Newt Gingrich in To Save America, by Newt Gingrich
On Budget & Economy:
Microlending efficiently gets money to local entrepreneurs
Megabanks versus microlending in poor neighborhoods: Microlending efficiently gets small amounts of money to local entrepreneurs in poor countries. Microlending requires a very inexpensive process of understanding and analyzing
the borrower, analyzing the project, making and implementing a decision to lend, and sometimes advising the recipients.Megabanks, which got into so much trouble during the Wall Street meltdown, could never successfully microlend.
They're too big and too bureaucratic to understand and analyze millions of small entrepreneurs, and they could never afford the cost of analyzing so many loan applications and processing checks.
Now consider this: if big banks are too isolated and too bureaucratic to operate successfully in small, local settings, why would we think big, centralized government bureaucracies could do better?
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 24
May 17, 2010
On Budget & Economy:
Putting people in houses they can't afford invites disaster
Americans overwhelmingly understand that putting people into houses they can't afford is an invitation to disaster. Yet our government policy has repudiated this common-sense wisdom. Prodded by liberal guilt and a belief among many leaders in
redistributionist, big-government policies, our government adopted ever-more aggressive and unsustainable housing policies. Prospective home owners were told:- If you do not have any credit, government will find a way.
-
If you cannot save for a down payment, government will waive the requirement.
- If you cannot afford to pay the principal, government will give you an interest-only loan for the first three years.
- If you cannot even afford full interest payment,
government will give you a below market rate.
With one person, these policies might tragically lead to bankruptcy. As national policy, they mired millions of families in debt, created a housing bubble, and sparked a financial collapse.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.145
May 17, 2010
On Civil Rights:
Repeal hate speech legislation including campus speech codes
The liberties of both religious expression and speech in general are guaranteed by the First Amendment. Therefore:- Repeal so-called "hate speech" legislation. Allowing the courts to broadly determine what they consider "hate speech" is profoundly
dangerous to a free people. Congress has no constitutional authority to regulate thought. Speech is already protected, and criminal activities are already legally defined, as are their punishments. Religious leaders who speak either from the pulpits are
particularly vulnerable.
- Bar public universities that enforce campus speech codes from using taxpayer funding. The forerunner to recently passed "hate speech" legislation can be found in many of today's publicly funded universities. College campuses
historically have been the incubator of ideas and the strongholds of free expression. Today, those same schools have instituted intolerant rules and reporting systems designed to silence speech deemed politically incorrect.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.271-272
May 17, 2010
On Corporations:
Chrysler bankruptcy bailout was politically rigged
Consider the Chrysler bankruptcy. Between 2000 & 2008, the United Auto Workers (UAW) union gave $23 million to the Democratic Party and its candidates while giving just $194,000 to Republicans. In return, the federal government disregarded bankruptcy
law & the unions were made the primary beneficiaries of the Chrysler bankruptcy. The Obama Treasury Department strong-armed Chrysler's creditors into a deal in which the UAW was given 55% ownership of the company.
As rotten as it was, the Chrysler
bankruptcy was just a prelude to the General Motors bankruptcy, again brokered by the Obama administration. And once again, the big losers were the bondholders.
According to a Barrons's magazine analysis, while the bondholders will be lucky to recover
15 cents on the dollar, the UAW can expect to recover up to 6-70 cents on the dollar--four to five times what the bondholders will receive. As the magazine noted, "Never has an American union done so well at the expense of shareholders and creditors."
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 78-79
May 17, 2010
On Corporations:
Big business uses government to protect itself from rivals
Big Business knows the greatest threat to its survival is not government regulation, but competition with smaller, more innovative firms. So when the opportunity arises to operate with government in crafting new regulations for their industry, big
business lobbyists don't oppose the reforms; instead, they help write the laws to their own advantage.The Left's message to business is simple: support our regulatory schemes or get crushed. And they know that big business--the only ones that can
afford a seat at the table--will pay whatever it takes to join them.
