|
Amy Coney Barrett on Immigration
|
|
Counting undocumented is long-standing Census practice
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Migration, along with other Catholic organizations, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in [the Supreme Court case Trump v. New York], arguing that excluding those without legal documentation from
the apportionment base of the census sends a message that these individuals are not equal members of the human family, which contradicts the dignity of all people and violates the U.S. Constitution and the Census Act.
Since the census started in 1790, its practice has been to count all people living in the U.S. Currently, an estimated 11 million unauthorized immigrants are living in this country. The point of counting everyone was raised by Justice Amy Coney
Barrett, who told the Acting Solicitor General who was representing the Trump administration: "A lot of the historical evidence and long-standing practice really cuts against your position."
Source: Catholic News Service on USCCB amicus, "Trump v New York"
, Nov 30, 2020
Let embassies abroad reject visas for any reason
Judge Barrett authored a panel opinion in Yafai v. Pompeo, rejecting a U.S. citizen's challenge to the denial of his wife's visa by a consular officer at the U.S. embassy in Yemen. The record in the case did not indicate what evidence led the consular
officer to deny the visa, and Judge Barrett's opinion did not require the government to supply such evidence.A dissenting judge would have required the government to "point to some factual support for the consular officer's decision." Under Supreme
Court precedent, however, visa denials are subject to only a very limited level of review by federal courts, even when U.S. citizens challenge the denials on constitutional grounds. Nonetheless, Supreme Court precedent is arguably unclear about the
circumstances for factual support before rejecting challenges to visa denials.
Judge Barrett's decision in Yafai may suggest that she takes an expansive view of executive exclusion authority and a narrower view of the federal judiciary's role.
Source: Cong. Research Service (p.45) on SCOTUS Confirmation Hearing
, Oct 6, 2020
Page last updated: Mar 20, 2022