Topics in the News: Energy
Gary Johnson on Energy & Oil
: Jul 21, 2011
Current policy prevents common-sense energy development
Q: As President, if you could enact any policy to fix the economy without congressional approval what would it be? A: Change regulatory & enforcement policies that are preventing common-sense energy development. Millions of jobs would be created.
Many other regulatory approaches can be changed as well to create certainty for the private sector. As Governor of NM I had the best jobs record of anyone candidate, but didn't claim to creating one job. Government does not create jobs.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2011 Republican primary debate on Twitter.com
Herman Cain on Government Reform
: Jul 21, 2011
Cut through all bureaucracy; reduce regulatory authority
Q: As President, if you could enact any policy to fix the economy without congressional approval what would it be? A: As President, I would reduce the regulatory authority of executive agencies in order to ease burdens on businesses. I would limit the
EPA, Department of Energy and other executive agencies from getting in the way of businesses. A President Cain would lower the regulations that the government puts on businesses and cut through all possible bureaucracy.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2011 Republican primary debate on Twitter.com
Newt Gingrich on Jobs
: Jul 21, 2011
Jobs & Prosperity Plan: cut business taxes & regulations
Q: Can a president create jobs without expanding the role of the federal government? A: My Jobs and Prosperity Plan: No tax increase, 100% expensing, reduce business tax to 12.5%, eliminate cap gains & death tax; audit & reform the Federal
Reserve; repeal Dodd-Frank, Sarbanes Oxley, Community Reinvestment Act; break up Freddie and Fannie; Repeal & replace Obamacare and fully develop American energy. These would all create jobs by REDUCING government.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2011 Republican primary debate on Twitter.com
Herman Cain on Principles & Values
: Jun 13, 2011
Focus on the Three E's: economy, entitlements, and energy
We don't just have one problem; we have a crisis of the three E's. We've got the economy, entitlement spending, and energy. We've got to simultaneously work on all of those so we can put 13 million to
14 million people back to work. That's what we've got to do. So it's not just a single issue. It is the multiplicity and the compounding effect of those three critical problems.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2011 GOP primary debate in Manchester NH
Herman Cain on Energy & Oil
: May 21, 2011
Loosen government's grip; expand domestic energy resources
America is a land blessed with abundant natural resources and the capability of the people to obtain them. From the oil-rich states of Louisiana and Alaska to the mighty dams along rivers, the options for many forms of energy are real and plenty. Still,
liberals continue to perpetuate the misunderstanding that the high energy consumption of a thriving nation and conservation of our precious planet are at odds with one another.Because they have perpetuated such a myth, liberals have forced excessive
environmental regulations that have stifled our domestic energy production, and instead, forced American consumers to rely far too heavily upon foreign oil. In many cases, this oil comes from Middle Eastern countries, some of whom are not friendly to the
US, who end up dictating the prices of our energy consumption. In return, Americans have seen no improvements in our environment or in the cleanliness of our air. We must expand our domestic energy resources by loosening government's grip responsibly.
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, www.hermancain.com/ "Issues"
Herman Cain on Environment
: May 21, 2011
No ethanol subsidies; let markets decide forms of energy
Subsidies on agricultural products, like ethanol-producing corn, have become a mechanism for the government to pick and choose industries it favors, while doing little to enhance our ability to harness real alternative energy resources.
Instead, we must allow all forms of energy the ability to develop in a free market system.
Alternative energy sources, such as wind, solar, nuclear and hydroelectric are certainly part of the solution long term, but private industry must take the lead for true innovation to be a bigger part of our future energy needs.
If alternative energy sources are found to be inexpensive, safe and plentiful, then American consumers will choose to purchase them. Let the markets decide which forms of energy fuel our cars, heat our homes and which ones will keep America working.
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, www.hermancain.com/ "Issues"
Herman Cain on Corporations
: May 19, 2011
When was the last time a poor person gave you a job?
Cain said that the president has no leadership ability, but beyond that, there's a political mess and lack of solutions throughout Washington,
D.C. "America is on the wrong track, but we can get it back," he said. "We have become a nation of crises"--moral, economic, entitlement spending, energy and immigration.The federal stimulus funds did nothing to stimulate the economy, Cain said.
As president, he would reduce the corporate tax rates from 35 to 25 percent, take the capital gains tax to zero and suspend taxes on repatriated foreign profits.
"Lower taxes do stimulate the economy," said
Cain. "It's not rewarding the rich. When was the last time a poor person gave you a job?" He also would replace as a second phase the tax code with a national sales tax, describing it "as simple and fair."
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: Rob Novit in Aiken Standard
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: May 5, 2011
I made a mistake in considering cap-and-trade in MN
Q: Before you signed a 2007 bill to promote renewable energy sources, you made this ad for the Environmental Defense Action Fund, saying: "If we act now, we can create thousands of new jobs in clean energy industries, before our overseas competitors beat
us to it. Cap greenhouse gas pollution, now." You now say it was a dumb mistake. Were you committed to cap and trade over those years?A: We did consider in designing a law in Minnesota that would study cap and trade. We didn't impose it.
We signed up to review it, study, join with other states to look at it and we did. What I concluded subsequently is it is really a bad idea. I sent a letter to Congress about two years ago. And other times have said, I was wrong, I was a mistake and
I'm sorry. It is ham fisted, it is going to be harmful to the economy. If you've got an executive position and you have been in the battle, you are going to have battle scars in your record. And that's one of mine. I just admit. I made a mistake.
Click for Tim Pawlenty on other issues.
Source: 2011 GOP primary debate in South Carolina
Herman Cain on Energy & Oil
: May 5, 2011
Establish real energy independence, with existing resources
Q: A gallon of gas is now over $4. What would President Cain do to alleviate skyrocketing gas price? A: Contrary to what Pres. Obama said, when he stated there's wasn't anything we can do in the short term.
He can establish a real energy independence plan. We have all of the resources we need in this country to establish energy independence if we had the leadership. The dynamics that impact the price of oil--and ultimately the price of gasoline:
Getting it out of the ground; refining and distribution; and speculators.
If the world market believed that we were serious about energy independence, and we were going to utilize all of our existing resources, the speculators would stop speculating up, and they would speculate down until we got our own oil out of the ground.
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: 2011 GOP primary debate in South Carolina
Buddy Roemer on Energy & Oil
: Mar 3, 2011
Bring our Marines home from "oil" duty via domestic energy
If we are going to have real change in America, we need a President free to lead. Free to strive for energy independence by the end of this decade creating millions of new jobs, bringing our
Marines home from "oil" duty, and relieving us from the foreign policy strangle-hold oil has on America.
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: Exploratory Committee press release
Buddy Roemer on Energy & Oil
: Mar 3, 2011
More energy exploration in the US
Besides calling for campaign finance reform in his announcement, Roemer touched on other issues, backing a simplified federal tax code and more energy exploration in the U.S., hoping for complete independence from foreign oil by 2020.
Roemer also said he backed reducing spending in all federal departments and cracking down on illegal immigration.
Click for Herman Cain on other issues.
Source: Kevin Derby in Sunshine State News
Newt Gingrich on Energy & Oil
: Feb 11, 2011
2008 petition drive: Drill here, Drill now, Pay less
For the last thirty years we've had the worst possible national security policy in energy and it's time we've stopped it, and it's times we've an passed aggressively pro-American jobs, aggressively pro-American energy.In 2008 when gasoline was at
$4 a gallon, [my policy organization] American Solutions launched a petition drive: Drill here, Drill now, Pay less.
The Left couldn't survive in a world where we had the courage to say, "Why don't we find American oil and why don't we find
American gas, and why don't we have the next building boom in the United States, not in Dubai. And why don't we make sure that the terrorists run out of money?" And that ought to be our approach to this, so let's do it now.
First of all: Reopen off of
Louisiana. The people of Louisiana want it to happen. So let's reopen the areas off only those states that want to reopen them, but if a state wants to go and find oil and gas and wants to create more jobs in that state, let's let them do it now.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jan 26, 2011
Subsidize clean energy by canceling oil subsidies
Already, we're seeing the promise of renewable energy. We're issuing a challenge. We're telling America's scientists and engineers that if they assemble teams of the best minds in their fields, and focus on the hardest problems in clean energy, we'll fun
the Apollo projects of our time.With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have a million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.
We need to get behind this innovation.
And to help pay for it, I'm asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don't know if you've noticed, but they're doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy, let's
invest in tomorrow's.
Clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market. So tonight, I set a new goal: By 2035, 80% of America's electricity will come from clean energy sources.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2011 State of the Union speech
Sarah Palin on Principles & Values
: Jan 6, 2011
OpEd: Her energy is the fuel of grassroots politics
Sarah Palin has become a force of nature in the Republican Party. She inspires people in the conservative cause. She exudes enthusiasm, and that energy is the fuel of grassroots politics. We need that kind of energy and fuel from people all over this
country if we want a shot at setting America back on course. While some might still debate McCain's selection in 2008, the undeniable truth is that it took courage to stand up to the critics, the pundits, and the establishment and choose Sarah Palin.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Courage to Stand, by Gov. Tim Pawlenty, A.P. excerpts
Sarah Palin on Families & Children
: Nov 23, 2010
Founding Fathers took strong families for granted
It sounds strange to us today, given how preoccupied we can be with the problems the family faces, that the men who laid the foundation of our republic said so little about the institution of the family. The founders took it for granted that strong
families instilled in children the habits and disciplines necessary for those children to govern themselves in adulthood.What the founders focused their energy on, then, wasn't a government that sought to control or shape families, but a government
that could capitalize on the virtues of trust and self-restraint that families create--a government that could respect and honor good citizens by allowing them to liver and prosper in freedom. The Constitution's relationship to the family, then, was
meant to be reciprocal: to depend upon the virtues of family life to make its system of government work, while protecting the freedom of families to create self-governing citizens.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: America by Heart, by Sarah Palin, p.111-112
Bobby Jindal on Energy & Oil
: Nov 15, 2010
Develop any & all methods of producing energy
What may surprise you is that along with being a big supporter of fossil fuels, I'm also a big proponent of developing any and all methods of producing energy, in order to make America energy independent.Liberals need to accept that fossil fuels are
critical to our national security and to our economy, and that they can be developed in an environmentally responsible way. Conservatives, for our part, need to do more than simply shout "Drill, baby, drill"--we need to aggressively pursue the next
generation of renewable and clean energy production technologies.
Republicans seem instinctively to oppose cultivating energy sources favored by the environmental movement, such as solar and wind power. Likewise,
Democrats often stridently oppose the expansion of traditional energy sources such as oil, coal, and nuclear power. Here's an idea: how about we do it all? That's not a Republican or Democrat solution. That's an American solution.
Click for Bobby Jindal on other issues.
Source: Leadership and Crisis, by Bobby Jindal, p.199-201
Bobby Jindal on Energy & Oil
: Nov 15, 2010
Cap-and-trade is a jobs bill for other countries
The liberal attack on fossil fuels doesn't even make sense in the context of global warming--destroying our domestic energy production and manufacturing base and expanding our jobs abroad won't cut the world's carbon emissions. In fact, these jobs will
go to countries like Mexico, China, & India, while more of our oil and natural gas will come from countries like Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, & Russia--all of which have much weaker environmental laws than we do. Do you really think a smokestack in Tijuana
will produce fewer emissions than one in San Diego?Keep that in mind next time you hear the Democrats' proposals for a "cap and trade" scheme. In addition to increasing utility costs of homeowners, charging our own companies for releasing
carbon will provoke a lot of them simply to relocate to countries that don't charge these fees. Still, at least the Democrats' rhetoric is honest on this issue. Cap and trade IS a jobs bill--for other countries. It is a win/win--for the rest of the world
Click for Bobby Jindal on other issues.
Source: Leadership and Crisis, by Bobby Jindal, p.209
Tim Pawlenty on Budget & Economy
: May 10, 2010
Nationalizing banking, health, & autos is wrong direction
Pawlenty criticized President Obama in January 2009 for his "runaway spending": "It's unsustainable, it's irresponsible, it's reckless. It has to be reined in federally like we've done in Minnesota." He also criticized the Bush-Obama administrations for
further extending government into the private sector: "We are watching the total or partial nationalization of mortgage, banking, autos, soon to be health and energy. That is the absolute wrong direction for the country. It's not going to work."
Click for Bobby Jindal on other issues.
Source: Sam's Club Republican, by J.A. McClure, p. 55
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: May 10, 2010
Building, Benchmarks, & Beyond: reduce 200,000 tons of CO2
Pawlenty teamed up with Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM) in 2007 to form a "Governors' Windpower Coalition" aimed at promoting wind power research. Pawlenty addresses a global audience of 800 representatives in Washington DC at the 2007 Energy Efficiency
Global Forum. He touted Minnesota as a leader in clean energy. With their Building, Benchmarks and Beyond program, the state made older public buildings more energy efficient, saving an estimated $23 million and 200,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually.
Click for Bobby Jindal on other issues.
Source: Sam's Club Republican, by J.A. McClure, p. 60-61
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: May 10, 2010
25% renewable by 2025: Requirement, not a goal
Pawlenty served as Chair of the National Governors Association (NGA) for the 2007-08 term. While Chair of the NGA, he selected "securing a Clean Energy Future" as the main goal of his tenure. He said other states would learn from
Minnesota's example, citing the following accomplishments:"A requirement, not a goal, that 25% of our energy will come from renewable sources by 2025. It includes legislation signed into law to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050.
It includes reducing our fossil fuel consumption by 15% by 2015, which is coming up fast."
At a 2007 NGA conference, Pawlenty warned the US must curtail its carbon emissions, or it would "risk the nations' security posture, its prosperity and quality
of life." He added that fossil fuels would still be an important part of the nation's energy supply, but they would have to pursue cleaner and more efficient ways of utilizing them.
Click for Tim Pawlenty on other issues.
Source: Sam's Club Republican, by J.A. McClure, p. 48-49
Sarah Palin on Budget & Economy
: Feb 6, 2010
First priority for GOP Congress: rein in spending
Q: When we have a conservative House and a conservative Senate, as soon as that happens, what do you think are the top three things that have got to be done?A: We've got to rein in the spending, obviously, and not raise it extremely high budgets and
then say, OK, we are going to freeze a couple programs here. That doesn't do us any good really. We've got to start reining in the spending. We have got to jump start these energy projects that, again, we have heard so much about because it is ridiculous
that we have just sitting warehoused under God's green earth here in the United States of America, rich resources, oil, and gas, and our coil and all of the conventional resources.
We have got to actually walk that walk, to allow them to come to development. And then allow America's spirit to rise again by not being afraid--not being afraid to kind of go back to some of our roots as a God-fearing nation
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2010 Tea Party Convention Q&A
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jan 29, 2010
Big promoter of clean coal technology & nukes
Rep. CAPITO: I represent the state of West Virginia. We're resource-rich. We have a lot of coal and a lot of natural gas. But our miners and those who are unemployed are very concerned about some of your policies in these areas: cap and trade, an
aggressive EPA, and the looming prospect of higher taxes. In our minds, these are job-killing policies.Pres. OBAMA: I know that West Virginia struggles with unemployment. That's part of the reason why I've said that we need a comprehensive energy
policy that sets us up for a long-term future. For example, nobody has been a bigger promoter of clean coal technology than I am. Testament to that, I ended up being in a whole bunch of advertisements that you guys saw all the time about investing in way
for us to burn coal more cleanly. I've said that I'm a promoter of nuclear energy, something that I think over the last 3 decades has been subject to a lot of partisan wrangling & ideological wrangling. I think that that has to be part of our energy mix.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Obama Q&A at 2010 House Republican retreat in Baltimore
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jan 27, 2010
More incentives for clean energy, including nuclear
To create more clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas
for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy profitable.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2010 State of the Union Address
Sarah Palin on Budget & Economy
: Nov 17, 2009
Vetoed $25M stimulus earmark; Alaskans don't desire "help"
My cabinet agreed that in challenging the stimulus package, we'd have to deal in reality. Conservative governors all over the country were getting hammered for questioning use of the stimulus funds. Some legislatures, through threats of litigation,
made it impossible to refuse the money.I highlighted universal energy building codes that we'd have to adopt if we accepted a $25 million earmark for energy conservation. Universal building codes, in ALASKA! A practical, libertarian haven full of
independent Americans who did not desire "help" from government busybodies. A state full of hardy pioneers who did not like taking orders from the feds telling us to change our laws.