This is nothing new. As the regulatory state has grown, big business has learned to use big government to protect itself from small business rivals. The Left can often easily pass
new regulations when they get big business on board, and these laws help both parties: the Left create the illusions they're standing up for the little guy, and big business gets laws that damage their small competitors.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.115-116
May 17, 2010
On Corporations:
Cut corporate taxes to 12.5%
We need a new economic policy to promote a robust economic recovery and a new, long-term economic boom. This requires sweeping change.First, we should cut corporate taxes. American suffers from the second highest business tax
rate in the industrialized world, with a federal rate of 35 percent, and states pushing it close to 40 percent. Much of the rest of the world, ironically, has learned the lessons of Reaganomics. Ireland has a corporate tax rate of
12.4 percent, which has caused per capita income to soar from the second lowest in the EU twenty years ago to the second highest today.
We should restore America's competitiveness in the world by reducing the federal business tax rate to match Ireland's rate of 12.5 percent.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.171-172
May 17, 2010
On Education:
School prayer ban shows secular socialists oppose God
The left-wing Democrats who currently control the White House, the House of Representatives, the Senate, and many state capitols are committed to a secular-socialist ideology that is alien to America's history and traditions.Traditional
America values hard work, entrepreneurship, innovation, and merit-based upward mobility. But the secular-socialist machine rewards its members, punishes "overachievers," kills job by over-taxing small businesses, and even exploits your
death to tax the savings you hope to pass on to your children and grandchildren.
Traditional America was based on a profound belief that "we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights."
But secular socialists are so opposed to God in public life that they can't tolerate school prayer or even allow a cross to stand in the middle of the Mojave Desert.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 2
May 17, 2010
On Education:
Since 1963 school prayer ban, teen pregnancy & drugs are up
The move toward secularism has harmed American society. Look at the problems affecting today's teenagers, compared to the same data for 1963, the year the Supreme Court banned school prayer.- Drug addiction is up.
-
Teenage pregnancy is up.
- Drinking is up.
- Violence is up.
- Rape in schools is up.
- Assaults on teachers are up.
- The display of disrespectful attitudes is up.
Did the elimination of school prayer help our schools? No. To the contrary, the decline of morality in school and in society overall has given rise to a destructive pattern that the late
Senator Pat Moynihan captured perfectly in his article, "Defining Deviancy Down."
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 32
May 17, 2010
On Education:
Don't ban Bibles from public schools
To protect religious liberty in education we should adhere to the following:- Since it is the prerogative of parents to choose the instruction that is best for their child, we must preserve the homeschooling option.
- School districts should be
allowed to offer optional religious instruction including Bible study. Providing this option in no way constitutes an establishment of religion.
- Parents should be free to choose the school of their choice, including religious schools. They should be
given an education credit coupon (a Pell Grant for K-12) allowing them more options to choose a school that best fits their own values.
- Parents must have the right to choose which value instruction their child receives and therefore must be able to
opt out without qualification.
- US history classes should study the influences of religion on the Founders and other historical figures.
- Religious texts, including Bibles and scriptures, should not be banned in public schools.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.274-276
May 17, 2010
On Energy & Oil:
Doomsday climate theory pushes massive wealth transfer
A global, left-wing environmental movement organized around a doomsday theory of climate change is pushing for a massive wealth transfer for the West to developing nations, and an enormous increase in bureaucratic control but governments.
Meanwhile, UN-designated experts and an alliance of global bureaucrats are lobbying for treaties to enforce international climate change regulations within a system of global taxation.
This entire "solution" is a kind of class warfare applied to nation states.With our historical emphasis on free enterprise and national sovereignty, Americans have resisted these extreme measures.
But we believe genuine environmental problems, many of them ignored due to the global warming obsessions, cannot be resolved without U.S. leadership.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.235-236
May 17, 2010
On Environment:
Tragic Kelo case confiscated private property
The Founding Fathers counted private property among the unalienable rights endowed by our Creator.Rejecting the sanctity of private property, the secular-socialist model has no problem with a city council or Washington bureaucrat taking your property
and giving it to someone else. It has presided over a steady decline in private property rights over the last generation, highlighted by the tragic "Kelo vs. City of New London" case, in which the Supreme Court unconsciously ruled that private property
can be confiscated from individuals and given to private developers if, in the judgment of local, state, or federal bureaucrats, doing so would aid economic growth and raise tax revenues.
