George W. Bush on China
Do “whatever it takes” to defend Taiwan, including military
Pres. Bush said he would do “whatever it took”-including the use of US military forces-to defend Taiwan against China, potentially adding new tension to the troubled US-China relationship. Bush touched off the controversy in a morning TV interview
when he was asked if the US would defend Taiwan with the full force of the US military. “Whatever it took to help Taiwan defend herself,” he replied. In later interviews, Bush said military action was “certainly an option,” but he also said that Taiwan
should not declare its independence.
The US has long supported a “one China” principle, but has insisted that Taiwan and China resolve their differences peacefully. Bush and his aides said the president’s remarks were not meant to signal a change in
policy. Under the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, the US is obligated to provide Taiwan with equipment to defend itself. Whatever else the US might do to defend Taiwan has been left deliberately vague by previous administrations.
Source: Inland Valley [So. Cal.] Daily Bulletin, p. 1
Apr 26, 2001
Agrees with Clinton-Gore: PNTR for China
I have defined some sharp disagreements with the Clinton-Gore administration. But today I want to address an important area of agreement. The issue is whether to extend normal trade relations to China on a permanent basis. China is on the verge of
joining the 136 members of the World Trade Organization. Congress must now decide whether the US will gain the benefits of China’s more open economy.The stakes are high, on all sides. For businesses, workers and farmers across our country, it will
mean much lower trade barriers and enormous opportunities for US exports. For the people of East Asia, it will affect their relations with the region’s major power. For the people of China, it holds out the hope of more open contact with the world of
freedom.
In short, this will be among the most serious decisions our government will make this year. I am here to urge all members of Congress, both Republicans & Democrats, to join together in making China a normal trading partner of the United States
Source: Speech at Boeing plant, part of “Renewing America’s Purpose”
May 17, 2000
China NTR promotes freedom, security and economics
There are three compelling reasons to support this agreement [of permanent NTR for China] - freedom, security and economics.- Trade with China will promote freedom. The case for trade is not just monetary, but moral - not just a
matter of commerce, but a matter of conviction. Economic freedom creates habits of liberty. And habits of liberty create expectations of democracy.
- Trade with China serves our own national interest, as well as the security interests of China’s
neighbors. China is not our “strategic partner.” But neither is it our enemy. When both China and Taiwan are members of the WTO, both will need to apply global rules to their trade, including trade with one another, and the prospects for
cross-straits relations should improve.
- Trade with China serves the economic interests of America. China today is the world’s fourth largest market for our agricultural products. China must cut its average tariff from almost 25% to 9% by 2005.
Source: Speech at Boeing plant, part of “Renewing America’s Purpose”
May 17, 2000
Maintain relations with both Taiwan & China
- Would refocus America’s policy in Asia on friends and allies
- Would redefine relationship between China and U.S. as one of competitors, not strategic partners
- Supports ‘one-China’ policy
- Supports the Taiwan Relations Act
- Supports the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act
- Supports China’s & Taiwan’s admission into the WTO
Source: GeorgeWBush.com: ‘Issues: Policy Points Overview’
Apr 2, 2000
Defend Taiwan if China violates one-China policy
Q: Would you commit US forces to defend Taiwan?
A: No. What the Chinese need to assume is that if they violate the One China Policy, the longstanding One China Policy, which has clearly said that the United States
expects there to be a peaceful resolution between China and Taiwan, if they decide to use force, the United States must help Taiwan defend itself. Now, the Chinese can figure out what that means. But that’s going to mean a resolute stand on my part.
Source: GOP debate in Los Angeles
Mar 2, 2000
No strategic ambiguity: US will defend Taiwan against China
Bush signaled his intention to break a long-standing policy by stating that the US would help Taiwan if it were attacked by China. Previous presidents, including Bush’s father, have adopted a policy called “strategic ambiguity,” which does not specify
how the US would respond to an attack on Taiwan. Although the Taiwan Relations Act suggests that the US would help Taiwan, successive administrations have preserved this deliberate ambiguity so as not to encourage Taiwan to be bolder, making a war more
likely.But Bush said today, “It’s important for the Chinese to understand that if there’s a military action, we will help Taiwan defend itself.” He would not say whether this meant the US would send troops. Bush’s foreign policy advisor said that
Bush was moving away from strategic ambiguity partly because Taiwan has become a democracy and partly because the policy has been poorly implemented in the Clinton administration.
