Search for...
OnTheIssuesLogo

Joseph Hoeffel on Environment

Former Democratic Rep (PA-13); 2004 former Senate challenger


Voted NO on speeding up approval of forest thinning projects.

Vote to adopt the conference report on the bill that would reduce and expedite (speed up) environmental and judicial reviews of forest thinning projects. The bill would authorize $760 million a year from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2008. The Bureau of Land Management and the US Forest Service would have the authorization to remove vegetation that could cause or assist the spread of wildfires, disease or insect infestation. All forest thinning project would come after public meetings had been held. Forest thinning would be restricted to land that is within a 1.5 miles of at-risk communities , high-risk land that serves as a home for threatened and endangered species, high-risk land in the area of municipal water sources and and high-risk land that is specifically susceptible to disease or insect infestation.
Reference: Healthy Forests Restoration Act; Bill HR 1904 ; vote number 2003-656 on Nov 21, 2003

Rated 95% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes.

Hoeffel scores 95% by the LCV on environmental issues

The League of Conservation Voters (LCV) is the political voice of the national environmental movement and the only organization devoted full-time to shaping a pro-environment Congress and White House. We run tough and effective campaigns to defeat anti-environment candidates, and support those leaders who stand up for a clean, healthy future for America. Through our National Environmental Scorecard and Presidential Report Card we hold Congress and the Administration accountable for their actions on the environment. Through regional offices, we build coalitions, promote grassroots power, and train the next generation of environmental leaders. The 2003 National Environmental Scorecard provides objective, factual information about the environmental voting records of all Members of the first session of the 108th Congress. This Scorecard represents the consensus of experts from 20 respected environmental and conservation organizations who selected the key votes on which Members of Congress should be graded. LCV scores votes on the most important issues of the year, including environmental health and safety protections, resource conservation, and spending for environmental programs. Scores are calculated by dividing the number of pro-environment votes by the total number of votes scored. The votes included in this Scorecard presented Members of Congress with a real choice on protecting the environment and help distinguish which legislators are working for environmental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded votes occurred.

Source: LCV website 03n-LCV on Dec 31, 2003

Other candidates on Environment: Joseph Hoeffel on other issues:
PA Gubernatorial:
Ed Rendell
PA Senatorial:
Alan Sandals
Arlen Specter
Bob Casey
Chuck Pennacchio
Rick Santorum
Tom Martin

2004 Presidential:
Pres.George W. Bush
V.P.Dick Cheney
Sen.John Kerry
Sen.John Edwards
Ralph Nader

2008 possibilities:
Sen.Hillary Clinton
Sen.John McCain
V.P.Al Gore

2006 Senate retirements:
Jon Corzine(D,NJ)
Mark Dayton(DFL,MN)
Bill Frist(R,TN)
Jim Jeffords(I,VT)
Paul Sarbanes(D,MD)
2006 Senate Races:
(AZ)Kyl v.Pederson
(CA)Feinstein v.Mountjoy
(CT)Lieberman v.Lamont
(DE)Carper v.Protack
(FL)Nelson v.Harris
(HI)Akaka v.Case
(MA)Kennedy vScott vMacdonald
(MD)Mfume v.Cardin v.Steele
(ME)Snowe v.Bright v.Mehnert
(MI)Stabenow v.Butler v.Zandstra
(MN)Kennedy v.Bell v.Klobuchar
(MO)Talent v.McCaskill
(MS)Lott v.Fleming
(MT)Burns v.Morrison v.Tester
(ND)Conrad v.Grotberg
(NE)Nelson v.Kramer v.Stenberg
(NJ)Menendez v.Kean
(NM)Bingaman v.Pfeffer
(NV)Ensign v.Carter
(NY)Clinton v.Spencer vMcFarland
(OH)DeWine vHackett vBrown
(PA)Santorum v.Casey
(RI)Chafee vBrown vWhitehouse
(TN)Ford v.Kurita v.Bryant v.Hilleary
(TX)Hutchison v.Radnofsky
(UT)Hatch v.Ashdown
(VT)Sanders v.Parke v.Drown
(VA)Allen v.Miller v.Webb
(WA)Cantwell v.McGavick
(WI)Kohl v.Vogeler v.Redick
(WV)Byrd v.Lawhorn
(WY)Thomas v.Groutage
Uncontested: - IN
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
HouseMatch
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes