|
Claudia Tenney on Environment
|
|
Obama era EPA focused on pushing radical ideological agenda
Claudia Tenney said, "Under President Obama's tenure, the EPA was more focused on pushing a radical ideological agenda and shutting down the coal industry than protecting the environment. We had a crisis in Flint (Michigan) where residents did not have
access to clean, drinkable water while the EPA fumbled. President Trump's EPA is putting ideology aside and protecting our air and water."[Tenney's Democratic opponent Anthony Brindisi responded], "When it comes to the environment,
I want to be a congressman like Congressman Sherwood Boehlert, who was a leader on environmental protection, because I believe protecting our environment should not be a partisan issue. Scientists all agree that climate change is real and
caused by humans and we are already seeing its devastating impact. I'm very concerned about rolling back important rules that protect the environment and public health."
Source: Utica Observer Dispatch on 2018 Congressional NY-22 election
, Sep 30, 2018
Loosen restrictions on predator control in Alaska.
Tenney voted YEA Disapprove Subsistence Hunting Rule on ANWR
Library of Congress Summary: This joint resolution nullifies the rule finalized by the Department of the Interior on Aug. 5, 2016, relating to non-subsistence takings of wildlife and public participation and closure procedures on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska.
Case for voting YES by House Republican Policy Committee: The Fish and Wildlife Service rule--which lays claim to more than 20% of Alaska--violates ANILCA (Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act) and the Alaska Statehood Compact. Not only does [the existing 2016 rule] undermine Alaska's ability to manage fish and wildlife upon refuge lands, it fundamentally destroys a cooperative relationship between Alaska and the federal government.
Case for voting NO by the Sierra Club (April 6, 2017):
- President Trump signed H.J. Res. 69, overturning the rule that banned "predator control" on federal wildlife refuges in Alaska unless "based on sound science in response to
a conservation concern."
- Any rule mentioning "sound science" is in trouble under a Trump administration.
- So what kinds of practices will the Trump administration now allow on our federal wildlife refuges? Activities that include shooting or trapping wolves while in their dens with pups, or hunting for grizzly bears from airplanes.
- It's all about ensuring a maximum yield of prey species like elk, moose, and caribou for the real apex predator: humans. So if having more elk requires killing wolf pups in their dens, then so be it.
- The Obama administration's rule (which Trump revoked) never tried to stop all hunting. Subsistence hunting was still allowed. What's changed is that the predators on federal wildlife refuges are now under the control of the state of Alaska. And that makes them prey.
Legislative outcome: Passed Senate, 52-47-1, March 21; passed House, 225-193-12, Feb. 16; signed by Pres. Trump April 3.
Source: Congressional vote 18-HJR69 on Feb 16, 2017
Page last updated: May 25, 2022; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org