Source: New York Times, p. A10
Feb 26, 2000
China is an American competitor, not a friend
Q: What area of international policy would you change immediately? A: Our relationship with China. The President has called the relationship with China a strategic partnership. I believe our relationship needs to be redefined as competitor.
Competitors can find areas of agreement, but we must make it clear to the Chinese that we don’t appreciate any attempt to spread weapons of mass destruction around the world, that we don’t appreciate any threats to our friends and allies in the Far East.
Source: GOP Debate on the Larry King Show
Feb 15, 2000
Entrepreneurial China trade differs from totalitarian Cuba
BUSH [to Bauer]: Capital that goes into Cuba will be used by the Castro government to prop itself up. Dollars invested will end up supporting this totalitarian regime.. It’s in our best interest to keep the pressure on Castro until he allows free
elections, free press & free the prisoners.BAUER: You just made the case for withdrawing MFN status from China. Everything that you just said about Cuba applies to China.
BUSH: There is a huge difference between trading with an entrepreneurial class
like that which is growing in China and allowing a Castro government to skim capital monies off the top of capital investment.
BAUER: Tell the people rotting in the prisons of China that there’s any difference between Castro’s Cuba & Communist China.
There is none.
BUSH: If we turn our back on the entrepreneurial class that is taking wing in China, we’re making a huge mistake.
BAUER: They are using that money for a massive arms buildup that our sons will have to deal with down the road.
Source: (cross-ref to Bauer) GOP Debate in Michigan
Jan 10, 2000
WTO for both China & Taiwan; maintain Taiwan relations law
It’s in our nation’s best interests to open up Chinese markets to farm products, to high-tech manufactured goods. So therefore I believe China ought to be in the World Trade Organization. I also believe that Taiwan ought to be in the World Trade
Organization. But let me make this clear to you and to the Chinese. I will enforce the Taiwan relations law if I’m the president, if the Chinese get aggressive with the Taiwanese we’ll help them defend themselves.
Source: Phoenix Arizona GOP Debate
Dec 7, 1999
China’s taste of freedom encourages capitalism’s growth
BAUER [to Bush]: We would never make the argument [that we should work with China] if we were talking about Nazi Germany. Is there no atrocity that you can think of, the labor camps doubling in their slave labor, a bigger crackdown, more priests
disappearing in the middle of the night, is there anything that would tell you to put trade on the back burner? BUSH: Gary, I agree with you that forced abortion is abhorrent. And I agree with you when leaders try to snuff out religion.
But I think if we turn our back on China and isolate China things will get worse. Imagine if the Internet took hold in China. Imagine how freedom would spread. Our greatest export to the world has been, is and always will be the
incredible freedom we understand in America. And that’s why it’s important for us to trade with China to encourage the growth of an entrepreneurial class. It gets that taste of freedom. It gets that breath of freedom in the marketplace.
Source: (cross-ref. from Bauer) Phoenix Arizona GOP Debate
Dec 7, 1999
Chinese nuclear spying will shift balance of power
Bush also called for a congressional investigation into “what went wrong and why.”“I think the balance of power is going to shift as a result of this,” Bush said. “I think it’s going to accelerate China’s emergence as a nuclear power. And the next
president and presidents after that are going to have to deal with that.”
Source: Associated Press, “Republicans on China”, by K. Srinivasan
May 26, 1999
Reaction to espionage was not serious and not enough
Presented with detailed information about China’s espionage, this administration apparently did not take it seriously, did not react properly and it is still trying to minimize the scope and extent of the damage done. I trust that Congress will
investigate to determine what went wrong and why, and I expect that our government will take immediate action to protect sensitive American technology. There are some areas of mutual benefit [but] we must deal with China in a firm and consistent manner.
Source: GeorgeWBush.com/News/ “Cox Report”
May 25, 1999
Cox Report warrants review of all export controls to China
Trade will help expand the private sector in China. Trade will open a window to the free world for the people of China. But there is a difference between selling food and selling technology that could be used against America and our allies. China’s
growing military capabilities present serious challenges for the United States. The Cox report should prompt a full and serious review of export controls, to make certain that America’s technology is not arming China’s military.
Source: GeorgeWBush.com/News/ “Cox Report”
May 25, 1999