George Allen on Abortion
Republican Senate Challenger
Define that life begins at conception, but contraception ok
bit of Latin, that contraception means it stops conception--and so you do not have a fertilized egg.
Moderator: Don't they work by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg?
Allen: Well if the egg is not fertilized, there is not conception.
Kaine explained that the common birth control pill works by a dual mechanism--both preventing fertilization, and preventing successful implantation when fertilization does occur. Also, he added, intra-uterine devices work singly by preventing implantatio
Cruz on immigration: Wants to triple size of Border Patrol. Says Dewhurst supported in-state tuition for kids of illegal immigrants.
I have always been against an amnesty program. "If they want to be a citizen, they ought to go home and reapply."
Dewhurst says he was against tuition for children of illegal immigrants.
Source: Eric Kleefeld reporting on 2012 Virginia Senate debate
, Dec 7, 2011
For parental notification; against funding abortions
George Allen's record on life issues is strong. As our Governor, he signed Parental Notification of Minors for Abortions into law after vetoing a weaker version, and issued an order that ended 25 years of taxpayer-funded abortions by changing the
State employee health benefits plan to prohibit coverage of elective abortions.
As our Senator, his record earned him a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee.
He worked hard for and voted for legislation to ban partial-birth abortions and to prohibit federal funding of elective abortions. He sponsored legislation to prohibit taking a minor across
State lines in order to evade parental notification laws, and supported efforts to ensure that abortion clinics do not circumvent notification laws nor encourage the misuse of any exceptions.
Source: 2012 Senate campaign website, www.georgeallen.com, "Issues"
, Jul 22, 2011
For adult stem-cell research; against embryonic research
George Allen co-sponsored the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act in 2005, so that mothers seeking an abortion of an unborn child at 20 weeks or more after conception would be given information that the child in the womb could feel severe and extreme pain
during the procedure. And, he supported federal funding only of stem-cell research involving adult cells or that does not destroy a human embryo.
George Allen will continue this record after his election to the Senate in 2012. Specifically, he pledges
Source: 2012 Senate campaign website, www.georgeallen.com, "Issues"
, Jul 22, 2011
- support the re-instatement of the Mexico City policy prohibiting American taxpayers' dollars from funding any U.N. or international program that encourages or performs abortions
- oppose the use or importation of any drug that is for the purpose
of causing abortions, such as RU-486
- work to reverse the current Administration's funding of Embryonic Stem Cell research outside of the current lines approved under the Bush Administration in 2001, as well as continue to oppose human cloning.
Strongly opposes “Abortion is a woman’s right”
As a U.S. Senator, I will work and vote for an end to partial birth abortion in America. Partial birth abortion is performed late in the pregnancy. It is not
medically justifiable, and it is barbaric.Today’s Supreme Court decision [allowing the procedure] makes it all the more pressing for Congress to adopt a national law that will stop the extreme procedure of partial birth abortion.
Source: Press Release, “Partial Birth Abortion Must End”, Jun 28, 20
, Sep 19, 2000
Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
This bill prohibits taking minors across State lines in circumvention of laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions. Makes an exception for an abortion necessary to save the life of the minor. Authorizes any parent to sue unless such parent committed an act of incest with the minor. Imposes a fine and/or prison term of up to one year on a physician who performs an abortion on an out-of-state minor in violation of parental notification requirements in their home state.
Proponents recommend voting YES because:
This bill deals with how young girls are being secretly taken across State lines for the purpose of abortion, without the consent of their parents or even the knowledge of their parents, in violation of the laws of the State in which they live. 45 states have enacted some sort of parental consent laws or parental notification law. By simply secreting a child across State lines, one can frustrate the State legislature's rules.
It is subverting and defeating valid, constitutionally approved rights parents have.
Opponents recommend voting NO because:
Some States have parental consent laws, some don't. In my particular State, it has been voted down because my people feel that if you ask them, "Do they want their kids to come to their parents?", absolutely. But if you ask them, "Should you force them to do so, even in circumstances where there could be trouble that comes from that?", they say no.
This bill emanates from a desire that our children come to us when we have family matters, when our children are in trouble, that they not be fearful, that they not be afraid that they disappoint us, that they be open with us and loving toward us, and we toward them. This is what we want to have happen. The question is: Can Big Brother Federal Government force this on our families? That is where we will differ.
Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act;
; vote number 2006-216
on Jul 25, 2006
Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives.
Vote to adopt an amendment to the Senate's 2006 Fiscal Year Budget that allocates $100 million for the prevention of unintended pregnancies. A YES vote would expand access to preventive health care services that reduce unintended pregnancy (including teen pregnancy), reduce the number of abortions, and improve access to women's health care. A YES vote would:
Reference: Appropriation to expand access to preventive health care services;
Bill S.Amdt. 244 to S Con Res 18
; vote number 2005-75
on Mar 17, 2005
- Increase funding and access to family planning services
- Funds legislation that requires equitable prescription coverage for contraceptives under health plans
- Funds legislation that would create and expand teen pregnancy prevention programs and education programs concerning emergency contraceptives
Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime.
Bill would make it a criminal offense to harm or kill a fetus during the commission of a violent crime. The measure would set criminal penalties, the same as those that would apply if harm or death happened to the pregnant woman, for those who harm a fetus. It is not required that the individual have prior knowledge of the pregnancy or intent to harm the fetus. This bill prohibits the death penalty from being imposed for such an offense. The bill states that its provisions should not be interpreted to apply a woman's actions with respect to her pregnancy.
Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act;
; vote number 2004-63
on Mar 25, 2004
Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life.
S. 3 As Amended; Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Vote to pass a bill banning a medical procedure, which is commonly known as "partial-birth" abortion. Those who performed this procedure would then face fines and up to two years in prison, the women to whom this procedure is performed on are not held criminally liable. This bill would make the exception for cases in which a women's life is in danger, not for cases where a women's health is in danger.
; vote number 2003-51
on Mar 12, 2003
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record.
Allen scores 0% by NARAL on pro-choice voting record
For over thirty years, NARAL Pro-Choice America has been the political arm of the pro-choice movement and a strong advocate of reproductive freedom and choice. NARAL Pro-Choice America's mission is to protect and preserve the right to choose while promoting policies and programs that improve women's health and make abortion less necessary. NARAL Pro-Choice America works to educate Americans and officeholders about reproductive rights and health issues and elect pro-choice candidates at all levels of government. The NARAL ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: NARAL website 03n-NARAL on Dec 31, 2003
Page last updated: Mar 13, 2014