Jesse Ventura on Tax Reform Former Independent MN Governor; possible Presidential Challenger

OpEd: Reduction of deficit were "Jesse taxes"

Cut fees on only some watercraft, as unconstitutional

I was accused of getting laws passed to benefit myself or my friends. Well, my view is, what else can you govern by except personal experience?

Remove "license tab fees": a hidden sales tax

How can you have a licensing system based upon the street value of the car? If you're going to do something like that, then base it on the weight of the car--that's what tears up the streets!

Base property tax on services needed, not on value of home

Replace property-tax-funded schooling with general funds

So, in 2001, I came up with a plan for the state to start paying the full costs of public education out of a general fund, rather than from local property taxes--which would then become smaller, simpler, and fairer. To help pay for this switch, I proposed adding a sales tax onto many services that weren't subject to it--but, at the same time, lowering the overall sales tax from 6.5 to 6%.

Need balance between tax relief, services expected

Tax increases may be necessary, but use every dollar well

Supported Bush tax cuts; it was over-taxation money

If you look at the president's cuts, the lower income gets the bigger percentage. Why are we penalized for being successful? Why does government take this attitude that somehow if you're successful you should have to apologize for it? Look who pays most of the taxes. 1% of higher- income people pay almost a third of the income tax anyway. My view is that the people that pay it ought to get the relief. If you're going to do it the other way, then call it a subsidy.

Property tax needs to be smaller, simpler, fairer

Across the board reduction in state income tax rates

Find a way for state taxes to be collected on ecommerce

Modernize, simplify, & clarify tax system

• A better tax system will be more understandable and predictable for taxpayers, so they know how much tax they’re paying & why, and what government is doing with those dollars.
• A better tax system will be more fair, balancing citizens’ ability to pay and the cost and benefits of the government services they consume, and building confidence that the tax laws are being applied evenhandedly to all.
• A fair tax system will eliminate unfunded mandates by assigning tax responsibility to the same level of government that defines what levels of service will be provided.
• A better tax system will be modern, reflecting the economy, technology, and society of the 21st century so we can raise sufficient revenue to meet future needs, be competitive with other states and countries and incorporate new technology and ways of doing business.
• And finally, a better tax system will just make sense, with tax laws that don’t undermine citizens and communities from doing the right things.

Repeal the 16th Amendment

I’m not crazy about a flat tax. The first reason is that even a flat tax is still an income tax. I think the Sixteenth Amendment, the one granting government the power to collect taxes on income, should be repealed. The other reason I’m against a flat tax is that we’ve already got one: It’s called Social Security. And look at the mess that’s in.

Replace income with national sales tax

A fair national sales tax wouldn’t touch the necessities of life like food and clothing. It would make sure that people were able to provide for themselves with the basics before it collected any tax. Taxes would only be collected on optional purchases. That would make the taxpayers much more powerful. We could decide how much tax we’re going to pay by controlling our level of consumption. We would have the option of hanging onto our money and living off the basics, or of spending as much as we feel like. We wouldn’t be penalized for saving or investing. We wouldn’t have to hand the government money just because we’re looking our for our own financial welfare.

Reforming property tax system a high priority

Let people keep as much of their money as possible

$600 “Jesse Checks” tax rebate to every taxpayer

We also worked things out so that next year, Minnesota’s working folks won’t have to wait for a rebate: they’ll be paying less in taxes in the first place. They’ll get to keep more of their money. That’s what’s supposed to happen when government starts working more efficiently.

Replace income tax with 15% national sales tax

I’m totally sold on this idea. We’d be able to take home the gross on our paychecks! We’d be in control of how much tax we paid by choosing how much to buy. We wouldn’t be penalized any more for working hard and saving money! And it would be much fairer, because in the current system there are plenty of industries (legal and illegal) that get away with paying no taxes--gambling, drug dealers, cottage industries. But since everybody has to buy things, the tax would cover everyone, even illegal immigrants. But it’s got to start with the feds. And it will only happen if we, the citizens, show a lot of support for it.

Supports national consumption tax to equalize tax burden

Such a system also allows individuals to get their money before the government does. Each person then, in effect, decides how much the government will get based upon their individual spending choices. If people had to actively pay their taxes as opposed to the current passive system, it would result in lower taxation and fewer pork barrel programs being passed. Such a program would also ensure the government curbing its spending when the economy is weak, and learning to live within its budget.

Reform outdated property tax system

The value of a property for taxation purposes should be fixed at the time the owner purchases the property. That is the one time the true value of the property can be fixed. The current system requires speculative valuations, and results in people being forced to sell their land when the “value” increases do to developments on nearby property. If the tax valuation is fixed at the time of purchase, individuals will know whether or not they can afford the taxes when they purchase their property. The only time the property valuation for tax purposes would be changed is when the property changes hands.

No national sales tax or VAT.

State tax policy is closely linked to federal policy. 36 states currently use either federal income or federal tax liability as the state tax base for personal income taxes. It is critical that Congress and the administration do not enact tax reform in a vacuum, but in consultation and in partnership with the nation’s Governors.
• National Sales or Value-Added Tax The nation’s Governors oppose a national sales or transactional value-added tax. Such taxes would intrude into a tax area that has traditionally been reserved for and relied on by state and local governments. If enacted, either of these taxes would seriously threaten the ability of state and local governments to maintain their tax base.
• Current Income Tax If Congress decides to reform the current tax system, they should reduce the complexity of current income taxes; increase incentives to work, save, and invest; and increase efficiency and fairness. As part of any reform of the current income tax, the nation’s Governors would oppose any modification to the deductibility of state income taxes, property taxes, and the interest on state and local bonds.
• Transition If major tax reform is enacted, it should not be implemented for at least three years, to give states ample time to adjust their own tax systems.
• Information Needs of the StatesThe ability of states to tax various revenue sources depends to a large extent on information that only the federal government can collect. This is becoming much more important given the complexity of both the international and domestic economies in tracing where goods and income are generated. It is critical that the federal government separate tax reform per se from the information that is collected from individuals, businesses, and corporations with respect to income generated. The data collection role of the federal government must be developed in partnership with state and local governments.

Let states independently determine estate taxes.

We are writing to request equal treatment between states and the federal government on estate tax changes. Regardless of one’s view about phasing out the federal estate tax, the Governors are absolutely united in opposing any action that would discriminate against states in the phase-out of the state and federal estate taxes. This issue needs to be addressed before the Senate goes to conference with the House.

Governors believe that the ability of states to independently determine their own tax revenue policy is a basic tenet of federalism. Moreover, no federal tax bill should be enacted without close consultation with the states.

At the very least, there must be equity in the treatment of the state death tax credit in the tax bill the Congress considers with the proposed phase-out of the federal estate tax. Governors oppose provisions that impose disproportionate impacts on state revenue systems. The changes proposed by the Senate would have abrupt, significant adverse impacts on state revenues at a particularly onerous time for many states. The potential impact on states would begin next year and have a potential impact of between $50 and $100 billion over the next ten years.

We urge the leaders to respect those rights and to restore fairness.