A state so geographically diverse that one-size-fits-all codes simply wouldn't work.
I vetoed those building code funds.
The Democrat-controlled legislature overrode my veto.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.360-362
Joe Biden on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
1970s: Voted against the Trans-Alaska Pipeline
I respected Biden's decades of experience, but I also knew him as one of just a handful of members of the US Senate who way back in the 1970s had actually voted AGAINST the Trans-Alaska
Pipeline, an economic lifeline that would ultimately result in thousands of American jobs, 15 billion barrels of oil pumped into the economy to date, and a huge chunk of domestic energy production.Over the years, I had occasionally listened to
Biden's discussions of energy and realized he had not changed. He still seemed opposed to sensible innovations, from clean coal to nuclear energy to responsible new directional drilling techniques in places like ANWR. On one issue after another, Obama's
VP choice was loaded with government experience but still seemed to have no understanding of logical steps we could take to capitalize on American energy resources.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.288-289
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
Open gasline process, but $500M inducement to oil company
My team and I were determined to fundamentally change the game when it came to the natural gas pipeline. Instead of negotiating behind closed doors with the monopolistic industry, we wanted to get back to competitive free-market principles, ethically
employed. To that end, we built a team that would provide a framework within which any company could compete.This was a multi-billion-dollar project, the largest private-sector energy project in US history.
We asked companies to compete for the righ
to build Alaska's gasline. Our approach would be open and transparent.
Some accused us of taking too hard a line with the oil companies. I knew we were acting appropriately to hold the companies' feet to the fire.
This project would cost the private
sector a tremendous amount in government fees and prep work. Therefore, in crafting what would become the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, or AGIA, we promised to reimburse up to $500 million in matching funds for the exclusive gasline license.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.156-157
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
Natural gas mantra: good for Greenies, Grannies, and Gunnies
Internally, our natural gas mantra was "Greenies, Grannies, & Gunnies."- Greenies: Natural gas is the cleanest nonrenewable fuel.
- Grannies: Production of a domestic supply would help those on fixed incomes, such as the elderly, by increasing
supply and lowering costs.
- Gunnies: Alaska's energy supplies would help lead America toward energy independence and greater national security.
Greenies, Grannies, Gunnies. So Alaskan, So politically incorrect. Perfect.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.129
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
North Slope could supply 10 years' energy for entire country
Alaskans have been waiting more than 50 years to realize the benefits of the state's vast reserves of natural gas. At least 35 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves lie untapped on the North Slope, both on and offshore. Our oil and gas
supplies would be enough to provide ten years of total energy independence for the entire country.Construction of a gas pipeline to transport this safe, clean energy supply to the Lower 48 was originally authorized in 1979. Cheap natural gas from othe
countries had delayed the project for years. Our government's well-meaning policies had driven producers to other parts of the world where there were no restraints on their activities. That was no way to protect the environment or heat the economy.
Our state Constitution stipulates that the citizens actually own our natural resources. Our goal was to commercialize Alaska's treasure of oil & gas by opening up the North Slope to long-term exploration and production. , creating jobs and stable energy.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.125-127
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
Renewable Energy Fund for hydropower, wind, biomass
[At an energy conference in 2007 in Texas] I told the gathered industry officials that Alaska was suspending its fuel tax--giving relief to consumers at the pump--and outlined our "three-legged stool" approach to meeting our energy needs: conservation,
responsible development, and renewable energy sources. Thus we set a goal of drawing 50% of our electricity generation from renewable sources--an unprecedented policy goal in the United States. We would also use the earnings from a multimillion-dollar
Renewable Energy Fund for projects like hydropower, along with wind, geothermal, and biomass. Those projects could not even flirt with snake-oil science, I insisted; they must be doable, economical, and real. Finally, Alaska would lead American toward
energy security and a cleaner, safer world through responsible development of our conventional sources as we built our AGIA gasline. And I reminded Texas that there is an inherent link between energy and security, energy and prosperity, energy and peace.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.194
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2009
Sued ExxonMobil to drill next to ANWR, or give up lease
In 2007, for the 22nd time, ExxonMobil submitted its plan to begin drilling in the Point Thomson Unit [near ANWR] but still had not drilled. These domestic supplies of energy were needed. So we took steps to prove that ExxonMobil was in default of its
lease agreements. We announced that ExxonMobil would no longer be allowed to just warehouse America's resources. After all these decades, if the largest company in the world wasn't going to drill, we would rebid the leases and find a company that would.
"You in the industry make your living by providing the goods and services necessary to get Alaska's resources to market," I said. "Lessees must develop the public's resources or give back their leases." I also knew that unless we accessed our known
reserves on state lands, it would be more difficult to argue for access to federal lands such as ANWR.
The oil giant's M.O. is to tie up issues through litigation. It threatened to sue. We said, okay, we know the way to the courthouse, too.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.196-198
Sarah Palin on Government Reform
: Nov 17, 2009
1996: Promised to cut her own pay as mayor; then did so
In my first mayoral campaign in 1996, I promised new energy and an end to politics-as-usual. I raised some eyebrows by promising to cut property taxes. I also promised to take a pay cut. It would be a money-where-your-mouth-is move. If I was going to run
as a budget cutter, I figured the cutting had to start with me. Plus, as a council member I had just voted against a mayoral pay raise, and it would be hypocritical to conveniently forget that vote if I were elected mayor.I won by a handy margin, so
I knew the voters were mandating "no more politics-as-usual."
The City Councilor who had originally recruited me to serve on the council, confronted me personally to announce that he intended to make my life difficult. He launched a recall effort.
Within days, he and his cronies began holding public meetings, drafting a petition that said I was too inexperienced to do the job. When I cut my own pay, as I'd promised to do, they accused me of trying to shoehorn myself into a lower tax bracket.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p. 70-73
Sarah Palin on Principles & Values
: Nov 17, 2009
2002: Lost unenergetic campaign for lieutenant governor
Part of what made the lieutenant governor's campaign tough is that a statewide race is expensive, and I was uncomfortable asking people for funds. While the other candidates' war chests ballooned to six figures, I managed to scrape together only about
$40,000. My heart just wasn't in soliciting donations.I realized the problem: My campaign theme was "New Energy," but, unfortunately, I did not run an energetic campaign. I was stretched so thin. My energies remained in my full-time job as mayor and i
raising my family.
Looking back, I should have known that without that fire in my belly, it would be a futile effort. I wasn't living my own creed: Do it right, or don't do it at all. But even with my lackluster campaigning, I continued to win a few
opinion polls that conventional wisdom said I shouldn't have won. It was an indicator that people were eager for change at the state level. I came in a close second, coming up short by only about 2% of the vote despite being outspent five to one.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p. 85-88
Sarah Palin on Principles & Values
: Nov 17, 2009
2006 ad campaign: Little House on the Tundra
In the 2006 Governor campaign, campaign staff brought their kids, along with ours, on the trail as much as possible. We'd stop to take pictures of them standing by frozen waterfalls, or with a double rainbow over the tundra in the background.My media
campaign was the essence of simplicity--which would also be my communication strategy as governor. My two themes were "New Energy for Alaska" and "Take a Stand." I ran a few upbeat commercials that featured my family and Alaska's natural beauty,
highlighting our Piper airplane, reading to our kids who attend public schools, and thanking law enforcement officers. It wasn't so much to portray a "Little House on the Tundra" scene as to let the visual imagery speak to my priorities. In those
ads, I promised that I would fight to protect our state's future. I was as sick & tired of the corruption and politics-as-usual as the majority of Alaskans were, but I kept an optimistic message flowing to show how we'd turn things around for the people.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Going Rogue, by Sarah Palin, p.119
Jon Huntsman on Gun Control
: May 21, 2009
Conservative line on gun control
As governor, Huntsman lists economic development, health-care reform, education and energy security as his top priorities. Huntsman is receptive to environmental issues and would like the state to reduce fuel and energy consumption. He is also concerned
with nuclear waste being stored within his state. On hot button social issues, such as abortion and gun control, Huntsman generally walks a more conservative line. The same is somewhat true for gay marriage, though he has shown support for civil unions
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: China Daily, "US Offiicials"
Newt Gingrich on Tax Reform
: Feb 27, 2009
Energy taxes are taxes on people earning under $250K
I looked at the budget yesterday which has a $640 billion revenue item from energy tax. I thought to myself; let me get this straight, we're not going to raise taxes on anyone below $250,000 a year unless you use electricity. And we're not going to raise
taxes on anyone under $250,000 a year unless you buy gasoline, and we're not going to raise taxes on anyone under $250,000 unless you buy heating oil, and we're not going to raise taxes on anyone under $250,000 a year unless you use natural gas.ÿ
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Speech to 2009 Conservative Political Action Conference
Bobby Jindal on Energy & Oil
: Feb 24, 2009
More renewables; more nuclear power, more drilling
We need urgent action to keep energy prices down. All of us remember what it felt like to pay $4 at the pump and unless we act now, those prices will return. To stop that from happening, we need to increase conservation, increase energy efficiency,
increase the use of alternative and renewable fuels, increase our use of nuclear power, and increase drilling for oil and gas here at home. We believe that if we unleash the innovative spirit of our citizens, we can achieve energy independence.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: GOP response to the 2009 State of the Union address
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Feb 24, 2009
$15B in clean energy; plus market-based cap on carbon
We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. We will double this nation's supply of renewable energy in the next three years. We've also made the largest investment in basic research funding in
American history--an investment that will spur not only new discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine and science and technology.
But to truly transform our economy, to protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate
change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy in America.
And to support that innovation, we will invest $15 billion a year to develop technologies like wind power and solar power, advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more efficient cars and trucks built right here in America.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2009 State of the Union address
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Feb 24, 2009
FactCheck: US imports less oil today than in 2005
Given the widespread concern about foreign oil, one line certainly sounded plausible: Obama said, "We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy, yet we import more oil today than ever before."Not true.
We're importing less than we were just a few years ago. Imports reached a high point of 15 million barrels per day on Nov. 4, 2005. Most recently, they totaled 11.5 million on Feb. 20, 2009. Monthly and annual imports show the same trend.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2009 State of the Union address
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Feb 24, 2009
FactCheck: Chevy Volt uses Korean battery, but Ford's don't
Obama gave a few examples of how the U.S. isn't leading when it comes to "clean, renewable energy," saying at one point that "new plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea."He's partly right.
The Chevy Volt, if it comes to market as scheduled in 2010, would be the first American-made, plug-in hybrid car, and General Motors recently announced that the Volt will use battery systems from South Korea's LG Chem Ltd.
But the U.S. isn't a complete laggard in this department. Ford said earlier this month that batteries for its hybrid, due to be available in 2012, will be supplied by a joint venture between a
U.S. company, Johnson Controls Inc., and France's Saft. At least initially, though, the battery cells will be made in France; they will be assembled into power packs in the U.S.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2009 State of the Union address
Rick Perry on Energy & Oil
: Jan 27, 2009
$5,000 incentive for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
When we combine lower utility taxes with increased, diversified production, we will preserve our role as the nation's energy leader. Unfortunately, our strength in petrochemical production and refining makes us a big target on the radar of an increasingl
activist EPA, whose one-size-fits-all approaches could severely harm our energy sector; an agency whose potential to harm our state with punitive actions will only increase in the months and years to come.Rather than wait for more mandates and
punishments for environmental non-attainment, let's continue encouraging innovation. I support giving Texans in the non-attainment areas of our state a $5,000 incentive towards a purchase of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles, using the funds
Texans have already paid to reduce emissions, while providing a unique way to store wind energy. This will keep Texas competitive in an emerging technology and take advantage of an energy portfolio that grows deeper and more diverse every day.
Click for Rick Perry on other issues.
Source: 2009 State of the State Address
Jon Huntsman on Energy & Oil
: Jan 27, 2009
Make Utah the premier destination for renewable energy
If we are going to take air quality seriously, which we must for the sake of the next generation, we must be bold; we must be visionary. Our aspirations should be nothing short of extraordinary.
Just as Wall Street is known for finance and Silicon Valley for technology, by 2012, I believe Utah can become the premier destination in America for renewable energy!
And don't tell me it can't be done!
In just this past year alone, we have witnessed in Utah the opening of a solar farm, a hydroelectric plant, a wind farm and a geothermal plant. To support this energy development, innovation at our higher education campuses is running at an all-time
high, like technologies that will ensure the long-term viability of our abundant natural resources. The University of Utah is now second only to MIT in commercialization of cutting-edge research.
Click for Jon Huntsman on other issues.
Source: Utah 2009 State of the State address
Rick Perry on Jobs
: Jan 27, 2009
70% of all jobs created in the US last year were in Texas
From November 2007 to November 2008, roughly 70% of the jobs created in the US were in Texas. Think about that for a moment. Our state is home to one out of ten Americans, but seven out of ten new American jobs were created here in the Lone Star State.
Click for Jon Huntsman on other issues.
Source: 2009 State of the State Address
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Jan 22, 2009
Goal of 50% of Alaska electric power from renewable sources
Previously, we've relied on a diminishing gas supply from Cook Inlet, and expensive diesel, and a mix of government subsidies, and not enough conservation--but that is not sustainable. And it shouldn't take another spike in energy costs to stir us into
action. Alaska will help achieve energy independence and security for our country, and we can lead with a long-needed energy plan for America. But let us begin with energy security for ourselves. This includes meeting my goal of generating
50% of our electric power with renewable sources. That's an unprecedented policy across the US but we're the state that can do it with our abundant renewables, and with Alaskan ingenuity.
In our energy plan, for the first time,
Alaskans will see cooperation among our utilities. We'll introduce legislation creating the joint utility corporation to finally accomplish this. We will have coordinated power generation that will finally make sense for consumers.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska 2009 State of the State Address
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Oct 7, 2008
Nuclear power ok, as one component of energy mix
Q: What can you do to move Congress on climate change?McCAIN: I traveled all over the world looking at the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. Now, what’s the best way of fixing it? Nuclear power. Sen. Obama says that it has to be safe or disposable
or something like that. Nuclear power is safe, and it’s clean. And I know that we can reprocess the spent nuclear fuel. The Japanese, the British, the French do it. And we can do it, too. Sen. Obama has opposed that.
OBAMA: I’ve called for investments
in solar, wind, geothermal. Contrary to what Sen. McCain keeps on saying, I favor nuclear power as one component of our overall energy mix. But this is another example where I think it is important to look at the record. Sen. McCain said a while
back that the big problem with energy is that for 30 years, politicians in Washington haven’t done anything. What Sen. McCain doesn’t mention is he’s been there 26 of them. And during that time, he voted 23 times against alternative fuels.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2008 second presidential debate against John McCain
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Oct 7, 2008
FactCheck: Reluctant on nuclear power in past; now favors it
Obama flatly said he favored nuclear energy--embracing it more warmly than in the past. Obama said, “Contrary to what Sen. McCain keeps on saying, I favor nuclear power as one component of our overall energy mix.”
Previously Obama has been more hesitant. He said at a town hall meeting in Newton, Iowa, on Dec. 30, 2007, when asked if he was “truly comfortable” with the safety of nuclear power, “I start off with the premise that nuclear energy is not optimal.
I am not a nuclear energy proponent.“ He then went on to say later in the same response that he has ”not ruled out nuclear ... but only so far as it is clean and safe.“
The energy plan Obama released in
October 2007 only grudgingly conceded that more nuclear power is probably needed to reduce carbon emissions: ”It is unlikely that we can meet our aggressive climate goals if we eliminate nuclear power from the table.“
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2008 second presidential debate
Barack Obama on Environment
: Oct 7, 2008
Government should invest in clean energy & green jobs
Q: What would you do for the environment?OBAMA: It is critical that we understand this is not just a challenge, it’s an opportunity, because if we create a new energy economy, we can create five million new jobs, easily.
It can be an engine that drives us into the future the same way the computer was the engine for economic growth over the last couple of decades. We can do it, but we’re going to have to make an investment.
The same way the computer was originally invented by a bunch of government scientists who were trying to figure out, for defense purposes, how to communicate, we’ve got to understand that this is a national security issue, as well.
