Blake Farenthold on Environment
Farenthold figured the low estimation was due to the perception that the House wasn't even trying. And he happened to agree. He himself had given too many programs the benefit of the doubt. No more. He now intended to vote for almost every cut. Washington needed to start behaving like it was broke. "No more, 'Instead of getting lobster I'm getting steak,'" he would scoff. "No. You should be getting ramen noodles. They didn't even cut the $2 million for summer concerts and fireworks! If we can't cut freakin' fireworks, we are in serious trouble."
But more than just program-slashing, he thought, why not be bolder? Why not defund the EPA and start from scratch? Why not eliminate the Department of Energy? To Farenthold, it would be a marvelous thing to replace the entire Appropriations Committee with freshmen. How about that?
Congressional Summary:Amends the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) to exclude manure from the definition of "hazardous substance" and "pollutant or contaminant" for purposes of such Act. Defines "manure" to mean:
Opponent's Comments (Jim Ruen on AgProfessional.com, Oct. 3, 2011): Since when can a fertilizer dealer operate without concern for environmental regulation and impact? Let's face it, we aren't talking about Ma and Pa Kettle with their six milk cows and three sows here spreading a load of manure on the back 40. We are talking about CAFO units with thousands of animals and tens of thousands or more tons/gallons of manure. While a few maybe spreading on their own land, most are selling it to area farmers. At a time when fertilizer dealers and companies have to be conspicuously careful with how they handle product, why shouldn't mega-livestock operators be equally regulated as they sell their "waste" product for its nutrient and soil building value. Since when do commercial N, P and K producers or handlers get a free ride from the EPA...or Congress?
112th Mid-Term Humane Scorecard: The Humane Society Legislative Fund has posted the final version of the 2011 Humane Scorecard, where you can track the performance of your federal lawmakers on key animal protection issues during last year. We rated legislators based on their voting behavior on measures such as agribusiness subsidies, lethal predator control, and the Endangered Species Act; their cosponsorship of priority bills on puppy mills, horse slaughter, animal fighting, and chimps in research; their support for funding the enforcement of animal welfare laws; and their leadership on animal protection. All of the priority bills whose cosponsorships we're counting enjoy strong bipartisan support; in the House, each of the four now has more than 150 cosponsors.
The Humane Scorecard is not a perfect measuring tool, but creating some reasonable yardstick and allowing citizens to hold lawmakers accountable is central to our work. When the Humane Scorecard comes out each year, it helps clarify how the animal protection movement is doing geographically, by party affiliation, and in other categories. It helps us chart our course for animals by seeing where we have been effective, and where we need to improve.
|2016-17 Governor, House and Senate candidates on Environment:||Blake Farenthold on other issues:|
George P. Bush
Newly-elected Democrats taking office Jan.2017:
Newly-elected Republicans taking office Jan.2017:
Office 2110 RHOB, Wash., DC 20515