Tommy Thompson on Welfare & Poverty Former Secretary of H.H.S.; former Republican Governor (WI)

Converted welfare into work-required benefit

Replace welfare program with self-sufficiency program

Replace Welfare with the Tools to Succeed

Before starting, Thompson invited groups of welfare mothers to his home for luncheon discussions on what locked them into welfare and what was needed to free them from the trap. The most commonly cited barriers to leaving welfare were inadequate child care, health care, transportation and training - four elements that became the foundation for the governor’s reform programs.

Since 1987, Thompson has instituted many welfare reform programs and initiatives that have combined to reduce Wisconsin’s welfare caseload by more than any state in the nation.

Since 1987, Wisconsin has cut its welfare caseload by more than 93%, from 98,000 AFDC families in January 1987 to under 6,700 W-2 cash assistance families in February 2000.

Early leader in welfare reform

Wisconsin under Gov. Thompson was the first state to:
• Require a measure of performance from AFDC recipients in return for their checks by requiring recipients to send their children to school (Learnfare 1987).
• Stop rewarding parents for having children they could not afford, 1994
• Make fathers more directly accountable through Children First
• Require work and time limit on benefits. (“Work Not Welfare”, 1995).
• Get its welfare-to-work replacement program approved. (1996).
• The first state to end the welfare entitlement and Aid to Families with Dependent Children. (1997).
• And the first state to print its last AFDC check. (March 1998).

1950s common sense taught by families, schools, & churches

In the 1940s and 1950s, people in Elroy generally have a positive view of the federal government, but we didn't have much contact with it in our everyday lives. We were a self-sufficient community. We didn't need Washington or anyone else to tell us to work hard, support our families, and look after our neighbors. Our families, schools, and churches taught us that, and the tightness of the community reinforced those fundamental values. You would have found the same was true in countless towns and big-city neighborhoods throughout America.

We've lost a good part of that self-reliance and sense of community in America today.

Scrap federal welfare & let states experiment freely

In fact, REFORM is the wrong word because it suggests adjusting the current system to make it work better. It doesn't work. Welfare as we know it is fundamentally and unalterably destructive.

Learnfare: teen mothers welfare cut unless attending school

1992: Washington couldn't end welfare as we knew it; WI did

No government handouts; demand something in return

Handing out a welfare check and expecting nothing in return is not public assistance, it is public apathy - “Here is your check, see you next month.” So while Washington stood around and talked about how welfare needed to be changed, we in the states-I started in 1986-started doing something about it. We started offering hope and opportunity along with the welfare check and expecting certain responsibilities in return. We put common sense reforms in place. We required young men and women up to age 19 to go to school; and in the case of chronic truants, we took away that portion of the welfare check attributable to that young man or woman. Some opponents said, “What if they don’t want to go to school?” And I said, “Tough.”

Supports block grants to foster state experimentation

In order to accomplish these things we had to go to Washington and kiss someone’s ring to say, “Please give us a chance to try something that might work.” I have had waivers under Reagan, Bush and Clinton. Why should states need waivers to try innovative ideas in welfare? Why should we have to go to Washington and kiss somebody’s ring to do what everybody wants us to do and that is to change welfare in our society and give people jobs and hope and optimism

That is why I am fighting for the government to block grant welfare funding back to the States.

Support LIHEAP, low-income heating assistance.

• WHEREAS, The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) enables states to assist low-income households in meeting critical heating and cooling needs; and
• WHEREAS, More than two-thirds of households eligible for LIHEAP have annual incomes under $8,000, making LIHEAP a targeted, cost-effective way to help low-income citizens pay their home energy bills; and
• WHEREAS, Households served because of LIHEAP include the most vulnerable populations in our states ? the elderly, disabled, and young children; and
• WHEREAS, LIHEAP provides a foundation upon which the Midwestern states have built community-based energy assistance programs and has permitted us to leverage state and local dollars to meet the needs of our citizens; and
• WHEREAS, In past years, funding for LIHEAP has been substantially reduced, and any new funding cuts will impede the states’ ability to meet the energy needs of low-income households; now therefore be it
• RESOLVED, That the Midwestern Governors’ Conference encourages Congress to renew its support for LIHEAP and maintain funding in Fiscal Year 2001 at or above the level appropriated for the program in Fiscal Year 2000.

Supports workfare.

Christian Coalition publishes a number of special voter educational materials including the Christian Coalition Voter Guides, which provide voters with critical information about where candidates stand on important faith and family issues. The Christian Coalition Voters Guide summarizes candidate stances on the following topic: "Requiring welfare recipients to work or get job training"