Reasserting private property right will be deeply resisted by
every local and federal bureaucrat and every judge who likes having the power to use your property to enrich someone else. And it will be opposed by every environmental group eager to tell you what you can and cannot do with your own property.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 22
May 17, 2010
On Environment:
Correct use of DDT doesn't harm humans nor environment
The origins of today's radical environmental movement provide a disturbing example That movement launched with a successful effort in the 1960s to effectively ban the insecticide DDT worldwide. This led to the reemergence of malaria in Africa, which has
caused 1-2 million preventable deaths a year, according to the American Council on Science and Health. The crusade against DDT contradicts overwhelming evidence that the correct use of the chemical does not harm humans or the environment.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.122
May 17, 2010
On Environment:
Green conservatism: market-oriented, incentive-led
More and more people around the world are discovering "green conservatism," a new pathway to environmental stewardship and a compelling conservative alternative to the high-tax, big-bureaucracy, job-killing, and government-centralizing environmentalism
of the Left.Green conservatives are political active in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom among other nations. When we first applied the term in
U.S. politics, we defined green conservatism as: "An optimistic, positive, science and technology-based, entrepreneurial, market-oriented, incentive-led, conservative environmentalism that creates more solutions faster and that will result in more
biodiversity with less pollution and a safer planet."
Entrepreneurial environmentalists are the new agents of change on the frontlines of a creative environmental movement. Government's role, rather than to dictate it, is to incentivize.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.233-234
May 17, 2010
On Families & Children:
Stop funding China's mandatory one-child policy
Valuing life from the beginning to end is central to a healthy culture. To uphold life we should:- Ensure that taxpayer dollars are never used for funding elective abortions, which are cases that don't involve rape or incest or where it is
necessary to save the life of the mother.
- Defund the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which is using U.S. taxpayer dollars to help enforce
China's mandatory one-child policy that compels, sometimes through force, millions of women to undergo abortions.
- Reinstate the "Mexico City Policy,: which banned funding to organizations that promote and/or perform abortion overseas.
President Obama rescinded it shortly after his inauguration.
- Protect the frail, the infirm, and the elderly from the state's arbitrary decision to terminate life.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.277-278
May 17, 2010
On Foreign Policy:
UN is corrupt bureaucracy that protects dictators
The United Nations was formed as a vehicle for world leaders to promote peace, human rights, and economic development. Tragically, from these noble origins, the UN has evolved into a corrupt, inept, bureaucratic machine that protects the world's worst
dictatorships.Since even the most despotic governments are entitled to UN membership, the UN is not limited by elections or the need to keep up democratic appearances. And, lacking America's legal framework for government transparency, the organizatio
is more prone to corruption.
The UN's most influential voting block is a group of 130 undeveloped countries called the G-77. Using the UN's one country-one vote system, the G-77 has hijacked the UN to turn it into a mechanism for redistributing wealth
from developed to developing countries.
The beneficiaries are not poverty-stricken families suffering under dictatorships. To the contrary, the illicit funds go straight to their oppressors--the privileged bureaucrats that prop up despotic regimes.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.129-133
May 17, 2010
On Government Reform:
Replace Washington controls with American ideals
The fundamental difference between historic American ideals & those of the secular-socialist Left can be seen in ten conflicting values:- Work vs. theft
- Productivity vs. union work rules and bureaucracy
- Elected representation vs. bureaucrats
& judges
- Honesty vs. corruption
- Low taxes with limited government vs. high taxes with big government
- Private property vs. government controls
- Localism vs. Washington control
- American energy vs. environmental extremism
- Conflict resolutio
vs. litigation
- Religious belief vs. secular oppression
Any one of these conflicts represents clashing values on the most basic level. Taken collectively, they indicate two irreconcilable worldviews that cannot coexist in the American system.
Eventually one of these value systems will defeat & replace the other. If we lose this struggle, the America of our fathers and forefathers will be forever lost, giving way to a secular-socialist machine that will never relinquish power of its own accord
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 7
May 17, 2010
On Government Reform:
Passing massive debt to next generation is immoral
Because government power expands at the direct expense of individual freedom, the best way to protect liberty, particularly religious liberty, is to limit the size and scope of government at all levels. To do that, we should pass a balanced budget
amendment. Passing on our massive federal debt to the next generation is immoral. The best way to stop the politicians from bankrupting our country and limiting freedom is to pass a balanced budge4t amendment to the Constitution.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.273
May 17, 2010
On Health Care:
$151B wasted annually to avoid malpractice lawsuits
To encourage young people to pursue medical careers, we must have litigation reform.If we want Americans to emphasize cooperation and problem solving over acrimonious, costly conflicts, we must have litigation reform.