McCAIN:
We can move forward, and clean up our climate, and develop green technologies, and alternative energies for battery-powered cars, so that we can clean up our environment and at the same time get our economy going by creating millions of jobs.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2008 second presidential debate against John McCain
Joe Biden on Energy & Oil
: Oct 2, 2008
Obama believes in investing in alternative energy
BIDEN: We have 3 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We consume 25% of the oil. John has voted 20 times in the last decade-and-a-half against funding alternative energy sources, clean energy sources, wind, solar, biofuels. Obama believes by
investing in clean coal and safe nuclear, we can not only create jobs in wind and solar here, we can export it.PALIN: I was the first governor to form a climate change sub-cabinet to start dealing with the impacts. We’ve got to reduce emissions. John
McCain is right there with an “all of the above” approach to deal with climate change impacts. As we rely more on other countries that don’t care as much about the climate as we do, we’re allowing them to produce and to emit and even pollute more than
America would ever stand for. It’s all the more reason that we have an “all of the above” approach, tapping into alternative sources of energy and conserving fuel, conserving our petroleum products and our hydrocarbons so that we can clean up this planet
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Oct 2, 2008
Exxon & Conoco are not my biggest fan
BIDEN: We’re not going to support the $300 billion tax cut that they have for corporate America and the very wealthy. We’re not going to support another $4 billion tax cut for ExxonMobil.PALIN: Sen. Biden, you would remember that, in that energy plan
that Obama voted for, that’s what gave those oil companies those big tax breaks. Your running mate voted for that. You know what I had to do in the state of Alaska? I had to take on those oil companies and tell them, “No,” you know, any of the greed
there that has been kind of instrumental, I guess, in their mode of operation, that wasn’t going to happen in my state. And that’s why Exxon and ConocoPhillips, they’re not my biggest fans, because what I had to do up there in
Alaska was to break up a monopoly up there and say, you know, the people are going to come first and we’re going to make sure that we have value given to the people of Alaska with those resources.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Sen. Joe Biden
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Oct 2, 2008
Nonsensical to leave domestic supply untapped
BIDEN: I agree with the governor: She imposed a windfall profits tax up there in Alaska. That’s what Barack Obama and I want to do.PALIN: When we talk about energy, we have to consider the need to do all that we can to allow this nation to become
energy independent. It’s a nonsensical position that we are in when we have domestic supplies of energy all over this great land. And East Coast politicians who don’t allow energy-producing states like Alaska to produce these, to tap into them, & instead
we’re relying on foreign countries to produce for us. We’re circulating about $700 billion a year into foreign countries, some who do not like America--they certainly don’t have our best interests at heart--instead of those dollars circulating here,
creating thousands of jobs and allowing domestic supplies of energy to be tapped into and start flowing into these very, very hungry markets. Energy independence is the key to this nation’s future, to our economic future, and to our national security.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Sen. Joe Biden
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Oct 2, 2008
Drill, baby, drill
BIDEN: We have 3% of the world’s oil reserves. We consume 25% of the oil. John has voted 20 times in the last decade-and-a-half against funding alternative energy sources, clean energy sources, wind, solar, biofuels. McCain thinks,
I guess, the only answer is drill, drill, drill. Drill we must, but it’ll take ten years before any [new drilling delivers oil]. PALIN: The chant is “drill, baby, drill.” That’s what we hear across this country in our rallies because people are hungry
for those domestic sources of energy to be tapped into. They know that even in my own energy-producing state we have billions of barrels of oil and hundreds of trillions of cubic feet of clean, green natural gas. Barack Obama and Sen.
Biden, you’ve said no to everything in trying to find a domestic solution to the energy crisis. You even called drilling -- safe, environmentally-friendly drilling offshore as raping the outer continental shelf.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Vice Presidential debate against Joe Biden
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 17, 2008
First and foremost, we must become energy independent
Q: What specific role will take on as vice president?A: I will focus on energy independence. First and foremost, an energy independent nation. We must get there. It is a matter of national security and of our future prosperity, being able to quit
relying on foreign sources of energy to feed our hungry markets when we have the American supplies and we have the American ingenuity and we have the American workers to produce these supplies of energy.
Q: Americans have heard a lot of information on
ANWR. I’ve heard you talk passionately about your love for your state of Alaska.
A: Yes.
Q: Why then would you support drilling in Alaska?
A: I support drilling in Alaska because it’s going to be good for our nation.
Q: Including ANWR?
A: Absolutely. ANWR is a 2,000 acre plot of land. It’s about the size of LAX, that platform of land that we would need to explore. But, no secret, John McCain and I agree to disagree on that one. And I’m going to keep working on him with ANWR.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview on “Hannity & Colmes”
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 17, 2008
McCain wants healthy deliberation on disagreements like ANWR
Q: Have you had any discussions about ANWR yet, on which you disagree with John McCain?A: We have.
Q: Is he softening?
A: Well, I’m very, very encouraged, as we all understand that John
McCain knows, more so than any other leader in our nation today, that for national security reasons we must be an energy independent nation. We must start taking the steps to get there. That’s why he has embraced offshore drilling.
That’s why he has embraced the ideal of the alternative fuels also. And I’ll keep working on him with ANWR.
Q: There will be some spirited discussion, I assume, in the administration.
A: Sure.
The nice thing about him, too, is he is not asking me or anybody else to check our opinions at the door. He wants that healthy deliberation and debate within.
Q: And you’ve talked about that too?
A: Yes, we sure have. Yes. It’s been refreshing.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview on “Hannity & Colmes”
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 17, 2008
Energy is inherently linked to security and prosperity
Q: We’re importing 70% of our oil. Do you view this as a national security issue, an economic security issue?A: Both.
Q: And what is the impact for Americans down the road if we don’t do something to solve our energy dependence?
A: That imbalance
of trade is something that we need to tackle also. Yes, those dollars should be circulating within our own economy. It’s a matter of national security. It is a matter of our future prosperity. Energy is inherently linked to security and prosperity.
More and more Americans are recognizing this also. You can see the constituents putting pressure on Congress to come on, Congress, get rid of that gridlock that you are so engaged in now. We sort of have a “do nothing Senate” right now where nobody’s
wanting to really pick up the ball and run with it and take the steps that we have to take to become more energy independent. And it’s going to take a whole a change in leadership in order to really crush that gridlock and get going on this.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview on “Hannity & Colmes”
Sarah Palin on Families & Children
: Sep 17, 2008
V.P. role would include helping special-needs children
Q: Governor, have you spoken with Senator McCain about your specific role in the McCain administration?A: Sure have. I’m very excited about the role that I will play as his partner. And I will focus on energy independence and reform overall of
Washington and tax cuts for Americans and reigning in spending.
Q: These are specific roles that you already talked about?
A: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely.
Q: That you will take on as vice president?
A: Right.
So I’d like to talk about each one of them. And I wish we had hours to talk about this also.
Q: I have nothing to do.
A: OK, good. Because another thing that we’ll talk about also is the role that I will play that is very near and dear to my heart.
And that’s helping families with special-needs children and being able to strengthen our National Institute of Health also and find cures for presently incurable diseases.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview on “Hannity & Colmes”
Sarah Palin on Government Reform
: Sep 17, 2008
Only independent mavericks can reform Washington
Q: You & Sen. McCain want to eliminate earmarks; to reduce government spending; to keep taxes low; to reform government. Many people have gone to Washington & they’ve made these promises, especially when it comes to cutting spending and it doesn’t happen
Look how partisan it is in Washington right now. How do you get that accomplished?A: Yes, it is gridlock and that’s ridiculous. That’s why we don’t have an energy policy. That’s why there hasn’t been the reform of the abuse of the earmark process.
And real reform is tough and you do ruffle feathers along the way. But John McCain has that streak of independence in him that I think is very, very important in America today in our leadership.
I have that within me also. And that’s why John McCain tapped me to be a team of mavericks, of independents coming in there without the allegiances to that cronyism, to that good ol’ boy system.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview on “Hannity & Colmes”
Sarah Palin on Homeland Security
: Sep 11, 2008
Energy is a foundation of national security
Q: When I asked John McCain about your national security credentials, he cited the fact that you have commanded the Alaskan National Guard and that Alaska is close to Russia. Are those sufficient credentials?
A: Let me speak specifically about a credential that I do bring to this table, and that’s with the energy independence that I’ve been working on for these years as the governor of this state that produces nearly 20% of the
US domestic supply of energy, that I worked on as chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, overseeing the oil and gas development in our state to produce more for the United States.
Q: I know.
I’m just saying that national security is a whole lot more than energy.
A: It is, but I want you to not lose sight of the fact that energy is a foundation of national security. It’s that important. It’s that significant.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: ABC News: 2008 election interview with Charlie Gibson
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 3, 2008
Produce more of our own oil & gas, for national security
The stakes for our nation could not be higher. When a hurricane strikes in the Gulf of Mexico, this country should not be so dependent on imported oil that we are forced to draw from our Strategic Petroleum Reserve. And families cannot throw away more an
more of their paychecks on gas and heating oil.With Russia wanting to control a vital pipeline in the Caucasus, and to divide and intimidate our European allies by using energy as a weapon, we cannot leave ourselves at the mercy of foreign suppliers.
To confront the threat that Iran might seek to cut off nearly a fifth of world energy supplies ... or that terrorists might strike again at the Abqaiq facility in Saudi Arabia ... or that Venezuela might shut off its oil deliveries ... we
Americans need to produce more of our own oil and gas.
And take it from a gal who knows the North Slope of Alaska: We’ve got lots of both.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Republican National Convention
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 3, 2008
Gas pipeline:history’s largest private-sector infrastructure
I fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history. And when that deal was struck, we began a nearly $40 billion natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence.
That pipeline, when the last section is laid and its valves are opened, will lead America one step farther away from dependence on dangerous foreign powers that do not have our interests at heart.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Republican National Convention
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Sep 3, 2008
More pipelines; more nukes; more coal; more alternatives
Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America’s energy problems--as if we all didn’t know that already. But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all.Starting in
January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we’re going to lay more pipelines ... build more nuclear plants ... create jobs with clean coal ... and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal and other alternative sources.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Republican National Convention
Sarah Palin on Homeland Security
: Sep 3, 2008
Focus on fighting Al-Qaeda terrorists, not on reading rights
What does [Barack Obama] actually seek to accomplish? The answer is to make government bigger ... take more of your money ... give you more orders from Washington ... and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world. America needs more energy..
our opponent is against producing it.Victory in Iraq is finally in sight ... he wants to forfeit.
Terrorist states are seeking nuclear weapons without delay ... he wants to meet them without preconditions.
Al-Qaida terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America ... he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights?
Government is too big ... he wants to grow it.
Congress spends too much ... he promises more.
Taxes are too high ... he wants to raise them. His tax increases are the fine print in his economic plan, and let me be specific.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Republican National Convention
Sarah Palin on Homeland Security
: Aug 29, 2008
Strong military and sound energy
Q: If you were running for president, what causes would you champion? A: I would push for a strong military and a sound energy policy. I believe that Alaska can help set an example on energy policy.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Q&A with Newsmax.com’s Mike Coppock
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Aug 27, 2008
Drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution
For our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East. Washington’s been talking about our oil addiction for the last 30 years, and
McCain has been there for 26 of them. He’s said no to higher fuel-efficiency standards for cars, no to investments in renewable energy. Today, we import triple the amount of oil as the day that McCain took office. Now is the time to end this addiction,
and to understand that drilling is a stop-gap measure, not a long-term solution. As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto companies re-tool,
so that the fuel-efficient cars are built in America. I’ll invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in renewable energy--an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be outsourced.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Democratic National Convention
Joe Biden on Foreign Policy
: Aug 27, 2008
The US is less secure and more isolated in recent history
Our country is less secure and more isolated that it has been any time it has in recent history. The Bush foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole, with very few friends to help us climb out. For the last seven years, the administration has failed
to face the biggest forces shaping this century. The emergence of Russia, China and India’s great powers, the spread of lethal weapons, the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water. The challenge of climate change and the resurgence of
fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front in the war on terror. We once again see the consequences of the neglect of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia. Barack and I will end that neglect.
We will hold Russia accountable for its action and we will help Georgia rebuild. I have been on the ground in Georgia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms, this administration’s policy has been an abysmal failure.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Democratic National Convention
Barack Obama on Principles & Values
: Aug 27, 2008
Fulfilling America’s promise means individual participation
We must also admit that fulfilling America’s promise will require more than just money. It will require a renewed sense of responsibility from each of us to recover what John F. Kennedy called our “intellectual and moral strength.”
Yes, government must lead on energy independence, but each of us must do our part to make our homes and businesses more efficient. Yes, we must provide more ladders to success for young men who fall into lives of crime and despair.
But we must also admit that programs alone can’t replace parents; that government can’t turn off the television and make a child do her homework; that fathers must take
more responsibility for providing the love and guidance their children need. Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility -- that’s the essence of America’s promise.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Democratic National Convention
Joe Biden on Principles & Values
: Aug 27, 2008
We need a wise leader like Obama, not just a good soldier
These times require more than a good soldier. They require a wise leader. A leader who can change, make the change that everybody knows we need. Obama is going to deliver that change. He will reform our tax code. He will cut taxes for 95% of the American
people who draw a pay check. Obama will transform our economy by making alternative energy a national priority and in the process creating 5 million new jobs and finally freeing us from the grip of foreign oil. Obama knows that any country that out
teaches us today, will out compete us tomorrow. That’s why he’ll invest in the next generation of teachers and why he’ll make college more affordable. That’s the change we need. Obama will bring down health care cost by $2,500 for the average family and
at long last deliver affordable, accessible health care for every American. That’s the change we need. Barack will put more cops on the street, put security back in social security and he’ll never ever give up until we achieve equal pay for women.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Speech at 2008 Democratic National Convention
Barack Obama on Tax Reform
: Aug 25, 2008
Trickle-down economics has failed
speech titled, "An Agenda for Middle Class Success." He began by describing the Republican philosophy: "Give massive tax breaks to big corporations and multimillionaires and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else. Sacrifice investments in
health care and education and energy and technology to pay for these tax breaks, and borrow the rest from countries like China, leaving our children to foot the bill." And he added, "Well, it's painfully clear by now how badly this strategy has failed."
While Democrats have long been intimidated by the "tax-and-spend" label, most have now accepted the need to restore taxes on the top brackets. Obama and his chief rival, Hillary Clinton, both campaigned on a platform to raise taxes on people with annual
earnings of at least $250,000, roughly the wealthiest 2% of Americans. Both pledged to reclaim at least some inheritance taxes on very large estates.Obama's own proposals to date have sometimes mocked his bold rhetoric. On July 7 Obama delivered a
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Link
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Aug 20, 2008
Resource rebate: suspend AK 8-cent fuel tax for one year
I’m pleased to report to Alaskans that in early August, our Alaska Legislature agreed to approve a one-time resource rebate that returns part of our resource wealth to Alaskans --the owners in common of these resources. The rebate will be a direct
payment of $1,200 to each Alaskan eligible for the 2008 Permanent Fund Dividend. The resource rebate was part of a larger energy package that also includes a 50% increase in the maximum loan amount for bulk fuel bridge and bulk fuel revolving loan funds
to communities and cooperatives. Additionally, it suspends the state’s 8-cent motor fuel tax on gasoline, marine fuel and aviation fuel for one year and strengthens the Power Cost Equalization Program.Our lawmakers also included an additional
$60 million for the Home Energy Rebate Program operated by the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation and $50 million in grant funds to the Renewable Energy Fund, bringing the total available for renewable energy projects in FY 2009 to $100 million.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska Governor’s Office: August 2008 Newsletter
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Aug 14, 2008
To win, GOP must push energy independence
Q: What ideas do you have to gain back GOP majorities in Congress?A: What the GOP has got to do, on a real practical level, between now and the election, is to convince Americans that it is our energy policy that is best for our nation and the
nation’s future, that if we are to become energy independent and if we are to become a more secure nation then we had better start supplying our very, very hungry markets across the nation with American supplies of energy.
The GOP agenda to ramp up domestic supplies of energy is the only way that we are going to become energy independent, the only way that we are going to become a more secure nation.
