OnTheIssuesLogo

Rick Sikma on Abortion

Republican Senate Challenger


Inalienable rights exist for unborn, same as for living

Q: Do you support or oppose the policy: "Abortion is a woman's right"?

A: STRONGLY OPPOSE: I unconditionally support the rights of the unborn child from conception through birth and beyond. The same inalienable rights exist for the unborn as well as the living; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, no matter what their physical or mental condition is before, or after birth.

Source: Email interview on 2008 Senate race with OnTheIssues.org Jun 2, 2008

Inalienable rights exist for the unborn, from conception

I unconditionally support the rights of the unborn child from conception through birth and beyond. The same inalienable rights exist for the unborn as well as the living; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, no matter what their physical or mental condition is before, or after birth.

I pledge to do all within my power to support and encourage laws and bills in the US Senate that protect the rights of the unborn.

Source: Campaign website, www.ricksikma.com, "Issues" May 30, 2008

Other candidates on Abortion: Rick Sikma on other issues:
AK Gubernatorial:
Sarah Palin
AK Senatorial:
Dave Cuddy
Lisa Murkowski
Mark Begich
Ted Stevens
Vic Vickers


2008 Senate retirements:

Wayne Allard(R,CO)
Larry Craig(R,ID)
Pete Domenici(R,NM)
Chuck Hagel(R,NE)
Trent Lott(R,MS)
Craig Thomas(R,WY)
John Warner(R,VA)

2008 Presidential Contenders:

Chuck Baldwin(C)
Rep.Bob Barr(L)
Sen.Hillary Clinton(D)
Sen.Mike Gravel(L)
Alan Keyes(C)
Sen.John McCain(R)
Rep.Cynthia McKinney(G)
Ralph Nader(I)
Sen.Barack Obama(D)
Rep.Ron Paul(R)
2008 Senate Races:
AK:Stevens v.Begich v.Cuddy v.Sikma
AL:Sessions v.Figures
AR:Pryor v.Kennedy
CO:Schaffer v.Udall
DE:Biden v.O`Donnell
GA:Chambliss v.Martin v.Buckley
IA:Harkin v.Reed
ID:Risch v.LaRocco v.Rammell
IL:Durbin v.Sauerberg v.Stafford
KS:Roberts v.Jones v.Slattery
KY:McConnell v.Lunsford
LA:Landrieu v.Kennedy
MA:Kerry v.Beatty v.Underwood
ME:Collins v.Allen
MI:Levin v.Hoogendyk v.Boman v.Nikitin
MN:Coleman v.Franken v.Barkley v.Cavlan
MS4:Wicker v.Musgrove
MS6:Cochran v.Fleming
MT:Baucus v.Kelleher
NC:Dole v.Hagan
NE:Johanns v.Kleeb v.Larrick
NH:Sununu v.Shaheen v.Blevens
NJ:Lautenberg v.Zimmer
Pearce v.Udall
OK:Inhofe v.Rice
OR:Smith v.Merkley v.Brownlow
RI:Reed v.Young v.Tingle
SC:Graham v.Conley v.McBride
SD:Johnson v.Dykstra
TN:Alexander v.Tuke v.Lugo v.Heyward
TX:Cornyn v.Noriega v.Jameson
VA:Gilmore v.Warner
WV:Rockefeller v.Wolfe
WY4:Barrasso v.Carter
WY6:Enzi v.Rothfuss
Abortion
Budget/Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy/Oil
Environment
Families
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Govt. Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland Security
Immigration
Jobs
Principles
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
War/Peace
Welfare

Other Senators
House of Representatives
SenateMatch (matching quiz)
Senate Votes (analysis)
House Votes
Bill Sponsorships
Affiliations
Policy Reports
Group Ratings

Page last updated: Sep 28, 2008