Most Americans agree there
are too many lawyers filing too many lawsuits, especially in medicine.
An estimated $151-210 billion is wasted annually in defensive medicine, as doctors follow unnecessary procedures and conduct needless tests and services solely to avoid malpractice
lawsuits.
In preparing for health reform in 2009, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that litigation reform in medical malpractice would save the federal government $53 billion over ten years.
For most doctors and businesses, litigation reform is important but it's not dire. But for the trial lawyers--the reactionary defenders of the old order--this is a life-or-death issue.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 27-28
May 17, 2010
On Health Care:
Focus on Availability, Affordability, and Appropriateness
Everyday Americans do not focus on the nuances of insurance collectives & industry jargon. Rather, they ask the simple questions:- Will healthcare be AVAILABLE for me and my family when we need it?
- Will we be able to AFFORD what we need?
- Will
what is offered be APPROPRIATE for us?
As we consider the best way to transform our healthcare system, we must assure access includes these elements.- Availability: A 21st century healthcare system must use creative initiatives like medical
education debt forgiveness.
- Affordability: There is a waste and inefficiency across the entire spectrum of discovery, development and delivery of healthcare.
- Delivery: The system of product delivery today is plagued by fraud and abuse, contributing
to a dramatic waste of money, time, talent, and expertise.
- Appropriateness: Radically transform healthcare so that treatment is no longer based on population medicine, but on personalized medicine. This can begin with modernizing the FDA.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.199-202
May 17, 2010
On Health Care:
$600B to $850B in healthcare waste every year
Every year we taxpayers pay $70-120 billion to crooks through Medicare and Medicaid alone. Fraud, waste, and abuse in our healthcare sector are more pervasive than people think--they constituted a third or more of the $2.5 trillion spent on healthcare
services in 2009. The overall American health care system wastes $600-850 billion every year. Here's the breakdown:- Unnecessary care (40 percent)
- Fraud (19 percent)
- Administrative inefficiency (17 percent)
-
Healthcare provider errors (12percent)
- Preventable conditions (6 percent)
- Lack of care coordination (6 percent)
Consider this: the federal department that oversees
Medicaid cannot even accurately measure the extent of the problem. As the old saying goes, "You can't manage what you can't measure."
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.217-220
May 17, 2010
On Homeland Security:
Enemy combatants not entitled to Miranda rights
Our government traditionally regarded the protection of American lives as its top priority. Our primary concern with captured terrorists (or pirates, the old equivalent of terrorists) was interrogating them and using that information to stop further
attacks.The secular socialists, however, want to give out enemies the same constitutional protections we afford our own citizens, effectively placing the right of terrorists ahead of the lives of Americans.
With the Left in charge, when a foreign terrorist tried to blow up an airplane over Detroit, he was read his Miranda rights (which, as a foreign enemy combatant, he was not actually entitled to have).
Taxpayers were forces to pay for the terrorist's lawyer, who most likely advised his client not to answer questions except as leverage to get a plea bargain.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 3
May 17, 2010
On Homeland Security:
Gitmo lawyers threaten to identify our CIA officers
The Obama administration hired nine lawyers who had previously advocated on behalf of terrorists. These nine lawyers were among the over 400 members of the so-called "Gitmo Bar" who volunteered to represent terrorist detainees at Guantanamo. Most of the
terrorists defended by these lawyers were alien enemy combatants challenging their detention, not defendants in a criminal trial, & thus they had no legal right to representation. Nevertheless, the Gitmo Bar volunteered its services to the terrorists.
All these lawyers would undoubtedly deny having sympathy for al Qaeda, but the actions of some of them went far beyond simply challenging a detention policy they thought was unjust. In Aug. 2009, they provided photographs of CIA officers to their clients
in an attempt to identify those officers who had interrogated them when they were captured overseas. The lawyers were apparently unconcerned by the potential threat to our CIA officers from being identified by name to al Qaeda and Taliban terrorists.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 69-70
May 17, 2010
On Jobs:
Union power games the system to minimize work
Soviet workers had a motto: "We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us." American had a remarkably different slogan: "An honest day's work for an honest day's pay."