And the GOP agenda is the right agenda in that respect, but the
GOP is going to have to prove to Americans in following weeks that we can safely, responsibly and ethically develop these resources. That, of course, has been a problem for the GOP.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Q&A with Time Magazine’s Jay Newton Small
Sarah Palin on War & Peace
: Aug 14, 2008
We don’t know what the plan is to ever end the war
Ramping up domestic supplies of energy is the only way to become energy independent, the only way that we are going to become a more secure nation. And I say this, of course, knowing the situation we are in right now--at war, not knowing what the plan
is to ever end the war we are engaged in, understanding that Americans are seeking solutions and are seeking resolution in this war effort. So energy supplies and being able to produce and supply domestically is going to be a big part of that.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Q&A with Time Magazine’s Jay Newton Small
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Aug 4, 2008
Agrees with Obama on more Alaska oil & gas production
Gov. Sarah Palin today responded to the energy plan put forward by the presumptive Democratic nominee for President, Illinois Senator Barack Obama. “I am pleased to see Senator Obama acknowledge the huge potential Alaska’s natural gas reserves represent
in terms of clean energy and sound jobs,” Governor Palin said. In a speech given in Lansing, Michigan, Senator Obama called for the completion of the Alaska natural gas pipeline, stating, “Over the next five years, we should also lease more of the
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska for oil and gas production. And we should also tap more of our substantial natural gas reserves and work with the Canadian government to finally build the Alaska natural gas pipeline, delivering clean natural gas
and creating good jobs in the process.“
Gov. Palin said, ”This is a tool that must be on the table to buy us time until our long-term energy plans can be put into place, and it is gratifying to see Senator Obama get on board.“
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska Governor’s Office: press release, “Obama Energy Plan”
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Aug 4, 2008
Windfall oil profits tax prevents investment
Palin [supported Obama’s energy proposal but] questioned the means to pay for Obama’s proposed rebate--a windfall profits tax on oil companies. In Alaska, the state’s resource valuation system, ACES, provides strong incentives for companies to re-invest
their profits in new production.“Windfall profits taxes alone prevent additional investment in domestic production. Without new supplies from American reserves, our dependency and addiction to foreign sources of oil will continue,” Palin said.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska Governor’s Office: press release, “Obama Energy Plan”
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Aug 4, 2008
More Alaska oil & gas leases, plus new gas pipeline
Gov. Sarah Palin today responded to the energy plan put forward by the presumptive Democratic nominee for President, Illinois Senator Barack Obama. “I am pleased to see Senator Obama acknowledge the huge potential Alaska’s natural gas reserves represent
in terms of clean energy and sound jobs,” Governor Palin said. In a speech given in Lansing, Michigan, Senator Obama called for the completion of the Alaska natural gas pipeline, stating, “Over the next five years, we should also lease more of the
National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska for oil and gas production. And we should also tap more of our substantial natural gas reserves and work with the Canadian government to finally build the Alaska natural gas pipeline, delivering clean natural gas
and creating good jobs in the process.“
Gov. Palin said, ”This is a tool that must be on the table to buy us time until our long-term energy plans can be put into place, and it is gratifying to see Senator Obama get on board.“
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Gov. Palin’s press release, “Pleased with Obama’s Plan”
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Jul 31, 2008
Convinced McCain to drill offshore; not yet on drilling ANWR
Q: When we talked about a month ago, you told me you were going to persuade Senator McCain to drill in ANWR. Now actually, McCain’s come a long way on drilling Outer Continental Shelf. Have you yet talked him in to ANWR?A: I have not talked him in to
ANWR yet. But yeah, he has evolved into being open enough to say yes to that offshore. Obama certainly hasn’t gone there. We certainly need this. We need it for American security, & for energy independence.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: CNBC “Kudlow & Company” Interview
Sarah Palin on Government Reform
: Jul 31, 2008
VECO scandal & Stevens indictment shows need for GOP cleanup
Q: In Alaska, the so-called “culture of corruption”--this energy services company VECO buying favors for state and federal contracts. People linked to VECO--a couple of state legislators--have been convicted, a couple more being investigated. And Senator
Ted Stevens has now been caught in that loop.A: Sen. Stevens’ indictment was very dismaying. Hopefully the Ted Stevens issues won’t be a distraction. But yeah, lots and lots of damage has been done by this oil industry service company, VECO.
Not good for Alaska.
Q: What about the Republican Party in general? It seems to me the GOP has just got to cleanse itself of all the pork barrel, corruption, lobbying, cash-for-favors that cost them the Congress back in November 2006.
A: You’re absolutely right on the cleaning that’s needed in our party, in the Republican Party. And you know, I think Senator McCain is on the right track with the earmark reform that he’s so adamant about. I’m right there with him.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: CNBC “Kudlow & Company” Interview
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jul 1, 2008
Political climate at fault for failing energy independence
In a speech in Oct. 2007 in Portsmouth N.H., Obama blamed the Washington political climate, and the corporate special interests who control it, for what has happened to the planet:"We have heard promises to curb our use of fossil fuels in nearly every
State of the Union address since the oil embargo of 1973.
"Our energy problem has become an energy crisis because no matter how well-intentioned the promise, they all fall victim to the same Washington politics that has only become more divided and
dishonest; more beholden to the powerful interests that have the biggest stake in the status quo."
- Obama's long-term goal is to reduce all carbon emissions by 80% by the year 2050. Obama will:
- Introduce a market-based cap and trade system to
limit carbon emissions;
- Encourage renewable and alternative energy use;
- Emphasize conservation and improve energy efficiency; and
- Reestablish America as the global leader in global warming negotiations.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Obamanomics, by John R. Talbott, p.128
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jul 1, 2008
Include clean coal in clean energy future
Obama's plan to invest in a clean energy future and in renewable and alternative energies states that he will:- Invest $150 billion over ten years in clean energy: Obama will advance the next generation of biofuels & fuel infrastructure, accelerate
the commercialization of plug-in hybrids, promote development of commercial-scale renewable energy, invest in low-emission coal plants, and begin the transition to a new digital electricity grid.
- Invest in a skilled clean technologies workforce: Obama
will use proceeds from the cap and trade auction program to invest in job training and transition programs to help workers and industries adapt to clean technology development and production.
- Develop and deploy clean coal: Commercialize and deploy
low-carbon coal technologies.
- Deploy cellulosic ethanol: Obama will invest federal resources, including tax incentives, cash prizes, & government contracts into developing the first 2 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol into the system by 2013.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Obamanomics, by John R. Talbott, p.132-133
Barack Obama on Free Trade
: Jul 1, 2008
Assist workers who lose globalization's race to the bottom
Obama comments, "But the larger problem is what's missing from our prevailing policy on trade and globalization--namely, meaningful assistance for those who are not reaping its benefits and a plan to succeed in a twenty-first century economy.
So far, almost all of our energy and almost all of these trade agreements are about making life easier for the winners of globalization, while we do nothing as life gets harder for American workers."
Obama adds, "But this is about more than displaced workers. Our failure to respond to globalization is causing a race to the bottom that means lower wages and stingier health and retiree benefits for all Americans.
It's causing a squeeze on middle-class families who are working in this new economy. As one downstate (Illinois) worker told me during a recent visit, 'It doesn't do me much good if I'm saving a dollar on a T-shirt in Wal-Mart, but don't have a job.'"
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Obamanomics, by John R. Talbott, p.117-118
Barack Obama on Technology
: Jul 1, 2008
Invest in a digital smart grid for electricity utilities
Obama's plan states that it "will reduce oil consumption by at least 35%, or 10 million barrels per day, by 2030." Obama's plan to set America on a path to energy independence states that he will:- Increase fuel economy standards: Obama will double
fuel economy standards within eighteen years. Obama will also invest in advanced vehicle technology such as advanced lightweights materials and new engines.
- Set national building efficiency goals: Barack Obama will establish a goal of making all new
buildings carbon neutral, or produce zero emissions, by 2030. He'll also establish a national goal of improving new building efficiency by 50% and existing building efficiency by 25% over the next decade to help us meet the 2030 goal.
- Invest in a
digital smart grid: Obama will pursue a major investment in our utility grid to enable a tremendous increase in renewable generation and accommodate modern energy requirements, such as reliability, smart metering, and distributed storage.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Obamanomics, by John R. Talbott, p.137
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Jun 27, 2008
Unlock ANWR; we’re ready, willing and able to contribute
Q: The governor of Alaska sent a letter to Senate Leader Harry Reid with a very clear demand--drill in ANWR now. Governor Sarah Palin is on the phone right now. Governor, I’m curious how you were received today, when so many of your constituents,
I would assume, want to protect the land, not drill. How did it go today?A: I’ll correct you there with all due respect--the people of Alaska understand that Alaska has so much to contribute in terms of energy sources to the rest of the US.
Folks up here want ANWR to be unlocked by the federal government so that we can drill. We’ve got a tremendous amount of resource up here, and we’re ready, willing and able to contribute. I think Washington doesn’t understand that we’re at a real critical
crossroads: We are either going to become more and more dependent on foreign sources of energy, or we’re going to be able to secure our nation and drill domestically for safe, stable, clean supplies of energy that we have here. We have them in Alaska.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview: “Your World” with Neil Cavuto
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 26, 2008
GovWatch: Supports nuclear power if it’s clean & safe
McCain released a Web ad entitled “Dr. No” that portrays Obama as saying “no to clean, safe, nuclear energy.” That’s false. Obama has said he’s open to building new nuclear plants if they are clean & safe.McCain bases his claim on a partial quote from
Obama on Dec. 30, 2007. Obama said, “I start off with the premise that nuclear energy is not optimal. I am not a nuclear energy proponent.” If that was all Obama said it would not make him an opponent of nuclear power, of course.
But Obama went on to say, “There is no perfect energy source. Everything has some problems right now. We haven’t found it yet. Now I trust in our ingenuity. I have not ruled out nuclear as part of that [$150 billion proposed energy research]
package, but only so far as it is clean and safe.”
Furthermore, the energy plan Obama released in October 2007 said: “It is unlikely that we can meet our aggressive climate goals if we eliminate nuclear power from the table.”
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: GovWatch on 2008: Washington Post analysis
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 26, 2008
GovWatch: Opposes Yucca Mountain for nuclear waste storage
McCain portrays Obama as saying “no to clean, safe, nuclear energy.” That’s false. But there’s no question that McCain is a much bigger advocate of nuclear power than Obama, who has taken a more guarded position. McCain has said that he’d work to bring
45 new nuclear power plants online by 2030, with the eventual goal of building 100 new nuclear plants. Obama has criticized that, highlighting his opposition to long-term storage of nuclear waste at the federal government’s Yucca Mountain site in
Nevada. “He wants to build 45 new nuclear reactors when they don’t have a plan to store the waste anywhere besides right here,” Obama said on June 25. McCain supports going ahead with the Yucca Mountain plan.Obama’s 2007 plan promised that he “will
also lead federal efforts to look for a safe, long-term disposal solution based on objective, scientific analysis.” It’s inaccurate to cast Obama as an opponent, and McCain goes too far when he portrays Obama as saying “no” to nuclear.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: GovWatch on 2008: Washington Post analysis
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: Jun 22, 2008
Increase supply; diversify sources; drill ANWR
Q: What do you think about the Saudis increased oil production? A: Well, it’s relatively good news. We have a supply and demand problem, so the more supply we can get into the market, the better. But we also need to realize we can’t just continue to
rely on that approach for our future.
Q: But what about the addiction to imported oil?
A: Well, we have to diversify and Americanize our energy supply. Pres. Bush made the case for going ahead and drilling in ANWR. Listen to the president.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2008 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: Jun 22, 2008
The more oil supply, the better
Q: What is your reaction to the Saudis deciding to increase oil production?A: Well, it’s relatively good news. We have a supply and demand problem, so the more supply we can get into the market, the better. But we also need to realize we can’t just
continue to rely on that approach for our future.
Q: But what do you do about the addiction to imported oil?
A: Well, we have to diversify and Americanize our energy supply. But we need to do it in a way that’s environmentally sensitive and friendly
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2008 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 15, 2008
$150B over 10 years to establish a green energy sector
The dangers are eclipsed only by the opportunities that would come with change. We know the jobs of the 21st century will be created in developing alternative energy. The question is whether these jobs will be created in America, or abroad. Already, we’v
seen countries like Germany, Spain and Brazil reap the benefits of economic growth from clean energy. But we are decades behind in confronting this challenge. George Bush has spent most of his Administration denying that we have a problem, and making
deals with Big Oil behind closed doors. It’s time to make energy security a leading priority. My energy plan will invest $150 billion over the next ten years to establish a green energy sector that will create up to 5 million jobs over the next two
decades. We’ll help manufacturers--particularly in the auto industry--convert to green technology, and help workers learn the skills they need. And unlike George Bush, I won’t wait until the sixth year of my presidency to sit down with the automakers.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Speech in Flint, MI, in Change We Can Believe In, p.252-3
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: May 21, 2008
Extend tax incentives for energy efficiency and energy R&D
Letter from Governor Pawlenty and Governor Rendell to the Senate Finance Committee: On behalf of the nation’s governors, we urge Congress to extend expiring tax provisions for renewable energy efficiency, research and development.
Continued and consistent support for renewable energy and efficiency through tax incentives is critical to the development and deployment of alternative energy technologies and energy efficiency.
To stimulate innovation, we encourage Congress to exten
the research and development tax credit that expired last year. Providing business with an incentive to invest in research is critical for driving innovation and generating high wage job opportunities that will propel the U.S. economy throughout the
21st century.
Securing our energy future and promoting innovation are priorities at both the state and federal level. We strongly urge you to partner with governors by passing legislation on a bipartisan basis to extend these tax provisions this year.
Click for Tim Pawlenty on other issues.
Source: Letter from two governors to Senate Finance Committee
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: May 18, 2008
Get tough with energy speculators and with OPEC cartel
Q: You’ve said you want to get tough with OPEC. But what does it mean when you have members of OPEC like Ahmadinejad of Iran or Hugo Chavez of Venezuela? How do you plan on getting tough with them?A: Well, I actually have a four-part program that
I would put into effect were I president today to deal with these rising gas prices. I would go after the energy traders and speculators. I would close the “Enron loophole.” I voted to quit filling up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
I have advocated a gas tax holiday that is paid for, out of the record profits of the oil companies. And it’s an enormous burden on people who drive any considerable distance.
Q: But what kind of leverage do you have on OPEC?
A: Nine countries
that are members of OPEC are members of the WTO, where they have agreed to certain rules that I believe OPEC by definition violates. Also, we have never used antitrust laws in our country to really go at the heart of what is a monopoly cartel.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2008 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: May 15, 2008
Energy relief plan: $100 per person monthly, for oil & gas
Returning surplus funds through grants to electric utilities will result in a 60% reduction for all ratepayers. The benefit will flow to homeowners, renters, schools, governments and businesses. In addition, there will be conservation incentives for
the utilities. For every 1% reduction in 2008 kilowatt hour sales from 2007 sales, the state will make a year-end contribution for capital energy projects to the utility.
The Energy Debit Card will go out to every qualifying [Alaska resident]. The
benefit will be $100 per month per recipient. The temporary Energy Debit Card can be used for purchases from Alaska energy vendors, such as heating oil distributors, natural gas utilities, electric utilities, gas stations & other retail fueling stations.
The value of this plan is approximately $1.2 billion. The grant to electric utilities is expected to be $475 million, while the Energy Debit Card totals are forecast to be $729 million. The Governor has proposed this energy relief plan for one year.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Alaska Governor’s Office: Press release 08-074 “Energy Plan”
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: May 4, 2008
Figure out how to sequester carbon and burn clean coal
Q: In terms of global warming, you’ve talked about wind and solar and biofuels. What about nuclear? A: I think we do have to look at nuclear, and what we’ve got to figure out is can we store the material properly? Can we make sure that they’re secure?
Can we deal with the expense? My attitude when it comes to energy is there’s no silver bullet. We’ve got to look at every possible option. You know, I’ve said the same thing about coal. I have a aggressive goal of reducing carbon emissions, and coal is a
dirty fuel right now. But if we can figure out how to sequester carbon and burn clean coal, we’re the Saudi Arabia of coal, and I don’t think that we can dismiss out of hand the use of coal as part of our energy mix. What we are going to have to
understand, though, is that global warming is real, it is serious and that whatever options we come up with, if they are not addressing the fact that the planet is getting warmer, then we are failing not just this generation, but future generations.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press: 2008 “Meet the Candidates” series
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Apr 29, 2008
Bush is right: drill ANWR & develop our own supplies
Gov. Sarah Palin released the following statement after Pres. Bush renewed his call to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration in the face of surging gasoline prices: “Pres. Bush is right. Across the nation, communities are feeling
the pinch of high energy costs. It is absurd that we are borrowing from one foreign country to buy oil from another. It is a threat to our national security and economic well-being. It is well past time for America to develop our own supplies.”
