|
Michelle Lujan-Grisham on Civil Rights
|
Legal equality regardless of sexual orientation
I strongly support legal equality and the same basic human rights for all and will fight against discrimination in any context, regardless of race, creed, religion, disability, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.I was an early advocate for the
Hate Crimes Act and spearheaded efforts to recognize same-sex partners as legally qualified to make medical and healthcare decisions for their partners. New Mexico was the first state to include the provision in state law.
Source: 2012 House campaign website, michellelujangrisham.com
, Nov 6, 2012
Advocate for elder rights and women's rights
Throughout her career I have been a strong leader and advocate for elder rights, patient rights, access to comprehensive health care and other social justice issues, all of which impact women and their families.In my work with elders and families,
there has always been an emphasis on the specific impact and issues of women, since there is a higher percentage of women over age 65; and women are at a particular financial disadvantage in regards to benefits and consumer issues.
Source: 2012 House campaign website, michellelujangrisham.com
, Nov 6, 2012
Opposes a DOMA amendment.
Lujan-Grisham opposes the CC Voters Guide question on a DOMA amendment
Christian Coalition publishes a number of special voter educational materials including the Christian Coalition Voter Guides, which provide voters with critical information about where candidates stand on important faith and family issues.
The Christian Coalition Voters Guide summarizes candidate stances on the following topic: "U.S. Constitutional Amendment to prohibit same sex marriage"
Source: Christian Coalition Voter Guide 12-CC-q3a on Oct 31, 2012
Supports same-sex marriage.
Lujan-Grisham supports the PVS survey question on same-sex marriage
Project Vote Smart infers candidate issue stances on key topics by summarizing public speeches and public statements. Congressional candidates are given the opportunity to respond in detail; about 11% did so in the 2012 races.
Project Vote Smart summarizes candidate stances on the following topic: 'Marriage: Do you support same-sex marriage?'
Source: Project Vote Smart 12-PVS-q3 on Aug 30, 2012
Enforce against wage discrimination based on gender.
Lujan-Grisham co-sponsored Paycheck Fairness Act
Congress finds the following: - Women have entered the workforce in record numbers over the past 50 years.
- Despite the enactment of the Equal Pay Act in 1963, many women continue to earn significantly lower pay than men for equal work. These pay disparities exist in both the private and governmental sectors. In many instances, the pay disparities can only be due to continued intentional discrimination or the lingering effects of past discrimination.
- The existence of such pay disparities depresses the wages of working families who rely on the wages of all members of the family to make ends meet; and undermines women's retirement security.
- Artificial barriers to the elimination of discrimination in the payment of wages on the basis of sex continue to exist decades after the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. These barriers have resulted because the Equal Pay Act has not worked as Congress originally intended.
-
The Department of Labor and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have important and unique responsibilities to help ensure that women receive equal pay for equal work.
- The Department of Labor is responsible for investigating and prosecuting equal pay violations, especially systemic violations, and in enforcing all of its mandates.
- The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the primary enforcement agency for claims made under the Equal Pay Act.
- With a stronger commitment [to enforcement], increased information on wage data and more effective remedies, women will be better able to recognize and enforce their rights.
- Certain employers have already made great strides in eradicating unfair pay disparities in the workplace and their achievements should be recognized.
Source: S.84&H.R.377 13-HR0377 on Jan 23, 2013
Page last updated: Apr 12, 2013