations, a better international effort. We must realize that we can’t go it alone. It is reprehensible to suggest that we ought to stay in Iraq so that our soldiers become targets--cannon fodder--so we don’t take the war on terror to all the trouble spot in the world. We must set a timetable and we must withdraw.

HUTCHISON: I can’t think of anything worse than America cutting-and-running because times are tough. I think it would hurt our troops.

Source: Texas 2006 Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV-TX Oct 19, 2006

On War & Peace: Partition of Iraq will increase terrorism

RADNOFSKY: My opponent’s idea for partition is not adequate. First, the prime minister of Iraq has said that partitioning will increase terrorism in Iraq. Secondly, the history of partitioning in this part of the world is unsuccessful.

HUTCHISON: It is clear it is not going well in Iraq, and we should come up with ideas. One of the things we should put on the table as an option is semi-autonomous regions. This is provided for in the constitution of Iraq, and the parliament of Iraq has set out a process. The Sunnis reject that idea, because they’re worried about not having the oil revenue, but that can be handled as well.

JAMESON: I am upset for the way the Iraq war is funded. It is inappropriate to fund a war on a constant emergency basis, because Congressmen can add in extra appropriations and pork barrel spending that they know will get passed.

Source: Texas 2006 Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV-TX Oct 19, 2006

On War & Peace: Secret CIA papers at time of war vote skeptical of WMD info

Q: Had you known then that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs), how would you have voted on the Iraqi War Resolution?

HUTCHISON: If I had known then what I know now about the WMDs--which was a key reason that I voted to go in there-- I would not vote to go into Iraq the way we did. But the President would not have asked for that vote, either. We had intelligence that we relied on. So did the British. Everyone thought they had WMDs.

RADNOFSKY: At the time of the Iraqi War Resolution, Sen. Graham of Florida begged his colleagues to read the secret papers that we weren’t privy to. We now know that those secret papers revealed that the WMD documentation from the CIA was quite skeptical. I don’t believe that our senators read the secret documents. Our senators made a mistake when they voted. They should have read the secret papers. Any senator who did not do as their colleagues begged was derelict in their abilities to lead. We need new leaders.

Source: Texas 2006 Senate Debate, sponsored by LWV-TX Oct 19, 2006

The above quotations are from Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R), Barbara Ann Radnofsky (D) & Scott Lanier Jameson (L) debate at KLRN Studios in San Antonio. This is sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Texas. Moderated by Yolette Garcia, Oct. 19, 2006..
Click here for other excerpts from Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R), Barbara Ann Radnofsky (D) & Scott Lanier Jameson (L) debate at KLRN Studios in San Antonio. This is sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Texas. Moderated by Yolette Garcia, Oct. 19, 2006..
Click here for other excerpts by Barbara Radnofsky.
Click here for a profile of Barbara Radnofsky.
Barbara Radnofsky on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)

Page last updated: Feb 26, 2019