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Alaska Governor’s Office: Press release 8-068, “ANWR”
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Apr 16, 2008
Investigate gas price manipulation; add windfall profits tax
Q: What are you going to do about gas prices? $4 a gallon is killing truckers.A: #1, we are going to investigate these gas prices. The federal government has tools that this administration will not use, in the Federal Trade Commission, because
I believe there is market manipulation going on, particularly among energy traders. We’ve seen this movie before, in Enron, and we’ve got to get to the bottom to make sure we’re not being taken advantage of. #2, I would quit putting oil into the Strategi
Petroleum Reserve and I would release some to help drive the price down globally. And #3, if there is any kind of gas tax moratorium, as some people are now proposing--
Q: Like John McCain.
A:--like John McCain, and some Democrats, frankly. What
I would like to see us do is, if we have $4 gas, then we should have a windfall profits tax on these outrageous oil company profits, and put that money back into the highway trust fund, so that we don’t lose out on repair & construction & rebuilding.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2008 Philadelphia primary debate, on eve of PA primary
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Apr 16, 2008
FactCheck: Yes, FTC is investigating gas price manipulation
Clinton said she believes “market manipulation” is a factor in the rise of fuel prices but offered no evidence to support that. Clinton said, “We are going to investigate these gas prices. The federal government has certain tools that this administration
will not use, in the Federal Trade Commission and other ways, through the Justice Department, because I believe there is market manipulation going on, particularly among energy traders.”In an article we posted when John Edwards raised this issue,
we noted that the FTC has repeatedly looked into allegations of market manipulation and fixing of gasoline prices. So far, it has found nothing to prosecute, not even in the post-Hurricane Katrina gas price spikes.
The FTC isn’t sitting on its hands as prices shoot skyward, at least according to information on its Web site. It monitors retail gas prices in 360 U.S. cities, to look for suspicious pricing. But the FTC does not disclose its ongoing investigations.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org analysis of 2008 Philadelphia primary debate
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Apr 16, 2008
Raise fuel efficiency standards to reduce long-term demand
Q: We’ve heard from politicians for a long time we’re going to end dependence on foreign oil. I just have a quote: “The generation-long growth in our dependence on foreign oil will be stopped dead in its tracks right now.” That was Jimmy Carter in 1979.
And it’s gotten a whole lot worse since then.A: Well, you’re right. And that’s why people are cynical, because decade after decade, we talk about energy policy or we talk about health care policy, and through Democratic and
Republican administrations, nothing gets done. [I agree with Sen. Clinton on] investigating potential price gouging & a windfall profits tax. I think that long term, we’re going to have to raise fuel efficiency standards on cars, because the only way
that we’re going to be able to reduce gas prices is if we reduce demand. You’ve still got a billion people in China & India who want cars. So we have to get serious about increasing our fuel efficiency standards and investing in new technologies.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2008 Philadelphia primary debate, on eve of PA primary
Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values
: Feb 11, 2008
FactCheck: Ranked 16th most liberal in Senate
Obama was asked about a recent ranking of senators by the National Journal that rated him the most liberal in 2007. He responded by citing one vote on “an office of public integrity that stood outside of the Senate.”Obama’s answer could mislead voters
Obama cited just one of 99 Senate votes selected by National Journal’s reporters and editors for the study. Most of the votes chosen had to do with the minimum wage, renewable energy, immigration, embryonic stem cell research, and other issues that
divide liberals and conservatives.
Clinton ranked 16th most liberal in the Senate, although she actually differed from Obama on just 2 of the 99 selected votes--the creation of an outside ethics office, and allowing certain immigrants to stay in the
country while their visas were being renewed. A comparison of Obama & Clinton over the last three years (since Obama has been in the Senate) shows that Obama had an average composite “liberal” score of 88, which is higher than Clinton’s average of 77.6.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2008 Politico pre-Potomac Primary interview
Barack Obama on Government Reform
: Feb 2, 2008
Ended corporate jet travel subsidized by lobbyists
THE PROBLEM- Lobbyists Write National Policies: For example, Vice President Dick Cheney’s Energy Task Force of oil and gas lobbyists met secretly to develop national energy policy.
OBAMA’S PLAN-
Support Campaign Finance Reform: Obama supports public financing of campaigns combined with free television and radio time as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests.
OBAMA’S RECORD-
Federal Ethics Reform: Obama and Senator Feingold (D-WI) took on both parties and proposed ethics legislation that was described as the “gold standard” for reform. It was because of their leadership that ending subsidized corporate jet travel,
mandating disclosure of lobbyists’ bundling of contributions, and enacting strong new restrictions of lobbyist-sponsored trips became part of the final ethics bill that was signed into law.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Campaign booklet, “Blueprint for Change”, p. 3-5
Barack Obama on Social Security
: Feb 2, 2008
Stop any efforts to privatize Social Security
THE PROBLEM- Insecure Retirement Savings: 75 million working Americans lack employer-based retirement plans. Too many companies have dumped their pension obligations, leaving workers in the cold.
- Income Security:
With skyrocketing health care, energy and housing costs, too many seniors do not have the resources to live comfortably.
OBAMA’S PLAN- Commitment:As someone who was largely raised by his grandparents,
Obama has first-hand knowledge of how hard America’s seniors have worked. He will honor their lifetime of work.
- Protect Social Security: Obama will preserve Social Security by stopping any efforts to privatize it and working in a bipartisan
way to preserve it for future generations.
- Secure Hard-Earned Pensions: Obama will fight to ensure that companies don’t dump their pension obligations.
- Help Americans Save More: Obama will make retirement savings automatic.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Campaign booklet, “Blueprint for Change”, p. 16-19
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Jan 30, 2008
They don’t call it “America warming” but “global warming”
When you put in place a new cap or a mandate, and particularly if you don’t have any safety valve as to how much the cost of that cap might be, you would impose on the American people, if you do it unilaterally, without involving all the world, you’d
impose on the American people a huge new effective tax: 20% on utilities, 50 cents a gallon for gasoline--that’s according to the energy information agency--would be imposed on us. What happens if you do that? You put a big burden on energy in this
country as the energy-intensive industries say, “We’re going to move our new facilities from the US to China, where they don’t have those agreements.” You end up polluting and putting just as much CO2 in the air because the big energy users go there.
That’s why these ideas make sense, but only on a global basis. They don’t call it “America warming.” They call it “global warming.” That’s why you’ve got to have a president that understands the real economy.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2008 Republican debate at Reagan Library in Simi Valley
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Jan 27, 2008
Opposes McCain-Lieberman bill due to $0.50/gal. gas tax
One of the things I find extraordinary is that Sen. McCain pushes this bill known as McCain-Lieberman. It is effectively a tax on all energy in this country. It would raise gasoline prices by about 50 cents a gallon, and that is according to the
Energy Information Agency. He would raise electric rates by some 20%, put a huge burden on us.
And it basically would slow down our economy without helping the environment at all, because major users of energy would take their production to countries like China that wouldn’t sign the deal.
It is basically saying the cost of global warming would all be borne by American rate-payers and consumers. He just doesn’t understand how the economy works.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2008 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Jan 24, 2008
Support the technologies that improve alternative energy use
The very best way to reduce carbon emission is to support the technologies that are alternatives that can save the environment, and to get us to the point where those technologies can actually take over. We haven’t licensed a nuclear power plant in 30
years. We need to expand the use of hybrid vehicles. We need to expand the use of clean coal. Carbon sequestration is expensive, but it’s a process that works. We have more coal reserves in the US than they have oil reserves in Saudi Arabia. I prefer
incentives for these new industries. Same thing is true with biofuels. We should expand biofuels, the way Brazil has done. We should expand wind, solar, hydroelectric. We should expand natural gas, liquid natural gas. We should have a project like puttin
the man on a moon, the way we did back in the ‘50s and ‘60s. It should be a major national project, to be energy independent. That’s a matter of national security. It’s also the best way, the very best way, to protect against global warming.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2008 GOP debate in Boca Raton Florida
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jan 21, 2008
$650 for help with energy bills to those who can’t afford it
Q: How much money would your stimulus plan put in the pockets of the average citizen?A: We have to stimulate the economy. I began calling for some kind of economic action plan back at the beginning of December. I have a package of $110 billion;
$70 billion of that would go towards dealing with the mortgage crisis. I would have a moratorium on home foreclosures for 90 days to try to help families work it out so that they don’t lose their homes. I want to have an interest rate freeze for 5 years.
Then, I think we need to give people about $650, if they qualify--which will be millions of people--to help pay their energy bills this winter. There are so many people on fixed incomes and working people who are not going to be able to afford the
spike in energy costs. And then we will have money for rebates, but let’s make them the right rebates. A lot of our seniors on fixed incomes don’t pay income taxes. But that doesn’t mean they’re immune from the energy costs.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2008 Congressional Black Caucus Democratic debate
Haley Barbour on Homeland Security
: Jan 21, 2008
Defense industry is economic bright spot for MS
An economic bright spot is our defense industry. Navistar’s new IMG facility at West Point employs some 800. Northrup Grumman’s shipyards have just won new multi-billion dollar ship contracts. General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Rolls Royce: our
traditional defense contractors are strong. And we’ve added some new defense industries, such as EAD’s American Eurocopter & RTI International Metals. The defense industry, like energy, is not subject to the same economic variables as most other sectors.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2008 State of the State address to state legislature
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Jan 20, 2008
$20 billion package for energy research & new car technology
Q: You pledged to offer a $20 billion package to help out the auto industry with energy research and new technology. One conservative columnist wrote, “Is that what a Republican should do, bail out a private industry?”
Are you going to offer billions of taxpayer dollars to every industry that’s in trouble in this country?A: We spend about $4 billion a year right now on energy research to try and help us become less energy dependent on foreign sources. And
I think over the coming years we need to increase our investment to become energy independent from about $4 billion a year to about $20 billion a year. Obviously, that has got to grow gradually because there are not a lot of places now that do the kind o
research we need to do to get ourselves energy independent. But that’s not just to bail out the automobile industry. That’s not what I have in mind. I’m not looking for a bailout at all. Instead, it’s saying that where we invest, we tend to do very well.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2008 Fox News interview: “Choosing the President” series
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jan 16, 2008
FactCheck: Oil & gas giveaways stripped from final 2005 Bill
Obama and Clinton dueled over the 2005 energy bill, but Clinton repeated her misleading claims. Clinton said, “It’s well accepted that the 2005 energy bill was the Dick Cheney lobbyist energy bill. It was written by lobbyists. It was championed by Dick
Cheney. It wasn’t just the green light that it gave to more nuclear power. It had enormous giveaways to the oil and gas industries.”While it’s true that Republican lawmakers had once considered large tax breaks for oil and gas companies in the bill,
the biggest of them had been stripped out of the bill by the time it passed.
It’s true that the Energy Policy Act contained $14.3 billion in tax breaks, but most went to electric utilities for such things as incentives for new transmission lines
& “clean coal” facilities, and also for incentives for alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy efficient cars and homes.
The bill did give $2.6 billion in tax breaks for oil companies, but those were offset by $2.9 billion in tax increases.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas
Sarah Palin on Education
: Jan 15, 2008
Committed to providing strong education, including morals
It is our energy development that pays for essential services, like education. Victor Hugo said, “He who opens a school door, closes a prison.” It’s a privileged obligation we have to “open education doors.”
Every child, of every ability, is to be cherished and loved and taught. Every child provides this world hope. They are the most beautiful ingredient in our sometimes muddied up world. I am committed to our children and their education.
Stepping through “the door” is about more than passing a standardized test. We need kids prepared to pass life’s tests--like getting a job and valuing a strong work ethic. Our Three-year Education
Plan invests more than a billion dollars each year. We must forward-fund education, letting schools plan ahead. We must stop pink-slipping teachers, and then struggle to recruit and retain them the next year.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 State of the State Address to 25th Alaska Legislature
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Jan 15, 2008
$250M for proven alternative energy, including wind & hydro
We need a comprehensive approach to long-term energy plans, not just fiscal “shots-in-the-arm.” I’m appointing an Energy Coordinator, to activate a statewide Energy Plan. We’ll use earnings from a $250 million “Renewable Energy Fund” for alternative
projects, like hydro, wind, geothermal, and biomass. These projects cannot even flirt with snake-oil science--they will be real, doable, and economic. Alaska’s plan can lead America toward energy security and a cleaner, safer world.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 State of the State Address to 25th Alaska Legislature
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jan 15, 2008
Reduce the consumption of energy and be more efficient
One thing that we haven’t talked as much about that we need to is reducing the consumption of energy. We are inefficient, and oftentimes during the presidential campaign, people have asked, what do we expect out of the American people in bringing
about real change. This is an example of where ordinary citizens have to make a change. We are going to have to make our buildings more efficient. We’re going to have to make our lighting & our appliances more efficient.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas
Hillary Clinton on Environment
: Jan 15, 2008
A comprehensive energy plan as our Apollo moon shot
I have a comprehensive energy plan that does not rely on nuclear power. I have said we should not be siting any more coal-powered plants unless they can have the most modern, clean technology. I want big demonstration projects to figure out how
we would capture and sequester carbon. This is going to take a massive effort. This should be our Apollo moon shot. There’s work for everybody to do--the states, communities and individuals. That’s what I want to summon the country to achieve.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Jan 13, 2008
Need worldwide global warming solutions; not CAFE or US tax
Q: What about the domestic auto industry?A: Look at Washington. They gave it CAFE standards, which hurt. Some Senators are talking about a new form of tax on energy in this country, which would make it even harder on the domestic companies.
Q: Well, their point is that you have got to do something about global warming. Isn’t that your understanding?
A: Oh, sure. And there’s nothing wrong with dealing with global warming. But there is a big difference between talking about global
warming, which requires global solutions, and the idea of America warming. No one talks about America warming. If we’re going to have solutions that deal, for instance, with a cap in trade program or a BTU tax or anything of that nature, it has to be
global in its sweep. But Sen. McCain’s proposition is that we do this as America only. A unilateral effort would only cause higher costs here, and give the advantage to nations that already have a substantial cost advantage.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2008 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Mitt Romney on Budget & Economy
: Jan 10, 2008
To avoid recession, deal with housing crisis & gas prices
What do we have to do at the federal level to keep a recession from occurring? - We’re going to have to make sure that we stop the housing crisis.
- We’re going to have to reduce taxes on middle-income Americans immediately.
- We’re going to have
to deal with gas prices. We’re going to have to finally become energy independent and make the investments in new technology that will allow us to get there.
- And, finally, R&D, investments in science and technology. That’s an area where America can
continue to lead the world.
It’s time for us not just to talk about improving our economy; we’re going to have to do the hard work of rebuilding our economy, strengthening it. And I know that there are some people who think that some jobs have left
that are never coming back. I disagree. I’m going to fight for every single job, in every state in this country. We’re going to fight for jobs & make sure that our future is bright. We’re going to protect the jobs of Americans and grow this economy again
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2008 GOP debate in S.C. sponsored by Fox News
Mike Huckabee on Budget & Economy
: Jan 10, 2008
Fuel prices & subprime mortgages possibly cause recession
I hope we’re not headed toward recession, but if we are, there’s four factors that will be the reason.- Fuel prices: Everything costs more because it took more money to transport it. With our dependency upon foreign oil, if we don’t begin to revers
that and become energy independent, we well could continue this enslavement to foreign oil, and ultimately wreck our economy.
- Subprime mortgages: Two million people today in America risk losing their homes. Now, there’s culpability on both lender, as
well as a lot of borrowers who bought more home than they could.
- Health care costs
- Education costs. All those factors together.
And a lot of people are working harder this year than a year ago, and yet they’re not getting ahead. Even if they
make more money, they’re not making enough money to make up. So the first thing is not raise taxes, cut the marginal tax rates, if anything, and eventually go to a fair tax which really does stop the penalties on people’s productivity.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2008 GOP debate in S.C. sponsored by Fox News
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Jan 1, 2008
Comprehensive plan for energy independence within ten years
For too long, we have been constrained because our dependence on imported oil has forced us to support repressive regimes and conduct our foreign policy with one hand tied behind our back. I will free that hand from its oil-soaked rope and reach out to
moderates in the Arab and Muslim worlds with both. I want to treat Saudi Arabia the way we treat Sweden, and that will require the United States to be energy independent.