American today is still filled with small businesses, self-employed people, professionals, and others who live by that principle every day.Because we are self-reliant and operate in markets where people won't pay us if we cheat,
Americans have created an environment where honesty pays. In contrast, the secular-socialist machine, with its commitment to a socialist vision of wealth redistribution, has undermined the very
concept of "an honest day's work," especially through its union power, In fact, it spreads the opposite ethic: game the system to get as many benefits as you can while working as little as possible.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 8
May 17, 2010
On Jobs:
Card Check strips workers of right to secret ballot
Last year, the House passed the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) card check legislation that would strip American workers of the right to a secret ballot when deciding whether to join a union.
It would also institute "binding arbitration" that takes power away from the US employers and employees and gives it to new arbitration bureaucracies.
The political rationale for this bill is that unions--long-time power centers of the global socialist movement and a powerful Democratic constituency--have been shrinking in size and influence over the past fifty years
(with the notable exception of public employee unions). This bill is a clear attempt to reinvigorate them with new powers, even if workers don't agree.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 43
May 17, 2010
On Jobs:
Jobs plan: lower taxes; lower spending; domestic energy
During the present job crisis, leaders at all levels of government must understand the needs of our small-business job creators. With that Goal, American Solutions, a citizens action network for which I serve as general chairman, developed the following
3-step job-creation plan:- Reduce spending and replace inefficient and often corrupt government programs with limited, effective government in order to balance the budget.
- Enact five key tax reforms to reward job creation, entrepreneurship,
savings, and investment.
- Immediate payroll tax relief.
- Incentives for investing in new equipment.
- Zero taxes on capital gains.
- Reduced tax rate for businesses
- Eliminate the death tax.
-
Implement an American energy plan to create American jobs and keep American money at home. Developing more domestic energy while protecting the environment would means millions of new American jobs.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.179-182
May 17, 2010
On Principles & Values:
America is now facing a mortal threat
This is a book I never expected to write. After the victory of freedom over Communist tyranny, of religious liberty over secular police states, and of American pride over the malaise and cynicism of the 1970s, I fully expected America to follow an upward
curve of consistent improvement. I did not expect the Left to ignore the lessons of history and move further into ideological extremism.After leaving Congress in 1999 with a balanced budget and a booming economy, I certainly did not foresee
Republican failure so vast that it allowed left-wing radicals to take over the House, Senate, and Presidency.
America as we know it is now facing a mortal threat.
This danger to America is greater than anything
I dreamed possible after we won the Cold War and the Soviet Union in December 1991. We stand at a crossroads: either we will save our country or we will lose it.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 1-2
May 17, 2010
On Principles & Values:
Saul Alinsky is clear: Left needs to be dishonest
Perhaps nobody has been more clear about the Left's need for dishonesty than Saul Alinsky, considered the godfather of community organizing. His two most famous works, "Reveille for Radicals" and "Rules for Radicals" were published in the late 60s and
early 70s. In these works, Alinsky draws a distinction between meek, garden-variety liberals and brave, revolutionary radicals. "While liberals are most adept at breaking their own necks with their tongues," Alinsky wrote, "radicals are most adept at
breaking the necks of conservatives."Many of his "rules" are guidelines for engaging in immoral, dangerous, political dishonesty, including the following:
- "In war the end justifies almost any means."
- "Concern with ethics increases with the
number of means available and vice versa."
- "The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluation of means."
- "You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments."
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p. 46-47
May 17, 2010
On Social Security:
Capital markets return more that Social Security promises
A key concept for positive, structural entitlement replacement is personal accounts for Social Security, which would let workers substitute savings & investment accounts for at least part of the current system.Beginning at any size, accounts could be
expanded over time until workers can choose to substitute them for all their Social Security retirement benefits. This could be accomplished using just the 6.2% employee share of the Social Security payroll tax, still leaving workers with close to twice
the benefits Social Security promises under current law (but which in the future it will not be able to pay).
A bill introduced by Rep. Paul Ryan maintains the current social safety net in full by including a federal guarantee that if any retiree's
account cannot pay at least what Social Security would under current law, the federal government would pay the difference. Because capital market returns are so much higher, however, it's unlikely the government would ever have to pay off this guarantee.
Source: To Save America, by Newt Gingrich, p.192-195
May 17, 2010
Page last updated: Feb 25, 2019