|
Clay Higgins on Homeland Security
|
|
I have no problem with FISA: not a secretive rubber-stamp
FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) has been criticized as being "too secretive". I don't think it's possible to be too secretive in a room full of attorneys and government agents. It has been criticized as being a "rubber stamp" court for the
NSA. This refers to the 99% approval rate of submitted warrant applications. However, that criticism ignores the fact that the majority of FISA judicial review and oversight takes place during pre-submission procedures--procedures put in place to make
sure the submitted warrant request meets FISA judicial standards and legal precedent. This procedure means that many, perhaps 25% or so, are rejected initially but then are either re-submitted, based on FISA requirements, or pulled entirely. I have no
problem with FISA. We must use every asset to keep America safe from terrorist attacks. Warrants for electronic surveillance is certainly an important tool and it needs to be used.
Source: 2016 Louisiana House campaign website CaptainHiggins.com
, Dec 10, 2016
Voted against combating Islamophobia.
Higgins voted NAY Combating International Islamophobia Act
H.R.5665: Combating International Islamophobia Act: This bill establishes within the Department of State the Office to Monitor and Combat Islamophobia and addresses related issues. The bill requires annual reports to Congress about human rights and religious freedom in foreign countries to include information about Islamophobia, such as:
- acts of physical violence or harassment of Muslim people,
- instances of propaganda in government and nongovernment media that attempt to justify or promote hatred or incite violence against Muslim people, and
- actions taken by a country's government to respond to such acts. The office shall coordinate and assist in preparing these portions of the reports.
Rationale to vote NO (Rep. Zeldin, R-NY, 12/14/21)::: Lee Zeldin, one of two Jewish Republicans in Congress, announced that he will vote against H.R. 5665, a partisan resolution: "Rep. Ilhan Omar's bill that is supposed to combat Islamophobia does not even
define 'Islamophobia'. In fact, the way the bill is worded intentionally plays into Omar's calculating game that any criticism about any topic relating to her, even if it has absolutely nothing at all to do with her religion, could be defined as 'Islamophobia'. That is absurd and I will vote 'no'!"
Rationale to vote YES (NY1.com, 12/15/21)::: "Our country's commitment to defending freedom of religion and belief goes back centuries, and the Administration strongly believes that people of all faiths and backgrounds should be treated with equal dignity and respect around the world," a statement of support issued by the White House read. The bill comes after Republicans in Congress have targeted the three Muslim members of Congress as members of a "jihad squad."
Legislative Outcome: Passed House 219-212-3 on 12/14/2021, Roll no. 448)' introduced in Senate on 12/15/21 and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations; no further Senate action during 2021.
Source: Congressional vote 21-HR5665 on Oct 21, 2021
Page last updated: May 25, 2022; copyright 1999-2022 Jesse Gordon and OnTheIssues.org