The first thing I will do as president is send Congress my comprehensive plan for achieving energy independence within ten years of my inauguration.
We will explore, we will conserve, and we will pursue all types of alternative energy: nuclear, wind, solar, ethanol, hydrogen, clean coal, biomass, and biodiesel.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: America’s Priorities in the War on Terror: Foreign Affairs
Newt Gingrich on Energy & Oil
: Dec 18, 2007
2008 book: Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less
In 2008, American Solutions launched an online petition drive to demand Congress lift the 25-year-old moratorium on new offshore drilling. We collected 1.5 million signatures. Our effort sparked a nationwide grassroots rebellion that resulted in Congress
allowing the moratorium to expire.I wrote a book in fall 2008 called "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less," describing America's vast energy potential and explain how misguided government policies have prevented us from becoming an energy powerhouse.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.205-206
Newt Gingrich on Energy & Oil
: Dec 18, 2007
Billion-dollar prize for first mass-produced hydrogen car
The America that works focuses on inventing a better future and knows that customers will rapidly switch to a better solution. The same will be true for a new energy strategy. We need very large prizes for fundamental breakthroughs.
There ought to be a billion-dollar tax-free prize for the first hydrogen car that can be mass-produced for a reasonable price. Hydrogen has to be the ultimate basis for a truly bold energy program because it has no environmental impact and it is
universally available as a natural resource. Therefore it would have huge appeal to China and India if it were commercially competitive in price. American technologies for hydrogen vehicles might be one of the biggest economic winners of the next
generation.There should be a substantial tax break for investing in both ethanol and hydrogen supply stations and hydrogen pipelines so the fuel can be delivered when the automobiles are available at a reasonable cost.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Real Change, by Newt Gingrich, p.203
Joe Biden on Energy & Oil
: Dec 13, 2007
The energy challenge take sacrifice and is a moral crusade
We should increase the mileage for automobiles required, make sure every new car in the US is a flex-fuel automobile, and invest in cellulosic research because corn ethanol’s not going to take us the whole way. You’ve got to say we are going to make a
major change, and that requires a significant investment on renewable energy, moving from 22% to 20% by the end of this next decade in 2020, and making this a moral crusade for the American people. We’re going to have to sacrifice to be able to get by.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Democratic Debate
Hillary Clinton on Environment
: Dec 13, 2007
Advocate a cap and trade system
I advocate a cap and trade system. What the auction of pollution permits is taking that money and invest in new technologies, new ways of getting to our objectives that I’ve outline inside my energy plan. I want to use some of it to cushion the costs tha
will come on to the US consumer. It’s not just enough to tackle global warming, we’ve got to enlist the help of the next generation. My fifth grade teacher said it was to study math and science, but it gave me an idea of contributing to my country.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Democratic Debate
Ron Paul on Education
: Dec 12, 2007
Encourage homeschooling & private school via tax writeoff
It used to be the policy of the Republican Party to get rid of the Department of Education. We finally get in charge and a chance to do something, so we doubled the size of the Department of Education and we have No Child Left Behind. The teachers & the
students don’t like it, and the quality of education hasn’t gone up while the cost of education has. We need to release the creative energy of the teachers at the local level. We can immediately give tax credits. I have a bill that would give tax credits
to the teachers to raise their salaries. We should encourage homeschooling & private schooling and let the individuals write that off. The parents have to get control of the education. It used to be parents had control of education through local
school boards. Today it’s the judicial system and the executive branch of government, the bureaucracy, that controls things, and it would be predictable that the quality would go down. The money goes to the bureaucrats and not to the educational system a
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican Debate
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Dec 12, 2007
Biofuel mandates are not necessary
I am willing for us to make the decisions which will not necessarily create the mandates. One of the biggest energy users in the whole country is the US government. If the government commits to being the primary user of alternative forms of energy,
we have a market built in. Therefore, the big argument against having alternative energy is there’s no market for it. Let the government be a marketplace and we’ll create the kind of demand that lowers the price rather than raises the price.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican Debate
Mike Huckabee on Free Trade
: Dec 12, 2007
A free country must feed, fuel, & fight for itself
Q: Does our country’s financial situation creates a security risk?A: It’s most certainly a national security threat because a country can only be free if it can do three things.
- It has to be able to feed itself.
It has to be able to put food on the table for its own citizens.
- It’s got to be able to fuel itself. If it looks to somebody else for its energy needs, it’s only as free as those are willing for it to be.
-
And it also has to be able to fight for itself. It’s got to be able to manufacture its own weapons of defense--tanks, airplanes, bullets and bombs.
When we start outsourcing everything and we are in that kind of a trade deficit,
then just remember, who feeds us, who fuels us and who helps us to fight, that’s to whom we are enslaved. So if we can’t do those three things, our national security is very much at risk.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican debate
Mitt Romney on Government Reform
: Dec 12, 2007
Focus on global Jihad, immigration, tax cut, and healthcare
I want to establish a strategy to help us overwhelm global Jihad and keep the world safe. I want to end illegal immigration. I want to end the expansion of entitlements, rein them in. I want to end the extraordinary growth in federal spending and keep
our tax burden down and reduce our tax burden on middle-income families. I want to get us on a track to become energy-independent. I want to get our schools on a track so they can become competitive globally, and get health insurance for every citizen.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican Debate
Rudy Giuliani on Government Reform
: Dec 12, 2007
Focus on terrorism, immigration, tax cut, & small government
We can make sure that the country is secure against Islamic terrorism and on the road to winning the war against Islamic terrorists. We could end illegal immigration by beginning a BorderStat system. It might take 2 or 3 years, but we could begin it.
We could do a major tax reduction to stimulate the economy. I would immediately begin to reduce the size of the federal government. I would move toward energy independence as a goal similar to putting a man on the moon, the Manhattan Project.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Republican Debate
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Dec 9, 2007
Opposes mandated 35mpg by 2020; develop alternatives instead
Q: Congress has passed an energy bill which would mandate 35 mpg for automobiles by the year 2020. Would you support that?A: That isn’t the way I think it should be done. I think what we should be doing is developing the alternatives so it’s possible
to accomplish that as opposed to just setting mandates and not having the support there for expansion of hybrid vehicles, expansion of biofuels, including ethanol.
Q: But you’re against increasing miles per gallon.
A: I would not do it that way, yes.
I would do it with heavy expansion of hybrid vehicles, which move some of the sources over to electricity, then deal with clean coal, nuclear power, hybrid vehicles, expansion of hydroelectric power, more oil refineries, more domestic oil.
Those are the things that we should be supporting. And we should be selling that to the rest of the world. So the real emphasis here should be on developing energy independence and creating these alternative industries.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 “Meet the Candidates” series
Mike Huckabee on Foreign Policy
: Dec 9, 2007
Hugo Chavez was not elected as dictator; no friend of US
Q: How would you deal with Venezuela’s Pres. Chavez? He was elected democratically, but is attempting to overturn the Constitution.A: Well, Hugo Chavez is hardly the friend of the US. And even though we get 60% of their oil, I think it’s one of the
major reasons we need to become increasingly oil-free & energy-independent so that we don’t have to worry about Chavez. But there’s a greater issue here, and it’s the fact that the people of Venezuela aren’t Hugo Chavez and Hugo Chavez is not necessarily
the spirit of the people of Venezuela. Even though he was elected, he was not elected to be a dictator as he has become, suspending constitutional law. My mother used to have a statement: If you give somebody enough rope, they’ll hang themselves. I have
a feeling that Mr. Chavez, continuing to take power from the people as he has done, will find himself unfortunately out of power, and a democratically elected government there that will give those people back the freedom that he has robbed from them.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican primary debate on Univision
Ron Paul on Foreign Policy
: Nov 28, 2007
Stronger national defense by changing our foreign policy
Q: What are the top three federal programs you would reduce in size in order to decrease spending?A: I would like to change Washington, and we could by cutting three programs, such as the Department of Education--
Ronald Reagan used to talk about that--Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security is the biggest bureaucracy we ever had. And besides, what we can do is we can have a stronger national defense by changing our foreign policy.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Nov 25, 2007
Energy independence: let Saudis keep their oil & their sand
Q: What would you do about US dependence on Saudi oil?A: I would make the United States energy independent within 10 years and tell the Saudis they can keep their oil just like they can keep their sand, that we won’t need either one of them.
America has allowed itself to become enslaved to Saudi oil. It’s absurd. It’s embarrassing. Since 1973, we keep talking about project independence. We never have the political will to do it.
It is high time that we stop this sense of almost being subordinated by the Saudis as well as the rest of the Middle East, particularly countries who do not like us, who do not have our best interests at heart.
We need a self-sustaining, environmentally friendly energy source or energy sources. And that’s no longer a matter of just environmental concern and our economic interest, it is now really a matter of utmost national security.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: CNN Late Edition: 2007 presidential series with Wolf Blitzer
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 10, 2007
National energy policy not an either/or proposition
Gov. Palin yesterday sent a letter to Senators and the Bush Administration advocating defeat of a bill that would prohibit oil and natural gas development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Joe Leiberman (I-CT),
aims to designate ANWR as wilderness. Palin criticized the bill as it would effectively ban oil and gas exploration in the most promising unexplored regions in North America--the coastal plain of ANWR. In the letter, Gov. Palin states that national energ
policy must include a variety of resources:
“I don’t see national energy policy as an either/or proposition,” said Gov. Palin. “Rather, we need to develop secure domestic sources of conventional energy, such as oil & natural gas, while also researching
and developing alternative and renewable energy.”
Gov. Palin reminded senators that opening ANWR to oil and gas exploration would reduce US dependence on foreign sources of oil, increase federal revenues and create hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Letter to members of the U.S. Senate & Pres. Bush
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Oct 30, 2007
Investigate & move toward energy efficiency and conservation
We do have enough money in LIHEAP to help consumers pay their bills. We should have a crash program on weatherization to help to drive those bills down. We need to do more to investigate, and we might even have to look at the strategic petroleum reserve,
which the Bush administration has been filling up beyond any expectation of need for the short term. We also have to have a serious move toward energy efficiency and conservation. We need to get people to be more conscious to do it for themselves.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: 2007 Democratic debate at Drexel University
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Oct 30, 2007
Fund cellulosic biofuel research in Farm Bill
We urge you to allocate the maximum feasible level of funding for the programs in Title IX in the 2007 Farm Bill. If the nation is to pursue energy independence, we must look beyond traditional biofuels production. Governors urge Congress to include a
strong energy title as part of the Farm Bill that provides technical and financial assistance to expand the use of farm and forest biomass for renewable energy production. Local production of renewable biomass energy benefits the national economy,
promotes national and regional energy security and stimulates the rural economy through the creation of high quality jobs. Encouraging such production will require increased federal investment in programs that support cellulosic biofuels research,
increased biodiesel production and use, increases in wind and solar energy and energy from animal wastes, improvements in energy efficiency, bio-based product development, effective carbon storage, and other renewable technologies.
Click for Sarah Palin on other issues.
Source: Letter from two governors to Senate Committee on Agriculture
Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values
: Oct 23, 2007
Key to Bill & Hillary’s marriage is shared love of politics
The key to understanding them is in their shared love of politics--the intellectual and emotional bedrock of their relationship. From 1974 onward, they have been united in a common quest: to win--and keep winning--political office.
He savors the sheer joy of the political game, the energy from the outstretched hands, the connection with people, the applause and adoration that come with being a political star. For Hillary, politics has long been more utilitarian: a means to gain
power and enact programs she believes would make a difference. Politics has bound them together when other aspects of their lives showed signs of crumbling.Politics may seem an odd foundation for a marriage, but for the
Clintons, it has served as the defining factor not only of their careers, but also of their friendships, their dinner-table conversations, their intellectual interests, and to outsiders at least, their emotional lives.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: For Love of Politics, by Sally Bedell Smith, p. xxii
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Oct 9, 2007
Don’t draw the line anywhere--advance all technologies
Q: How will this country become oil independent?A: I think Iran would be a lot more of a paper tiger if we were more energy independent. You could go on into a lot of examples like that. This is a matter of national security. You’ve got to support all
the alternatives. There’s no magic bullet here--biofuels, nuclear power. We haven’t licensed a nuclear power plant in 30 years. We haven’t had a new refinery in 30 years. We’re on hold. Hydroelectric power, solar power, wind power, conservation--
we have to support all of these things. The president has to treat this like putting a man on the moon.
Q: But where do you draw the line? Do you support drilling off the coast of Florida, California?
A: You don’t draw the line anywhere.
What you do is you work with people to try to advance all of these technologies. Long-term damage to our environment would be a mistake, that would be an overreaction. You have to make sound judgments, and you have to advance these new technologies.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Oct 9, 2007
Develop energy technology like nuclear or liquefied coal
Q: We face serious competitive challenges globally unless we become serious with getting prices of energy down. It’s a great opportunity for America to develop technology to lead the world in energy efficiency as well as energy production.
And whether it’s nuclear or liquefied coal, where we sequester the CO2, far more fuel-efficient automobiles. These are some of the incentives that have to be behind our policies with regards to our investments in new technologies like ethanol.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Oct 9, 2007
Ethanol & biofuels are part of future energy
Q: The federal government has spent years and billions of dollars promoting ethanol, but the result has been a glut of ethanol and gas prices that are still at record level. Wouldn’t it be better to just let the free market determine whether ethanol
makes economic sense or not?A: I think ethanol and all biofuels are going to be an important part of the future energy needs of the country, but the accelerated pace at which we get there is critical for national security as well as for our own
economic interest. We’ve got to come to the place where everything is on the table--nuclear, biofuels, ethanol, wind, solar--any and everything this country can produce.
We once had a president who said, “Let’s go to the moon in 10 years,” and we were there in eight. And we did that when we started with a technology of bottle rockets when we got the thing launched. And we all saw that we can do it.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan
Rudy Giuliani on Free Trade
: Oct 9, 2007
Balance foreign debt by selling more things overseas
Q: Hillary Clinton says that one of our biggest economic threats right now is how much of our federal debt is owned overseas by foreigners. Do you agree?A: Actually, the way to balance that is to sell more things overseas.
That’s the usual Democratic pessimistic approach. How about we try an optimistic approach? The way to balance the books is sell more overseas. Sell energy independence. Sell health care. Let’s do it in a positive way.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan
Mitt Romney on Jobs
: Oct 9, 2007
I believe in domestic supports for our agriculture industry
Q: We subsidized farmers to the tune of $26 billion last year.A: I believe in domestic supports for our agriculture industry. I don’t want to see our food supply be in the same kind of a jeopardy situation that our energy supply is in. And clearly
there’s a responsibility of government to make sure that our farmers are treated on the same basis as farmers in Europe & other markets that we compete with. The WTO talks [may] find a way to bring down subsidies around the world, & that’ll be good news.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: 2007 Republican debate in Dearborn, Michigan
Barack Obama on Technology
: Sep 13, 2007
JFK inspired with space program; now same with energy R&D
Q: How would you change the system to make American students competitive on the world scene?A: [One thing is] emphasizing math and science instruction, finding innovative ways to make it interesting for students. This is an area where the president
has the power to use the bully pulpit and to make math and science interesting and vibrant again. One of the things that I’m always struck by when I talk to engineers and scientists who are in their 50s and 60s is how many say they were inspired by
JFK and the space program for going into science and math. And one area where I think we could actually do that is to really make a huge effort around energy independence. And if a president is talking about the importance of us engaging in research and
development, doubling the amount of research dollars that are being put into basic science and basic research, all that can help lift up the importance of these areas of study for young people who basically take their cues from the larger culture.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Huffington Post Mash-Up: 2007 Democratic on-line debate
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Sep 6, 2007
Nuclear power ok if we safeguard against waste & terrorism
Q: Would you be in favor of developing more nuclear power to reduce oil dependency?A: I don’t think that we can take nuclear power off the table. What we have to make sure of is that we have the capacity to store waste properly and safely, and that we
reduce whatever threats might come from terrorism. And if we can do that in a technologically sound way, then we should pursue it. If we can’t, we should not. But there is no magic bullet on energy. We’re going to have to look at all the various options.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College
Rudy Giuliani on Principles & Values
: Sep 1, 2007
12 Commitments to the American People
12 Commitments to the American People- I will keep America on offense in the Terrorists’ War on us
- I will end illegal immigration, secure our borders, & identify every non-citizen in our nation
- I will restore fiscal discipline & cut wasteful
Washington spending
- I will cut taxes & reform the tax code
- I will impose accountability on Washington
- I will lead America towards energy independence
- I will give Americans more control over & access to health care with affordable & portable
free-market solutions
- I will increase adoptions, decrease abortions, & protect the quality of life for our children
- I will reform the legal system & appoint strict constructionist judges
- I will ensure that every community in America is prepared
for terrorist attacks & natural disasters
- I will provide access to a quality education to every child by giving real school choice to parents
- I will expand American involvement in the global economy & strengthen our reputation around the world.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, www.joinrudy2008.com
Newt Gingrich on Technology
: Sep 1, 2007
Invest in scientific revolutions: energy, space, environment
[We can meet] the triple economic challenges of an explosion in technological knowledge, an increasingly competitive world market, and the rise of China & India by implementing:- A new system of civil justice to reduce the burden of lawsuits and to
incentivize young people to go into professions other than the law.
