Barack Obama in To Save America, by Newt Gingrich


On Energy & Oil: OpEd: Fast-tracking green energy projects took two years

President Obama needed emergency stimulus money so fast that no one in Congress had time to read the $787 billion stimulus bill. Then that legislation met the federal bureaucracy. Consider the example of "fast track" green energy projects which, despite their name, still have to go through a multi-layered environmental impact and public review process. According to the website of the Bureau of Land Management (which handles green energy projects for the Department of the Interior), these projects could "potentially" be cleared for approval to receive stimulus funds by December 2010, almost two years after the stimulus was passed.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 11-12 May 17, 2010

On Energy & Oil: New coal plants ok if they pay for greenhouse gas emission

Obama's most honest comments have been those when he went "off message." In one interview he said, "If somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted." Obama's normal campaign rhetoric did not promise to bankrupt our own coal industry. While he promised a new dawn of abundant energy, he actually planned to declare war on the coal industry.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 63 May 17, 2010

On Environment: Stimulus bill earmark for LA-Vegas mag-lev railway

President Obama claimed the stimulus bill had no "earmarks or the usual pork barrel spending." This assertion, however, relies on an extremely narrow definition of an "earmark" as an outlay for a specific project or company. Although they cleverly avoided this level of specificity in the stimulus, Democrats packed the bill with spending on narrowly defined programs. For instance, in the $8 billion set aside for high speed railway, there was a specific outlay for a Los Angeles-to-Las Vegas maglev. There was also $1 billion for a zero emissions energy plant in Illinois, of which there was only one in development. There are earmarks in all but name--and everyone knows it , including President Obama.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 51 May 17, 2010

On Environment: Greenhouse gases declared dangerous to public health

As the UN's annual climate change conference began in Copenhagen on December 7, 2009, Obama's EPA chief, Lisa Jackson, announced the EPA now considers six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and methane, dangerous to the environment and public health, and that the EPA would begin drawing up new regulations to arbitrarily reduce them.

The announcement deliberately coincided with the climate change conference, which aims to establish an international treaty to reduce greenhouse emissions. Of course, the president cannot implement a treaty by himself; he needs the approval of two-thirds of the U.S. Senate. So the EPA's announcement was actually a threat to circumvent the Senate's constitutional prerogatives. Obama was indicating he would commit the United States to carbon-cutting goals reached at Copenhagen, and if the Senate refused to approve a carbon-cutting treaty or to pass capo and trade, Obama would simply use the EPA to regulate carbon whether the Senate likes it or not.

Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 81 May 17, 2010

On Government Reform: Used signing statements, like Bush, 17 times in 2009

Accusing Pres. Bush of abusing signing statements, candidate Obama pledged in 2007 not to use them to "nullify or undermine congressional instructions as enacted into law." When asked, Obama responded unequivocally, "We aren't going to use signing statements as a way to do an end run around Congress."

After taking office, however, Obama suddenly became enamored with signing statements. In fact, in 2009 Obama used signing statements to object to specific legislative provisions 17 times. Obama stopped issuing statements after some Democrats objected that he was breaking his campaign pledge. Promise salvaged?

Actually, no--it just got worse. The Obama administration still ignores parts of legislation they sign; they just stopped issuing signing statements announcing their intention to do so. Instead, the administration feels justified in ignoring objectionable provisions as long as they have previously expressed concern about them in a "statement of administration policy."

Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 65-66 May 17, 2010

On Health Care: Promised time for Congress to read ObamaCare bill

On the day that president Obama was sworn into office, the White house launched a new website that included this pledge: "President Obama has committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history."

As the debate over health reform heated up that summer, the president made another pledge: "I just want everybody to know, Congress will have time to read the bill. They will have time to debate the bill. They will have all of August to review the various legislative proposals. When we come back in September, I will be available to answer any question that members of Congress have. If they want to come over to the White House and go over line by line what's going on, I will be happy to do that."

Did the health reform debate live up to the president's standard? Hardly. The American people were promised a fair, bipartisan, transparent process. But instead the Democrats wrote trillion-dollar, 2,000-plus page bills in secret with no republican input and no public oversight.

Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 95-97 May 17, 2010

The above quotations are from To Save America
Stopping Obama's Secular-Socialist Machine,

by Newt Gingrich.
Click here for main summary page.
Click here for a profile of Barack Obama.
Click here for Barack Obama on all issues.
Barack Obama on other issues:
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles/Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology/Infrastructure
War/Iraq/Mideast
Welfare/Poverty
Please consider a donation to OnTheIssues.org!
Click for details -- or send donations to:
1770 Mass Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail: submit@OnTheIssues.org
(We rely on your support!)





Page last updated: Feb 25, 2019