- A dramatically simplified tax code that favors savings, entrepreneurship, investment, & constant modernization of equipment & technology.
- Math & science education [that encourages]
young Americans to both discover the science of the future and to compete successfully with other well-educated societies.
- Investing in the scientific revolutions that are going to transform our world--particularly in energy, space, & environment.
-
Transforming health care into a 21st Century Intelligent Health System that improves our health while lowering costs dramatically. In the process, American health care will become our highest value export and foreign exchange earning sector.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org, “Issues”
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Aug 31, 2007
The time for true energy independence has come
“America must become energy independent. We must finally take the necessary steps to actually produce as much energy as we use. This may take twenty years or more.
True energy independence will requiring energy employing technology to make our use of energy more efficient, in our cars, in our homes, and in our businesses.”“I will initiate a bold and far-reaching research initiative--an
Energy Revolution. It will be our generation’s equivalent of the Manhattan Project or of the mission to reach the Moon.“
”While scientists are still debating how much human activity impacts the environment,
we can all agree that alternative energy sources will be good for the planet. For any and all for these reasons, the time for true energy independence has come.“
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: The Man, His Values, & His Vision, p.112-113
Hillary Clinton on Environment
: Aug 8, 2007
Support green-collar job training
Q: What policies would you implement to make businesses invest in energy-efficient technologies?A: I have supported a green building fund and green-collar job training with the
AFL-CIO that will put a lot of people too work. And it’s important that we do this, because we can create millions of new jobs.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 AFL-CIO Democratic primary forum
Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values
: Aug 8, 2007
Bring your brooms & vacuum cleaners; we got to clean up DC
We’re going to try to do national health care as soon as we get in there. We’re going to move for energy independence and create those millions of new jobs. We’re going to finally have an education policy that actually will work for students and teachers
and families and communities.There’s going to be a lot of repair work to do, and I’m going to ask people to come to Washington. Bring your brooms. Bring your vacuum cleaners. We’ve got to clean the place out and get to work together.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 AFL-CIO Democratic primary forum
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Aug 7, 2007
Invest in alternative energy; jobs that won’t be outsourced
We’ve got to have a source of new jobs. That’s why we’ve got to invest in energy.
We can create millions of new jobs if we go toward renewable energy. Those are not jobs that will be outsourced.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 AFL-CIO Democratic primary forum
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jul 23, 2007
Explore nuclear power as part of alternative energy mix
Q: What about nuclear power as an alternative energy source?A: I actually think that we should explore nuclear power as part of the energy mix. There are no silver bullets to this issue. We have to develop solar.
I have proposed drastically increasing fuel efficiency standards on cars, an aggressive cap on the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted. But we’re going to have to try a series of different approaches.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jul 23, 2007
End Big Oil tax break; $50 billion for strategic energy fund
I have proposed a strategic energy fund that I would fund by taking away the tax break for the oil companies, which have gotten much greater under Bush and Cheney. And we could spend about $50 billion doing what America does best.
It’s time we start acting like Americans again. We can solve these problems if we focus on innovation and technology. Alternative forms of energy are important. So is fuel efficiency for cars and so is energy efficiency for buildings.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jul 23, 2007
Agnostic about nuclear power until waste & cost issue solved
Q: What about nuclear power as an alternative energy source?A: I’m agnostic about nuclear power. Until we figure out what we’re going to do with the waste and the cost, it’s very hard to see nuclear as a part of our future.
But that’s where American technology comes in. Let’s figure out what we’re going to do about the waste and the cost if we think nuclear should be a part of the solution.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jul 23, 2007
FactCheck: There was no Big Oil tax break under Bush-Cheney
Clinton wrongly claimed that the Bush-Cheney administration had increased tax breaks for the oil industry:CLINTON: First of all, I have proposed a strategic energy fund that I would fund by taking away the tax break for the oil companies,
which have gotten much greater under Bush and Cheney.
Actually, the highly publicized energy bill the president signed in 2005 raised taxes slightly on the oil industry as a whole. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 provided about $2.6 billion of
tax cuts for the oil and gas industry, plus $2.9 billion of tax increases, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years.It’s true that many generous subsidies were proposed and debated, but those were stripped out before
the bill was passed. The final bill contained $14.3 billion in tax breaks, but the bulk of the cuts went to electric utilities, and nuclear, and also to alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy-efficiency--not to the oil industry.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 19, 2007
Cap-and-trade carbon emissions; raise CAFE standard
It’s time to turn the page on energy, to break the stalemate that’s kept our fuel efficiency standards in the same place for 20 years, to tell the oil and auto industries that they must act, not only because their future’s at stake,
but because the future of our country and our planet is at stake.As president, I will place a cap on carbon emissions and require companies who can’t meet the cap to buy credits from those who can, which will generate
billions of dollars to invest in renewable sources of energy and create new jobs and even a new industry in the process. I’ll put in place a low carbon fuel standard that will take 50 million cars worth of pollution off the road.
I’ll raise the fuel efficiency standards for our cars and trucks because we know we have the technology to do it and it’s the time to do it.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jun 8, 2007
Energy Independence 2020: $50B for Strategic Energy Fund
In Dec. 2005, Hillary hooked up with an alliance of environmentalists and unions to help unveil a new Democratic plan, “Energy Independence 2020.”[In a speech introducing the plan,] after praising solar power and wind technology,
Hillary turned her attention to her villains--the oil companies--and discussed the legislation she hoped to pass that would force them to change their ways. Unless they diversified away from fossil fuels and into preferred, renewable technologies,
her bill would require that they be assessed heavy windfall-profits taxes. This new revenue source, estimated at $50 billion, would finance a government energy fund that invested in innovative energy research.
Hillary introduced her promised
legislation to create a federal “Strategic Energy Fund” financed by oil company taxes. But her energy bill, while music to the ears of the Left, overreached her colleagues. Hillary could not find another senator to cosponsor her bill.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Her Way, by Jeff Gerth & Don Van Natta, p.279-283
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jun 8, 2007
Extensive funding into alternative energy
At a Sept. 2005 global warming conference, Hillary told the audience there had been an “absence of leadership” by the Bush administration on climate change. She offered her own solution: “I would advocate a much more concerted effort on our government’s
part to fund an extensive research project into alternative forms of energy.”The next day there was a plenary session on global warming. The marquee attraction was Al Gore. Hillary and Gore had vied for
Bill’s attention during his presidency, and that rivalry had only intensified after the Clintons left the White House. Bill privately told confidants that he believed that if Hillary emerged as the likely Democratic presidential nominee,
Gore would enter as a left-of-Hillary alternative.
One month later, Hillary unveiled a comprehensive clean-energy plan, tailed along the lines she had mentioned at the conference. She suffered the same fat as Gore: Nobody paid attention.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Her Way, by Jeff Gerth & Don Van Natta, p.276-277
Hillary Clinton on Principles & Values
: Jun 8, 2007
Pre-Wellesley, confident her conservatism wouldn’t change
Two teachers--a graduate of Smith and a graduate of Wellesley--urged her to apply to their alma maters. Hillary never visited either campus, but she attended local alumnae-held events for both and was impressed with the energy of the students and
commitment to academic excellence.Hillary’s high school government teachers warned her that college would likely change her conservative politics. “You’re going to Wellesley, and you’re going to become a liberal and a Democrat.”
Hillary blanched and replied, “I’m smart, I know where I stand on the issues. And that’s not going to change.”
In the mid-1960s, student activism, spurred by growing disenchantment with the war in Vietnam and racism at home, was beginning its ascent.
Wellesley was beginning to change too, though more tentatively than other campuses. Hillary’s class would accelerate the transformation of Wellesley from a genteel island to a campus with much more in common with the “beatnik” Harvard Square vibe.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Her Way, by Jeff Gerth & Don Van Natta, p. 22-23
Ron Paul on Energy & Oil
: Jun 3, 2007
Big Oil profits ok; Big Oil subsidies are not
Q: Bush’s energy bill provided billions of dollars in tax breaks & subsidies to the oil companies with the goal of boosting domestic production at a time of record profits. Do you support that?A: I don’t think the profits is the issue. The profits are
okay if they’re legitimately earned in a free market. What I object to are subsidies to big corporations when we subsidize them and give them R&D money. I don’t think that should be that way. They should take it out of the funds that they earn.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP debate at Saint Anselm College
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Jun 3, 2007
Accept global warming & work toward energy independence
Q: Is science wrong on global warming? And what, if any, steps would you take as president to address the issue of climate change?GIULIANI: I think we have to accept the view that scientists have that there is global warming and that humans contribute
to that. And the fact is that there is a way to deal with it and to address it in a way that we can also accomplish energy independence, which we need as a matter of national security. It’s frustrating and really dangerous for us to see money going to
our enemies because we have to buy oil from certain countries. We should be supporting all the alternatives. We need a project similar to putting a man on the moon.
ROMNEY: Rudy Giuliani is right in terms of an
Apollo project to get us energy independent, and the effects of that on global warming are positive. It’s a no-regrets policy. It’s a great idea. [We need,] as a strategic imperative, energy independence for America. And it takes that Apollo project.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP debate at Saint Anselm College
Ron Paul on Foreign Policy
: Jun 3, 2007
Our foreign policy is designed to protect our oil interests
You can’t discuss energy without discussing our foreign policy. Why do we go to the Middle East? You know that oil is very important about the Middle East and why we’re there. Why did our government help overthrow Mossadeq in 1953?
It had to do with oil. So our foreign policy is designed to protect our oil interests. The profits--that’s not the problem. It’s the problem that we succumb to the temptation to protect oil interests by literally going out and fighting wars over oil.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2007 GOP debate at Saint Anselm College
Hillary Clinton on War & Peace
: Jun 3, 2007
It was a mistake to trust Bush on his judgment to wage war
If I had known then what I know now I never would have voted to give Bush authority. It was a mistake to trust Bush that he would do what he told all of us he would do. He made it in speeches, he told us in private that he would put the inspectors
in to determine whether or not the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Clinton administration, many other countries who thought that there were stores of chemical and biological weapons were true or not.
Click for Rudy Giuliani on other issues.
Source: 2007 Dem. debate at Saint Anselm College
Ron Paul on Government Reform
: May 15, 2007
Close departments of Energy, Education & Homeland Security
Q: [To Gov. Thompson] Tell me three federal programs you consider wasteful and would eliminate.THOMPSON: There are several programs that need to be cut in Washington, several of those in my former department. I would first make every agency come in
with a budget at 95% of last year’s budget and one at 100%. And you will be able to use that exercise in order to reduce budgets all across the line.
Q: I didn’t hear three programs. Can you tell me one?
THOMPSON: The first one I would eliminate is
a program in the Department of Health and Human Services in CDC that deals with the stockpile. The stockpile does a great job, but there are some inefficiencies there.
Q: [To Paul] Can you do better than that?
PAUL:
I’d start with the departments--the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security. There’s a lot of things that we can cut, but we can’t cut anything until we change our philosophy about what government should do.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: [X-ref Thompson] 2007 Republican Debate in South Carolina
Joe Biden on Budget & Economy
: Apr 29, 2007
Invest in new programs by ending war & eliminating tax cuts
Q: On your website you say about programs for energy research, health insurance, tuition deductions--all noble goals for Democrats, but it’s more money, more money. Where you going to get it?- A: First of all, we’re going to end this war. It’s
$100 billion a year we’re spending.
- Eliminate the tax cuts for people making over a million bucks --that’s $85 billion a year.
- Eliminate the tax break for investment on dividends--$195 billion.
We have a fancy word--a new “paradigm” [about
crime, health, and energy]: Investment in these areas saves money. But you need start-up dollars. I’d start off with $220 billion a year by the tax cuts and ending the war. Q: But, senator, we have a deficit. We have Social Security and Medicare
looming.
A: The answer is you have to put it all on the table. We put Social Security on the right path for 60 years. Social Security’s not the hard one to solve. Medicare, that is the gorilla in the room, and you’ve got to put all of it on the table.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Meet the Press: 2007 “Meet the Candidates” series
Joe Biden on Energy & Oil
: Apr 26, 2007
Make every automobile sold be a flex-fuel automobile
We have to make an equivalent of a Manhattan Project [on energy & climate change]. We have to fundamentally shift the way we do it. Barack and I have a bill to make sure that every automobile sold in the US is a flex-fuel automobile; every gas station in
America, by the year 2009, has to have 10% of it’s pumps pumping E85 ethanol. We also have legislation in requiring we invest
$100 million a year for the next couple of years in order to be able to find lithium battery technology to be able to power our cars.
We also have legislation talking about capping emissions. Cap them now; not wait.
Cap them where they are now. Time’s running out.
But you have to be willing to make multi-billion dollar investments over the next 10 years and set hard goals in order to be able to get to the point where we are no longer dependent.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: 2007 South Carolina Democratic primary debate, on MSNBC
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Mar 26, 2007
No new energy tax; focus on alternatives instead
Q: Al Gore wants carbon caps and a carbon tax. What’s your take?A: I don’t like taxes. I don’t know how to make that any clearer. I don’t like taxes. Inventing new ones is a very big mistake. Find other ways to do it. If you want to deal with
global warming, the way to deal with global warming is to develop these alternative technologies. Get serious about energy independence, so we wouldn’t have to send money to our enemies. Let’s put the resources in to catch up on ethanol.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Interview on “Kudlow & Company”, RealClearPolitics.com
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Mar 26, 2007
Develop energy-independent technology, but not wind power
Let’s look at wind and solar from the point of view of can we spare that energy? Right now, it’s inconsistent energy. When the wind is blowing, you get energy. When it isn’t, you don’t. Is there a way to develop a technology that you can store it?
Can we clean coal? Carbon sequestration, it can be done. Can we expand it? The other benefit is looking at a pro growth way: we move ourselves to that energy independence and then we also create an industry, a new industry in America.
Click for Joe Biden on other issues.
Source: Interview on “Kudlow & Company”, RealClearPolitics.com
Barack Obama on Principles & Values
: Feb 15, 2007
Replace partisan bickering with politics of hope
Obama called for universal health care, energy independence, an effective policy to stem global warming, and an end to loud and uncivil, Rush-Limbaugh-like public discourse. “We have come to be consumed by a
24-hour, slash-and-burn, negative-ad, bickering, small-minded politics that does not move us forward,” he said in
Portsmouth, aiming his critique at both Republicans and his own party as they glowered across a gaping, ever-widening partisan gulf. “Sometimes one side is up, and the other side is down.
But there is not sense that they are coming together in a common-sense, practical, nonideological way to solve the problems that we face.”
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Hopes and Dreams, by Steve Dougherty, p. 17-18
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Feb 2, 2007
Will make big oil fund alternative energy research
The other day the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to find alternative smart energy,
alternatives and technologies that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence!
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: Speech at Democratic National Committee winter meeting
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Jan 4, 2007
Explore ways to harness nuclear power
Alternative energy sources such as solar or wind have great potential in that they occur naturally, are therefore environmentally friendly, and have an inexhaustible source. There are certainly limitations, particularly to sources such as wind energy
because of the intermittent nature of wind power. While many Americans still fear nuclear power, we would be wise to explore ways to harness it for purposes more peaceful and productive than the building of bombs.
The growing anxiety over the impact of suddenly spiking gasoline, nature gas, and electricity costs have created near panic in the homes of many Americans. Many small business owners are threatened out of existence because of the escalating costs from
uncontrollable energy expenses. People who are impoverished and on the brink of financial disaster can be pushed over the edge when they simply do not have the money to pay their electric bill and cannot afford to pay for transportation to work.
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: From Hope to Higher Ground, by Mike Huckabee, p. 79-80
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Dec 1, 2006
Develop alternative energy but also drill in ANWR
To remain the economic and military superpower, America must address achieving energy independence. We must become independent from foreign sources of oil. This will mean a combination of efforts related to conservation and efficiency measures,
developing alternative sources of energy like biodiesel, ethanol, nuclear, and coal gasification, and finding more domestic sources of oil such as in ANWR or the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
Click for Mike Huckabee on other issues.
Source: PAC website, www.TheCommonwealthPac.com, “Meet Mitt”
Newt Gingrich on Energy & Oil
: Dec 1, 2006
Focus on incentives for conservation & renewable resources
A sound American energy policy would focus on four areas: basic research to create a new energy system that has few environmental side effects, incentives for conservation, more renewable resources, and environmentally sound development of fossil fuels.
The Bush administration has approached energy environmentalism the right way, including using public-private partnerships that balance economic costs and environmental gain.Hydrogen has the potential to provide energy that has no environmental
downside. Conservation is the second great opportunity in energy. A tax credit to subsidize energy efficient cars (including a tax credit for turning in old and heavily polluting cars) is another idea we should support. Renewable resources are gradually
evolving to meet their potential: from wind generator farms to solar power to biomass conversion. Continued tax credits and other advantages for renewable resources are a must.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Gingrich Communications website, www.newt.org
Mitt Romney on Principles & Values
: Dec 1, 2006
Address issues so America can remain a superpower
Ten Issues America Must Address to Remain The Economic and Military Superpower- Defeating the Jihadists
- Competing with Asia
- Stopping Runaway Spending
- Getting Immigration Right
- Achieving Energy Independence
-
Affirming America’s Culture and Values
- Simplifying the Tax System
- Investing in Technology
- Extending Health Insurance to All Americans
- Raising the Bar on Education
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: PAC website, www.TheCommonwealthPac.com, “Meet Mitt”
Tim Pawlenty on Energy & Oil
: Nov 7, 2006
Encourage development of locally owned wind energy sources
- Achieved the nation’s largest tracks of certified sustainable forests, totaling over 4 million acres
- Increased the state’s commitment to renewable energy for the future through Prairie Island legislation.
- Advanced the Community Based
Energy Development Tariff to encourage the development and use of locally owned wind and clean energy sources and established a goal of obtaining 800 megawatts of community based wind to be added to our electric system by 2010.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, www.timpawlenty.com, “Issues”
Sarah Palin on Civil Rights
: Nov 3, 2006
Value our cultural diversity
Sarah Palin and Sean Parnell are a New Team with New Energy for Alaska who value our cultural diversity and will provide opportunities for all Alaskans.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Palin-Parnell campaign booklet: New Energy for Alaska
Sarah Palin on Education
: Nov 3, 2006
Forward-fund K-12 schools to allow better planning
I support adequate and full funding for education, as well as for pupil transportation and municipal school debt reimbursements. There must be recognition for increases in costs for energy, utilities, insurance, and salaries. We cannot go back to the day
of simply ignoring inflation. A centerpiece of my fiscal plan is to forward fund K-12. School districts will be able to do a better job of planning their budgets for upcoming years if they know in advance the level of funding they can expect from Juneau.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Palin-Parnell campaign booklet: New Energy for Alaska
Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil
: Nov 3, 2006
Chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
The Natural Gas Pipeline- Sarah is the one with experience and energy to move Alaska forward!
- Sarah Palin will use her experience as Chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission to negotiate a fair gas pipeline agreement that puts Alaska first and creates jobs for all Alaskans.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Palin-Parnell campaign booklet: New Energy for Alaska
Sarah Palin on Principles & Values
: Oct 30, 2006
Endorsed by Sen. Ted Stevens
Campaign advertisement in Alaska gubernatorial race: Senator Ted Stevens speaking: We have a state that needs new management. [Palin & Parnell] represent a new generation. And they represent a new vision, new energy. They represent the kind of people
that ought to come along and take our places.
And it needs a new agenda for all of use to get behind. Think of this -- when you go to vote, don’t go to vote alone, and you’ll help Sarah become the next governor of Alaska, which we all want to see.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: AdWatch of 2008 presidential race: 2006 Alaska Governor ad
Sarah Palin on Welfare & Poverty
: Oct 22, 2006
Funding for faith-based initiatives is adequate today
Q: Do you support an increase in state-funded, faith-based initiatives?A: We see an adequate level of funding for faith-based initiatives today.
Q: What, specifically, would you do to help make rural Alaska sustain itself economically?
A: I support a municipal revenue sharing so local areas can prioritize their own needs. The state needs to establish a rural energy plan. Commercial fishing is a mainstay for many villages, and I oppose actions that cut off Alaskans from our fisheries.
Click for Newt Gingrich on other issues.
Source: Anchorage Daily News: 2006 gubernatorial candidate profile
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Oct 11, 2006
$50B strategic energy fund from taxing oil companies
Amidst rising gas prices in June 2006, Clinton declared that US energy independence was “absolutely feasible” providing Congress created a “federal legal framework that encourages people to make the right decisions.” In May 2006,
Clinton unveiled a proposal for a “virtual revolution” in energy, to decrease the use of foreign oil by 8 million barrels a day by 2025. The plan called for the creation of a $50 billion “strategic energy fund” by increasing taxes on oil companies.
Clinton also suggested the government force oil firms to invest in unproven, renewable fuels like ethanol.
Clinton, in short, sought to reallocate money from fuel that consumers do buy (oil) to fuel that they don’t buy (renewables).
Clinton’s plan was consistent with her tenacious opposition to any measure allowing oil companies to increase domestic drilling [both in ANWR and off the US coast].
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, by Amanda Carpenter, p. 62-63
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Oct 1, 2006
We cannot drill our way out of our addiction to oil
It is hard to overstate the degree to which our addiction to oil undermines our future. Without any change to energy policy, US demand for oil will jump 40% in 20 years. Over the same period, worldwide demand will jump 30%.A large portion of the
$800 million we spend on foreign oil every day goes to some of the world’s most volatile regimes. And there are the environmental consequences. Just about every scientist outside the White House believes climate change is real.
We cannot drill our way
out of the problem. Instead of subsidizing the oil industry, we should end every single tax break the industry currently receives and demand that 1% of the revenues from oil companies with over $1 billion in quarterly profits go toward financing
alternative energy research and infrastructure.
Over the last 30 years, countries like Brazil have used a mix of regulation and direct government investment to develop a biofuel industry; 70% of its new vehicles run on sugar-based ethanol.
Click for Barack Obama on other issues.
Source: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama, p.167-169
Ron Paul on War & Peace
: Jun 20, 2006
Iran not in violation of NPT--so talk without preconditions
I am concerned about the pre-conditions set by the administration before it will agree to begin talks with Iran. The pre-condition is that the Iranians abandon their uranium enrichment program. But this is exactly what the negotiations are meant to
discuss.By demanding that Iran give up its uranium enrichment program, the US is unilaterally changing the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty. UN inspectors have been in Iran for years, and International Atomic Energy Agency Director El
Baradei has repeatedly reported that he can find no indication of diversion of nuclear materials to a military purpose.
As a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the “inalienable right” to the “development, research, production and use
of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.” Yet the US is demanding that Iran give up that right en though, after years of monitoring, Iran has never been found to have diverted nuclear material from peaceful to military use.
Click for Ron Paul on other issues.
Source: House speech, in Foreign Policy of Freedom, p.359-360
Hillary Clinton on Civil Rights
: Jun 16, 2006
Pushing for privacy bill of rights
Hillary Clinton urged creation of a “privacy bill of rights” to protect people’s personal data. Clinton’s speech on protecting consumers from identity theft and citizens from government snooping was the latest in a series of talks billed as “major
addresses” by aides. Previous speeches were on energy and the economy. A potential presidential candidate in 2008, Clinton noted her work on a House committee investigating the Nixon administration’s illegal snooping and other abuses. Clinton said
any president should have the latest technology to track terrorists, but within laws that provide for oversight by judges. “The administration’s refrain has been, ‘Trust us,’” Clinton said. “That’s unacceptable.
Their track record doesn’t warrant our trust. Unchecked mass surveillance without judicial review may sometimes be legal but it is dangerous. Every president should save those powers for limited critical situations.”
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2008 speculation in Associated Press
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 14, 2006
3-way win: economy, environment, & stop funding terror
Progressives are the folks who believe in energy independence for America. We believe that we can harness homegrown alternative fuels and spur the production of fuel-efficient hybrid cars, and break our dependence on the world’s most dangerous regions.
We understand that we get a three-for: We can save our economy, our environment, and stop funding both sides of the war on terror if we actually get serious about doing something about energy. We understand that.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Annual 2006 Take Back America Conference
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jun 14, 2006
Remove energy dependence on countries who would harm us
An important thing to do is to have a new energy policy so that we are not dependent upon regimes that are going to undermine our security, our economy and our environment.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: Annual 2006 Take Back America Conference
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Jan 6, 2006
Need to move toward energy efficiency and conservation
The economy is slipping toward a recession. The unemployment figures hitting 5%, the $100 a barrel oil this week, the fall of the dollar. There’s a lot of pressures on middle-class families, and the kind of costs that they have to keep up with have all
gone up astronomically. The energy costs for the typical family in New Hampshire since Bush has been president have tripled. That’s far beyond what the costs of the tax cut that they got from Bush. What we’ve got to do is use energy as an opportunity to
actually jump-start economic recovery. We need to quickly move toward energy efficiency. We should require the utilities to begin to work for energy efficiency and conservation. We need a weatherization and low-income heating emergency program that is
helping families to cover their costs, and look at how doing what is right about energy is not only good for our security and good for the fight against global warming, but it will be essential in dealing with the economic challenges that we face.
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: 2008 Facebook/WMUR-NH Democratic primary debate
Mitt Romney on Energy & Oil
: Jan 5, 2006
Can’t become energy independent in a decade, but be on track
We’re going to have to deal with this in an honest way with the American people, and that is this is not something that’s going to get solved in 10 years. We can’t become energy independent in 10 years, but we can get ourselves on a track to do that.
It’s going to require a far more substantial investment by our nation in energy technology. Right now, we spend about $4 billion a year on new sources of energy and energy efficiency. We’re going to have to increase that dramatically. And American
corporations, last year they spent more money defending tort lawsuits than they spent on research and development. We’re upside-down. The future of a great nation like ours depends on leading the world in technology & innovation, in energy in particular.
This has to be our highest domestic economic priority, get ourselves on a track to become energy secure & energy independent. It’s within our grasp. But it’s going to take reality rather than just the political rhetoric we’ve seen over the last 25 years.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2008 Facebook/WMUR-NH Republican primary debate
Rudy Giuliani on Energy & Oil
: Jan 5, 2006
Got to expand nuclear and do clean coal
We have to take the idea of energy independence and turn it into a program for energy independence. It has to be done on the scale of putting a man on the moon. All of the things that they’ve all talked about, we’ve talked about it a long time;
we just haven’t done it. We’ve got to expand nuclear. We’ve got to do clean coal. We’ve got to expand the use of hybrid vehicles, wind, solar, hydroelectric, liquid natural gas, natural gas, domestic oil, more refineries.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2008 Facebook/WMUR-NH Republican primary debate
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Sep 28, 2004
20% nation’s power supply from renewable sources by 2020
Neither American security, nor our economic potential, can afford to be held hostage by those half a world away because our nation is too dependent on others for our energy. This requires concrete steps to move us toward energy independence including
requiring that 20% of the nation’s power supply portfolio come from renewable sources like wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy by 2020, and that a percentage of our nation’s fuel supply is provided by renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, ObamaForIllinois.org, “On the Issues”
Mitt Romney on Environment
: Aug 25, 2004
Lit mountain with Olympic rings while placating enviro’s
We decided to put rings on the side of a mountain. Together the rings were the size of 10 football fields, with 1000s of high output, low energy bulbs, strung on three parallel electric cables. Then came the flack from environmental activists.
They charged the installation would damage ground cover. I described our precautions: the whole program had been environmentally engineered to protect the land. We agreed to re-grade the dirt road. We also agreed to plant seed when we were through.
We agreed to pay $25,000 to the Nature Conservancy endowment. The environmental groups still said no. If it were not for the courage of the Mayor standing up to some constituents, we might not have prevailed. That and the generosity of Utah Power.
They bought 1000s of bulbs and their own workers installed it.
The rings were a signature of the overall look of the Games. We even had requests from the community that we illuminate the rings in the morning so commuters could enjoy the Olympic spirit.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Turnaround, by Mitt Romney, p.221-222
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jul 12, 2004
Free America from its dependence on foreign oil
[We should] free America from its dependence on foreign oil. We must take concrete steps to move us toward energy independence including requiring that 20 percent of the nation’s power supply portfolio come from renewable sources like
wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy by 2020, and that a percentage of our nation’s fuel supply is provided by renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Press Release, “Renewal of American Leadership ”
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 25, 2004
Invest in alternative energy sources
Barack Obama believes that by investing in alternative energy sources and improving automobile fuel efficiency, America can be a leader in this global market while spurring new industries and creating jobs at home.
His “Energy Independence for Illinois” plan will reduce American dependence on foreign oil and promote emerging markets throughout the country.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, ObamaForIllinois.com
Barack Obama on Energy & Oil
: Jun 25, 2004
Tradable credits for renewable energy
Obama will support legislation requiring that by 2020, 20% of the nation’s power supply portfolio comes from renewable sources like wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy. Promoting renewable energy will create new investments and new jobs without
increasing prices. Obama has proposed a flexible market-based approach that allows electricity providers to either generate the renewable energy themselves, obtain it from other companies, or purchase credits from providers who exceed the standard.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Campaign website, ObamaForIllinois.com
Jon Huntsman on Energy & Oil
: Nov 17, 2003
Lead US in alternative sources for energy and efficiency
We need to lead the nation in finding alternative sources for energy and efficiency.- Regulation stance that will consider Utah ‘s natural advantages in both renewable and non- renew able technologies.
- I will promote an energy conservation
plan that encourages smarter use among providers and consumers.
- I will focus the legislature-dedicated monies for energy research with a future oriented view to insure that there use is in accordance with a healthy Utah . <.ul>
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Press release, “Opposes Nuclear Waste”
Mike Huckabee on Energy & Oil
: Nov 1, 2002
Promote alternative fuel technology
Indicate which principles you support regarding the environment and energy. - Promote increased use of alternative fuel technology.
-
Use state funds to clean up former industrial and commercial sites that are contaminated, unused, or abandoned.
- State environmental regulations should not be stricter than federal law.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: 2002 AR Gubernatorial National Political Awareness Test
Hillary Clinton on Energy & Oil
: Oct 8, 2000
Supports oil reserve release & fund conservation
Q: Do you support conserving energy?A: I’ve spoken about an energy policy that would include conservation tax credits that the Republicans have blocked. The administration has put forth an energy policy that we couldn’t get through that Republican
leadership that my opponent is part of. We need a new Congress. I was pleased when the president did release some oil from the reserve. So we have work to do and it needs to be led by Democrats who understand that we shouldn’t be beholden to big oil.
Click for Mitt Romney on other issues.
Source: Senate debate in Manhattan
Hillary Clinton on Civil Rights
: Sep 25, 1996
Affirmative living: involve entire village against racism
There is probably no more important task parents--and the rest of the village--face than raising children not only to tolerate but to respect the differences among people and to recognize the rewards that come from serving others.
I call this affirmative living--the positive energy we derive from taking pride in who we are and from having the confidence and moral grounding to reach out to those who are different.Some of the most effective approaches to promoting affirmative
living are those that involve the entire village. An annual event in Boston called Team Harmony brings middle and high school students together with local sports figures and business leaders to take a stand against prejudice and bigotry. After the Team
Harmony event in 1994, many students wrote about the positive messages they received. “Since the event, I want to do all that I can to stop racism,” one of them wrote. “I want everyone to live in peace & harmony, where there is no hatred & no violence.”
Click for Hillary Clinton on other issues.
Source: It Takes A Village, by Hillary Clinton, p.172-179